Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Linux for old Hardware

  • 27-05-2011 09:43PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69 ✭✭


    I have an old beast of a Compaq Deskpro with a Pentium III -800MHz here, which I would like to turn into a linux box (for stuff like radius, airsnort etc).

    It currently has Win2K Server on in, which runs fine with 386Meg RAM and a 40Gig HD.

    I downloaded Debian Netinstall, i386 build, to install a minimum Linux build, but it doesn't let me past any install options without showing a screen glitch and stalling completely, so this doesn't seem to work or is incompatible.

    What other distro/build should I consider throwing at this?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭henbane


    Arch should install & run on that hardware.
    krautmick wrote: »
    I have an old beast of a Compaq Deskpro with a Pentium III -800MHz here, which I would like to turn into a linux box (for stuff like radius, airsnort etc).

    It currently has Win2K Server on in, which runs fine with 386Meg RAM and a 40Gig HD.

    I downloaded Debian Netinstall, i386 build, to install a minimum Linux build, but it doesn't let me past any install options without showing a screen glitch and stalling completely, so this doesn't seem to work or is incompatible.

    What other distro/build should I consider throwing at this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,739 ✭✭✭Stuxnet


    if your into that social engineering, have a look at latest backtrack linux, lts built on LTS ubuntu 10.04
    should work fine on old hardware with gnome env, you'll hardly be using it as a workstation !! :D has all the tools you could dream of pre-installed

    http://www.backtrack-linux.org/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,650 ✭✭✭10-10-20


    I've Ubuntu 9.10 server running on a Dell Dimension D300 (300 MHz Dechutes) with 384MB of memory.
    I've also got 9.10 running on a small HP thin client with a 700MHz Transmeta with 128MB.
    So, no issues installing Ubuntu on all of this old stuff here.

    Try run the installer with the "cli lowmem=1" option. You can also change the VGA settings for the installer by pressing the F1 key to see the various options.
    After that, try installing another VGA/AGP card as these can be the sticking points if the install hangs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69 ✭✭krautmick


    I use BT5 on my laptop for analysis work etc, but I find it acts very diffently when installed on the HDD. Additionally, the package builds and kernel are rather customised and I feel I may need to recompile the kernel to address some HW issues etc, which I don't fancy doing with BT kernel build.

    I got Archlinux running fine on it. I'll try Ubuntu too, although I remain skeptical that this isn't a bit of overkill for this old system

    Sidenote:
    Its amazing, that the 2 old Compaq Deskpros I have here are still running fine, while 2 old Dell Optiplexes, with much newer and better hardware are after showing up with leaking capacitors and are only fit for the scrapheap now.
    I guess that's the price of cheap PCs now, components are clearly not designed to last long anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69 ✭✭krautmick


    Classic case of RTFM. Using vga-mode=771 and reducing it to a lower VGA level did the trick. Debian seems to be running through just fine now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 Walnutcracker


    Puppy Linux is often recommended for old hardware. It is very good but i think Slitaz is better. It's super lightweight and very capable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31 rismak7


    I have lubuntu on my 2005 era Dell Dimension 5000. The hardware is slightly better on that, but I imagine lubuntu would have little issues with your hardware since it is quite light on resources.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,948 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    New ISOs released yesterday ... LXDE versions so they are light on resources ..... this is the link to the full release ...

    http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/pclinuxos/live-cd/pclinuxos-lxde-2011.06.iso

    and a 'mini' version, which has very few apps in the ISO, leaving it to the user to install what they want .....

    http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/pclinuxos/live-cd/pclinuxos-lxde-mini-2011.06.iso


Advertisement