Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Rangers FC lodge papers to go into administration

15657596162150

Comments

  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    To the other regular posters on here, how about we all make a donation to the same charity as well, say even just a tenner each would make a decent sum?

    I was going to suggest that to cover the €50, if Keith didn't pay up.

    Happy to donate a tenner to them, either directly or to one person here who can make the payment on everyone's behalf.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭ColeTrain


    For every €50 Keith spends I'll gladly donate €10


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    Keith, you're doing the right thing by paying it.
    Whatever about the situation, it was an honest bet, for charity.

    Sometimes you've just got to take these things on the chin, like Tony Mowbray.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭ColeTrain


    Eirebear wrote: »
    Keith, you're doing the right thing by paying it.
    Whatever about the situation, it was an honest bet, for charity.

    Sometimes you've just got to take these things on the chin, like Tony Mowbray.

    Celtic would have won the league anyway. Calling the title tainted when Celtic won 20 in a row and came back from being 15 behind is a little daft, even for Keith.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    ColeTrain wrote: »
    Celtic would have won the league anyway. Calling the title tainted when Celtic won 20 in a row and came back from being 15 behind is a little daft, even for Keith.

    That's besides the point tbh.

    Keith is entitled to his opinions wether the title is "tainted" or not, you or i don't have to agree with him but he's entitled nontheless.
    When it comes down to it, the bet is for Charity - neither Keith nor Bobby were ever going to profit from this, therefore it's the right thing to do to bite his tongue and pay the money to the hospice.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Something you win is only tainted if you yourself have done something to cheat to win that competition. Rangers going into admin was nothing to do with us and was completely outside of our control. Rangers fans who think this title is tainted need to ask themselves why they are where they are.

    The only thing tainted are the titles won by overspending, and by not paying Her Majesty's taxes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    PauloMN wrote: »
    Something you win is only tainted if you yourself have done something to cheat to win that competition. Rangers going into admin was nothing to do with us and was completely outside of our control. Rangers fans who think this title is tainted need to ask themselves why they are where they are.

    The only thing tainted are the titles won by overspending, and by not paying Her Majesty's taxes.

    yeah?
    Try taking those memories away from me.
    ;)


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Eirebear wrote: »
    yeah?
    Try taking those memories away from me.
    ;)

    Your new owner might do a job on your "history". Memories might be all you have left soon. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭shankespony


    Hopefully we can say KeithAFC doesn't do walking away!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭shankespony


    Whats going to happen with Rangers now? its not looking good for them at all, the investors are playin the "hokey kokey" one minute they are in the next they are out. It seems like they're all doing "walking away", i can't see anything other than liquidation, there are too many obstacles for an investor, like:

    - how much is the wee and big tax case going to cost
    - What punishments are going to be dished out as follows:
    newco into Division3? or handicapped with 10 points minimum for x number of seasons to come?
    -no european licence so no euro adventures or money for 2/3 years
    -how much will Ticketus need to get to approve an investor?
    -agent Whyte will want a good wedge to release his shares and provide the assets for a newco

    The fans talk about owning the club but 150,000 fans at £1,000 each only covers whats owed £135m+ thats alot for the average fan and not too many sugar daddies coming out of the woodwork.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    Whats going to happen with Rangers now? its not looking good for them at all, the investors are playin the "hokey kokey" one minute they are in the next they are out. It seems like they're all doing "walking away", i can't see anything other than liquidation, there are too many obstacles for an investor, like:

    - how much is the wee and big tax case going to cost
    - What punishments are going to be dished out as follows:
    newco into Division3? or handicapped with 10 points minimum for x number of seasons to come?
    -no european licence so no euro adventures or money for 2/3 years
    -how much will Ticketus need to get to approve an investor?
    -agent Whyte will want a good wedge to release his shares and provide the assets for a newco

    The fans talk about owning the club but 150,000 fans at £1,000 each only covers whats owed £135m+ thats alot for the average fan and not too many sugar daddies coming out of the woodwork.

