Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

restoration, reshell,is it possible to retain car's identity?

  • 17-01-2011 01:07AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭


    Over the last few months I've toying with the idea to restore an old car that's been lying idle for almost 20 years in one of my fields, and most likely will be a few more years until I get a chance to do it.
    By the looks of it i'd say it needs a complete reshell, seems every panels rusted from 20 years of exposure, not sure what would be savlageable.

    Was wondering how much of the original car would needed to be kept on in the rebuild so I can still have the same registration on the project car?

    Or am i better off just buying a complete car and ditching this idea, along with the old car?

    And no before anyone suggests it I don't want to change the plates onto a different car to avoid taxes, VRT etc. it was the car my dad had when I was a child and would like to see it returned to its former glory.


Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 2,913 Mod ✭✭✭✭macplaxton


    shineon23 wrote: »
    Or am i better off just buying a complete car and ditching this idea, along with the old car?

    A much more economical proposition - by a huge margin.

    To go the restoration route, would take a lot of time, a lot of effort and a lot of hard cash. So it'd have to be of immense sentimental value, rare or worth a pile before even considering starting work.

    Pics would help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭rugbyman


    Good morning Shineon 23

    I too would like to recreate a car of my fathers, but i have no rusting hulk.

    in your case
    if you were to
    A
    strip the body down and replace/repair all the rusty pieces n,no one would argue that it was not the same car. therefore, the car is alive again.

    B
    if you were to find /buy a solid shell of another car and transfer all the mechanical bits, stick your own numbers on, not many people would argue that it is not a legitimate rebuild . this is often done .

    C
    if you were to buy a similiar car ,here or the Uk and ,same colour and stick on your old plates, it is quite an "iffy" situation. I dont mean from the authorities point of view ,because they would not care, but from an old car enthusaists point of view.

    Somewhere in between B and C above is kind of unknown territory.

    there is no doubt money could restore your car, perhaps 5 to 10 k euro but to me it would be worth it.

    Regards ,Rugbyman


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    B and C are both illegal of course and pointless as it would no longer be "your" car.

    A is the only legitimate way to do it, :rolleyes:unless you can find a new shell or enough components to make one


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 2,913 Mod ✭✭✭✭macplaxton


    Aye Corky, but aren't new shells here subject to VRT and re-registration anyway?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,964 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    I've seen MkII Escorts essentially reshelled, with minimal carryover of panels. I'm not sure how kosher it would be to do that though.

    I'm also aware of Range Rovers etc. on ZV reg's using old chassis but with much more modern bodies.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    i dont know tbh. If you follow what would happen in the UK (IF you foiund such a shell :-) ) then the shell if NEW would be regarded as a legitimate spare part and you could use the original number. Whether that would happen here is academic until I find a new bodyshell for a Cortina and try it! Not holding my breath!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    This goes back to the argument if you have an axe with 2 replacement heads and two handles, is it the original axe. Same thing applies to ex rally cars that have been re-shelled, it just isnt the original car, no matter how much you want it to be!

    Maybe get a similar car in good order and put some of the stuff from your dads car on it, to carry over some parts.

    What is the car by the way OP?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 959 ✭✭✭manta mad


    as a matter of interest what is the car & year ?

    put up a few piccies and you wont be long about finding out if it should be shelved or rebuilt :rolleyes:

    also if the car is of sentimental value ,dont matter what cost ,id rebuild it ! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭alpina


    If it truly is out in a field, get it in if at all possible or at least get it covered. If you don't get around to it for another couple of years, at least you wont bang your head against a wall for letting it crumble:(. The whole identity argument is going to be dependant on your timescale & budget. Big budget, source original replacements, high quality pattern parts where required & keep it honest/pure, if not, hunt beg borrow steal, often the more satisfying way to go rather than picking up the phone & ordering all in one go. Had my car four years before stumbling across a near perfect chromed rear bumper in Germany, now it's complete, down to the correct torch for the glovebox:o but if I'm honest the years of hunting & searching/bargaining was half the fun. Whatever you decide to do, enjoy it! ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,358 ✭✭✭kev1.3s


    Likewise I trawl ebay every night looking for bargains maybe I don't need them yet but It'll work out cheaper to buy difficult to source parts when you see them going cheep on ebay than ringing the parts suppliers with credit card in hand when you do need them. For me there is only one answer, if it's your'e Father's car you've got to keep as much of it as is possible if you don't intend doing that you'd be a lot better of both financially any time wise just buying a similar car in good condition.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭shineon23


