Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

If... the Unforgiving Minute

18911131427

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Weights on Saturday left me feeling stiff and sore again but I felt up to pushing it a bit the next day. Sunday was 4 laps of a 3.74K trail at Union. I warmed up on the first lap in 16:30, pushed it on the 2nd one in 13:10, recovered on the 3rd in 20:43, and pushed as best I could on the last in 13:35. Paces on the 2nd and 4th lap were 3:31 & 3:38 /km - exactly the range I should be doing for tempo intervals according to McMillan, although my recovery was a bit generous.

    I plan to do my first 5K of the year at the weekend so I will save myself a bit for that this week. Tuesday's plan was 12x400(1:20)[1:20] - a bit faster than my 5K PB of 16:54. I hoped after recent intervals at 3K pace this would feel a bit easier and it did. I was joined by my usual intervals companion plus two others who jumped in at different stages. We hit the first one in 1:19 and kept in consistent with just one rep drifting out to 1:23. For the last one we hit the half-way in 40s and then picked it up to finish with a 34s final 200m. Average was 1:20.2 and recovery of 1:21.2. The rest of the week will be easy with strides.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    5k last night 16:50 - a 4s PB. 9th overall, 2nd M40. First 3k averaged 3:30, last 2 were 3:10 downhill. Hopefully can go better too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,108 ✭✭✭BeepBeep67


    Sweet - how did it feel?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I had picked the Ballyshannon 5K race on Friday for its PB potential and it did not let me down. I had talked to one of the guys who did it before and he swore it was not net downhill - I am not so sure.

    It started out on the main Donegal Road about a mile from the registration point and quickly a lead group of about 12 was established. Two of my cubmates were in there, one of whom I have only beaten once when I took him my surprise in a sprint finish, so I hoped to keep him in sight. The biggest bunch in the group was from Finn Valley who were packing well. The first km is definitely uphill and I was at the tail of this group. I did not want to get left in no-mans-land but I did not really push myself here either and by 1K they were a few secs ahead as I clocked 3:27.

    The next 2 kms were along a narrow side-road that rolled up and down. By now the main group had split and although they were still in sight, I had lost contact, with km's in 3:30 & 3:29. At 3K I realised I was on 17:30 pace and conceded a PB was out of reach. At this stage the pack was starting to spit a few tail-enders out the back and I concentrated on catching them and putting some respectability on my time. This 4th km was downhill and although my watch registered 3:10, my brain did not.

    The 5th km had a few ups and downs and I picked off another one or two runners but not my two clubmates. As I came around the final bend I thought about checking my watch to see if I should sprint for a better time but I decided there was no point. I strided across the line and checked my watch 16:49.8 (officially 16:50) - a 4s PB - that was a surprise. That last km was 3:12. I knew I had finished well but because everyone had picked up the pace, I did not realise how much quicker we were going.

    Back at the school, after the traditional tea, sandwiches and cake, I also got an envelope for 2nd M40, which after deducting a paltry 8 euro for the entry fee meant I probably covered my petrol as well. In hindsight I should have stuck with the pack longer and pushed harder over the opening kms and I might have done serious damage to my PB. But I'm not greedy, that's my first 5K in 7 months, it's more than 70s faster than this time last year and 5K is at the top end of my range for this year so I'll take that, hoping I can do more next time. It also proves to me that my October 5K PB was not a fluke, which I had started to doubt.

    Saturday was a rest day but with lots going on this weekend it did not feel like it. Sunday I went back up the hills on what is my new favourite trail, up to Lake Dageanna in 28:44 and then on to the top of the rocky descent, before turning back down in 26:47 for a good 70 min longish run of indeterminate distance, only spoiled by that damn song "rocky road to ..." going round in my head.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 920 ✭✭✭RandyMann


    Just saw your result above, well done on your PB. It seems you have more in the tank.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I have been drafting my training plan for the next few months recently. The general plan is to get into competition phase in about a months time, starting with a 5K and hopefully include a 1500m & a 400m as well as 3-4 800s. For the next few weeks I will include two track sessions, one at 800m pace and one at mile to 5K pace. I will maintain a weekend longish run, either steady and hilly or a long tempo with strides or hill sprints thrown in.