    Bill Miller & The Blue Knights bids are still on the table.

    According to SSN reports.
    (Filtered through another forum)
    Miller has the highest bid, administrators will make an announcement on Monday but if nothing changes it is expected that Miller's bid will be accepted.

    Problem for me with Miller's bid is that it is down to the SPL's acceptance of his "incubator company" idea.
    I doubt they'll stand for it tbh - too many people within the SPL want us gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭blahfckingblah


    Fair play to keith for finally agreeing to pay the bet and placing aside his personal beliefs (however wrong they may be) ;).


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Eirebear wrote: »
    I doubt they'll stand for it tbh - too many people within the SPL want us gone.

    Paranoid a bit? Who in the SPL want you gone, and why?

    Are you suggesting things would be different if it were any other club in the same situation? If the SPL meet Millers demands it would be a disgrace, and I expect it would make the whole league setup untenable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    PauloMN wrote: »
    Paranoid a bit? Who in the SPL want you gone, and why?

    Are you suggesting things would be different if it were any other club in the same situation? If the SPL meet Millers demands it would be a disgrace, and I expect it would make the whole league setup untenable.

    Why would it make the league setup untenable exactly ??:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    PauloMN wrote: »
    Paranoid a bit? Who in the SPL want you gone, and why?

    Are you suggesting things would be different if it were any other club in the same situation? If the SPL meet Millers demands it would be a disgrace, and I expect it would make the whole league setup untenable.

    Paranoid? Not in the slightest.
    2 SPL Chairmen, Yorkstone and Thompson have been fairly out spoken about their lack of "Need" for Rangers. Despite them fervently chasing debts.

    Where did i suggest it would be different for anyone? Simply stating that i don't believe that Miller's idea will be allowed to work.

    I'm not entirely sure how it would affect the league in such a manner, i'm sure if it wasnt a legitimate business approach then it wouldnt be getting discussed - that said, i don't know enough about it to really comment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Eirebear wrote: »
    Bill Miller & The Blue Knights bids are still on the table.

    According to SSN reports.
    (Filtered through another forum)
    Miller has the highest bid, administrators will make an announcement on Monday but if nothing changes it is expected that Miller's bid will be accepted.

    Problem for me with Miller's bid is that it is down to the SPL's acceptance of his "incubator company" idea.
    I doubt they'll stand for it tbh - too many people within the SPL want us gone.
    That could be possibly true. Although do you think the Establishment could help push it through?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    That could be possibly true. Although do you think the Establishment could help push it through?

    Doubt it - in fact you could say it's the "establishment" that put us in this mess!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    Eirebear wrote: »
    Bill Miller & The Blue Knights bids are still on the table.

    According to SSN reports.
    (Filtered through another forum)
    Miller has the highest bid, administrators will make an announcement on Monday but if nothing changes it is expected that Miller's bid will be accepted.

    Problem for me with Miller's bid is that it is down to the SPL's acceptance of his "incubator company" idea.
    I doubt they'll stand for it tbh - too many people within the SPL want us gone.

    Miller wants to transfer the assets of Rangers into a new company and play on using that company, there are rules and punishments to doing that. Then if you do want miller suggests in his statement and then transfer rangers plc into this other company, I dont see how it can lay claim to rangers history.

    You'd really want to transfer all these back into Rangers plc when the debt is sorted out, again rules and punishments for transferring assets to another company to have a chance at claiming rangers titles but thats just a merger isnt it? Like what ICT did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    How is it embarrassing? Wise up.

    It is a tainted title because it wasn't fair. When the bet was made, it was made on fair ground in the league. There was no points deduction. I know you don't want to piss them off Broxi but sometimes you need to be honest and call it as it is. It is a tainted title and everyone at Celtic park knows it.

