Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Default is inevitable. Discuss.

135678

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    dan_d wrote: »
    What??

    Well, if that's what Angela Merkel did when she heard we were guaranteeing the banks, I think her fears have proved to be groundless. If anything, it's the other way around - deposits are/were leaving Irish banks.
    At the time there was a rush of deposits into Irish banks. I don't want to sound overdramatic, but our guarantee could have pushed several Eurozone countries over the financial brink. The British in particular were spitting blood down the phone at the Irish government.

    I think most Irish people don't understand just how much hatred the Irish stirred up with the guarantee, while Europe was working towards a common solution we decided to go on a solo run that was supposed to solve our problem but put everyone else at risk and forced them in turn to take on liabilities they wanted to avoid. Then Lenihan had the gall to say it was a template for everyone else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Slydice wrote: »
    12/03/2011: Updated probabilities of default
    Posted by Dr. Constantin Gurdgiev
    I haven't the slightest clue where he's getting his figures from, hopefully he will explain.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,654 ✭✭✭Noreen1


    hmmm wrote: »
    At the time there was a rush of deposits into Irish banks. I don't want to sound overdramatic, but our guarantee could have pushed several Eurozone countries over the financial brink. The British in particular were spitting blood down the phone at the Irish government.

    I think most Irish people don't understand just how much hatred (the Irish) Messrs Lenihan and Cowen stirred up with the guarantee, while Europe was working towards a common solution we decided to go on a solo run that was supposed to solve our problem but put everyone else at risk and forced them in turn to take on liabilities they wanted to avoid. Then Lenihan had the gall to say it was a template for everyone else.

    FYP.

    The Irish people, on the other hand, were less than delighted with the Bank guarantee, even when it was 4 Billion, and the "cheapest bailout in history".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Noreen1 wrote: »
    FYP.

    The Irish people, on the other hand, were less than delighted with the Bank guarantee, even when it was 4 Billion, and the "cheapest bailout in history".
    How long are we going to have to listen to this "wasn't me guvner" line? We (yes we) voted the Irish government into office. The outside world doesn't care what our opinion is now 2 years afterwards, all they care about is the actions that the elected government of Ireland took at the time.

    Just because you (or I) didn't vote for FF doesn't mean we can disclaim all responsibility for the actions of the Irish government. Welcome to the real world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    hmmm wrote: »
    At the time there was a rush of deposits into Irish banks. I don't want to sound overdramatic, but our guarantee could have pushed several Eurozone countries over the financial brink. The British in particular were spitting blood down the phone at the Irish government.

    I think most Irish people don't understand just how much hatred the Irish stirred up with the guarantee, while Europe was working towards a common solution we decided to go on a solo run that was supposed to solve our problem but put everyone else at risk and forced them in turn to take on liabilities they wanted to avoid. Then Lenihan had the gall to say it was a template for everyone else.

    Sucked in a good chunk of deposits - first red line there is the announcement of the Guarantee, second is its expiry last year:

    zmjsav.gif

    http://i54.tinypic.com/zmjsav.gif

    That's about €17bn in Irish deposits that moved from other places, and about €40bn sucked in from "rest of world" - mostly the UK:
    Savers on both sides of the Irish Sea started to empty accounts of UK banks and put the proceeds into Irish-owned banks in the wake of a controversial plan by the Republic of Ireland yesterday to guarantee all deposits.

    Dublin was accused of making matters worse for non-Irish banks, with corporate treasurers and large savers pulling money out and putting it into the safer haven of Irish banks.

    “If this is legal, then I’m a banana,” one disappointed senior British banker said, arguing that the Irish guarantee amounted to unfair state aid.

    and:
    Asked if he would go further and copy the Irish plan, Brown told the BBC: "Let's remember that the Irish are dealing with taxpayers' money here. We have got to get what is right and also what is reasonable."

    He added: "I want people to know that we will do whatever is necessary, however it is necessary, to ensure the stability of the system."

    The Daily Mail said the Treasury was working on a proposal that could insure 1.9 trillion pounds of deposits in British banks. It said such a plan would carry significant risks as it could shake confidence in sterling and saddle the government with huge debts.

    The Independent newspaper reported on Wednesday that senior bankers were pressing the government to guarantee bank deposits in full.

    British banks fear they could lose out competitively to Irish banks that enjoy the full guarantee, the report said.

