Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Public Sector Wages - some facts please

  • 18-10-2010 10:22AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭


    Hi,
    I have been searching through Eurostat and google looking for a comparison of Irish public sector wages in comparison with other European countries, for example France, Germany etc.

    Anyway have any good links?

    Thanks.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,582 ✭✭✭WalterMitty


    Hi,
    I have been searching through Eurostat and google looking for a comparison of Irish public sector wages in comparison with other European countries, for example France, Germany etc.

    Anyway have any good links?

    Thanks.
    there isnt up to date stats AFAIK. In 2004 eurostat showed Ireland public servants on average were best paid of six major euro countries. Pay rates continued to rise at large pace after 2004 untill 2008 in public sector.
    http://www.thepropertypin.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=16238&hilit=eurostat

    http://www.politics.ie/economy/38595-david-mcwilliams-irish-public-sector-pay-eus-highest.html

    I know a nurse starting in France gets around 20k basic and in Ireland its 32k basic. Irish consultants also earn 2-3 times as much as their Eu peers in Germany/uk/france.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,717 ✭✭✭✭Godge


    The OECD does some work in the education sector on comparing salaries and terms and conditions. It produces a report every year on the subject.

    http://www.oecd.org/document/52/0,3343,en_2649_39263238_45897844_1_1_1_1,00.html


    I think the above link is to the latest one.

    Generally, you will find that entry-level posts in Ireland - clerical officer, executive officer, nurse, guard, teacher, lecturer, fireman, prison officer, physiotherapist - are exceptionally well paid compared to their EU counterparts. This point is continually missed on boards and other public fora.

    Similarly, at the very top, ministers, TDs, secretaries general, professors, chief executives are also very well paid by comparison.

    In the middle, where we have some (emphasis on some) very poor management, the salaries are less good by comparison.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    note: do remember that CSO stats on the public service also always exclude the health sector for some reason...


    the fact that a citizen of this country is not able to access information about where his/her taxmoney goes and/or money borrowed in our name
    illustrates one huge issue with the current system which could be changed, lack of transparency and information, which in turn breeds waste and corruption
    its all very frustrating


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,943 ✭✭✭20Cent


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    note: do remember that CSO stats on the public service also always exclude the health sector for some reason...


    the fact that a citizen of this country is not able to access information about where his/her taxmoney goes and/or money borrowed in our name
    illustrates one huge issue with the current system which could be changed, lack of transparency and information, which in turn breeds waste and corruption
    its all very frustrating

    Try a freedom of information request for something you can't find.
    All public service payscales are published on the web.

    What annoys me is we aren't even told anything about NAMA or these bondholders we have just given billions to.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    20Cent wrote: »
    Try a freedom of information request for something you can't find.
    All public service payscales are published on the web.
    .

    It shouldn't be that way, every single cent of expenditure should be logged and accessible to all

    20Cent wrote: »
    What annoys me is we aren't even told anything about NAMA or these bondholders we have just given billions to.

    Its ok that annoys me too, just read my past posts on the subject here


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,943 ✭✭✭20Cent


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    It shouldn't be that way, every single cent of expenditure should be logged and accessible to all




    Its ok that annoys me too, just read my past posts on the subject here

    What can't you find out online?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    20Cent wrote: »
    What can't you find out online?

    The total and up to date wage bill for all public, civil and state employees employed by the state and/or paid from the public purse.
    Alongside with detailed department/section breakdown + number employed where and doing what.
    Going back 10 years at least on a monthly basis.
    Sprinkle on top data for people employed indirectly via Quangos and various schemes which would be affected if funds were to be cut.


    And before you mention it, CSO are not up to date and exclude large sections such as the health services.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Yep, this data should be easily accessible (maybe not updated monthly but at least annually).
    Not sure why you'd want to go as deep as to where each and every person is and what they do (not practical) but the other figures should be available.
    The reason they are not is probably a case of lack of integration between all payroll systems in each of the departments and lack of wanting to make actual figures easily available.