    Nothing to do with not wanting to piss them off I think you will find I have done that on more than one occasion

    It was embarrassing because as a Bear if I make a bet and lose I pay my dues more importantly as a human being I pay if I lose and if its for charity even more so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    Dempsey wrote: »
    Miller wants to transfer the assets of Rangers into a new company and play on using that company, there are rules and punishments to doing that. Then if you do want miller suggests in his statement and then transfer rangers plc into this other company, I dont see how it can lay claim to rangers history.

    You'd reallu want to transfer all these back into Rangers plc when the debt is sorted out, again rules and punishments for transferring assets to another company to have a chance at claiming rangers titles but thats just a merger isnt it? Like what ICT did.

    How'd you figure that?
    Both Rangers FC and Rangers PLC will still exist, no one will have filed for liquidation and no one will have went out of business.

    As i said before, i don't know enough about it - but let's face it.
    A) If it wasn't legitimate business practice then it wouldnt be getting discussed
    B) Any suggestion that saves us is going to get you lot up in arms


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    Eirebear wrote: »
    How'd you figure that?
    Both Rangers FC and Rangers PLC will still exist, no one will have filed for liquidation and no one will have went out of business.

    As i said before, i don't know enough about it - but let's face it.
    A) If it wasn't legitimate business practice then it wouldnt be getting discussed
    B) Any suggestion that saves us is going to get you lot up in arms

    A) I never mentioned liquidation, legitimacy or anyone going out of business. I'm talking about SPL rules. There are rules about transferring the assets of one company into another. What Miller wants to do and what he can actually do are two different things.

    B) I dont care if you live or die, just that Rangers serve every punishment that is due to ye and no stone left unturned in uncovering what ye did in the last decade.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Why would it make the league setup untenable exactly ??:confused:

    Because if Miller's demands:
    My offer is contingent upon the regulatory bodies agreeing that the club will begin play in the 2012/13 season in the SPL and that they will do so without any loss of points and with all historic titles intact.

    are met by the SPL, there'd be war among the clubs in the league. He's making an offer Monday latest, so he wants the SPL to agree to all that when investigations are still going on and the big tax case is yet to be decided?

    This guy is worse than Whyte/White.

    Personally I think Murray will take over, with an improved deal for Ticketus. Either way, I'm not bothered what happens to Rangers because either way, Rangers are fecked - whether they continue as is, or are let die and reform as a newco - Rangers will be weak for a long time to come.

    I'm more interested in how this all pans out in terms of the SFA and the SPL, and how they handle it - and how the other clubs in the SPL react.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    PauloMN wrote: »
    Because if Miller's demands:



    are met by the SPL, there'd be war among the clubs in the league..

    Yet...i'm being paranoid? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭shankespony


    The issue is that kilmarnock £10m+, Aberdeen £15m+, Hearts £35m+ , Dundee Utd £6m, Hibs £4m+, Motherwell just a few years out of administration have debt mountains and really the model is unsustainable in the long term. What spl needs is new thinking the euro co-efficient has plummeted and so no longer celtic & rangers in group stages of champion league and the rest of scottish football getting the scraps so to speak. Rangers through financial doping lead the way and the rest of the teams followed suit in spending well beyond their means as seen above. There needs to be a period of consolidation where clubs are forced to reduce their debt.

    Now the model is broken I can see the day rapidly approaching where summer football will be the norm in Scotland even on an experimental basis for say 3 years.

    From both a revenue perspective and also to raise the coefficient where Scottish teams are at the top of their game and catching well known opponents from better leagues cold as they would not have started their leagues.

    Summer football makes economic sense its worked very well here,
    bigger crowds, and european football where shamrock rovers qualified for europa league,(they made £1m+ in profit) where only celtic got there on appeal, imagine if 3 or 4teams could make the europa league group stages! More crowds, more teams qualifying for europa and maybe champions league group stages, (i still cringe when i think of the likes of Gretna, Raith Rovers getting nowhere and the coefficient tumbling to where it is today in my opinion an all time low). With summer football you are giving scottish teams the best chance to qualify instead of like Rangers being knocked out of both competitions and the financial ramifications of this.