    Wow lads thanks for al the replies and opinion;
    sorry couldn't figure out how to quote multiple posts, so i'll try respond to all.

    manta mad: as a matter of interest what is the car & year ?
    its a mk 2 escort,don't know what year, westmeath reg I think SLI??? i'm thinking 77/78, so i think thats reason enough to try save it, Dad is retiring in about 5 years so would like to do it up and give it to him for then,

    and at the same time have an escort i could drive around on occaison:cool:

    Henry Ford III: I've seen MkII Escorts essentially reshelled, with minimal carryover of panels. I'm not sure how kosher it would be to do that though.
    I'm also aware of Range Rovers etc. on ZV reg's using old chassis but with much more modern bodies. with all the patent parts avail that would eb what i would be attempting but keep as much as possible. The ZV won't be an issue as its SLI someting.

    rugbyman and corktina:A
    strip the body down and replace/repair all the rusty pieces n,no one would argue that it was not the same car. therefore, the car is alive again.

    A and sourcing a new shell , if it came available, would be my top choice, as patent parts are very easily to in the uk.
    idea would be to strip the car, and try and make try the chassis solid and build up from there, hopefully managing to save some more bits on the way,

    Condition:
    i asked my father there and he said the whole thing is rotten, but he hasn't looked at it in years, mechanic long gone, engine out 15years or more and siezed, gearbox there but id say not saveable,
    Floors and boot; rotten, with grass growing up through it
    some of interior is okay, dash clock door cards, but seats would need replacing,
    really tryinf to save some of the actual shell will be tough I think but that's what i woud try do as best I could if new ones never become available. I seen mk1's remakes online has there ever been mk2's attempted?

    Regards originality, non-metal aftermarket body panels would be my preferred option as to prevent future rust,

    I have an 85 capri at home that i could get axels, gearbox and engine off should i get everything else sorted, but that's furtherest from my mind at the minute.

    Like i said have about a 5 year-ish timescale so little by little would be the way to go, no rush to get it finished. was tryng to get it lifted into a shed last summer but circumstances etc. meant that never materialized.
    could be a while before i get pictures up, its in one of our fields but it's a brave distance away from where we live so don't know when i'll be there again at the moment.

    And now I think i've figured out how to multiquote ha ha:confused::pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    If you have the tax book, buy another escort and just stick the number plates on it, then it will magically be your dads original car then, exactly same as he had 20 years ago.... Or so I'm led to believe reading previous threads on this forum....:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,781 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Can anyone point out the regulations on car identity, reshelling, kit car registration etc. Things are pretty clear in the UK and I think VOSPA is the relevant authority but not sure about here.

    The term "ringing" is thrown around a lot in this forum. My understanding of ringing is that it is tampering with the identity of a car having stolen that car.

    If someone buys a car that is the same as his NCT exempt wrecked one and then the wrecked car magically appears on the road with its original registration - leaving aside the "moral" aspect or bringing disrepute to the hobby - what regulation has been broken?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭shineon23


    If you have the tax book, buy another escort and just stick the number plates on it, then it will magically be your dads original car then, exactly same as he had 20 years ago.... Or so I'm led to believe reading previous threads on this forum....:p

    Well that won't be happening anyway,

    the amount of people that over the years have looked over the ditch and enquired about getting the tax book is worrying, wonder how many of these altered cars are around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,347 ✭✭✭si_guru


    I'm also aware of Range Rovers etc. on ZV reg's using old chassis but with much more modern bodies.

    You mean VIN plates fitted to completely different vehicles!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,347 ✭✭✭si_guru


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    Can anyone point out the regulations on car identity, reshelling, kit car registration etc. Things are pretty clear in the UK and I think VOSPA is the relevant authority but not sure about here.

    The term "ringing" is thrown around a lot in this forum. My understanding of ringing is that it is tampering with the identity of a car having stolen that car.

    If someone buys a car that is the same as his NCT exempt wrecked one and then the wrecked car magically appears on the road with its original registration - leaving aside the "moral" aspect or bringing disrepute to the hobby - what regulation has been broken?

    It is still ringed....

    What if the tax book I have is for a 1979 Fiesta and "restore" a 1981 Fiesta - that should be paying road tax and have an NCT.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,781 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    si_guru wrote: »
    It is still ringed....

