Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New 'United Left Alliance' formed

  • 25-11-2010 01:45PM
    #1
    james.xix
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭


    A newly-formed alliance of existing parties has said it will lead a campaign of sustained resistance on the streets.
    The 'United Left Alliance' is formed by the People Before Profit Alliance, Socialist Party, and Workers and Unemployed Action Group.
    The group has said it will become an alternative to a Fine Gael/Labour government following the next General Election.
    The ULA has said it expects to run around 20 candidates in the election.

    Story: http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/1125/united_left_alliance.html

    I think it's a good idea an alternative is being put forward, whether people are for it or not. 20 candidates is a bit low though but realistic I guess.


«13

Comments

  • #2
    Fuhrer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    What do they mean by sustained resistance on the street?


  • #3
    james.xix
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭james.xix


    I'd imagine they'll be leading protest. Peaceful protests at that as well. Someone has to stand-up for the people at the lower scale on income. The government and the leading two opposition parties don't seem to care about the interests of these people.


  • #4
    meglome
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    james.xix wrote: »
    I'd imagine they'll be leading protest. Peaceful protests at that as well. Someone has to stand-up for the people at the lower scale on income. The government and the leading two opposition parties don't seem to care about the interests of these people.

    Honestly if their economic policy's got implemented the "people at the lower end of the scale" would be on the streets.


  • #5
    james.xix
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭james.xix


    Where are the wealthy taking the burden under the 4 year plan? As the Examiner was saying: Cuts for all...except for politicians and top public servants.


  • #6
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    james.xix wrote: »
    Where are the wealthy taking the burden under the 4 year plan? As the Examiner was saying: Cuts for all...except for politicians and top public servants.

    They are hardly the 'wealthy'. The wealthy are the ones chairing companies, operating several successful business ventures, developers who managed to put assets beyond the control of NAMA. But then 'wealthy' is a relative term so those at the bottom of the public service are the 'poor'


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    nesf
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    How the hell are they an alternative to the FG/Labour Government if they are only running 20 candidates?


  • #8
    The Waltzing Consumer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    Here is the website:

    http://www.unitedleftalliance.org/


  • #9
    nesf
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    james.xix wrote: »
    Where are the wealthy taking the burden under the 4 year plan? As the Examiner was saying: Cuts for all...except for politicians and top public servants.

    They're being hit in their pensions. They'll no longer get 42% tax relief on pension payments and only get 20%. That's a big cut. They'll also get hit by the higher top income tax rate that has been promised. I'd also not be surprised if they were hit with more come budget day, they are after all the easiest group politically to hit.


  • #10
    GarlicBread
    Closed Accounts Posts: 270 ✭✭GarlicBread


    james.xix wrote: »
    A newly-formed alliance of existing parties has said it will lead a campaign of sustained resistance on the streets.
    The 'United Left Alliance' is formed by the People Before Profit Alliance, Socialist Party, and Workers and Unemployed Action Group.
    The group has said it will become an alternative to a Fine Gael/Labour government following the next General Election.
    The ULA has said it expects to run around 20 candidates in the election.

    Gandalf: "Theoden king stands alone"

    Eomer: "Not alone..........."

    We all know what happened next.


  • #11
    Langerland
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 328 ✭✭Langerland


    The whole sharing the burden, cuts for all is a joke and a lie...
    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/john-drennan/john-drennan-divided-dail-unites-to-give-itself-a-pay-rise-2410792.html


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    james.xix
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭james.xix


    nesf wrote: »
    How the hell are they an alternative to the FG/Labour Government if they are only running 20 candidates?

    Every group has to start small I guess. I'd agree though, 20 seems small. They'll be banking on getting the majority of that elected. If they gain support they might want to look at running at least about 10 more.


  • #13
    Lockstep
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,026 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    Are you involved?