    Therefore more money overall and also scottish football would have a
    somewhat monopoly in the uk during the summer with the premiership not on, so from a media, sky, gambling, publicity, crowd and maybe sponsorship perspective it would be very popular. Who wants to watch football in December, rain snow freezing cold, Christmas shopping etc, etc common sense would at least try it and if it doesn't work over 3 seasons then change it. If Celtic, Rangers, Hearts, Dundee utd, Motherwell were 4/5 months into the season then imagine the impact on crowds and qualification money that would be made. With strict budgets imposed on turnover and debt repayments. What other way is there except for every club to liquidate and become a "newco" what will that do to advertising?


    Also if the league finishes in Nov there may be an option for some of the players to transfer to the Premiership, etc for short term contracts with a view to permanent sales, Therefore even more revenue for players and their scottish clubs in what would be the close season (like Landon Donovan, Robbie Keane etc)

    Imagine an celtic v rangers game on a sat/sun in the summer being the main sporting event the viewing figures for sky would be massive as every fan in the UK/Ire would be getting their football kick so to speak.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Eirebear wrote: »
    Yet...i'm being paranoid? :confused:

    :confused:

    Do you think the SPL should give Miller the guarantees he is looking for?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭TheBuilder


    The issue is that kilmarnock £10m+, Aberdeen £15m+, Hearts £35m+ , Dundee Utd £6m, Hibs £4m+, Motherwell just a few years out of administration have debt mountains and really the model is unsustainable in the long term. What spl needs is new thinking the euro co-efficient has plummeted and so no longer celtic & rangers in group stages of champion league and the rest of scottish football getting the scraps so to speak. Rangers through financial doping lead the way and the rest of the teams followed suit in spending well beyond their means as seen above. There needs to be a period of consolidation where clubs are forced to reduce their debt.

    Now the model is broken I can see the day rapidly approaching where summer football will be the norm in Scotland even on an experimental basis for say 3 years.

    So rangers made the other teams go into debt?

    I hate the thought of summer football tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    Celtic are strongly opposed to summer football, not sure about other clubs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭shankespony


    if you read it!!! it clearly says rangers led the way and others followed suit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,229 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Right I will pay it. I need to get it sorted out next week with my card as it isn't debit. I got the website favoured. So I will do it.

    I want proof you paid it.

    PauloMN wrote: »
    :D

    Well the only reasonable suggestion would be that he pays online, and forwards the receipt by PM to Bobby. He made the bet with Bobby, I think he should show Bobby the receipt. Or give Bobby €50 cash and let him make the donation.

    100% agree. However, I don't expect him to hand € over to me or forward me on anything with name etc on it. Therefore it would be great if BBE (or one of his sons) was an intermediate that Keith could forward proof of payment to? If they say it's been paid then I'm happy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,229 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Eirebear wrote: »
    How'd you figure that?
    Both Rangers FC and Rangers PLC will still exist, no one will have filed for liquidation and no one will have went out of business.

    As i said before, i don't know enough about it - but let's face it.
    A) If it wasn't legitimate business practice then it wouldnt be getting discussed
    B) Any suggestion that saves us is going to get you lot up in arms

    There's not a hope that Miller will be successful in either the CVA or getting the SPL to agree to his proposal.

    The SPL won't agree because if you put lipstick on a pig it's still a pig. What's stopping Hearts running up bills of £50m, refusing to pay them and then transferring the playing side of Hearts to a newco whilst the bad debt side of the company negotiate with te creditors until a conclusion is reached. This is financial suicide for Scottish soccer. Not a hope this will succeed.

    If you lose tax case then Miller is basically offering 10p in the pound by way of CVA. Given tat D&P value Murray Park and Ibrox at £109m then liquidation will get creditors approx 75p in the pound.

    As I said earlier, if you lose Tax Case then unless someone steps in with about £50m then I think liquidation is unavoidable.


Advertisement