    Last Tuesday I did 12x400m at 5K pace (1:20). Plan for this week was 10x400m at 3K pace (1:15-1:17)with similar recovery. My knee has been niggling a bit since the weekend but I felt I was moving well for this session. Despite a bit of wind (the weather not me), the first 3 were around 1:16, I then picked it up a little to around 1:14 and finished with 1:11 and 1:06 - giving me an average of 1:13. I was well happy to hit a big one at the end at current 800m pace. Recoveries were a bit longer at average 1:43 but that was due to distractions as well as giving my running mate a few seconds start on each lap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I did a session of 200's three weeks ago but I set it up so I had the benefit of the wind behind me most of the time. This time I had no help and knew it would be tough.

    Plan was 3x4x200m (32s)[100m jog]

    I hit the first one too fast as always in 29.0 but then found the correct pace to clock the following:

    29.0, 32.2, 31.6. 31.5
    30.2, 31.2, 31.1, 31.5
    29.6, 31.8, 32.2, 31.9

    The recoveries were average 53s, 49s, 56s in each set and 8 mins between sets.
    I wore my new Nike spikes for the last set, I am still getting used to them but they are fast.
    I really felt tired after this, still feel it now, I will take plenty of recovery time before next one.
    I am debating whether to do another session like this next week or to move on to some fast 300's.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 920 ✭✭✭RandyMann


    dna_leri wrote: »
    I did a session of 200's three weeks ago but I set it up so I had the benefit of the wind behind me most of the time. This time I had no help and knew it would be tough.

    Plan was 3x4x200m (32s)[100m jog]

    I hit the first one too fast as always in 29.0 but then found the correct pace to clock the following:

    29.0, 32.2, 31.6. 31.5
    30.2, 31.2, 31.1, 31.5
    29.6, 31.8, 32.2, 31.9

    The recoveries were average 53s, 49s, 56s in each set and 8 mins between sets.
    I wore my new Nike spikes for the last set, I am still getting used to them but they are fast.
    I really felt tired after this, still feel it now, I will take plenty of recovery time before next one.
    I am debating whether to do another session like this next week or to move on to some fast 300's.

    The above is impressive with those short recoveries. I would guess doing fast 300s would be beneficial next week instead of repeating above.
    I have a session like that coming up next week for conditioning but I will be only doing 6X200m with 200m jog recovery.
    I was thinking of aiming for 30sec in each but will see how it goes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    RandyMann wrote: »
    The above is impressive with those short recoveries. I would guess doing fast 300s would be beneficial next week instead of repeating above.
    I have a session like that coming up next week for conditioning but I will be only doing 6X200m with 200m jog recovery.
    I was thinking of aiming for 30sec in each but will see how it goes.

    You are probably right about the 300s - I need to keep mixing it up.

    6x30s for 200m should be well within your range - that's only about 80-85% effort. I found this sprint training pace calculator and table useful in the past for working out paces and volume:
    http://www.brianmac.co.uk/sprints/tp400.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Another hilly trail run yesterday 3x5K laps, second one at tempo effort.

    First one was steady at 23 mins, pushed it a bit for the 2nd in 20 mins but did not trash the downhills, 3rd one was back to 23 mins.

    This week will be similar to the last, 400's on Tuesday and faster stuff on Thursday, probably 300's.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Tuesday's track session was a repeat of last week's 10x400m, but I planned to go a bit faster than last week's 1:13.3 average. With the warmer weather I could feel an extra spring in the tartan track. Ended up at 1:12.6 average, which is about my current mile pace. Recoveries were about 1:47 - I would prefer them to be a bit shorter

    Times were:
    1:15, 1:17, 1:13, 1:12, 1:12, 1:13, 1:13, 1:13, 1:11, 1:06 - some good consistent times in the middle and I was never really straining, except maybe the last one ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Plan for Thursday's session was 5-6 x300m at 800m pace (47-49s) with 3-4 mins recovery. The sun was out for the first time this summer and it was hot, about 25 deg at the track. I did not want to sacrifice speed but I was happy to make 5 reps and to extend the recoveries if necessary.