    The Irish pledge on Tuesday to guarantee the country's banking system triggered a flood of cash from businesses to Irish banks, a senior Irish stockbroker said.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    hmmm wrote: »
    I haven't the slightest clue where he's getting his figures from, hopefully he will explain.

    Basically, what he's doing is calculating what the market view as the probability of default of different sizes, based on the differential in risk between a risky investment (Ireland) and a safe haven (Germany). There's a formula (an ugly little one which I have little hope of representing properly here), so if you have the month by month figures for Irish bond rates and German bond rates, you can do this:

    Date|Irish 10 year bond yield|German 10 year bond yield|Estimate of default probability (20% default)
    Oct/07|4.397|4.17|8.924
    Nov|4.379|4.02|13.787
    Dec|4.491|4.30|7.531
    Jan,08|4.250|4.04|8.330
    Feb|4.254|3.96|11.481
    Mar|4.357|3.81|20.319
    Apr|4.552|4.05|18.664
    May|4.782|4.20|21.152
    Jun|5.052|4.55|18.325
    Jul|4.697|4.50|7.696
    Aug|4.551|4.22|12.693
    Sep/08|4.590|4.10|18.232
    Oct|4.667|3.90|27.085
    Nov|4.130|3.57|20.928
    Dec|4.266|3.06|39.936
    Jan/09|5.516|3.09|63.177
    Feb|5.487|3.17|61.446
    Mar|5.463|3.06|62.889
    Apr|5.199|3.19|56.431
    May|5.455|3.42|56.535
    Jun|5.711|3.55|58.436
    Jul|4.964|3.36|48.526
    Aug|4.847|3.33|46.739
    Sep|5.754|3.29|63.420
    Oct|4.708|3.23|46.035
    Nov|4.796|3.28|46.788
    Dec|4.839|3.23|48.814
    Jan/10|4.803|3.29|46.709
    Feb|4.541|3.19|43.234
    Mar|4.497|3.13|43.685
    Apr|5.168|3.09|57.757
    May|4.905|2.80|58.649
    Jun|5.471|2.63|69.353
    Jul|5.030|2.65|63.181
    Aug|5.661|2.53|72.781
    Sep/10|6.309|2.28|81.028
    Oct|7.100|2.51|84.366
    Nov|9.355|2.66|92.488
    Dec|9.047|2.74|91.352
    Jan/11 |9.310|3.16|90.511

    and this for 50% default:

    Date|Irish 10 year bond yield|German 10 year bond yield|Estimate of default probability (50% default)
    Oct/07|4.397|4.17|4.096
    Nov|4.379|4.02|6.409
    Dec|4.491|4.30|3.450
    Jan,08|4.250|4.04|3.804
    Feb|4.254|3.96|5.289
    Mar|4.357|3.81|9.619
    Apr|4.552|4.05|8.830
    May|4.782|4.20|10.130
    Jun|5.052|4.55|8.753
    Jul|4.697|4.50|3.544
    Aug|4.551|4.22|5.905
    Sep/08|4.590|4.10|8.622
    Oct|4.667|3.90|13.177
    Nov|4.130|3.57|9.877
    Dec|4.266|3.06|20.128
    Jan/09|5.516|3.09|36.035
    Feb|5.487|3.17|34.724
    Mar|5.463|3.06|35.785
    Apr|5.199|3.19|30.978
    May|5.455|3.42|31.193
    Jun|5.711|3.55|32.674
    Jul|4.964|3.36|25.634
    Aug|4.847|3.33|24.458
    Sep|5.754|3.29|36.365
    Oct|4.708|3.23|23.958
    Nov|4.796|3.28|24.464
    Dec|4.839|3.23|25.755
    Jan/10|4.803|3.29|24.419
    Feb|4.541|3.19|22.184
    Mar|4.497|3.13|22.434
    Apr|5.168|3.09|31.883
    May|4.905|2.80|32.357
    Jun|5.471|2.63|40.888
    Jul|5.030|2.65|35.733
    Aug|5.661|2.53|43.952
    Sep/10|6.309|2.28|52.403
    Oct|7.100|2.51|56.743
    Nov|9.355|2.66|69.784
    Dec|9.047|2.74|67.684
    Jan/11 |9.310|3.16|66.537

    In other words, our probability of defaulting on 50% of our debt in the 10 year period from now is estimated by the markets at 66.537% - and our probability of defaulting on 20% of our debt in the same period is estimated as 90.511%. Our probability of an 80% default is currently estimated at 51.006%.