    What if the tax book I have is for a 1979 Fiesta and "restore" a 1981 Fiesta - that should be paying road tax and have an NCT.
    What if you import a 1979 Fiesta, register it as a ZV having paid the nominal VRT, then use the entire car as "spare parts" to restore your wrecked Fiesta?

    I'm just trying to tease out exactly what regulation has been broken. In my example I don't see any tax evasion but the identity of the car has still been tampered with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    any car ringed like this from another is not insured as the Insurance policy applies to the scrapped cars ID rather than the donors. No Insurance is about as illegal as you can get in my book.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭PaulK_CCI


    In essence the law in Ireland is that the registration goes hand in hand with the chassis and the chassisnumber stamped on it. Whether you put a new bodyshell on it, has no bearing on the identity of the car. Hence Range Rovers, Beetles, and any other vehicle that have a SEPERATE chassis, can have a newer bodyshell without it becomeing a legal issue of the car being 'ringed'. Note that some people do cut Illegal corners by simply swapping the VIN number on the chassis to avoid a lengthy restoration of an otherwise rotten chassis. Also, a long wheel base Range Rover LSE with a ZV or old Irish plate, will also be rather suspicious since these models were only in 93-94 with a longer chassis than the original 2/4 door classic.

    This is a practice that has been going on since the forties and fifties of the last century: old Bentley's have been reshelled as the "Big Blower" Le Mans racers, retaining their original registration, perfectly legitimate.

    Nowadays however (or in fact from the sixties onwards really), cars have a monocoque construction, as in not a seperate chassis anymore but the entire body shell and frame is welded together to form a stronger and lighter unit, so you can no longer simply retain the original chassis and stick a new body on... you have to literally rebuild the car around the origianl unitary construction, which a lot more time consuming and costly! So for monocoque cars the only way to retain an original registration is a full blown restoration. How many new parts you throw at it, is irrelevant (in Ireland at least, I think in England you need a minimum of 30% of the original parts to go into the car to retain the identity), as long as you retain the original unitary/monocoque construction, where the chassis number was stamped intact.

    If the area where the chassisnumber had been stamped is lost to the elements, the identity of the car is in fact lost too, and you need to start a procedure with the vehicle licensing authority to get a new number stamped in a new/restored chassis/shell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,781 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    If the area where the chassisnumber had been stamped is lost to the elements, the identity of the car is in fact lost too, and you need to start a procedure with the vehicle licensing authority to get a new number stamped in a new/restored chassis/shell.
    Makes sense - but where is this stated in legislation?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭PaulK_CCI


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    Makes sense - but where is this stated in legislation?

    not sure where this is stated in the legislation, in fact I don't think there are seperate provisions in the law made regarding this situation, but the law is and has always been that the identity of the vehicle is determined by the VIN number stamped in the chassis, nothing more nothing less.

    It's how the authorities interpret this law, that's what I have been working with over the years, based on my dealings with the Vehicle Registration Offices in Rosslare and Vehicle Licensing in Co. Clare.

    It's similar in most other European countries, but in the Uk and the Netherlands, people have been trying to use the (lack of) specific regulations to their advantage, and therefore there is now special legislation in place for these sort of situations.
    For example here in Holland we have the enforcement of the 2/3 legislation: as in 2 out of the 3 basic elements/specifications should remain intact: Body/engine/chassis. You can replace the chassis, but only if the body and engine remain the same. You can replace engine, but body and chassis must be same. You cannot put different engine and body on an old chassis.. that's violating the 2/3 rule...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,781 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    not sure where this is stated in the legislation, in fact I don't think there are seperate provisions in the law made regarding this situation, but the law is and has always been that the identity of the vehicle is determined by the VIN number stamped in the chassis, nothing more nothing less.
    Possibly "construction and use" or some such regulation. At one point I spent a lot of time trawling irishstatutebook and could find not find anything concrete that would be applicable to reshelling, lost chassis numbers etc. or to how a car's identity is defined using its chassis number. Plenty about registration numbers of course.

    Somewhat off topic I was also looking into the possibility of getting a trailer "downgraded" so that its MAM is lower for licence purposes. This seems to be a common and known procedure in other countries - but not in the land of the homemade trailer with no weight plate where the MAM is whatever number is in your head at any given time :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭iphone4g


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by PaulK_CCI
    If the area where the chassisnumber had been stamped is lost to the elements, the identity of the car is in fact lost too, and you need to start a procedure with the vehicle licensing authority to get a new number stamped in a new/restored chassis/shell.