    I stopped the clock on the first one in 44.2s - much better than I expected. It did not feel too fast so stayed with it for the second in 45.0s. The third one was 45.6s. Although I was making sure to get a good recovery and take on water between each rep, I knew I could not last for 5 at that pace. For the 4th one, I dialled it back to 47.1s. I did not go all out for the final one but I had to work hard up the home straight for the slowest of the evening in 47.5s. I could feel my right calf tightening as I started that one so there was no way I was going to try a sixth.

    That gave me an average of 45.9s off recovery of 3:50, which would be 2:02 800m pace - not likely.
    Just found out I have a conflict for my target 5K race in 3 weeks time so will need to find another one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,108 ✭✭✭BeepBeep67


    dna_leri wrote: »
    Tuesday's track session was a repeat of last week's 10x400m, but I planned to go a bit faster than last week's 1:13.3 average. With the warmer weather I could feel an extra spring in the tartan track. Ended up at 1:12.6 average, which is about my current mile pace. Recoveries were about 1:47 - I would prefer them to be a bit shorter

    Times were:
    1:15, 1:17, 1:13, 1:12, 1:12, 1:13, 1:13, 1:13, 1:11, 1:06 - some good consistent times in the middle and I was never really straining, except maybe the last one ;)

    Out of interest - standing or rolling recoveries - guessing 200m jog?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    BeepBeep67 wrote: »
    Out of interest - standing or rolling recoveries - guessing 200m jog?

    You're right they were rolling recoveries of 200m jog.

    The group I was with were a few secs behind me, so that added some time and there was a bit of regrouping before getting restarted each rep. If I was on my own I would have kept the recoveries a bit closer to the rep time which means you are jogging at half the speed of the fast stuff. It's one of the disadvantages of training in a group that they are not exactly at the same pace but then I would not have had someone to chase after so you can't have it both ways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Advice for running in the heat:

    1. Make sure you are well hydrated (especially the day after a wedding when you have had a few scoops).
    2. Don't run in the midday sun.
    3. Run somewhere there is natural shade.

    On Sunday I managed to break all three rules, in what turned from a planned long run into an easy run with strides as I tried to combine a family trip to Rosses Point beach with my running schedule. I survived. At least I could run topless without any shame and I remembered the rule about always wearing sunscreen. The off-shore breeze kept me reasonably cool while I was moving but I could really feel the heat when I finished.

    I think I managed about 10K over and back on the beach plus ~6 quick strides, although the effort was more like a hard session. The bonus was an 'icebath' in the cool North Atlantic afterwards - gulf-stream my @rse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Last week my 10x400m averaged 1:12.6 with 200m jog recovery in 1:47
    This week I did the same in 1:12.5 with 100m walk recovery in 1:19

    This time I was not at the track so I used an old favourite straight stretch of trail. I have not ran hard here since I hurt my knee a few years ago. The surface is slightly uneven and a bit gravelly, affecting grip. To the eye it looks like no net incline or decline but when running both directions the times tell the real story. I averaged 1:10 one way and 1:15 on the uphill.

    The sequence was 1:11, 1:14, 1:10, 1:14, 1:10, 1:16, 1:10, 1:16, 1:08 1:16 - no heroic last rep this time as I had no one to chase down the back straight and I was fading fast. I did not have a natural 200m recovery like on track so although it was more of a walk I reduced the time a good bit. The first 5 recoveries averaged 1:11 and the last 4 were 1:30.

    Given the underfoot conditions, I was happy enough with the session. I left it feeling like I had run harder than previous weeks, though that was probably more down to shortening the recovery time. Hopefully I'm back on the track the next time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I was back to the track Thursday for another 800m pace session. I knew coming into the training that I was feeling a bit tired and also still had some residue from Tuesday in my legs. Last week I did 300's in under 46s, the plan for this week was 4x400m in 64s. This week was not as warm and there was a breeze down the back straight.

    The first one was 64.4s, ok.
    The second one 66.7s, crap. I had checked my watch on the split and saw 33s but I just did not do enough to pull it back in. It's easy to lose a couple of secs on these. I was tempted to change my session but persevered.
    The third one was 64.3s, back where I wanted to be.
    I dug a bit deeper for the last one in 63.9s

    Although I aimed for 64s on them all, I would have been satisfied with sub 65, so only the second one missed and I was happy that I got back on track after that. I kept the recoveries to plan, all around 4 mins jog.

