CHEMTRAILS

5uspect · 21-08-2011 10:08AM

On what basis do they look strange apart from your desire for them to look strange?

Here is an animation of typical cloud pattern over Ireland:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/satpics/latest_uk_vis.html

How do you imagine these large structures are being affected by contrails?

Sparticle · 21-08-2011 10:11AM

WakeUp wrote: »

Yeah the clouds over land for sure look like those cirrocumulus clouds but Im not so sure about the ones off the coast out to sea (West and North West) do you mean the clouds over land or the ones out to sea?...

Oh I meant the ones over land.

The ones over sea look a bit like cirrostratus.

As far as I'm aware cirrus clouds form before a front which would explain their presence. I remember reading somewhere that contrails can also evolve into cirrus clouds in the right conditions .

WakeUp · 21-08-2011 10:12AM

5uspect wrote: »

On what basis do they look strange apart from your desire for them to look strange?

Do you read minds?..

how do you know I "desire for them to look strange"?..what gave you that impression...you share your mind reading technique with me and I'll think about answering your question.

WakeUp · 21-08-2011 10:16AM

Sparticle wrote: »

Oh I meant the ones over land.

The ones over sea look a bit like cirrostratus.

As far as I'm aware cirrus clouds form before a front which would explain their presence. I remember reading somewhere that contrails can also evolve into cirrus clouds in the right conditions .

A front is the boundary between two different temperatures right?? So they could form then in theory if say something like an anticyclone was on the way?...

5uspect · 21-08-2011 10:30AM

WakeUp wrote: »

Do you read minds?.. how do you know I "desire for them to look strange"?..what gave you that impression...you share your mind reading technique with me and I'll think about answering your question.

Well you clearly want us to accept your claims that something looks strange without stating why. So who is expecting who to read minds?

What is your criteria for determining that a particular cloud is "strange"?

caseyann · 13-09-2011 09:07PM

I was having a look around and found this today.
I think might have some interesting things to have a discussion on.
For me it still is very odd,and this person seems to feel so also.

I challenge any organization to produce a vapour trail that can spread across the sky and remained for hours. We do not have that technology.

People who are keeping track of chemtrails have seen many strange performances by the "aircraft" that is making the trail. Sometimes, the aircraft disappears before their eyes and the chemtrail stops being formed. Other times, the chemtrails continues to be formed with no aircraft visible, see the picture to the right taken by Lydia Mancini. For more pictures and close-ups visit Bariumblues.com.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/ufo_extraterrestrials/2011/09/11/784.html

Mr. Thomas links chemtrails to “acute asthma-like attacks, gastrointestinal problems, and lingering severe flu-like illnesses including a persistent dry hacking cough that eventually goes away – only to return.”

5uspect · 13-09-2011 09:13PM

Why are you just copying random stuff from the internet into your post?

Could you use quote tags or simply provide a link?

caseyann · 13-09-2011 09:16PM

5uspect wrote: »

Why are you just copying random stuff from the internet into your post?

Could you use quote tags or simply provide a link?

Whats the problem you dont like my link?

Because its apart of the link and if i give my own observations usually told to provide links.:rolleyes:

clever_name · 13-09-2011 10:53PM

caseyann wrote: »

I challenge any organization to produce a vapour trail that can spread across the sky and remained for hours. We do not have that technology.

I'm not sure what your saying with this, it appears your post indicates a belief in chemtrails while the statement above says they are not possible.

caseyann wrote: »

People who are keeping track of chemtrails have seen many strange performances by the "aircraft" that is making the trail. Sometimes, the aircraft disappears before their eyes and the chemtrail stops being formed. Other times, the chemtrails continues to be formed with no aircraft visible, see the picture to the right taken by Lydia Mancini. For more pictures and close-ups visit Bariumblues.com.

So when a plane is no longer visable the contrail it was making stops being visable at this point?, this seems fairly straighforward to me - its out of visable range.

And chemtrails are formed when no planes are around? - so what causes them if its not the plane?

