Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Bible, Creationism, and Prophecy (part 2)

13637394142232

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sure, if you assume that 20th century English language metaphors are applicable to texts 6000 year old texts translated from ancient Hebrew. The phrase implies that somebody, at some time, considered the Earth to have literal ends. And oddly enough, Zechariah is the first known example of the phrase being used... odd that we can't find the presumed earlier literal version.
    Yet another reason to read the Bible ... because of it's impact on our current language ... and it's turns of phrases.:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    J C wrote: »
    The issue of what orbits what, simply doesn't arise in the Bible.
    This stuff was the province of the astrologers and the Pagan religions.
    That's very odd - all their 'figures of speech' (i.e. everywhere cosmology is mentioned) suggest a geocentric universe, and nothing anywhere else suggests otherwise.

    Very. Odd. I'll take that as a white flag on that issue then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    J C wrote: »
    Yet another reason to read the Bible ... because of it's impact on our current language ... and it's turns of phrases.:)

    So how do you know that it was a turn of phrase at the time of writing, when no other sources were using it in that sense?

    Care to respond to any other posts of mine or are you just going to stick with the easy stuff?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    J C wrote: »
    Please spare me the 'crocodile tears' for Christianity.
    The crocodile tears aren't for Christianity, they are for religious fundamentalists of all stripes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    J C wrote: »
    Please spare me the 'crocodile tears' for Christianity.

    A shame the Zechariah didn't stick quotes around 'ends'.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    So how do you know that it was a turn of phrase at the time of writing, when no other sources were using it in that sense?

    Care to respond to any other posts of mine or are you just going to stick with the easy stuff?
    He's been cornered on this stuff and of course won't admit it. Expect epic efforts to turn the discussion onto something else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    J C wrote: »
    The issue of what orbits what, simply doesn't arise in the Bible.
    This stuff was the province of the astrologers and the Pagan religions.

    You know what else doesn't arise in the bible? Unambiguous references to anything at all discovered in the last 2000 years, not even the stuff creationists accept.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    He's been cornered on this stuff and of course won't admit it. Expect epic efforts to turn the discussion onto something else.

    I know. I have a list of something like 30 questions on BC&P part 1 that he has been avoiding for... well it must be a few years now actually. What he likes to do if things really go bad is start block pasting massive chunks of scripture in colored text. It's like HAL9000 singing Daisy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    Indeed - it looks like Systemsready is actually Jewish!

    An analogy of that statement would be this:
    A group of Scottish are looking over the border at a group of English. The Scottish group criticize the English for the appearance of the English clothing, for example.
    One of the Scottish though, points out that , in fact, the English cloth was superior to the Scottish cloth and shows how this is so.
    His colleagues turn and say to him..."Are you English?"
    This is why people remain in ignorance, you have to maintain the status quo, you can't just ask a simple question.
    My question is and always is " If the Jews are forbidden pork and enjoin circumcision, and the Muslims are forbidden pork and enjoin circumcsion, and both of them say they are the religion of Abraham...why is it that Jesus who is from the Abrahamic faith would say these things should be abandoned.
    I think that we , through the teachings of the church, were not properly instructed as to the real religion of Abraham, I believe we were short changed. And thats why the church is winding up. It can no longer sustain itself. Enlightenment has arrived.
    You can say all you like about all the different interpretations that will allow you to forsake the real religion of Abraham, but the evidence is there.
    Its a shame that Irish people were misled like that. They had faith and they had sincerity...what they didn't have is honest teachers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    My question is and always is " If the Jews are forbidden pork and enjoin circumcision, and the Muslims are forbidden pork and enjoin circumcsion, and both of them say they are the religion of Abraham...why is it that Jesus who is from the Abrahamic faith would say these things should be abandoned.
    Perhaps God decided there were more important things to worry about than what people put in their sandwiches and cutting off a bit of your willy? He moves in mysterious ways, you know.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    Perhaps God decided there were more important things to worry about than what people put in their sandwiches and cutting off a bit of your willy? He moves in mysterious ways, you know.