    I am a public servant - I dont particularily want the money I earn per year with my name and potentially my address being too easily accessible (I dont think many of us would) but I obviously dont have issues with larger chunks of data about wages made available.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    kippy wrote: »
    Yep, this data should be easily accessible (maybe not updated monthly but at least annually).
    Not sure why you'd want to go as deep as to where each and every person is and what they do (not practical) but the other figures should be available.
    The reason they are not is probably a case of lack of integration between all payroll systems in each of the departments and lack of wanting to make actual figures easily available.

    I am a public servant - I dont particularily want the money I earn per year with my name and potentially my address being too easily accessible (I dont think many of us would) but I obviously dont have issues with larger chunks of data about wages made available.
    Just looking for comparable roles. For example, nurse in Ireland, nurse in Germany. Teacher in Ireland, Teacher in Germany. Clerical worker Ireland, Clerical worker Germany.

    The intent here is to try to have some sort of objective facts behind the proverbial public sector get paid too much / too little. If they get paid more than Germany that makes absolutely no economic sense. And our European neighbours are bound to take any pity on us.

    The question is - are they?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 228 ✭✭LevelSpirit


    Heres a fact.
    If we can get the public sector to take as much cuts as possible then the rest of us wont have to suffer as much.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Just looking for comparable roles. For example, nurse in Ireland, nurse in Germany. Teacher in Ireland, Teacher in Germany. Clerical worker Ireland, Clerical worker Germany.

    The intent here is to try to have some sort of objective facts behind the proverbial public sector get paid too much / too little. If they get paid more than Germany that makes absolutely no economic sense. And our European neighbours are bound to take any pity on us.

    The question is - are they?

    There are a number of posts (some stickied I believe) that contain links to a number of reports/data on relevant sites containing that SORT of data.

    HOWEVER and I said this in most posts I make on the topic.
    If you want to compare countries such as Ireland and others you must compare everything across the board, not just relative public sector wages (something by the way that unions failed to do when trying to get more money out of the government at the time)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    http://www.budget.gov.ie/Budgets/2010/Documents/whitepaperfin2010.pdf

    Central Statistics Office budget went from 49,670,000 to 63,858,000

    For the money being spend on this department we certainly are getting some very bad value for money. The opposition parties have been moaning lately also about lack of access to data and information.


    Hows this for job creation give 1 million a year to 50 private companies (50 million)
    to employ people who would audit, question and collect data from public bodies,
    create and maintain databases,
    and provide the data to anyone and everyone

    as added bonus you could employ alot of people in these audit&report companies :D


    the business plan:
    for every euro of public money wasted or corrupted that these audit companies find the employees would receive 50% bonus and rest go back to public purse
    Any organisation entrusted with money and power should be kept in constant check, the checks and balances would be provided by the private sector in pursuit of profit not more beuracrats.

    hows that for transparency :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Some data here:
    http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055750520
    Not exactly what you are after however.

    ei.sdraob,
    Can you advise of a location on the interwebs (from another country) where the granular information you are requesting that this government make available about our public sector is available?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭bryaner


    Here we go again!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    http://www.budget.gov.ie/Budgets/2010/Documents/whitepaperfin2010.pdf

    Central Statistics Office budget went from 49,670,000 to 63,858,000

    For the money being spend on this department we certainly are getting some very bad value for money. The opposition parties have been moaning lately also about lack of access to data and information.


    Hows this for job creation give 1 million a year to 50 private companies (50 million)
    to employ people who would audit, question and collect data from public bodies,
    create and maintain databases,
    and provide the data to anyone and everyone

    as added bonus you could employ alot of people in these audit&report companies :D


    the business plan:
    for every euro of public money wasted or corrupted that these audit companies find the employees would receive 50% bonus and rest go back to public purse
    Any organisation entrusted with money and power should be kept in constant check, the checks and balances would be provided by the private sector in pursuit of profit not more beuracrats.

    hows that for transparency :D
    Are these the same auditors that have been missing glaring holes and massive irregularaties in the books of banks for the last number of years?
    The private sector have been auditing private and public sector organisations for the past number of years.

    I do agree, we do require auditing, but the systems you need to put in place to do this are nowhere near as simplified as you make them out to be, the last number of years have taught us that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    kippy wrote: »
    Some data here:
    http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055750520
    Not exactly what you are after however.

    ei.sdraob,
    Can you advise of a location on the interwebs (from another country) where the granular information you are requesting that this government make available about our public sector is available?

