Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a New Union

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭seavill


    No I'm well aware that meetings are not well attended by and large. But that, at least in theory should give part timers room to manoeuvre. I've watched the smallest school in the county rally the troops and get their 10-12 staff members to all attend on one night and vote through their motion etc, and sat on my own, or with only one other person from my school and wondered why our staff won't do the same when we could have double those numbers there. With low attendances at meetings it would be quite possible for an organised group of part timers/NQTs to make up the majority on any given night.

    Yes as I said earlier I agree with your point. But arguing amongst ourselves gets us no where.
    Meetings are not well attended across the board my point was constantly putting across the point (which is correct) that not enough nqts go skews the overall impression. The fact is very few of any age go.

    I still make the point that union activity needs to become a regular part of local school life, as I said not just getting the mag once a month. Regular meetings within schools will bring people into the fold and that is where it starts.

    You have stated twice about the small school bringing loads of people. I would imagine this us not every meeting only when the need arises. In one way that isn't what it is really about. But it goes back to my point that obviously within that school there is a strong bond amongst the staff obviously have regular meetings and people feel part of it regardless of age rather than just saying to new staff go to this meeting in x place and it means nothing to them. I guarantee if thee was a guaranteed group of 10 going the nqt would go.

    Not everyone will but that is a fact if life if we take any issue. Local clubs very small amount of people do a large amount of work similar idea.

    We need to become one no matter how frustrating it may be letting those frustrations come out can be counter productive to the overall aim


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,402 ✭✭✭doc_17


    drvantramp wrote: »
    doc_17 wrote: »
    Those affected by recent changes in pay should, instead of forming a new union, actually show up to their cuurent one's meetings.

    If they then feel that this union is not representing them then they should form their.

    Oh and these current useless fatcat unions are soon to be taking a court case against the government because of this unequal pay stuff.





    Doc17 what happened in the last few weeks? (apart from Donegal winning:)) you were only recently saying NQTs should probably form a union?

    Bottomline: it is not about feeling that the union does not represent them, it is a clear fact they do not.
    Attending meetings and paying subs for what exactly, to agree to a two-tier system?

    And yes, teacher union heads salaries of €130k plus and expenses are indeed fat-cat and they cannot relate to the yellow-pack teacher anymore. Unions, Teaching Council, NCCA and DoE all too cosy, that is the reality.


    Looking forward to the court case, wonder will it pay out like paddy power?:confused:

    Just to clarify....if, after going To meetings and making the effort, some teachers are actually not being represented then maybe they should represent themselves. But to never join or go To meetings or get involved and still give out is something that i was referring to.

    Take a motion to your branch. "i believe we should do this" if it is carried great, if not then maybe there is a time to explore other options.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 574 ✭✭✭bdoo


    In my experience mots teachers who started from 2000 or so on had it handy with regard to union issues as there was a well established cohort of people in schools who protected their interests.

    Those people are now gone and it falls to the rest of us to.take the initiative to make the unions strong again.

    I'm not slagging my own, im stating facts. All the wanted to know before from TUI news was when our next pay rise was.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,388 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    desmurphy wrote: »
    THe TUI is composed of 2 factions who are constantly fighting to get control of the union. this takes up all their time and energy. if the members knew

    Again, strange half-referred to allegations.
    Whatever your beef with the TUI is, please take it somewhere where it can be addressed. That isn't here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭seavill


    bdoo wrote: »
    In my experience mots teachers who started from 2000 or so on had it handy with regard to union issues as there was a well established cohort of people in schools who protected their interests.

    Those people are now gone and it falls to the rest of us to.take the initiative to make the unions strong again.

    I'm not slagging my own, im stating facts. All the wanted to know before from TUI news was when our next pay rise was.

    Yes because as you said yourself they have not had many issues since 2000 or so, so they have had no real interaction or have not had any need to have any real integration outside of a pay or CID question.

    Now things are different but only in recent times it is a whole change of view, minds, beliefs. That doesn't happen overnight. Give people a chance. Get grass roots I.e. within the school on board first them we will see a change


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 50 ✭✭Nodnedlog


    Just a quick message in relation to the INTO.
    It seems that quite a high proportion of the senior members of this union are Principals or vice principals and there seems to be a conflict of interest as they are management yet representing teachers should they not form their own union as is done in the private sector once workers become management????

    The agenda of these unions is definitely self preservation and looking after the more long standing influential members. As people get older they get more involved in trade union issues. This is human nature I'm afraid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭mrboswell


    doc_17 wrote: »
    Those affected by recent changes in pay should, instead of forming a new union, actually show up to their cuurent one's meetings.

    I've been to a couple where the same 2 or 3 people take over the whole show and its like having teeth pulled!


Advertisement