    All of these are back-estimates from the market yield of 10-year bonds. So a high differential over the safe haven says there's a high chance of default, low differential, low chance.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭rocksteady36


    dan_d wrote: »
    What??

    Well, if that's what Angela Merkel did when she heard we were guaranteeing the banks, I think her fears have proved to be groundless. If anything, it's the other way around - deposits are/were leaving Irish banks.

    We do not need to threaten to leave the EU. How on earth do you perceive any benefit in that? Have all the hundreds of endless threads around here not got it through to people that sure, we could default, but we'd be the biggest losers at the end of it all? We have not got any money. Our banks are on their knees. We have put ourselves in a position whereby we are getting money from the EU, yes, but it's not a deal that's cast in stone for the next X number of years, that can't be budged. It can be.Maybe not straight away, but we will be able to negotiate it to some extent.

    Merkel went nuts when Lenihan guaranteed the bank debts, google it. I think renegotiate the debt is what ppl are all talking about...It is bllsht...I owe the bank a few grand, hows about u pay it for me, in fact ill loan you the money to pay the debt and charge you interest, thanks...We can negotiate the rate as long as you let me sleep with your sister (being the CT rate)....cheers

    Leaving the EU does not have to be forever, its been said by lots of commentators as a solution, leave, devalue our currency and come back in the future, i dont like that but we shud threaten to do it, play ball, stop being pussiess etc. Sarkozy and Merkel want us to increase and harmonise CT Rate so foreign multi national will go to central EU countries namely Germany and Europe, so they dont give a fk about us, so fk them... The EU leaders want the EU to work more than anything, so much power in a federal europe, like federal US and thats the end game here.

    Well from what I have been reading and listening to some commentators OUTSIDE ireland, this is important as its these outside forces that would have an OBJECTIVE view. Anglo wud ahve collapsed, but so what, never took money from and Anglo ATM cos they had fk all deposits, it was property developer bank...WE could have guaranteed the deposits only.

    These people recognise that the bank debt is not our debt, we are not like Greece but these outside commentators cant understand why were such push overs and just taking this, why accept this bank debt as soverign debt. greece people own there debt but there rioting on the streets, we just bitch and moan on boards.ie, trying to act like we know more than the next..

    When a company is insolvent and in examinership they renegotiatie everything, from rent ,lease agreement to creditors.. and this company would owe the debt. Were finding it impossible to even talk about renegotiating to merkel and sarkozy

    It turns out Lenihan did not have to guarantee the bondholders, it was a solicitor doing a finance job, its as simple as that, he had no clue what was going on, running up to McWilliams who said look at what the Swedes did and then Lenihan went off and fkd that up. He basically made us liable for foreign private investors, this we all know now. At the same time he pissed off merkel etc by doing this thinking he was clever and sealing our fate

    But the important issue or the elephant in the room is that we will not be able to pay this crazy debt, if ppl think we should re-arrange or renegotiate then we really are fkn idiots, we shouldnt even be thinking of renegotiate, all we should be doing is trying to find legal loop holes to get rid of debt..Change our thinking. I would pay off anyone elses debt, why should any of my taxes pay for foreign investors debts, fk offfff. Are we the biggest clowns the world ahs ever seen, YES if we take it up the assss, like we are. The world is laughing, just watched the film Hallpass and they take the piss out of the Irish twice, we are the laffn stock of the planet.

    Why pay foreign investors bad bets, we need to change our thinking away from renegotiate to 'go fk urself' were not going to be puppets paying off these debts, not even the bondholders thought the bets wud be guranateed as it says in the article Irish Eyes are Crying, the bondholder interviewd thought and ACCEPTED he lost everything and woke up with 100% guarantee, insane.

    My point about leaving the euro etc is to show we have some balls, some dignity, we have been royally screwed and will be paying debt with our taxes for decades not just ten years, instead of improving our schools and hospitals.

    Theres lot of chat about our natural resources and that there is estimated to over 400 BILLION of gas off west coast. Statoil own 25% of corrib gas field. They pump all there proifts from gas/oil in a pension fund for Norweigen people. We give away our gas to shell/statoil for nothing, because we dont have the balls to take it under control. That makes me sick to think the Norwegian oil and gas industry in controlled by government for the befit of the people, the pension fund is one of the biggest funds in the world....