Anyway forget all that, lets talk about some great quotes from their website;

I once experienced an unusual and vivid insight while returning to earthly consciousness: I felt absolute disgust for having to re-inhabit a physical body because it was clearly seen to be a wet system running with electricity, which indeed it is.

Suddenly a bald eagle flew right over me very low and slow. This alerted me to the fact that something really especially significant was happening

Electromagnetic forces act as connecting energies between the physical plane and the spiritual and/or etheric planes of existence.

This seems to be more of a religious theory that anything involving evidence.

5uspect · 13-09-2011 10:58PM

caseyann wrote: »

Whats the problem you dont like my link? Because its apart of the link and if i give my own observations usually told to provide links.:rolleyes:

That link wasn't in the original post.

Daithi 1 · 17-11-2011 01:38PM

namloc1980 wrote: »

So no evidence then.

First 5 minutes. Or from 4 min to 5. Anyone who think they are not already spraying is stupid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIlMY8-EdxE

rightyabe · 20-08-2012 07:01AM

Shocked no one has been commenting about the West Nile Virus to hit Texas and the aerial assult on the flying pests...

Any CT in this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/17/dallas-west-nile-virus_n_1791551.html

JustinDee · 21-08-2012 11:19AM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Anyone who think they are not already spraying is stupid

I don't think "they're" spraying and I'm not stupid.
What gives, eh?

Daithi 1 · 21-08-2012 02:15PM

JustinDee wrote: »

I don't think "they're" spraying and I'm not stupid.
What gives, eh?

How do you think they go about geoengineering ?

Do you think they throw chemicals into the air ?

Monty Burnz · 21-08-2012 03:09PM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

How do you think they go about geoengineering ?

Can you demonstrate the "geo-engineering" is actually happening? Who is carrying it out, and who is paying for it?

Daithi 1 · 21-08-2012 03:36PM

I can demonstrate that the public have been sprayed in the past, in secret, funded the the UK government. Obviously, the public were the last to know and it's likely we'll be the last to know this time around.

When we are informed about proposals to spray, it's probably already occurring.

Of course I don't have any proof it's occurring now, but text carried out b the crowd involved in "what on Earth are they spraying" suggests that spraying is occurring.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience

hooradiation · 21-08-2012 06:06PM

This

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Obviously, the public were the last to know and it's likely we'll be the last to know this time around.

is not the logical conclusion of this

Daithi 1 wrote: »

I can demonstrate that the public have been sprayed in the past, in secret, funded the the UK government.

Monty Burnz · 21-08-2012 06:08PM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Of course I don't have any proof it's occurring now, but text carried out b the crowd involved in "what on Earth are they spraying" suggests that spraying is occurring.

This sort of honesty I respect, I must say.

JustinDee · 22-08-2012 01:29PM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Of course I don't have any proof it's occurring . . .

You should have started your posting with this and then quit when still not quite so far behind.

--Kaiser-- · 22-08-2012 01:42PM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

This sort of honesty I respect, I must say.

I would have respected it had he not already said 'Anyone who think they are not already spraying is stupid'

Daithi 1 · 22-08-2012 04:20PM

--Kaiser-- wrote: »

I would have respected it had he not already said 'Anyone who think they are not already spraying is stupid'

In fairness, that post was 11 months ago.

My opinion has changed somewhat since then.

Torakx · 22-08-2012 04:35PM

Well this forum is about everyone being right, not the information lol
So dont mind what anyone here says thats personal or negative.
Alot are seeking self esteem and imo being able to change your mind is a sign of maturity.

For what its worth, i still believe chemtrails are a real issue.
But i have not seen enough evidence to say its happening for sure in Ireland.
I still look at the "contrails"/"chemtrails" the odd time and wonder though

Daithi 1 · 22-08-2012 11:14PM

Torakx wrote: »

Well this forum is about everyone being right, not the information lol
So dont mind what anyone here says thats personal or negative.
Alot are seeking self esteem and imo being able to change your mind is a sign of maturity.

For what its worth, i still believe chemtrails are a real issue.
But i have not seen enough evidence to say its happening for sure in Ireland.
I still look at the "contrails"/"chemtrails" the odd time and wonder though

Yeah, I reckon there is something to chemtrails too.. pointless to argue about it without proof tho.

