Liverpool v Manchester United, Anfield, 15th October 12:45 - (MOD NOTE - Post #1)

nullzero · 15-10-2011 08:03PM

Mr Alan wrote: »

It contains the FA's statement.

Which actually says that they think Evra & the Utd staff were lying as their statements all contradicted eachother.

I was having a laugh with you.
Fvck me you're a touchy cvnt.
Tell me will you be able to sleep tonight with this racing around your brain..."fvcking United bastards getting away with murder as usual"

jaykay74 · 15-10-2011 08:03PM

Pretty sure he is inviting him for dinner. As with the Marcelo case no evidence is good enough really.

Dinner ?

Paully D · 15-10-2011 08:03PM

At the end of the day Suarez has been absolutely nothing short of a drain on the Premier League since he's arrived. He's taken cheating and diving to a whole new level in England and had a history of it before he arrived. If this allegation of racism proves to be true then he should be banned for a very, very long time as that has no place in the game.

He can do no wrong according to Liverpool fans and I expect that even if this allegation is proved to be correct that somehow Evra will still have made it up.

I'm public enemy number one on here with Liverpool fans now as I haven't hailed ''King'' Kenny or refused to tell them how great they are so no doubt I'll get nothing but stick for my opinion :rolleyes:

The fact is Suarez is a cheat. He always has been and always will be. If he got up to what he was doing on the field against Liverpool then there would be protests held because of what Liverpool were being subjected to. The hypocrisy is frightening. But I guess the majority of people must be wrong and the Liverpool fans right as always :rolleyes:

I'm out......

NabyLadistheman · 15-10-2011 08:06PM

Paully D wrote: »

I'm out......

Thank god for that

Mr Alan · 15-10-2011 08:06PM

nullzero wrote: »

I was having a laugh with you.
Fvck me you're a touchy cvnt.
Tell me will you be able to sleep tonight with this racing around your brain..."fvcking United bastards getting away with murder as usual"

I actually have a beef with ANYONE who makes such serious allegations against someone because they stick & always do.

For example, people are saying innocent unitl proven guity....yet the Chelsea groundsman was found innocent yet here we are, people saying, "ahhh well you never know, it might have happpened!"

It's total bull****.

Mars Bar · 15-10-2011 08:07PM

Mr Alan wrote: »

I actually have a beef with ANYONE who makes such serious allegations against someone because they stick & always do.

For example, people are saying innocent unitl proven guity....yet the Chelsea groundsman was found innocent yet here we are, people saying, "ahhh well you never know, it might have happpened!"

It's total bull****.

Did the FA adjudge the groundsman to be innocent?

I thought it was more of an inconclusive on both sides on what was said?

nullzero · 15-10-2011 08:08PM

Mr Alan wrote: »

I actually have a beef with ANYONE who makes such serious allegations against someone because they stick & always do.

For example, people are saying innocent unitl proven guity....yet the Chelsea groundsman was found innocent yet here we are, people saying, "ahhh well you never know, it might have happpened!"

It's total bull****.

Sorry Alan, that makes no sense at all.
You're assuming that I'm defending Evra, I'm not.
You just assumed I was because I'm a United fan.
It is possible to be a fan of a team and not let it turn you into a [deleted]

3hn2givr7mx1sc · 15-10-2011 08:08PM

Suarez distracting DDG from an offside position at the free-kick?

Divorce Referendum · 15-10-2011 08:09PM

Mr Alan wrote: »

I actually have a beef with ANYONE who makes such serious allegations against someone because they stick & always do.

For example, people are saying innocent unitl proven guity....yet the Chelsea groundsman was found innocent yet here we are, people saying, "ahhh well you never know, it might have happpened!"

It's total bull****.

The groundsman said Evra barged him to the ground with a pitchfork which was proven to be bull****e so he is hardly an angel.

stesaurus · 15-10-2011 08:10PM

baz2009 wrote: »

Suarez distracting DDG from an offside position at the free-kick?

Anderson has been doing the exact same thing recently.

Nalz · 15-10-2011 08:10PM

Funny you should say that Baz as Ando got pulled up on this recently if memory serves me right?

He's also got away with it (twice from sucessful freekicks)

Mars Bar · 15-10-2011 08:10PM

baz2009 wrote: »

Suarez distracting DDG from an offside position at the free-kick?

Nah, I think that's clutching at straws to be honest Baz.

Anderson does this too so we can't really say anything about it.

jaykay74 · 15-10-2011 08:10PM

baz2009 wrote: »

Suarez distracting DDG from an offside position at the free-kick?

Anderson does it all the time for Utd. Not active surely. Ball goes nowhere near him.

nullzero · 15-10-2011 08:11PM

s.welstead wrote: »

Anderson has been doing the exact same thing recently.

Two wrongs make a right?

Mr Alan · 15-10-2011 08:11PM

mars bar wrote: »

Did the FA adjudge the groundsman to be innocent?

I thought it was more of an inconclusive on both sides on what was said?

This is EXACTLY my point.....there is no need to prove innocence.
Only guilt.
If he is not found guilty then there is an automatic assumption of innocence.

bamboozling · 15-10-2011 08:11PM

baz2009 wrote: »

Suarez distracting DDG from an offside position at the free-kick?

Wasn't interfering with play as per the rules of the game. Not that rules, statutes and regualtions mean much to United fans when it comes to defending their dear old left back from France.

YouTookMyName · 15-10-2011 08:11PM

Paully D wrote: »

I'm out......

Over react much??

3hn2givr7mx1sc · 15-10-2011 08:12PM

jaykay74 wrote: »

Anderson does it all the time for Utd. Not active surely. Ball goes nowhere near him.

mars bar wrote: »

Nah, I think that's clutching at straws to be honest Baz.