    Perhaps? Is that a guess?
    It must have been important if it was forbidden to eat pork...and it must have been important if it was obligatory to circumcise. They was no perhaps about it. It was a clear order. I don't understand how these things, which are fundamental to good health, suddenly became irrelevant to God, because there were "more important things to deal with".
    That's like saying God couldn't handle the whole system he created, and decided to 'let a few things go' in order to get the most important things done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Perhaps? Is that a guess?
    And you are not guessing? You claim to know the mind of god?
    It must have been important if it was forbidden to eat pork...and it must have been important if it was obligatory to circumcise. They was no perhaps about it. It was a clear order. I don't understand how these things, which are fundamental to good health, suddenly became irrelevant to God, because there were "more important things to deal with".
    That's like saying God couldn't handle the whole system he created, and decided to 'let a few things go' in order to get the most important things done.
    You seem to be trying to put your god in a box and limit what he can and cannot do. You seem to have no problem with him destroying the whole human race and starting again with Noah's flood, but you find it hard to believe he could change his policy on ham sandwiches?

    And isn't it a fundamental tenet of Christianity that there is no objective good and bad - that things are good or bad only because he decrees them so?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    And you are not guessing? You claim to know the mind of god?

    You seem to be trying to put your god in a box and limit what he can and cannot do. You seem to have no problem with him destroying the whole human race and starting again with Noah's flood, but you find it hard to believe he could change his policy on ham sandwiches?

    And isn't it a fundamental tenet of Christianity that there is no objective good and bad - that things are good or bad only because he decrees them so?

    The policy as you call it on certain orders has a basis that can never change. For example, the 'policy' on adultery is there forever because the consequences of committing adultery never change either.
    Now the Laws of God are not put there for God's benefit..they are put there for our benefit and our protection from harmful results.
    Picking and choosing what Laws of God you wish to follow renders you outside the protection of God Almighty.
    I don't read God's mind, I just read what He told us and that's enough for us. If God orders a thing, an someone else comes along and tells you the opposite..that someone must be the opposite to God..and we know who that is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    The policy as you call it on certain orders has a basis that can never change. For example, the 'policy' on adultery is there forever because the consequences of committing adultery never change either.
    Now the Laws of God are not put there for God's benefit..they are put there for our benefit and our protection from harmful results.
    Picking and choosing what Laws of God you wish to follow renders you outside the protection of God Almighty.
    I don't read God's mind, I just read what He told us and that's enough for us. If God orders a thing, an someone else comes along and tells you the opposite..that someone must be the opposite to God..and we know who that is.

    Do you honor the Sabbath on a Saturday in it's fullest sense? Do you mix fabrics of different kinds, or trim back the hair at the corners of the head? If so, the you are probably an ultra-Orthodox Jew, which is cool, but I've never heard of any Jew, Orthodox or otherwise, who argued that the laws in the Torah are obligatory for non-Jews.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    Benny_Cake wrote: »
    Do you honor the Sabbath on a Saturday in it's fullest sense? Do you mix fabrics of different kinds, or trim back the hair at the corners of the head? If so, the you are probably an ultra-Orthodox Jew, which is cool, but I've never heard of any Jew, Orthodox or otherwise, who argued that the laws in the Torah are obligatory for non-Jews.

    So you are saying that God created 2 religions, one for the jews and one for the gentiles?
    Are all men not equal before God?
    Whats this with calling me jewish? just because I highlight a few things in comparisons?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    The policy as you call it on certain orders has a basis that can never change. For example, the 'policy' on adultery is there forever because the consequences of committing adultery never change either.
    So you think you can limit god?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    So you think you can limit god?

    So you think its possible that one day God will abrogate the Law against Adultery. Change the commandment?
    "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors wife?"
    Do you really believe that God would do that?

    OK , you say He can do that, yes of course. But what authority on earth can speak for God and say "You can enjoy your neighbors wife!"
    Anybody who comes and tells you that , you will know is clearly not from God!
    But if you are a person who thinks that this can happen..then you have no idea what faith is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭Lelantos


    So you think you can limit god?