    I just think our problems come down to our political system, the qualtiy of our politicians leave alot to be desired, some i like but there not qualified for the job... Now we have a school teacher for Taoiseach and teacher for Minister for Finance, if Bruton didnt fk up he wud be the Min for Fin, at least he would be qualified, so again the best interests of the people are parked over rivalry issues...

    Again ill put these two articles up and please read them....

    http://www.afri.ie/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The-Great-Gas-Giveaway_2009.pdf

    http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/03/michael-lewis-ireland-201103


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Subject will be discussed on prime time @ rte1 on at 9:30 this evening


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭rocksteady36


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    Subject will be discussed on prime time @ rte1 on at 9:30 this evening

    Thanks for letting us know, although I feel like its a deja vu moment, reminds me of morgan kelly moment telling us we are going into economic crisis and all the EXPERTS telling us were fine, were different...

    Now everyone believes this banking debt should be shouldered by us AND we can handle it...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11CCxv2ueiQ

    Hopefully Morgan Kelly is on the show tonight because he has repeatedly got it right, not one person on boards.ie could even pretend to know whats going on, so listen to him.........

    Read this article, it makes me sick, literally, we should all be on the streets tearing the heads off Fianna Fail, not voting back in Brian Lenihan, the ppl who voted for him should be ashamed of themselves, for either not knowing how he screwed us or knowing and voting...

    'Mr Lenihan said he had no regrets" of his time as minister for finance.' ...No embarassment, he just got voted the worst finance minister in Europe...No he is blaming Cowen for lack of leadership...Bunch of clowns, I was thinking they wud end up with great jobs in europe, but i dont think they wud take these rejects. It really goes to show wth a bit of pull and nerve anyone could be taoiseach. Lenihan probably wud have become the next taoiseach, now we have two ex teachers running the show noonan and kenny

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2010/1108/1224282865400.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 429 ✭✭jman0war


    Is there such thing as defaulting and remaining in the euro?
    I'm thinking no.
    But what do others have to say?

    If we did leave the euro, what happens to RaboDirect and Investec account holders? While they are under the deposit protection guaranty's of their respective countries, i just wonder would those institutions maintain their deposits in euro denomination or would they be forced to take on the punt since they are in ireland?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    zmjsav.gif

    So beside bondholders half of the depositors who are not Irish could also have been burned for their stupidity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 42 kenrr


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    So beside bondholders half of the depositors who are not Irish could also have been burned for their stupidity.
    But the Irish depositors are still by far the majority ... should they also be burned for their stupidity? I don't see how, legally, there could be arbitrary discrimination such that the stupid foreign depositors could be burned but not the stupid Irish depositors. And, if the Irish depositors are burned, it would be impossible for Govt to find the many 10's of billions necessary to reimburse depositors their losses. That's why, in my opinion, no party in power will ever put major banks into liquidation. That would result in political suicide because there's no money to reimburse domestic depositors their inevitable losses.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    laws could be changed, guarantees can be removed as quickly as added

    not that guarantees are worth the paper they are written on since there is nothing to back up the guarantee


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    laws could be changed, guarantees can be removed as quickly as added

    not that guarantees are worth the paper they are written on since there is nothing to back up the guarantee

    Which is part of the problem. No Government wants to tell deposit holders, sorry, we guaranteed your money, but we can't pay out.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    K-9 wrote: »
    Which is part of the problem. No Government wants to tell deposit holders, sorry, we guaranteed your money, but we can't pay out.

    Hey no government wants to default either but we are falling down that slide now.

    I still remember the day after the guarantee asking in confusion, what is the guarantee backed by?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,872 ✭✭✭View


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    So beside bondholders half of the depositors who are not Irish could also have been burned for their stupidity.

    No they couldn't. All EU depositors must be treated exactly identically under EU law (irrespective of whether they are Irish or not). A large chunk of that "Rest of World" figure probably included the UK and a lesser amount the other non-Eurozone EU states. Hence our room to "burn" the "Rest of World" bondholders is much less than might appear at first glance (if we exclude the option of burning ourselves as well that is).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,912 ✭✭✭HellFireClub


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    Hey no government wants to default either but we are falling down that slide now.

    I still remember the day after the guarantee asking in confusion, what is the guarantee backed by?