    Overall 4x400m (1:04.8) [4:02.5] - I will have to come back to this session again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 920 ✭✭✭RandyMann


    dna_leri wrote: »
    The bonus was an 'icebath' in the cool North Atlantic afterwards - gulf-stream my @rse.

    This reminds me 2 years ago in August, we had a family break in Sligo and the weather was terrible. I was having a windup with my 7 year old daughter at the time that we should go for a swim in the sea but she of course thought I was serious and got into her bathing costume that morning before we left the hotel. I brought my shorts but not thinking she would go ahead with it. We got to the beach, enniscrone(quite stormy and cold) and she immediately takes off her outer clothes to run into the sea with my other daughter following suit. I had to do it myself but I must admit, it was invigorating smile.gif

    What are your racing plans for the near future, do you have a Connacht Championship coming up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    RandyMann wrote: »
    This reminds me 2 years ago in August, we had a family break in Sligo and the weather was terrible. I was having a windup with my 7 year old daughter at the time that we should go for a swim in the sea but she of course thought I was serious and got into her bathing costume that morning before we left the hotel. I brought my shorts but not thinking she would go ahead with it. We got to the beach, enniscrone(quite stormy and cold) and she immediately takes off her outer clothes to run into the sea with my other daughter following suit. I had to do it myself but I must admit, it was invigorating smile.gif

    What are your racing plans for the near future, do you have a Connacht Championship coming up?

    LOL.

    Racing plans are a bit uncertain. The Connacht Champs do not have a masters section and the entries for the seniors are very sparse. I'll be there as a spectator only with my 13-yo competing. Unfortunately it clashes with the Streets of Sligo 5K that I had intended doing so my racing plans are up in the air.

    I will do 1 or 2 of the Dublin graded meets but I am hoping there will be some event in the west before then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I have always said Garmins are for marathon runners that need to count their miles and feel most shorter distance runners don't need them. One of the drawbacks of not having a Garmin is I don't get accurate measurement for stuff like long intervals on the road or trail. I have used Sports Tracker on my phone previously but not since I changed phones so I loaded it up again this weekend to check out a few mile/km markers on my route. I had previously estimated the loop around the lake at 3.75km but that was a cut and paste of two other routes. This time on my warm-up I marked out a 1 mile stretch, followed by a 1 km section that I could use for intervals. I got a total distance of 3.64 km this time, but only noticed the difference when I checked it later.

    The plan then was 1 mile at tempo pace (5:38-5:50) a short recovery jog, then 1 km at similar pace (3:30-3:38), followed by a longer recovery and repeat. The first lap went like this:
    5:33 - 1 ml
    1:32 - jog
    4:07 - 1 km
    3:44 - jog
    - a bit quick for the mile and a bit slow for the 1K.

    The next two laps were:
    5:39 (ml), 1:34, 4:08 (km), 3:52
    5:41 (ml), 1:35, 4:07 (km)

    I did not worry too much about the time, just tried to keep the effort constant at about 6 out of 10 RPE. The miles were about right but I reckon the km's must have been long, may be that's where my missing 0.1 km went. Perhaps I will get a Garmin after all.

    On the other hand I also read a good article recently by Matt Fitzgerald on threshold running by feel:
    http://running.competitor.com/2012/05/training/sports-science-update-skip-the-lactate-threshold-test_53063


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I have been doing 400's for my Tuesday session for the past few weeks so I wanted to change it up a bit this week. Plan was 5-6 x800m in 2:35-2:40 with similar recovery. Last times I ran these I did 5x800m (2:34)[3:07]. This time I managed 6x800m (2:40) [2:42] so although the times were a bit slower, I was happy to keep the recoveries quicker.

    Sequence was 2:41.2, 2:40.7, 2:39.8, 2:39.9, 2:39.4, 2:37.2 - nice and consistent until I pushed it a bit on the last one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Dropped my track session yesterday evening due to family birthday and besides it was p1ssing rain too, no weather for track. The rain still had not stopped this morning but I had taken some time off to get my car NCT (fail :( ) so I squeezed in a hill session in the woods.

