Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Real Barack Obama?

  • 19-09-2012 05:32PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭


    I guess this is the week of dueling video/audio in the race for POTUS.

    At an October 19, 1998 conference at Loyola University, then State Senator Barack Obama spoke out against the "propaganda" that said government doesn't work, and that there is a need to "pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution."

    Hmmm… Isn’t the Redistribution Of Wealth the basic platform of Marxism, and a tenet of Socialism? I sure know it's not Capitalism.



    Lookin' like those of us on the other side of the fence might have been right all along. :)


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭DB21


    Oh my, Amerika, you seem to be taking a leaf from the book of the right leaning media by taking less than a sentence from and Obama speech completely out of context.

    The rest of that line is very, very important; "...pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution, at least at a certain level to make sure everybody's got a shot."

    Far from socialism I would imagine, as a socialist believes in such a system on EVERY level.

    Amused,
    DB21


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,943 ✭✭✭20Cent


    He's the worst socialist, Marxist Kenyan Muslim I've ever seen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    DB21 wrote: »
    The rest of that line is very, very important; "...pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution, at least at a certain level to make sure everybody's got a shot."

    Sure looks like that "level" is Income.

    And it didn't take long for my side to come out with an ad, showing him to also be a liar... with a December 2011 60 Minutes interview where Obama denied that his policies had anything to do with redistribution at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,943 ✭✭✭20Cent


    So are Romney Ryan proposing no tax for anyone?
    Like Romney now?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    Perhaps Obama was influenced by that notorious extreme leftist, James Madison, who in 1792 called for "the silent operation of laws, which, without violating the rights of property, reduce extreme wealth towards a state of mediocrity, and raise extreme indigence towards a state of comfort.".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭Duck Soup


    This is devastating. A taped open conversation from the last century in which he damningly says:
    What that means then is that as we try to resuscitate this notion that we’re all in this thing together, leave nobody behind, we do have to be innovative and thinking what are the delivery systems that are actually effective and meet people where they live. And my suggestion, I guess would be that the trick, and this is one of the few areas where I think there are technical issues that have to be dealt with as opposed to just political issues. I think the trick is figuring out how do we structure government systems that pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution, at least at a certain level to make sure everybody’s got a shot.

    He ain't gonna recover from this one.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Amerika wrote: »
    I guess this is the week of dueling video/audio in the race for POTUS.

    At an October 19, 1998 conference at Loyola University, then State Senator Barack Obama spoke out against the "propaganda" that said government doesn't work, and that there is a need to "pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution."

    Hmmm… Isn’t the Redistribution Of Wealth the basic platform of Marxism, and a tenet of Socialism? I sure know it's not Capitalism.

    Why yes, redistribtuion of wealth is at the core of Socialism. However to say that anyone who believes that wealth should be more evenly distributed is a Socialist is complete nonsense. By your logic anyone who wants to improve society is a Socialist. You simply don't understand what socialism is, that's the real problem.




    Lookin' like those of us on the other side of the fence might have been right all along. :)

    Nope, as usual you're wrong.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭Be like Nutella


    fair play for throwing some digs back : )

    But I've found that most politicians on the left in my lifetime from anywhere including France, Spain, certainly the US and Ireland... none of them are true socialists as we were taught in school history. They just don't believe in pure unadulterated capitalism... Obama is the same. In my view, if you believe in pure 'free market no reigns' 'rich deserve to be rich' and 'all will be fine if we just trust the market' capitalism, as if the market itself has any intention on trying to maintain a balanced society, then there's something wrong with your brain because it is not in my view an innately human ideal, you may disagree and think life is dog eat dog end of that's your 'right'.