    In fairness, there was probably this deluded notion at the time of the banking guarantee that because we could still borrow on international markets at the time, that we could just keep borrowing away for Ireland, piling on the debt to the soveriegn and all would just work out well at the end of the day... Fully consistent with what the whole problem has been all along in this country, the value of the money at issue here was not appreciated, the policy in place was clearly a policy of throwing money at a problem in an almost drunkenlike fashion. When the international markets stepped in to save us from ourselves, the whole thing was exposed for what it was, which was a cod and a bluff, made by a bust state without as much as a pot to p*ss into...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    @View
    No they couldn't. All EU depositors must be treated exactly identically under EU law (irrespective of whether they are Irish or not). A large chunk of that "Rest of World" figure probably included the UK and a lesser amount the other non-Eurozone EU states. Hence our room to "burn" the "Rest of World" bondholders is much less than might appear at first glance (if we exclude the option of burning ourselves as well that is).

    Well, we've already badly scalded ourselves trying to avoid burning anyone. The actions taken to save depositors put a larger and larger cost on wider society - especially the poorer parts of society (who dont have immense deposits) or even people who didnt bank with dodgy casinos like AIB and Bank of Ireland. The conventional approach to save the depositors at any cost - but depositors are simply creditors of the bank, and if we are at the point where burning senior bondholders is openly discussed then why should another class of creditor be given sacred status?

    In a crisis of this scale, there comes a point where "at any cost" must be revealed as mere rhetoric, so I wouldnt rule out burning the depositors to some degree if thats whats required to draw a line under this mess in the most efficient way possible. We've got into this trouble due to the inability and unwillingness of decision maker at home and abroad to make truly tough decisions sooner rather than later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    or even people who didnt bank with dodgy casinos like AIB and Bank of Ireland.

    The point is that these have the largest bank branch networks in the State and the ordinary punter has his account there because these are the only two banks in his town, not because of a judgement on their lending policies, he relied on the government to ensure that these were sound enough so that he would get his money back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Im sympathetic to that, but if were going to call on senior bondholders and homebuyers and people who took out silly loans to accept some personal responsibility for their investment than the thats got to be spread around. Bank depositors are just another form of creditor, usually ranked equally with the senior bondholders. The actions taken to protect depositors, at any cost, are being bourne by all of society - including the poorest sections of society who have no deposits.

    Im not advocating burning depositors, I think they ought to be protected as much as is possible, but if theres going to be a resolution to this and part of it is sharing the pain on depositors as well then I wouldnt consider that a barrier to drawing a line under things. Ireland doesnt have the resources to save everyone, and the EU/ECB dont show any inclination to help other than with useless competiveness pacts so there comes a point when it has to be asked if we are truly willing to protect the depositors at any cost.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    I see there is a primetime on tonight which will be looking at the Subject of Ireland and Default:
    http://www.rte.ie/news/2011/0315/blog-15march2011_primetime.html
    A Question Of Default (VIDEO)

    Ian Kehoe blogs ahead of tonight's Prime Time, which tackles the thorny and contentious issue of default:

    Despite the pre-election rhetoric, the Irish Government is not seeking to burn those banking bond holders. However, they have now acknowledged that the burden of the bank liabilities, coupled with our historic debts, would soon reach a point where sustainability would be a major issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    I've said the same Sand but no Government is going to do that, burn the bondholders sounds great but no new Government wants to be known for burning deposit holders, the old widower's life savings, pension funds, couples house saving for a house deposit, you know the stuff the media will love.

    A new Government definitely isn't going to do it, whether the blame lies with FF or not, FG/Labour will have taken the decision and will be remembered come the next election.

    I'd hope assets would cover a fair share of the deposits but I'm not sure where the ECB and ICB lie in priorities if banks were wound up.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    If we can't afford to repay then at least a partial default must happen. Otherwise we're sunk, no?

    I've been thinking about this again while watching the devastation in Japan.

    There's talk of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear meltdown costing Japan 120-180 billion Euro for recovery and reconstruction. The global insurance industry alone is to be hit for €34 billion. This is seen as an economic disaster for Japan that could plunge them into a prolonged recession.

    Japan has a population of 120 million and a GDP of around 3.5 trillion Euro. Here in Ireland we have 4 million people and a GDP (misleadingly inflated) of €180 billion. And the estimated final cost just for bailing out a few of Paddy's casino banks is €120 billion!!! When all that money is spent -- most of which we will never see again -- unlike the Japanese we won't have new schools, hospitals, roads, power stations, public services and other essential infrastructure as a result. Sick, sick, sick...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    If we can't afford to repay then at least a partial default must happen. Otherwise we're sunk, no?