Anderson does this too so we can't really say anything about it.

Ah I was only messing.:P
Anderson faces and dances were the first things I thought of when I saw the picture.:pac:

bamboozling · 15-10-2011 08:13PM

Mr Alan wrote: »

This is EXACTLY my point.....there is no need to prove innocence.
Only guilt.
If he is not found guilty then there is an automatic assumption of innocence.

This extremely simple concept has been lost on United fans. It doesn't suit their arguement hence it's ignored. It will be continually ignored and we will be told that we are accusing Evra of lying, as if proven by the fa wasn't enough? :rolleyes:

K-9 · 15-10-2011 08:14PM

Paully D wrote: »

At the end of the day Suarez has been absolutely nothing short of a drain on the Premier League since he's arrived. He's taken cheating and diving to a whole new level in England and had a history of it before he arrived. If this allegation of racism proves to be true then he should be banned for a very, very long time as that has no place in the game.

He can do no wrong according to Liverpool fans and I expect that even if this allegation is proved to be correct that somehow Evra will still have made it up.

I'm public enemy number one on here with Liverpool fans now as I haven't hailed ''King'' Kenny or refused to tell them how great they are so no doubt I'll get nothing but stick for my opinion :rolleyes:

The fact is Suarez is a cheat. He always has been and always will be. If he got up to what he was doing on the field against Liverpool then there would be protests held because of what Liverpool were being subjected to. The hypocrisy is frightening. But I guess the majority of people must be wrong and the Liverpool fans right as always :rolleyes:

I'm out......

You're just the same as the other Liverpool haters tbh, not that special at all, just another to add to the list.

Evra has to produce the evidence and if he thinks the ref heard it, well that's about as good as you'll get. We'll see. Some will still think there's no smoke without fire and blame the Daily Mail.

Mars Bar · 15-10-2011 08:14PM

Mr Alan wrote: »

This is EXACTLY my point.....there is no need to prove innocence.
Only guilt.
If he is not found guilty then there is an automatic assumption of innocence.

Assumptions can be incorrect which means a bad light can be shed on the accuser, in this case, Evra. If the groundsman did racially abuse him but Evra couldn't prove it, then Evra has been harshly done by.

It just...I think it's all a silly argument because nobody really knows what happened.

nullzero · 15-10-2011 08:15PM

bamboozling wrote: »

This extremely simple concept has been lost on United fans. It doesn't suit their arguement hence it's ignored. It will be continually ignored and we will be told that we are accusing Evra of lying, as if proven by the fa wasn't enough? :rolleyes:

Are you serious?
You won't entertain anything that doesn't suit your pro liverpool argument.
I'm a United fan, I'm not defending Evra.
You need to grow the fvck up and fast.

stesaurus · 15-10-2011 08:15PM

nullzero wrote: »

Two wrongs make a right?

Neither are wrong imo, or even the rules for that matter. Neither were considered active.

niallo27 · 15-10-2011 08:16PM

nullzero wrote: »

Allegations made against employees of a club with a history of extreme right wing/racist leanings you mean?
Where do we draw the line exactly?

Who have a team full of black fellas.

BERBA · 15-10-2011 08:17PM

nullzero wrote: »

Are you serious?
You won't entertain anything that doesn't suit your pro liverpool argument.
I'm a United fan, I'm not defending Evra.
You need to grow the fvck up and fast.

Bam is one of these fella's that thought pool would win the league this season , aint that right Bam Man ?;)

look at the bet he has with Johner !!!!

nullzero · 15-10-2011 08:18PM

niallo27 wrote: »

Who have a team full of black fellas.

I know, the C18 heads in the Chelsea crowd must be so conflicted these last few years... "Footballing success or racial purity?"

K-9 · 15-10-2011 08:20PM

Divorce Referendum wrote: »

The groundsman said Evra barged him to the ground with a pitchfork which was proven to be bull****e so he is hardly an angel.

I'm reading it as the groundsman had the fork! It's the Mail though and terribly worded.

Lukker- · 15-10-2011 08:27PM

nullzero wrote: »

I know, the C18 heads in the Chelsea crowd must be so conflicted these last few years... "Footballing success or racial purity?"

give over

daithijjj · 15-10-2011 08:30PM

Paully D wrote: »

At the end of the day Suarez has been absolutely nothing short of a drain on the Premier League since he's arrived. He's taken cheating and diving to a whole new level in England and had a history of it before he arrived. If this allegation of racism proves to be true then he should be banned for a very, very long time as that has no place in the game.

He can do no wrong according to Liverpool fans and I expect that even if this allegation is proved to be correct that somehow Evra will still have made it up.

I'm public enemy number one on here with Liverpool fans now as I haven't hailed ''King'' Kenny or refused to tell them how great they are so no doubt I'll get nothing but stick for my opinion :rolleyes:

The fact is Suarez is a cheat. He always has been and always will be. If he got up to what he was doing on the field against Liverpool then there would be protests held because of what Liverpool were being subjected to. The hypocrisy is frightening. But I guess the majority of people must be wrong and the Liverpool fans right as always :rolleyes:

I'm out......

Stay out would be my advice ..................because you have spoken enough bollocks in the last 7 days.

Fuhrer · 15-10-2011 08:30PM

bamboozling wrote: »

This extremely simple concept has been lost on United fans. It doesn't suit their arguement hence it's ignored. It will be continually ignored and we will be told that we are accusing Evra of lying, as if proven by the fa wasn't enough? :rolleyes:

You had no problem at all marching into the DDG donut saga talking about how much he disgusted you and how you hate thieves until it was pointed out that you are in fact, a rotten thief and subsequently skulked away.

Liverpool v Manchester United, Anfield, 15th October 12:45 - (MOD NOTE - Post #1)

Comments