    Extreme positions are rarely supportable... neocons, far right people, extreme far left people... there's a reason why these positions are called 'extreme'... it's because those positions are counter productive to the greater good which although we don't generally, as people, spend our whole time working for - we DO tend to care to some degree for, that's called moderation and that's what most 'lefty' people want - a free market, sure.. but don't trust the market to serve society completely.. it won't... it's not freakin sensient!!
    The market allows situations to arise which are counter to the greater good of society sometimes and visa versa and it is in my view one of governments responsibilities to react to negative market forces which produce very negative situations such as massive monopolies and massive divergence of wealth between segments of society... but not in an extreme socialist sort of way although I may be incorrectly labeled so by blinder wearing far rightish people.. but in a moderate and intelligent way that maintains some consideration to the greater good of society.

    There never has been pure socialism (each attempt has been corrupt to its core from day one!) OR pure capitalism (because people get pissed off from day one!) and there never will be. They are just ideals and they would never work (as per failed communist experiment if we want to label USSR as that to some degree). You may HATE hand outs but I HATE the 'rich boys club!' that doesn't make you a capitalist pig nor me a pure socialist... it makes me a quasi centristy can't be pigeon holed very easily complicated fukcer as most of us in fact are... and as most of the politicians we love and hate are... including Obama and Romney (counter to some extreme descriptions which suited me in other situations he is not in fact Satan himself)

    This whole thing, modern civilization is a big experiment of sorts... far right and far left don't work - we've tried that. Obama is no pure socialist and Romney as hard as he tried to seem like it ;) is not actually scrooge himself... he's just some rich dude acting like 'some rich dude' acts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭RMD


    If you're going to quote him please include the entire statement, not just parts you can misconstrue into a misleading statement.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    Benny_Cake wrote: »
    Perhaps Obama was influenced by that notorious extreme leftist, James Madison, who in 1792 called for "the silent operation of laws, which, without violating the rights of property, reduce extreme wealth towards a state of mediocrity, and raise extreme indigence towards a state of comfort.".

    Sorry, but I'm not all that familar with many of the writings of Madison, except for this one (a favorite of the Tea Party)

    "Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government."



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    RMD wrote: »
    If you're going to quote him please include the entire statement, not just parts you can misconstrue into a misleading statement.

    I don't believe it to be misconstrued at all.

    And curious... Does that type of thinking also apply to the missing two minutes from the Romney video which is currently all the rage?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    Nope, as usual you're wrong.

    That Barack Obama has displayed over the course of his career some troubling socialistic tendencies? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,889 ✭✭✭sarumite


    I was thinking about this one myself. I was wondering how long is too long. In terms of relevance.

    That tape is from 14 years ago. I was in my early 20's back then. 14 years of working and life experience has changed me. You could take something I said back then and try and apply it to me now it just wouldn't fit. The person I was back then is not the person I am today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    Amerika wrote: »
    Nope, as usual you're wrong.

    That Barack Obama has displayed over the course of his career some troubling socialistic tendencies? :confused:

    Yes, you're completely wrong about that. If Obama is a socialist, he has been a most disappointing one. I really think you need to read a little about socialism before you start throwing the word about.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,485 ✭✭✭Denerick


    Amerika wrote: »
    That Barack Obama has displayed over the course of his career some troubling socialistic tendencies? :confused:

    I agree. Medicare and Social Security should be stopped, immediately. Military spending should be reduced by 95%. Less big government! I'm sure the democrats would be more than happy to welcome the tens of millions of seniors flocking to their party as a result. Or is that why Republicans don't actually follow their principles?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    sarumite wrote: »
    I was thinking about this one myself. I was wondering how long is too long. In terms of relevance.

    That tape is from 14 years ago. I was in my early 20's back then. 14 years of working and life experience has changed me. You could take something I said back then and try and apply it to me now it just wouldn't fit. The person I was back then is not the person I am today.

    I would somewhat agree as I was a liberal in my younger, more naive days (shock, horror). That's why the 60 minutes interview is so daming... becasue that was only a few years back. So either Obama was lying, or perhaps he did too many drugs as a youth to remember what he thought as a State Senator 10 years earlier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭Mjollnir


    Amerika wrote: »
    I guess this is the week of dueling video/audio in the race for POTUS.