    The hill I used previously is a bit sheltered until you get to the top and then there is a nice flat bit to stride along. I took it easy on the first circuit and then got into the rhythm. I timed the third one : 25s up the first section, 12s jog along the first flat stretch, 14s up the next steep bit, jog for about a minute, then turn and stride back in 22s (wind assisted), jog down the hill in 1:30, then repeat.

    I kept the focus on good form and completed 6 circuits - with the short recoveries it was still a good session. On the way back down to my car, the path was blocked by a fallen tree that had been blown over in the 30 mins while I was running up and down the hill a few 100m away :eek: This was no sapling either, I knew it was a wild day but this shocked me. I clambered over the fallen tree and decided to finish my cool down on the road, for safety reasons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I don't do much training at different paces in the same session. I used to think those kind of sessions were for runners who had coaches by their side calling out the next repeat and at what pace and were unnecessarily complicated. I have enough difficulty remembering which rep I am on when doing 10x400s. However I thought about it again while watching the women in last nights AGPNY diamond league, especially Defar and Dibaba tracking down Britton and Magiso in the 800m. It's one think to have a finishing kick and another to be able to change pace mid-race and use that speed.
    I also read back over this article from Steve Magness and will incorporate more multi-paced training going forward.
    http://www.scienceofrunning.com/2011/10/training-to-kick.html

    After last week's rain, today was a perfect day for running - sunny but just enough breeze to keep cool. I started with about 4 miles mostly on the road at about 7:20 pace - one of my usual trails was still flooded.

    I then went back on the route I took last week for my tempo intervals, but in reverse direction. The first km rep was 3:33, followed by a 1:37 recovery and then started out on a mile tempo but came to a halt with another flood after about 300m. I turned back and did a 30s sprint and after another short recovery, back over the 1K in 3:18. I had not intended to pick up the pace but after the quick strides it seemed easier. This time I did two 30s strides before heading back on the 1K, in 3:27. I skipped the strides and did the 1K in 3:25 and at the end went straight into a fast stride which was more like a sprint finish but instead of lengthening my stride, I increased my cadence. One more 30s fast stride / sprint later and I was done.

    I finished off with about 3 miles at recovery pace. During my last sprint I felt a tightening in my right calf but as I jogged along it eased out confirming the usefulness of a long cool down. In the end it was not exactly what I planned but I think I adapted well and enjoyed it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    For the fourth time in five weeks I did 10x400m. This time was the slowest (average 1:13.5) with the longest recoveries (average 2:06) - not sure why, can't blame the weather, think I was just feeling tired aka lazy - I think a few early nights in bed are called for.

    I eased into the first one in 1:20, then I was reasonably consistent with the next lot: 1:13.8, 1:13.7, 1:13.4, 1:14.1, 1:13.4, 1:13.7, 1:13.4 and picked it up for the last two in 1:10.8 & 1:09.1. Recoveries were more a 200m walk than a jog.

    Nuff said.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Plan for Thursday was 4-6 x200m with the first 100 at 800m pace and the second 100 a gradual acceleration. I was planning about 4min recovery so I did not know how many I would be able for but managed six without much difficulty. The rain started bucketting down during the first one and there was a decent wind blowing diagonally across the track.

    I tried timing the splits but it was too difficult to watch the mark and concentrate on what I was doing - I was never very good at walking and chewing gum. The 200m times were as follows: 29.9, 30.8, 31.3, 30.2, 30.0, 29.1. Recoveries averaged 4:40.

    The approximate splits were 16/14 so at 30.2s average they were all fairly close to plan though I felt it was not until the fourth one that I really got up off my heels. The accelerations were all gradual so I did not really feel I was kicking for home but if I could close an 800 in 30s, I would be happy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I did my third track session in a week on Saturday - first time in a long while to fit in that many. Plan was 2x3x200m at 400m pace with 2 min recovery and 5 mins between sets. I am not sure what my 400m time would be now but it should be somewhere in the range of 56 to 59s so 28.0-29.5s for 200m. Conditions were good with a slight cross-wind, which I took as much advantage of as I could.

    The first one was 28.6s, followed by another in 28.6s. I concentrated on running relaxed for the third and inadvertently let the time slip to 29.7. After a 5 min recovery, the second set went well in 28.8, 29.0 & 28.7 - though I needed to push a bit in the last one. The recoveries were all to plan with a 200m walk/jog.

