Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

* Higher level Maths = The Aftermath *

2456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 700 ✭✭✭nommm


    ∈of C....(complex)........................D
    Way better than the other one. I wouldn't call it 'easy' tho!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 FreshTillDeath


    Paper 2 is my worse of the two papers but i did put a good bit of work into it and generally i'm very happy with it ( Besides Q3 ). Its after making me more optimistic that i didn't fail the whole thing anyway :) All questions were accessible and didn't make me cringe!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭LilMissCiara


    ∈ of N...(positive).........................B
    Easiest paper 2 i've ever seen tbh

    I concur..! :D

    I think I have done a near perfect paper.

    I am almost certain that Paper 1 and Paper 2 will give me an A2, or at least a B1! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭polka dot


    < 0........(negative).......................C
    Happy out with questions 6 and 7! Loved them. Glad I wasn't relying on question 4, I have never seen that circle yoke before in my life. (Though I vaguely remember it being called a concentric circle...? Maybe?) Didn't touch it.

    Question 5 was okay, got the proof out. Couldn't get the next part out. Got the c part all out.

    Question 1. Good god. Screwed it up so badly that I'd be surprised if I got more than 15 marks (got part a out...)

    Vectors was lovely, except for part a. Have a feeling that was some formula or triangle I was meant to know and didn't. My own fault.


    Group theory. WHAT the heck was that?! D: Goddamn tetrahedron made no sense to me. The A part was like... heaven. But the b part 1 and 2 just no. Also made up part 5. Can't wait to see the solutions for that anyway :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 madmax92


    Ive done like 1 a+b, 2a+b, 3 a+ b1, 4 a(att) + b, 5 a+b+c (att) + 8 a+b and I passed away 1hour before the end! FAIL


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭LilMissCiara


    ∈ of N...(positive).........................B
    polka dot wrote: »
    Vectors was lovely, except for part a. Have a feeling that was some formula or triangle I was meant to know and didn't. My own fault.

    Nope, multiply it out and let the i parts equal each other and the same for the js. You'll have a simultaneous equation then! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 289 ✭✭ChloeElla


    < 0........(negative).......................C
    Wow.. I thought it was a nice paper, pretty straightforward, but most girls in my class were complaining majorly about it!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 madmax92


    ChloeElla wrote: »
    Wow.. I thought it was a nice paper, pretty straightforward, but most girls in my class were complaining majorly about it!
    As I could never understand vectors, here I done them in 10mins so it was pretty easy. They ballanced 2 papers, so I hope just to pass it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 814 ✭✭✭NotExactly


    ChloeElla wrote: »
    Wow.. I thought it was a nice paper, pretty straightforward, but most girls in my class were complaining majorly about it!

    Ara sure, you'll always have that :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 64 ✭✭kahf1_01


    < 0........(negative).......................C
    well it was a relieft when I opened the paper and read it. At least it was "normal"

    It wasn't too difficult. It was more familiar and common. I did Q 1,2,3,4,5,8

    Q1. Part was A was great. B perfect. Part C I couldn't remember, attempt at most.
    Q2. Part A was fine, as was B (I hope) C i was easy. though C ii wasn't
    Q3. A was fine, I hope it was + instead of - the B part was a nightmare! bar i
    Q4. A fine. B I think I got it. C another nightmare!
    Q5. Well, I was getting tried at this stage. A was fine. B was impossible. and C was a real project maths question. I couldn't get it in surd form. kinda weird.
    Q8. Part A was lovely. B little harder. and C was good.

    Overall, paper 1 and 2 combined. I'd LOVE a B, although C looks likely. phew least it's all over, btw I get really tried at the end, my concentration drops off.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭electrictrad


    ∈ of N...(positive).........................B
    To prove it I did the thing with the proof slopes of a line but switched it so it was opposite.. :L

    Couldn't get 7Cii out.. I used 3 pages and all..! :P

    7 cii in 5 lines!. . .Standard Deviation = 1, as the SD from part i cancels out with the upper line

    . . .Loved the probability, especially the Pascals Triangle problem. . .