    At an October 19, 1998 conference at Loyola University, then State Senator Barack Obama spoke out against the "propaganda" that said government doesn't work, and that there is a need to "pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution."

    Hmmm… Isn’t the Redistribution Of Wealth the basic platform of Marxism, and a tenet of Socialism? I sure know it's not Capitalism.



    Lookin' like those of us on the other side of the fence might have been right all along. :)

    You have to actually imagine things there to dishonestly represent what he was talking about. Q'uelle surprise!!!

    Note that Obama is discussing the need to pool and redistribute government resources. Not wealth. Perhaps if you could be bothered to actually listen to what you linked to? Naaaaa....

    It's not like the US has had any success in fields like vaccination, flood control, firefighting, rural electrification, a state university system, or national parks.....

    If you're looking for more evidence that Obama is a secret commie socialist Marxist, you'll have to look elsewhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Amerika wrote: »
    I would somewhat agree as I was a liberal in my younger, more naive days (shock, horror). That's why the 60 minutes interview is so daming... becasue that was only a few years back. So either Obama was lying, or perhaps he did too many drugs as a youth to remember what he thought as a State Senator 10 years earlier.
    What's amusing is what politicians believe rarely ends up becoming policy once they're elected.

    The GOP likes to make it seem like voting for Obama will make the sky overcast with black clouds and lightening and suddenly everyone will be on the soup line, working for the same $7.25 whether they be burger flipper or rocket scientist.

    In reality the view is more akin to using government policy to instigate the "trickle down" that the GOP touts so much. Oh yes, let the rich hoard their wealth. It will trickle down. Eventually. When they're done playing the flash trading game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,908 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    "Liberal candidate believes that some of wealthier Americans' income should go to help poorer people."

    That swings it, he's just lost the Koch brothers' votes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    I see the Democrats and Republicans of the House, in bi-partisanship, just passed the Buffett Rule Act (different from the Buffett Rule Tax). Under the legislation, wealthy taxpayers (or anyone for that matter) could easily check a box on their tax returns and voluntarily pay more in taxes than they owe to the IRS in order to pay down the national debt. I like it! Put up or shut up! Let’s see if the Democrat controlled Senate even brings it up for a vote, and if it passes the Senate, if the President vetos it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    Hmmm, according to an article by the Republican David Brooks that I read today, government transfers to individuals (ie. redistribution) has grown faster over the past half century under Republican administarions that Democratic. Coupled with the fact that Democratic administrations have created far more jobs with less time in office than their GOP counterparts, I think you ought to be grateful to the Dems Amerika, and be thankful that one party at least is prepared to pay more than lip service to Republican core beliefs. It's just a shame that party isn't the Republican party.
    In 1960, government transfers to individuals totaled $24 billion. By 2010,
    that total was 100 times as large. Even after adjusting for inflation,
    entitlement transfers to individuals have grown by more than 700 percent over
    the last 50 years. This spending surge, Eberstadt notes, has increased faster
    under Republican administrations than Democratic ones.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/opinion/brooks-thurston-howell-romney.html?_r=4


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Amerika wrote: »
    That Barack Obama has displayed over the course of his career some troubling socialistic tendencies? :confused:


    Yes, you are completly wrong about that, mainly because your understanding of what constitutes Socialism is poor.

    How about you reply to a complete post for once? I explained exactly what I meant earlier on in that post.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Amerika wrote: »
    I would somewhat agree as I was a liberal in my younger, more naive days (shock, horror). That's why the 60 minutes interview is so daming... becasue that was only a few years back. So either Obama was lying, or perhaps he did too many drugs as a youth to remember what he thought as a State Senator 10 years earlier.



    A laughable accusation.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Kinski


    sarumite wrote: »
    That tape is from 14 years ago. I was in my early 20's back then. 14 years of working and life experience has changed me. You could take something I said back then and try and apply it to me now it just wouldn't fit. The person I was back then is not the person I am today.

