Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Jim Corr and Ian R Crane - Final Meltdown

2»

Comments

  • #32
    My name is URL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,242 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Di0genes wrote: »
    It was the Saturday Show. And he a idiot. Much of what he spouts has been exposed as incorrect.

    Lots of stuff has been exposed as incorrect but have still had a major impact on people, and life in general. Early alchemists were viewed as lunatics and heathens.. even contemporary scientists are often pushed to the fringes only to be proven correct posthumously. I'm not trying to say that Corr may be correct, but the mentality of those unwilling to listen has not changed much.


  • #33
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    My name is URL wrote: »
    Lots of stuff has been exposed as incorrect but have still had a major impact on people, and life in general. Early alchemists were viewed as lunatics and heathens..

    And were generally found out as being incorrect.
    even contemporary scientists are often pushed to the fringes only to be proven correct posthumously. I'm not trying to say that Corr may be correct, but the mentality of those unwilling to listen has not changed much.

    Which is nice and all, lets not wave in the direct of other people being correct, as proof Jim Corr could be correct as well.

    Lets judge Corr on the merits of his own arguments, and on that basis, his position is just laughable littered with stuff that has been exposed as false years ago.


  • #34
    profitius
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,976 ✭✭✭profitius


    todolist wrote: »
    I don't doubt Jim Corr's sincerity.Some of the stuff be believes is a little off the wall but some of it is very plausible.I seen him on the Late Late show and he was ridiculed.He's paid a high price for his beliefs.Either you believe what he's saying or you don't.Don't personalize it by calling him a nutter.

    I always find it funny when the brainwashed sheep laughs and ridicules somebody who has actually done some research on the topic.


  • #35
    COUCH WARRIOR
    Closed Accounts Posts: 116 ✭✭COUCH WARRIOR


    My name is URL wrote: »
    Lots of stuff has been exposed as incorrect but have still had a major impact on people, and life in general. Early alchemists were viewed as lunatics and heathens.. even contemporary scientists are often pushed to the fringes only to be proven correct posthumously. I'm not trying to say that Corr may be correct, but the mentality of those unwilling to listen has not changed much.

    Am I missing something? They were lunatics not sure about heathens though, but not scientists


  • #36
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    profitius wrote: »
    I always find it funny when the brainwashed sheep laughs and ridicules somebody who has actually done some research on the topic.

    And I find it even funnier when someone claims they've "researched" a subject and come out with idiotic declarations of "facts" about said subject that are demonstratively untrue.

    The litany of bull**** that spews forth from Jim Corr is proof of the old joke
    What do you call a drummer with half a brain?

    Gifted.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    StupidLikeAFox
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,795 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Di0genes wrote:
    Much of what he spouts has been exposed as incorrect.
    My name is URL wrote: »
    I'm not trying to say that Corr may be correct, but the mentality of those unwilling to listen has not changed much.

    But what people are saying is they did listen and he was talking rubbish??

    Anyway what I find funny is that Jim Corr has absolutely no background to be credible in this area. I mean he was a drummer in a pop band, the only information he has is what he picks up off websites. Its not like he was privileged to top secret information or seedy underground talks. He literally read a couple of articles and saw some videos.

    I mean to say that there are a couple of people pulling the strings at the top, and they are so powerful that they can control all major and minor news outlets, pharmaceutical companies, airlines etc is pretty ridiculous? If they were that powerful surely Jim Corr would have been bumped off by now in a tragic "drumming accident".


  • #38
    meglome
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    The Corrs drummer was pretty tasty... i.e. Jim isn't the drummer. Guitar and keyboards I believe.


  • #39
    Yitzhak Rabin
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,225 ✭✭✭Yitzhak Rabin


    As per Humanji's warning in post #11:

    Folks, there's no need for insulting Corr or Crane. And if you've no interest at all in this, then there's little point posting here.

    This is the last time such a warning will be issued in this thread. From now on it is infractions and/or bans.


  • #40
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    yekahs wrote: »
    As per Humanji's warning in post #11:

    Folks, there's no need for insulting Corr or Crane. And if you've no interest at all in this, then there's little point posting here.

    This is the last time such a warning will be issued in this thread. From now on it is infractions and/or bans.

    Sorry but this is grossly unfair. Jim Corr happily accuses people of committing mass murder and genocide based on flimsy or bogus evidence, and you're worried about us hurting his feelings.

    Sauce for the the goose etc....


  • #41
    The Recliner
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,630 ✭✭✭The Recliner


    Di0genes wrote: »
    Sorry but this is grossly unfair. Jim Corr happily accuses people of committing mass murder and genocide based on flimsy or bogus evidence, and you're worried about us hurting his feelings.

