Kaspersky Internet Security 2011 for €24.98 at Argos

I haven't paid for Anti-virus in about 4 years. And I wont be doing so again. I use this one on my laptop and desktop and seems to get good reviews for use on Netbooks too in terms of resource usage.
http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/

I'm not saying that your bargain alert is not a bargain. But you should know that there are antivirus progams out there for free that often perform better than the paid ones. like MSE
http://lifehacker.com/5714508/microsoft-security-essentials-2-released-still-the-best-darn-antivirus-around
http://lifehacker.com/5559102/microsoft-security-essentials-finds-unknown-malware-but-avoids-false-positives

An Ri rua wrote: »

Hmm, I'll reserve judgement on that. I've used free ones for years too and had virus attacks despite being uber-diligent with AVG (it had many update problems). I often use Trend's free online version too, as a double check.

But KIS is a lot more than an antivirus. And you can't run a machine in Windows with just an antivirus?

Features like virtual keyboard and many others have made it worth my while. Defo at this price.

Meh, I use ms security essentials which is grand and gets the job done.

Also, I know a lot of people that run windows without an antivirus or any sort of protection and have never got a virus. A basic free antivirus is more than enough imo. Once you start adding in extras like firewalls and such, it'll start slowing down your machine because of all the extra processes and such. security essentials comes with a constant monitor anyway which basically acts as a firewall.
imho I don't think anyone should pay for an antivirus. just my 2 cents

briankearon666 wrote: »

I haven't paid for Anti-virus in about 4 years. And I wont be doing so again. I use this one on my laptop and desktop and seems to get good reviews for use on Netbooks too in terms of resource usage.
http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/

I'm not saying that your bargain alert is not a bargain. But you should know that there are antivirus progams out there for free that often perform better than the paid ones. like MSE
http://lifehacker.com/5714508/microsoft-security-essentials-2-released-still-the-best-darn-antivirus-around
http://lifehacker.com/5559102/microsoft-security-essentials-finds-unknown-malware-but-avoids-false-positives

I have been using Kaspersky a few years now. At first I downloaded it (illegaly) as I'd herd it was good. I went onto the Macafee site, who offered me a free security test. I expected them to tell me how much I needed thier product. Instead after doing it's thing, it told me that my computer was completely secure, it could find no way of getting into it and was virtually invisible. I decided if their competition was telling me that Kaspersky was excellent then I'd stick with it. A few weeks later I got a message saying my activation code wasn't valid so I went and bought it. I have never looked back and have got many other people onto it.

Saying that, if I didn't want to pay for it I'd definitely be using MSE. I just don't get why people use Norton.

i find superanti spyware and avg sufice with most attacks

and both free.

Badgermonkey wrote: »

+1 Microsoft Security Essentials.

It's free, it works well and stays out of the way.

+1
And this bit in particular. It just does it's own thing, it's not resource intensive. It doesn't bother me, it just hangs out in the background without annoying me with pop ups and the likes.

I use it on my desktop and laptop, and i haven't had any issues.