Carbon ageing

Russman · 10-06-2011 07:17AM #1

Hi,

Been looking around for a new bike for the last few weeks after a crash, and probably going to go for carbon.
I've come across a high end (I think ?) carbon bike the same as this in a LBS

http://2009.feltracing.com/08/product.asp?catid=1507&pid=8672

but kitted out with last year's 105 as opposed to the Dura Ace shown. The bike is new and the price is €1,500 (before haggling).

My question is, should I be put off by the fact that its a 2 or 3 year old model ? Has carbon technology moved on that much in the last 2 years and would a 2011 frame be that much better ? Or is it a steal and I should jump on it straight away ?

Thanks

manwithaplan · 10-06-2011 09:09AM

I wouldn't be worried about it being an older model if you can get a good deal. The performance differences will be insignificant (in fact, maybe only the paint job has changed). The one issue is the re-sale value - I would push that angle when you are haggling.

By the way, you missed a golden opportunity to title your thread "Carbon Dating".

I'll get me coat.

Russman · 10-06-2011 11:53AM

Thanks for that, I'll probably go for it with a bit of haggling.

Re the thread title - good call !! Never thought of it at the time

Lumen · 10-06-2011 12:45PM

Felt frames have changed a lot recently, according to this...

http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/just-in-felt-f2

el tel · 10-06-2011 12:57PM

In some instances (e.g Scott) I've seen newer year equivalent models 'downgraded' in spec and materials over older ones (yet prices increase).

I do enjoy reading reviews (usually rehashed press releases) of new models in which all the improvements over previous models are reported thereby essentially making the last model sound totally $hit and deficient. Then next year, the latest and greatest will in turn be portrayed has having shortcomings now improved upon.

Still, I think we all fall for this b0ll0cks!

Carbon ageing

Comments