    Any ideas on how many they reasonably expect to get in? Can't see them getting more than 5 in (Higgins, Daly etc. Even Richard Boyd-Barrett will be struggling as the seats have been reduced to a 4 seater)


  • #14
    mike65
    Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    I was listening to Joe Higgins on RTE this morning, as per usual he had plenty of bluster but didn't put forward any solutions apart from tax the rich. This crowd won't amount to anything except lots of hot air on indymedia.ie


  • #15
    Lockstep
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,026 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    Just looked over previous Socialist Party and PBP candidates results in the previous elections.

    Only Higgins and Daly have a real chance, the rest would need some brilliant luck to get seats, given their previous performance.


  • #16
    The Waltzing Consumer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    james.xix wrote: »
    Every group has to start small I guess. I'd agree though, 20 seems small. They'll be banking on getting the majority of that elected. If they gain support they might want to look at running at least about 10 more.

    What is their view on corporation tax? I don't see it mentioned in their alternative program. Are they included in the tax on superrich?


  • #17
    The Waltzing Consumer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    kickoutthejams wrote: »
    Just looked over previous Socialist Party and PBP candidates results in the previous elections.

    Only Higgins and Daly have a real chance, the rest would need some brilliant luck to get seats, given their previous performance.

    Good point. Dublin West is going from three to four seats. Unless FG or Lab field a very strong second candidate, I would say it is near definite that Higgins will take that fourth seat.


  • #18
    Lockstep
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,026 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    The Waltzing Consumer wrote: »
    What is their view on corporation tax? I don't see it mentioned in their alternative program. Are they included in the tax on superrich?

    The SP want to "significantly increase" the corporation tax, whereas PBP want to increase corporation tax across Europe as a whole.


  • #19
    The Waltzing Consumer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    kickoutthejams wrote: »
    The SP want to "significantly increase" the corporation tax, whereas PBP want to increase corporation tax across Europe as a whole.

    That's some scary stuff. Joe Higgins comes from a constituency where a huge majority of employment and industry comes thanks to the corporation tax.

    If they got their way, IBM, eBay, PayPal etc., and many companies in the corporate parks would disappear creating thousands and thousands of job losses which are all located in Dublin west. Why would someone vote for that? What is he thinking?

    Seriously, I am from Dublin West, what the hell? Where is his logic in that plan?


  • #20
    mike65
    Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    People Before Profit plan
    STRATEGIC INDUSTRY
    Develop new strategic industries, which take Ireland’s
    industrial development forward.

    Given the failure of private capital to invest and the calamitous decline of manufacturing to only 13 percent of the workforce, these new industries will be predominantly state led.

    These new strategic industries might include:
    �� A generic pharmaceutical industry to contribute
    to the global replacement of big Pharma.
    �� Pioneering forms of technology to support a
    shift to preventative medicine
    �� Support for agricultural co-operatives which
    have pioneered the development of organic
    food.
    �� The operation of closed factories by their
    workforce to produce goods people really need.

    And that is the extent of it!


  • #21
    Sharkey 10
    Closed Accounts Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Sharkey 10


    What are peoples initial thoughts on this idea ?
    What do you think are there chances of getting a candidate or two elected ?

    I have always found joe higgins to be a man of integrity. I was brought up in his constituency and was always shocked as a young lad when my father would point out his house and i would always say but polititians live in big houses.

    Im pretty sure a lot of you will not approve of this alliance but at the same time look for change and alternatives.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/1125/united_left_alliance.html




    MOD NOTE:MERGED THREAD


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    The Waltzing Consumer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    Sharkey 10 wrote: »
    What are peoples initial thoughts on this idea ?
    What do you think are there chances of getting a candidate or two elected ?

    I have always found joe higgins to be a man of integrity. I was brought up in his constituency and was always shocked as a young lad when my father would point out his house and i would always say but polititians live in big houses.

    Im pretty sure a lot of you will not approve of this alliance but at the same time look for change and alternatives.