    So you think its possible that one day God will abrogate the Law against Adultery. Change the commandment?
    "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors wife?"
    Do you really believe that God would do that?

    OK , you say He can do that, yes of course. But what authority on earth can speak for God and say "You can enjoy your neighbors wife!"
    Anybody who comes and tells you that , you will know is clearly not from God!
    But if you are a person who thinks that this can happen..then you have no idea what faith is.
    Interesting, may I have your views on same sex relationships?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    Lelantos wrote: »
    Interesting, may I have your views on same sex relationships?
    Thats outside the realm of discussion about religion


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    The crocodile tears aren't for Christianity, they are for religious fundamentalists of all stripes.
    ... says an Atheist fundamentalist!!!:eek:

    If you are a Christian ... you are totally and fundamentally a Christian ... that loves your fellow man and wants to Save him/her.
    What is wrong with that?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    He's been cornered on this stuff and of course won't admit it. Expect epic efforts to turn the discussion onto something else.
    Not in the least cornered ... but you guys are doing a great job turning the discussion onto all kinds of things ... and I just don't have the time to respond to everything.:)
    There are legions of ye guys and just one of me.:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    So you think its possible that one day God will abrogate the Law against Adultery. Change the commandment?
    I'm saying that he can if he wants to, same as he can kill everyone bar one family and start again if he wants to. You believe the latter, but disbelieve the former? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    J C wrote: »
    ... says an Atheist fundamentalist!!!:eek:
    I'm not a fundamentalist, and I'm not even an atheist. I'm not sure how that helps you though - attacking the motives of the speaker rather than the point they make is another classic logical fallacy, much like your appeal to consequences earlier against evolution.

    By they way, why are there hundreds of 'figures of speech' in the bible that suggest the universe moves around the earth, and none that suggest the earth orbits the sun?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    I'm saying that he can if he wants to, same as he can kill everyone bar one family and start again if he wants to. You believe the latter, but disbelieve the former? :confused:

    He can, but He won't. God is constant, thats why we are certain of Him. He changes not.

    You keep believing what you want then..and see what kind of religion you end up with in the end.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    You keep believing that then..and see what kind of religion you end up with in the end.
    So your god doesn't even have free will?

    Are there any parts of the New Testament that you do like?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭Lelantos


    Lelantos wrote: »
    Interesting, may I have your views on same sex relationships?
    Thats outside the realm of discussion about religion
    No it isn't, you, and others have given theire views about everything from the sex industry to why pork is bad for you, I just wanted an answer to what peeps thought about that pertaining to the bible, it must be mentioned no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    Lelantos wrote: »
    No it isn't, you, and others have given theire views about everything from the sex industry to why pork is bad for you, I just wanted an answer to what peeps thought about that pertaining to the bible, it must be mentioned no?

    The Laws of God are clear to anyone who wishes to abide by them. If you seek another way, then find it elsewhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    You know what else doesn't arise in the bible? Unambiguous references to anything at all discovered in the last 2000 years, not even the stuff creationists accept.
    I came across the following ... which answers your question:-

    Science and the Bible


    The Bible is not a science book, yet it is scientifically accurate. We are not aware of any scientific evidence that contradicts the Bible. We have listed statements on this page that are consistent with known scientific facts. Many of them were listed in the Bible hundreds or even thousands of years before being recorded elsewhere. Many concepts and notes on this page are adapted from ideas and statements that appear in The DEFENDER’S Study Bible.[1]

    Statements Consistent With Paleontology
    Dinosaurs are referred to in several Bible books. The book of Job describes two dinosaurs. One is described in chapter 40 starting at verse 15, and the other in chapter 41 starting at verse 1. We think you will agree that 1½ chapters about dinosaurs is a lot—since most people do not even realize that they are mentioned in the Bible. (Actually reading the Bible would help, though. )
    http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/dinos.shtml

    Statements Consistent With Astronomy
    The Bible frequently refers to the great number of stars in the heavens. Here are two examples.


    Genesis 22:17
    Blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your descendants as the stars of the heaven and as the sand which is on the seashore; and your descendants shall possess the gate of their enemies.