    . . .Anyone else get a decimal BD on 5 c ii , and 300root3 for 5c part 1?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 355 ✭✭River Song


    I predicted right again :D I said last night the tan^-1 pi approximation would be great to come up :)

    Oh my, what a LOVELY paper. I might be on track to get my B again :D Eeeep


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭electrictrad


    ∈ of N...(positive).........................B
    Catacomb wrote: »
    I turned Tan(A+B) into Tan(A-(-B)) used the "Tan(A-B)" formula for it and then turned all the resulting Tan(-B)'s into -Tan(B)?

    :rolleyes: I wonder if that will get marks, it just seemed to easy for my liking?

    Unfortunately, probably just the attempt. . .but I could be wrong. . .

    you've to let tan(a+b)=sin(a+b)/cos(a+b), expand, and divide up and below by cosacosb. . .at least thats the book proof. . .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭LilMissCiara


    ∈ of N...(positive).........................B
    7 cii in 5 lines!. . .Standard Deviation = 1, as the SD from part i cancels out with the upper line

    . . .Loved the probability, especially the Pascals Triangle problem. . .


    . . .Anyone else get a decimal BD on 5 c ii , and 300root3 for 5c part 1?

    Haha.. It took all of 2 seconds..! :P

    And yes I got a decimal... 992.32m?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19 nightdream


    That's only the part a of the question, that's meant to be the easy bit!!!
    From what I remember it went on to a part h/j.
    Project maths is an absolute joke!!! Wish I could've done the normal course:mad:

    True, the hard part is the last few questions!!!! These one here are meant to be easy:/
    Paper 2 was alright today, although the roof top question took me a long time. And still couldn't get it out:/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭electrictrad


    ∈ of N...(positive).........................B
    Haha.. It took all of 2 seconds..! :P

    And yes I got a decimal... 992.32m?

    Youre probably right

    I think I was about 1536.05, ar something in that range. . .probably not right, but anyway. . .

    Loved Q4 with the 2 circles. . .pix^2 for part i anyone?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Pretty good Paper compared to Paper 1.

    Q1: I got some extremely strange answers for nearly every section of this question but nothing I couldn't get out.
    Q2: Only had enough time to get to 2bii (Not counting it anyway)
    Q3: Part a was quite alright. Part B was a bit strange, I got some very strange answers near the end.
    Q4: Loved this question. L'Hopital's rule in part A, trig equation and a lovely question concentric circles.
    Q5: My favourite question on the paper. The simple trig equation was fine. The tan(A+B) identity proof was fine and getting part bii out was surprisingly pleasant. The 3D trig question went perfectly fine as well.
    Q6: Lovely question from start to finish.
    Q7: Lovely question apart from Cii which I managed to answer but i'm not quite sure if I went about it the right way.
    Q8: Int by parts was fine. The max/man question was also quite nice except I may have made a blunder somewhere throughout. Part C was quite nice too.


    All in all, far better than Paper I anyway. I just hope the Marking scheme isn't too harsh on this paper...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 181 ✭✭BeanbagBallbag


    for anyone who wants a solution to the tan question..

    5 B i)

    Tan (A + B) = tanA + tanB
    ....................1- tanAtanB

    tan (A + B) = sin(A + B)
    ..................cos(A + B)

    =sinAcosB +cosAsinB
    ...cosAcosB + sinAsinB

    divide above and below by cosB

    = sinAcosB/cosB + cosAsinB/cosB
    ....... cosAcosB/cosB + sinAsinB/cosB

    =sinA + cosAtanB
    ...cosA + sinAtanB

    divide above and below by cosA

    = sinA/cosA +cosAtanB/cosA
    ...cosA/cosA + sinAtanB/cosA

    = tanA + tanB
    ...1 +tanAtanB


    ii) A + B= 90'

    tan2A = -1
    tan2B

    tan2A
    tan2(90-A)

    = tan2A
    ...tan(180-2A)

    =tan2A
    (tan180-tan2A)/1 +tan180tan2A .......................tan180 = 0



    = tan2A
    ....-tan2A

    = -1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,962 ✭✭✭jumpguy


    In the question on the Line, (b) (iv) (the last part), wasn't the angle AOB = 90 degrees and the angle A'OB' = 90 degrees?