    Ah you are from his area too. Would you really vote for someone who wants to significantly raise corporation tax? West Dublin has thousands and thousands of jobs from multinationals because of the corp. tax, they would be gone if Joe got his way. I hope you do not work in eBay, PayPal, IBM etc.

    How is he a man of integrity if one of his aims is to destroy a vast amount of industry and employment in West Dublin by increasing corp. tax?


  • #23
    amacachi
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,315 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    nesf wrote: »
    How the hell are they an alternative to the FG/Labour Government if they are only running 20 candidates?

    Maths isn't the left's strongest point. :pac:


  • #24
    nesf
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    james.xix wrote: »
    Every group has to start small I guess. I'd agree though, 20 seems small. They'll be banking on getting the majority of that elected. If they gain support they might want to look at running at least about 10 more.

    Eh, yeah sure but painting yourself as an alternative to FG/Lab would require you to be running enough seats to at least be able to form a large minority partner in Government. As is, running 20, they'll do well to get 4 and that'll leave them as a fringe group with little to no influence since they are so far from the main parties in terms of policy.


  • #25
    james.xix
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭james.xix


    I've no involvement with this group at all. Interested though in finding out what this group are about and if they are an alternative or not.
    My own preference is for FG and Labour but if another group were there will an alternative, I'd consider voting for them.
    I would not agree with the raising of the corporation tax.


  • #26
    james.xix
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭james.xix


    nesf wrote: »
    Eh, yeah sure but painting yourself as an alternative to FG/Lab would require you to be running enough seats to at least be able to form a large minority partner in Government. As is, running 20, they'll do well to get 4 and that'll leave them as a fringe group with little to no influence since they are so far from the main parties in terms of policy.

    We'll have to see if they can strike a cord. The groups joining for the alliance are starting off at a low base so it's hard to know.
    If they can get their message across that they will protect the tax-payer and not the bondholders, they could gain support.


  • #27
    Dannyboy83
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    I read a few lines and nearly got sick in my mouth.
    Where are all these magical wealthy people they want to tax?

    Every time parties speak of state sector reform, facts and figures can be given.
    Every time these magicians speak of tax reform, we are expected to go on their word.

    Show me the figures that prove there are loads of mystically wealthy people who we can tax so that we don't have to reform state sector expenditure.

    Other wise, you may aswell vote for me and my plan to grow factories from magic beans.


  • #28
    johngalway
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,271 ✭✭✭✭johngalway


    I had some level of respect and fondness for Joe Higgins, even though I completely disagree with just about 99% of everything he says. The this clap trap today. Good riddance to the lot of them. Just come out and rebrand as the Communist Party of Dublin and be done with it.


  • #29
    Sharkey 10
    Closed Accounts Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Sharkey 10


    The Waltzing Consumer wrote: »
    Ah you are from his area too. Would you really vote for someone who wants to significantly raise corporation tax? West Dublin has thousands and thousands of jobs from multinationals because of the corp. tax, they would be gone if Joe got his way. I hope you do not work in eBay, PayPal, IBM etc.

    How is he a man of integrity if one of his aims is to destroy a vast amount of industry and employment in West Dublin by increasing corp. tax?

    Surely it is only fair to raise the corporation tax by a small amount as ive alway heard that everything should be hit . I would like to have someone else chime in here because i lack knowledge in this department .
    Are these companies only here because of the low corp tax?
    ie are there any geographical advantage, good workforce etc.

    Is it a fact that if corp tax goes up foreign companies leave?

    My thoughts is that we should be encouraging indigenous business so that the profit aren't going abroad.


  • #30
    MagicSean
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    "There can be no just or sustainable solution to the crisis based on the capitalist market. Instead we favour democratic and public control over resources so that social need is prioritised over profit."

    So they're communists?


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    mike65
    Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Sharkey 10 wrote: »
    Is it a fact that if corp tax goes up foreign companies leave?

    Its more that they don't add significant fresh investment to existing plant and start to look elsewhere for any new plants.


Advertisement