    There is no such procedure,I have tried to do this with a restored car,have been to the guards, the licensing authority and went to main dealers to ask about getting chassis number re stamped and there is no legal way to have it done or at least I have failed to find it after a year and a half of what seemed like banging my head add a wall!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,781 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    iphone4g wrote: »
    There is no such procedure,I have tried to do this with a restored car,have been to the guards, the licensing authority and went to main dealers to ask about getting chassis number re stamped and there is no legal way to have it done or at least I have failed to find it after a year and a half of what seemed like banging my head add a wall!!
    Were you trying to get a new chassis number? Or were you trying to "re stamp" the one that was there before? I believe PaulK was talking about a new number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭shineon23


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    Were you trying to get a new chassis number? Or were you trying to "re stamp" the one that was there before? I believe PaulK was talking about a new number.

    would that new chassis number, mean new VIN, reg etc. essentially a new car then anyway?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭iphone4g


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    Were you trying to get a new chassis number? Or were you trying to "re stamp" the one that was there before? I believe PaulK was talking about a new number.

    I was trying to go about legally getting the chassis restamped and there is no way to have this done.If you stamp it yourself it could be seen as ringed and you would have no way to prove otherwise


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭hi5


    Reshelling would be the same as a kitcar i'd imagine.

    From the Revenue VRT website


    1.2.3.1 Re-built VehiclesThe initial determination to be made here is whether the re-built vehicle is required to
    be declared for registration and, if so, whether it is liable to VRT. The rule to be
    followed is that if the chassis, monocoque, or assembly serving an equivalent purpose
    to a chassis, of the vehicle is either new and unused, or derived from another
    Revenue Operational Manual VRT Section 1
    12
    unregistered vehicle in the State, then the vehicle must be given a new identity and
    registered on payment of VRT. Where the chassis etc. has been obtained from a
    registered vehicle registration is not required. The fact of the original/donor vehicle
    being scrapped, and the alteration of the particulars of the re-built vehicle, must be
    notified by its owner to the CVO and Driver and Vehicle Computer Services Division,
    Department of Transport by completing the appropriate sections on the rear of the
    Vehicle Licensing Certificate (VLC).
    1.2.3.2 Kit CarsThese are vehicles constructed from an amalgam of parts supplied unassembled in kit
    form. In general, the kit will include a new chassis and a variety of body panels that
    must be assembled. The mechanics (e.g. engine, motors, etc.) and trim must be
    obtained from another vehicle to enable the process to be completed. In most cases
    the donor vehicle will be a vehicle already registered in the State, but no allowance is
    made/granted in this respect when VRT payable on the completed kit car is being
    calculated.
    1.2.3.3 "Q"- Registered VehiclesThese vehicles are so-called because of the fact that the first letter of the assigned
    registration number is the letter "Q". The registration numbers are issued by the UK
    registration authorities where the age/origin of a vehicle, for whatever reason, cannot
    be determined and, as such, requires special treatment when it is presented for
    registration in the State. This includes:
    �� assignment of an appropriate statistical code;
    �� assessment of OMSP, where applicable (see para 1.3);
    �� assignment of an unique index mark which indicates the year in which the
    vehicle was first brought into use;
    The NCTS Centre will record all the details relating to the vehicle and the CVO will
    determine a statistical code and value for the vehicle.
    Once a statistical code has been assigned by the CVO, OMSP determined and a VIN
    assigned (where necessary), registration should proceed in the normal way. The
    registration record should be noted to the effect that a manual certificate is required
    and the papers forwarded to the CVO for necessary attention. The endorsement on
    the VRC issued by the CVO should clearly reflect the origin and manufacture of the
    vehicle.
    The following points should also be noted:
    �� where a private individual acquires a newly-assembled kit car abroad, the
    normal VAT rules should be applied, i.e. VAT is payable if the vehicle is less
    than 6 months old or has travelled less than 6,000 kms. Kit cars assembled in
    the State are not liable to VAT where the sale/purchase invoice indicates that
    it has been paid at the time of purchase of the kit;
    �� for the present, new kit cars are subject to a general exemption from the
    normal Department of Transport type-approval requirements (see para 1.6).


Advertisement