    This felt like a quality session and a good indicator of my speed which I plan to come back to again before long. After missing a target 5K at the weekend, I have decided skip doing another one and move on to some track races. I am trying to line up a few in the coming weeks and have a bit of a plan that includes at least two 800s and one 1500 or 400m.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    Work was pretty crap Tuesday and the the right thing would have been to go for a long run to forget about it. As it was I stuck with my plan for 6x800m (2:40)[2:40] which I had also done two weeks ago. I felt a bit tired but hit the numbers anyway with average 2:39.4 (although it was a faster final two that really achieved it) and recovery of 2:37.

    Times were: 2:42, 2:42, 2:41, 2:42, 2:38, 2:31. This is supposed to be a relatively easy session so I can push hard on my pace workout Thursday, but it wasn't. The weather is forecast to be wet on Thursday so I will probably struggle to hit the times anyway, at least now I have a few excuses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I was not expecting much from Thursday's session - weather was expected to be wet, I had struggled a bit on Tuesday and I had a tough one planned - 4x600m in 1:40-1:45 with the only saving grace a full recovery of 8 mins. The weather was not as bad as predicted dry and only a bit of breeze down the home straight, which I took best advantage of in the 3rd and 4th reps.

    I tried to hit 34s for each 200m split. The first rep as often happens was a bit fast finishing in 1:40.6. I tried to ease just a little in the second - 1:43.0. By now I was feeling better than I expected and kept it steady at 1:42.5 for the third. For the fourth, the recovery time felt more than enough and I pushed it a bit to finish with 1:41.2.

    Average was 1:41.8 with walk/jog recoveries spot on 8 mins.
    Overall better than I feared and a pace I could hold comfortably in an 800m race, whether I could kick a sub-30 200m off that is another story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I realised I had done 11 sessions in the past 4 weeks so I eased off a bit on Sunday as I felt heavy legged and tired so instead of tempo intervals I did a Fartlek session which included 1 mile in 5:40 and 2x about 1km in 3:16 & 3:50, followed by a few easy miles and 4x 100m quick strides.

    Tuesday I planned 9x100m increasing speed from 16s to 14s. First one out was 14.1, so I kept them all around that effort. In the end I averaged 14.4s from rolling starts, with the slowest just creeping over 15 and a sneaky 10th one in 13.3s. Recoveries were a 300m jog in 2:30. It was good to have company in a short session for a change.

    Thursday I was down for a 800m at Galway Open T&F Champs. I raced there a few years ago at sprint distances and it was a good low-key event with a few decent runners in each field. The only problem was the journey, just a bit too long for only a few mins running.

    My plan for the 800 was to go out hard and try to hold on, which I have not done before, usually preferring to hold something back for a finishing kick. Conditions were ideal, a warm dry evening with no wind - Galway is my favourite track for that reason - I almost always get good weather. There were only four of us in the masters race - I hoped they would have combined it with the senior race so I could get pulled along to a fast time but there were over 10 seniors entered. I went out quickly from the start and no one came with me, I hit 200m in 29s, although that was quick I felt fine. At the bell it was 62s so I knew a good time was possible if I hung on. With 200m to go, the inevitable happened and I started to slow. With good support as I came off the bend, I maintained form and drove for the line 2:08.2. Not 100% sure about the fraction (I will get the official time later) but 2:08 is better than I expected.

    Although positive splits of 62/66 might seem crazy to longer distance runners, it's not that far off the recommended ideal - some people will say add 4s per lap; others 3%. I think there is still opportunity for improvement if I had a target to push for on the final lap, I might have gone under 2:08 - maybe another day.

    After only a short recovery, about 15 mins, I did the masters 100m and won it in a hand-timed 12.6s (I think). The time was not too important, it was good to get the effort of a hard sprint after the 800m. To round it off I did the first leg of a 4x100m relay about 20 mins later so it felt like I did a good quality session.

    I got a good measure of where I am at for 800m, which I can build on; I learned I can run a race from the front; the speed is still in the legs and the opportunity for improvement is to get to 700m with still something in the tank so keep working on that speed endurance.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 920 ✭✭✭RandyMann


    2:08 is a very nice improvement since January's indoor time, well done there.
    To run those 100s after that will have a good training benefit for sure.


Advertisement