    Sauce for the the goose etc....

    You can dismiss his ideas and how true or otherwise his facts are to your hearts content

    But making it personal is a no no, same as if you were talking about another Boardsie

    Civility isn't a difficult concept and I don't understand why people have so much trouble with it


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    ClovenHoof
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    silkworm53 wrote: »
    Do you think there will be any surprise guests?

    The Grand Master of the Supreme Society of Egelloc will surely arrive in disguise along with his lizard shape-shifting bodyguard minions to keep an eye on Jim and on everyone else should they get ideas above their station as sentinels of the Illuminati and Committee of 300.:D

    I see someone just got their journalism degree...


  • #43
    ClovenHoof
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    Di0genes wrote: »
    Sorry but this is grossly unfair. Jim Corr happily accuses people of committing mass murder and genocide based on flimsy or bogus evidence, and you're worried about us hurting his feelings.

    Sauce for the the goose etc....

    Well the thing is although I think that 9/11 was not an inside job as such. I do think that mass-manslaugter was committed as most of the attack could/should of been stopped and wasn't. If keeping the issue alive one days leads to negligent manslaughter charges against your beloved authority figures who should of used all their military power to SAVE lives that day. Then good man Jim Corr. It seems to be the only way we might ever get a decent investigation in future.

    One more thing, are you honestly implying that the 9/11 were not used as justification for the murder of 1 million Iraqis for oil?

    Because you can't have it both ways. Either you slavishly adore and defend authority figures (like most of the anti-CT folks on this board) or you judge them from issue to issue. So which is it?

    I personally may not believe that 9/11 was an inside job - but I have no doubt that the NeoCons are a shower of psychopatic opertunists who loved when it happened even if they had nothing to do with causing it directly. It was the event they had wet dreams at night fantasing about.

    So which is it? You instinctually adore and serve politicians no matter what or you judge them from issue to issue?


  • #44
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    Well the thing is although I think that 9/11 was not an inside job as such. I do think that mass-manslaugter was committed as most of the attack could/should of been stopped and wasn't. If keeping the issue alive one days leads to negligent manslaughter charges against your beloved authority figures who should of used all their military power to SAVE lives that day. Then good man Jim Corr. It seems to be the only way we might ever get a decent investigation in future.

    One more thing, are you honestly implying that the 9/11 were not used as justification for the murder of 1 million Iraqis for oil?

    Because you can't have it both ways. Either you slavishly adore and defend authority figures (like most of the anti-CT folks on this board) or you judge them from issue to issue. So which is it?

    There is an alternative view point, you feel that wittering on about no planes, and explosives in the towers, is a distraction to the real issues about the run up and justification of the war and how it was carried out.
    So which is it? You instinctually adore and serve politicians no matter what or you judge them from issue to issue?

    The fact that you don't seem to think there's an alternative view point, that I can suspect politicians motives and ideology, and not think 9/11 was an inside job


  • #45
    profitius
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,976 ✭✭✭profitius


    Jim gets mentioned on coast to coast am!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1KMRlfk9vE


  • #46
    Flaregon
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 560 ✭✭✭Flaregon


    Lol this sound like 2 guys trying to drawing blood for stones.
    there making us pay to be told that were fcuked, when we could of save that 10e and been a little better off.:pac:


  • #47
    Grumpypants
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,233 ✭✭✭Grumpypants


    ColHol wrote: »
    But what people are saying is they did listen and he was talking rubbish??

    Anyway what I find funny is that Jim Corr has absolutely no background to be credible in this area. I mean he was a drummer in a pop band, the only information he has is what he picks up off websites. Its not like he was privileged to top secret information or seedy underground talks. He literally read a couple of articles and saw some videos.

    I mean to say that there are a couple of people pulling the strings at the top, and they are so powerful that they can control all major and minor news outlets, pharmaceutical companies, airlines etc is pretty ridiculous? If they were that powerful surely Jim Corr would have been bumped off by now in a tragic "drumming accident".

    I went to see the show and to be honest Jim doesnt have the back ground but comes across really well. I dont agree with everything he says but large portions are factually correct.

    Ian Crane who does have years of experience and does have the back ground comes across as a bit out there with large portions of hear say and makey upy facts.


    A lot of what Jim said would happen with regards Ireland the IMF and the ECB came true within a few weeks of the show.

    Granted this could be seen by anyone who takes 10mins to study financial history and how booms and busts are manufactured to make large sums of money for a small elite group. Which makes it all the stranger that they can keep doing it.


Advertisement