We know it's been done before in secret, it could be happening any time at all, anywhere.

I'm thinking that if I believe im constantly breathing in those chemicals, even if im not. I'll probably give myself some disease...

Torakx · 23-08-2012 12:16AM

You might be doing just that lol
Apparently we live amongst many realities and it only changes when we observe or take part in it.
Im talking about that laser test where they split a beam of light in a covered box.
Brings a little bit more weight to the matrix theory

This is a cartoon but explains it pretty well.

If you want to know more on what this could actually mean, check out
"BBC horizon What is reality?"
Sorry off topic, but its too good to not post on this forums somewhere.

A side theory i have based on this, is that the illuminatti etc already know about this stuff and are literally programming the future to go their way by using holly wood magic etc etc.
So the chemtrails might not be real as well as aliens and everything else until we create them globally in our minds lol
Just a bit of Ct fun i like to have now and then

Daithi 1 · 23-08-2012 12:21AM

Torakx wrote: »

You might be doing just that lol
Apparently we live amongst many realities and it only changes when we observe or take part in it.
Im talking about that laser test where they split a beam of light in a covered box.
Brings a little bit more weight to the matrix theory

This is a cartoon but explains it pretty well.

If you want to know more on what this could actually mean, check out
"BBC horizon What is reality?"
Sorry off topic, but its too good to not post on this forums somewhere.

Ive watched that clips at least 30 times and was going to mention it in my last post. Mindblowing !!!

Edit, ther is a follow up video to it, by someone else, Ill try dig it up for you.

Am waiting on a friend get back to me, but the experiment was about weather it was the observation of the camera watching or the humans...

Daithi 1 · 23-08-2012 12:42PM

Here is it, enjoy :P

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfeoE1arF0I

Daithi 1 · 07-11-2012 09:15AM

Artificial snowstorm brings chaos to Beijing

Chinese scientists have artificially induced the second major snowstorm to wreak havoc in Beijing this season, state media said, reigniting debate over the practice of tinkering with Mother Nature.

After the earliest snow to hit the capital in 22 years fell on November 1, the capital has again been shrouded in white, with more snow expected in the coming three days, the National Meteorological Centre said.

The China Daily, citing an unnamed official, said the Beijing Weather Modification Office had artificially induced both storms by seeding clouds with chemicals, a practice that can increase precipitation by up to 20 per cent.

The office refused to comment on the report when contacted. On Tuesday, an official had said the storm was "natural".

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-11-11/artificial-snowstorm-brings-chaos-to-beijing/1138460

Jonny7 · 07-11-2012 09:31AM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Artificial snowstorm brings chaos to Beijing

Chinese scientists have artificially induced the second major snowstorm to wreak havoc in Beijing this season, state media said, reigniting debate over the practice of tinkering with Mother Nature.

After the earliest snow to hit the capital in 22 years fell on November 1, the capital has again been shrouded in white, with more snow expected in the coming three days, the National Meteorological Centre said.

The China Daily, citing an unnamed official, said the Beijing Weather Modification Office had artificially induced both storms by seeding clouds with chemicals, a practice that can increase precipitation by up to 20 per cent.

The office refused to comment on the report when contacted. On Tuesday, an official had said the storm was "natural".

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-11-11/artificial-snowstorm-brings-chaos-to-beijing/1138460

Seeding clouds has been around since the 50's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_seeding

The Chinese used it before the Olympics. Have the foggiest why they are generating snow, maybe its an attempt to divert rain. Their 10 year change of leadership is coming up tomorrow.

Daithi 1 · 07-11-2012 09:39AM

Call it what you will. Chemicals into the air, from planes, causes damage to forests, buildings and most likely people.

--Kaiser-- · 07-11-2012 10:53AM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Call it what you will. Chemicals into the air, from planes, causes damage to forests, buildings and most likely people.

How so? From what I remember they use dry ice (carbon dioxide), who or what is that going to harm?

CHEMTRAILS

Comments