    Jeremiah 33:22
    “As the host of heaven cannot be numbered, nor the sand of the sea measured, so will I multiply the descendants of David My servant and the Levites who minister to Me.”

    Even today, scientists admit that they do not know how many stars there are. Only about 3,000 can be seen with the naked eye. We have seen estimates of 10^21 stars—which is a lot of stars. (The number of grains of sand on the earth’s seashores is estimated to be 10^25. As scientists discover more stars, wouldn’t it be interesting to discover that these two numbers match?)


    The Bible also says that each star is unique
    .

    1 Corinthians 15:41
    There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory.
    All stars look alike to the naked eye.* Even when seen through a telescope, they seem to be just points of light. However, analysis of their light spectra reveals that each is unique and different from all others.[1] (*Note: We understand that people can perceive some slight difference in color and apparent brightness when looking at stars with the naked eye, but we would not expect a person living in the first century A.D. to claim they differ from one another.)

    The Bible describes the precision of movement in the universe.


    Jeremiah 31:35,36
    Thus says the LORD,
    Who gives the sun for a light by day,
    The ordinances of the moon and the stars for a light by night,
    Who disturbs the sea,
    And its waves roar
    (The LORD of hosts is His name):
    “If those ordinances depart
    From before Me, says the LORD,
    Then the seed of Israel shall also cease
    From being a nation before Me forever.”


    The Bible describes the suspension of the Earth in space.


    Job 26:7
    He stretches out the north over empty space;
    He hangs the earth on nothing.


    Statements Consistent With Meteorology
    The Bible describes the circulation of the atmosphere.


    Ecclesiastes 1:6
    The wind goes toward the south,
    And turns around to the north;
    The wind whirls about continually,
    And comes again on its circuit.


    The Bible includes some principles of fluid dynamics.


    Job 28:25
    To establish a weight for the wind,
    And apportion the waters by measure.
    The fact that air has weight was proven scientifically only about 300 years ago. The relative weights of air and water are needed for the efficient functioning of the world’s hydrologic cycle, which in turn sustains life on the earth.

    Statements Consistent With Biology
    The book of Leviticus (written prior to 1400 BC) describes the value of blood.


    Leviticus 17:11
    ‘For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul.’
    The blood carries water and nourishment to every cell, maintains the body’s temperature, and removes the waste material of the body’s cells. The blood also carries oxygen from the lungs throughout the body. In 1616, William Harvey discovered that blood circulation is the key factor in physical life—confirming what the Bible revealed 3,000 years earlier.


    The Bible describes biogenesis (the development of living organisms from other living organisms) and the stability of each kind of living organism.



    Genesis 1:11,12
    Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth”; and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, the herb that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.


    Genesis 1:21
    So God created great sea creatures and every living thing that moves, with which the waters abounded, according to their kind, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.


    Genesis 1:25
    And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
    The phrase “according to its kind” occurs repeatedly, stressing the reproductive integrity of each kind of animal and plant. Today we know this occurs because all of these reproductive systems are programmed by their genetic codes.

    The Bible describes the chemical nature of flesh.

    Genesis 2:7
    And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.


    Genesis 3:19
    In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread
    Till you return to the ground,
    For out of it you were taken;
    For dust you are,
    And to dust you shall return.


    It is a proven fact that a person’s mental and spiritual health is strongly correlated with physical health. The Bible revealed this to us with these statements (and others) written by King Solomon about 950 BC.


    Proverbs 12:4
    An excellent wife is the crown of her husband,
    But she who causes shame is like rottenness in his bones.


    Proverbs 14:30
    A sound heart is life to the body,
    But envy is rottenness to the bones.


    Proverbs 15:30
    The light of the eyes rejoices the heart,
    And a good report makes the bones healthy.


    Proverbs 16:24
    Pleasant words are like a honeycomb,
    Sweetness to the soul and health to the bones.