    Hence both angles were equal?

    A very nice paper. So sickened I got the (c) (iii) of Q8 wrong. I bet that'll be the difference between a grade, and it was so simple! I realised that it was only a sub-in question as I was sealing the paper. :mad:

    Probability and stats Q7 (b) was strange, but quite manageable (required thought though - was a bit deceptive).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭polka dot


    < 0........(negative).......................C
    Nope, multiply it out and let the i parts equal each other and the same for the js. You'll have a simultaneous equation then! :)

    Ohhhhhhhhhhhh.

    Well I was on the right track (...baby I was born this way :rolleyes:) Yeah. I multiplied it out, put i = i and j=j ...

    And that's where the similarities end I'm afraid. Half marks maybe! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Now that that's over I hope to never ever have to talk about Maths again. I'm unfollowing this thread :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭what.to.do


    < 0........(negative).......................C
    Youre probably right

    I think I was about 1536.05, ar something in that range. . .probably not right, but anyway. . .

    Loved Q4 with the 2 circles. . .pix^2 for part i anyone?

    Those numbers look familiar... I'll assume that I got them too. :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 355 ✭✭River Song


    Haha.. It took all of 2 seconds..! :P

    And yes I got a decimal... 992.32m?

    I did too, but I got 1601.something metres.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭Daniel S


    ∉ of Q....(craaaaazy)....................Fail
    How many marks will I get for doing this?

    5(b)(i)

    Tan(A+B) =tanA + tanB
    ...................1- tanAtanB

    tan(A+B) =sin(A+B)
    ................cos(A+B)

    =sinAcosB +cosAsinB
    ....cosAcosB + sinAsinB

    .........
    .........

    = tanA + tanB
    ...1 +tanAtanB


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,962 ✭✭✭jumpguy


    Why is there so much difficulty with the Tan(A+B)? :confused: I had that down as a normal proof.

    I also got a decimal for Q5 (c) (ii), it was something in the late 900's, can't remember exactly what.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭polka dot


    < 0........(negative).......................C
    jumpguy wrote: »
    Why is there so much difficulty with the Tan(A+B)? :confused: I had that down as a normal proof.

    I also got a decimal for Q5 (c) (ii), it was something in the late 900's, can't remember exactly what.

    myself and three of the girls got 9999.86 ... :pac: I'm hoping we all didn't make the same mistake


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭Shanee.


    ∈of C....(complex)........................D
    Easier than Paper II but still reckon i made a balls of it.. So sickened


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13 Anniefearon


    hahaha reading some ppls comments on this i feel genuinely depressed im so **** at maths just hope i passed the bloody thing. Q3 was HORRIBLE altho the a part was fine, that b was disgusting bar b(i). And as far as trig goes i never want to see a triangle ever again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭Daniel S


    ∉ of Q....(craaaaazy)....................Fail
    Shanee. wrote: »
    Easier than Paper II but still reckon i made a balls of it.. So sickened
    Think you passed?



    I think I just passed overall, and on Q6Ci-iv, I had it all right, then decided "You know what, It'd be much better if I f**k with it and make it all wrong!".


    WHY DIDN'T I JUST LEAVE IT!!!!!!

    EDIT: You mean Paper one was harder than paper two yea?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 289 ✭✭ChloeElla


    < 0........(negative).......................C
    polka dot wrote: »
    myself and three of the girls got 9999.86 ... :pac: I'm hoping we all didn't make the same mistake

    I got 1000m.. I think I'm the only one without decimals! :P


Advertisement