    Here the author says he is 25, here that he is 50...which you would think goes without saying, but Nietzsche felt the need to point that out somewhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,139 ✭✭✭Carcharodon


    Amerika wrote: »
    I guess this is the week of dueling video/audio in the race for POTUS.

    At an October 19, 1998 conference at Loyola University, then State Senator Barack Obama spoke out against the "propaganda" that said government doesn't work, and that there is a need to "pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution."

    Hmmm… Isn’t the Redistribution Of Wealth the basic platform of Marxism, and a tenet of Socialism? I sure know it's not Capitalism.



    Lookin' like those of us on the other side of the fence might have been right all along. :)

    Fact
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    A fact (derived from the Latin factum, see below) is something that has really occurred or is actually the case. The usual test for a statement of fact is verifiability, that is whether it can be shown to correspond to experience via proof.

    Fiction

    Fiction is the form of any narrative or informative work that deals, in part or in whole, with information or events that are not factual, but rather, imaginary and theoretical—that is, invented by the author

    Propaganda

    Propaganda is a form of communication that is aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position by presenting only one side of an argument. Propaganda is usually repeated and dispersed over a wide variety of media in order to create the chosen result in audience attitudes.

    Just a few words you should study before you post anything.



    Cue, a not so witty similar post followed by a wink to deflect from the insanity of it all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Jon Stewart's very good monologue on this week of politics

    Chaos on Bull**** Mountain
    Amerika wrote: »
    Sure looks like that "level" is Income.

    And it didn't take long for my side to come out with an ad, showing him to also be a liar... with a December 2011 60 Minutes interview where Obama denied that his policies had anything to do with redistribution at all.

    I see they also continue to double down on the "you didn't build that" line.

    Here again, is the full quote:

    Obama wrote:
    If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business—you didn't build [roads and bridges]. Somebody else made that happen.
    Amerika wrote: »
    I don't believe it to be misconstrued at all.

    And curious... Does that type of thinking also apply to the missing two minutes from the Romney video which is currently all the rage?
    So post the two minutes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    Fact
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    A fact (derived from the Latin factum, see below) is something that has really occurred or is actually the case. The usual test for a statement of fact is verifiability, that is whether it can be shown to correspond to experience via proof.

    Fiction

    Fiction is the form of any narrative or informative work that deals, in part or in whole, with information or events that are not factual, but rather, imaginary and theoretical—that is, invented by the author

    Propaganda

    Propaganda is a form of communication that is aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position by presenting only one side of an argument. Propaganda is usually repeated and dispersed over a wide variety of media in order to create the chosen result in audience attitudes.

    Just a few words you should study before you post anything.



    Cue, a not so witty similar post followed by a wink to deflect from the insanity of it all.

    Hmmm… I post an audio of Barack Obama in his own words. And note that his comments have some of the tenets of Marxism and Socialism. You tell me, is that Fact, Fiction or Propaganda? If anything other than Fact, please explain to my why?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Amerika wrote: »
    Hmmm… I post an audio of Barack Obama in his own words. And note that his comments have some of the tenets of Marxism and Socialism. You tell me, is that Fact, Fiction or Propaganda? If anything other than Fact, please explain to my why?


    In his own words, as you say.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    Yes, you are completly wrong about that, mainly because your understanding of what constitutes Socialism is poor.

    How about you reply to a complete post for once? I explained exactly what I meant earlier on in that post.

    Please tell me what constitutes pure Socialism and which country is completely Socialistic? If there is none, then I guess countries have different degrees of Socialism, including ours. And if you don’t believe Barack Obama is not trying to fundamentally change and move the needle away from our mostly center right country towards the socialistic spectrum, there is not much I can do about it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    Overheal wrote: »
    In his own words, as you say.

    Yup, the clips with Mitt Romney speaking in your clip are indeed Fact.


Advertisement
Advertisement