    Proverbs 17:22
    A merry heart does good, like medicine,
    But a broken spirit dries the bones.
    Statements Consistent With Anthropology
    We have cave paintings and other evidence that people inhabited caves. The Bible also describes cave men.


    Job 30:5,6
    They were driven out from among men,
    They shouted at them as at a thief.
    They had to live in the clefts of the valleys,
    In caves of the earth and the rocks.
    Note that these were not ape-men, but descendants of those who scattered from Babel. They were driven from the community by those tribes who competed successfully for the more desirable regions of the earth. Then for some reason they deteriorated mentally, physically, and spiritually.


    Statements Consistent With Hydrology

    The Bible describes the recirculation of water.


    Ecclesiastes 1:7
    All the rivers run into the sea,
    Yet the sea is not full;
    To the place from which the rivers come,
    There they return again.


    Isaiah 55:10
    For as the rain comes down, and the snow from heaven,
    And do not return there,
    But water the earth,
    And make it bring forth and bud,
    That it may give seed to the sower
    And bread to the eater,


    The Bible refers to the surprising amount of water that can be held as condensation in clouds.

    Job 26:8
    He binds up the water in His thick clouds,
    Yet the clouds are not broken under it.


    Job 37:11
    Also with moisture He saturates the thick clouds;
    He scatters His bright clouds.


    Hydrothermal vents are described in two books of the Bible written before 1400BC—more than 3,000 years before their discovery by science.


    Genesis 7:11
    In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.


    Job 38:16
    Have you entered the springs of the sea?
    Or have you walked in search of the depths?


    Statements Consistent With Geology
    The Bible describes the Earth’s crust (along with a comment on astronomy).


    Jeremiah 31:37
    Thus says the LORD:
    “If heaven above can be measured,
    And the foundations of the earth searched out beneath,
    I will also cast off all the seed of Israel
    For all that they have done, says the LORD.”
    Although some scientists claim that they have now measured the size of the universe, it is interesting to note that every human attempt to drill through the earth’s crust to the plastic mantle beneath has, thus far, ended in failure.

    The Bible described the shape of the earth centuries before some people thought that the earth was spherical.

    Isaiah 40:22
    It is He who sits above the circle of the earth,
    And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers,
    Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain,
    And spreads them out like a tent to dwell in.
    The word translated “circle” here is the Hebrew word chuwg which is also translated “circuit,” or “compass” (depending on the context). That is, it indicates something spherical, rounded, or arched—not something that is flat or square.

    The book of Isaiah was written sometime between 740 and 680 BC. This is at least 300 years before Aristotle suggested that the earth might be a sphere in this book On the Heavens.


    Statements Consistent With Physics
    The Bible suggests the presence of nuclear processes like those we associate with nuclear weaponry. This is certainly not something that could have been explained in 67 AD using known scientific principles (when Peter wrote the following verse).


    2 Peter 3:10
    But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up.


    The Bible contains passages that describe something like television—something that allows everyone on earth see a single event. (Note: such passages typically refer to the end of time. It may not be long before we learn for sure whether the Bible is true or not on this one.)

    Matthew 24:30
    Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.


    Revelation 11:9-11
    Then those from the peoples, tribes, tongues, and nations will see their dead bodies three-and-a-half days, and not allow their dead bodies to be put into graves. And those who dwell on the earth will rejoice over them, make merry, and send gifts to one another, because these two prophets tormented those who dwell on the earth. Now after the three-and-a-half days the breath of life from God entered them, and they stood on their feet, and great fear fell on those who saw them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭systemsready


    So your god doesn't even have free will?

    Are there any parts of the New Testament that you do like?

    This is how you see things.
    God gives you clear instructions about what is right and what is wrong.
    Someone comes to you and says that what God said is now changed and He says something completely different.
    You say.."How so?"
    They tell you..."Can God not do anything?"
    You say "Yes of course"
    They say "so be it"
    That then is the limit of your resistance to satan.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    The Laws of God are clear to anyone who wishes to abide by them.
    Well, not really. It seems that you like some Old Testament laws but not others, and some New Testament laws but not others. They may be clear to others, but apparently they are not clear to you.


Advertisement