    I've been thinking about this again while watching the devastation in Japan.

    There's talk of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear meltdown costing Japan 120-180 billion Euro for recovery and reconstruction. The global insurance industry alone is to be hit for €34 billion. This is seen as an economic disaster for Japan that could plunge them into a prolonged recession.

    Japan has a population of 120 million and a GDP of around 3.5 trillion Euro. Here in Ireland we have 4 million people and a GDP (misleadingly inflated) of €180 billion. And the estimated final cost just for bailing out a few of Paddy's casino banks is €120 billion!!! When all that money is spent -- most of which we will never see again -- unlike the Japanese we won't have new schools, hospitals, roads, power stations, public services and other essential infrastructure as a result. Sick, sick, sick...

    Central bank of Japan also created 60 billion out of thin air after the quake, more to come...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    Central bank of Japan also created 60 billion out of thin air after the quake, more to come...


    Isn't that what's called quantitative easing?

    Better to make it appear out of thin air than disappear down a black hole?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Isn't that what's called quantitative easing?

    Better to make it appear out of thin air than disappear down a black hole?
    In this case not really. It's to try and plug a newly opened hole in the money supply as people cut back on spending and investment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    hmmm wrote: »
    hole in the money supply as people cut back on spending and investment.

    you could be talking about ireland


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 634 ✭✭✭Euroland


    Default is inevitable

    Agree.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Taxi Drivers


    Default is inevitable. Discuss

    Here is an alternative take on it that generally goes by the numbers. It concludes (emphasis mine):
    Regardless, I think an €81 billion bank bailout package is sustainable – though it is a colossal and, particularly in the case of Anglo and INBS, a needless waste of money. What will the final cost of this financial disaster be? We await the answer. If we can get out the far side for something less than the €35 billion available under the EU/IMF deal then we can survive it without default.
    We must decide if we want to continue along this road and the opportunity to change course grows ever smaller as more and more bonds are paid off (with the money provided the ECB). This decision, and the decisions required to bring down the fiscal deficit, must be made quickly. We are still in a position where default is an option rather than a necessity.
    I don't think there are too many commentators who think the final cost will come in at around €80 billion. Many suspect it will be €100 billion (or more!) but it the absence of actual figures the piece makes a nice counter balance. I hadn't really considered that a portion of the money wasted on the bank bailout won't actually be borrowed. It suggests the extra debt burden will be something around €53 billion but I can't really see us being able to sell the big banks at a price to reduce this coming to pass.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Here is an alternative take on it that generally goes by the numbers. It concludes (emphasis mine):
    Regardless, I think an €81 billion bank bailout package is sustainable – though it is a colossal and, particularly in the case of Anglo and INBS, a needless waste of money. What will the final cost of this financial disaster be? We await the answer. If we can get out the far side for something less than the €35 billion available under the EU/IMF deal then we can survive it without default.
    We must decide if we want to continue along this road and the opportunity to change course grows ever smaller as more and more bonds are paid off (with the money provided the ECB). This decision, and the decisions required to bring down the fiscal deficit, must be made quickly. We are still in a position where default is an option rather than a necessity.
    I don't think there are too many commentators who think the final cost will come in at around €80 billion. Many suspect it will be €100 billion (or more!) but it the absence of actual figures the piece makes a nice counter balance. I hadn't really considered that a portion of the money wasted on the bank bailout won't actually be borrowed. It suggests the extra debt burden will be something around €53 billion but I can't really see us being able to sell the big banks at a price to reduce this coming to pass.

    In a sense, this is exactly my fear:
    Regardless, I think an €81 billion bank bailout package is sustainable – though it is a colossal and, particularly in the case of Anglo and INBS, a needless waste of money.

    My concern is that default is not in any sense inevitable - and again, nobody has really offered a good argument that it is, instead mostly relying on spoofing up debt numbers to massive proportions - but that it is right at the limits of sustainability, where default is highly attractive but still optional.

    The reason that that's a problem is because an optional default is likely to be treated differently by the markets to an inevitable default.

    I felt the same about the banks in general - that in the case of Iceland, there was no question, the ratio of bank debt to GDP was never going to allow a bailout - but that in our case, the numbers made it just at the limits of capacity.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


Advertisement