    I do not know of any since i haven't looked for info on other countries :)
    But the likes of Obama have made alot of noise about more transparency (whether it will materialize is another issue)

    In order to make decisions and for people to keep their governments in check everyone needs more information. Right now the current government can lie an do lie to the people of this country regularly, and get away with it.

    An informed populace in theory would make better choices in a democratic system (See Lisbon) and keep the people they elect in check and off the waste and corruption trail, that is something that some politicians do not like the sound of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭Richard tea


    It would also be important to take into account the price for daily consumables (bread,milk) and working conditions ( annual leave, sick pay, maternity leave etc etc:rolleyes:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    I do not know of any since i haven't looked for info on other countries :)
    But the likes of Obama have made alot of noise about more transparency (whether it will materialize is another issue)

    In order to make decisions and for people to keep their governments in check everyone needs more information. Right now the current government can lie an do lie to the people of this country regularly, and get away with it.

    An informed populace in theory would make better choices in a democratic system (See Lisbon) and keep the people they elect in check and off the waste and corruption trail, that is something that some politicians do not like the sound of.
    Perhaps you should find have a quick look. I would wager that that level of access/granularity is exceptionally rare.
    Obama (and most politicians) speak a lot about transparency, especially in the current climate. It is unlikely the transparency will go down to the levels you are looking for due to many practical reasons.

    Despite the last number of months, I dont think you've managed to see the big picture.
    Ultimately as an electorate we either:
    1. Dont care about corruption/shading dealings.
    2. Are too afraid to do anything about it.

    No mater how much accountability we push on them, these two facts have become blatently obvious of late.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    kippy wrote: »
    Are these the same auditors that have been missing glaring holes and massive irregularaties in the books of banks for the last number of years?

    Our financial regulator is not a private entity, they still to this day rely on the banks reporting to them and not lying (yeh like they never do that)


    kippy wrote: »
    I do agree, we do require auditing, but the systems you need to put in place to do this are nowhere near as simplified as you make them out to be, the last number of years have taught us that.

    Provide a reward for the auditors to keep a % of any waste they find, problem solved. Fire anyone responsible for the waste.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    kippy wrote: »
    Perhaps you should find have a quick look. I would wager that that level of access/granularity is exceptionally rare.
    Obama (and most politicians) speak a lot about transparency, especially in the current climate. It is unlikely the transparency will go down to the levels you are looking for due to many practical reasons.

    Despite the last number of months, I dont think you've managed to see the big picture.
    Ultimately as an electorate we either:
    1. Dont care about corruption/shading dealings.
    2. Are too afraid to do anything about it.

    No mater how much accountability we push on them, these two facts have become blatently obvious of late.



    1. put that to a democratic vote, lets have a referendum on whether or not have more transparency (anyone who doesnt show up and vote will have their tax credits removed and they can pay for waste directly :D then they might care about waste and corruption)

    2. what can people do about it? (rioting and burning cars wouldn't get us far), we are being denied a vote (the by-elections), change should happen at the ballot box.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    Our financial regulator is not a private entity, they still to this day rely on the banks reporting to them and not lying (yeh like they never do that)





    Provide a reward for the auditors to keep a % of any waste they find, problem solved. Fire anyone responsible for the waste.

    So you think the financial regulator is the only "auditor" who has been looking at the banks the past ten years?
    He is the regulator (Yes, that office has been at major fault) but ALL of the banks and most of the public sector organisations have been audited by private sector auditors for years.........the banks have been audited by "third parties" for years.

    I love your simplified thinking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    1. put that to a democratic vote, lets have a referendum on whether or not have more transparency

    2. what can people do about it? (rioting and burning cars wouldn't get us far), we are being denied a vote (the by-elections), change should happen at the ballot box.


    A referendum on more transparency. You do realise the legal reasoning for referenda?

    People can do plenty about it should they not suffer from either condition.

    GO TO THEIR LOCAL POLITICANS, THEIR CLINICS, EMAIL THEM, WRITE TO THEM AND MAKE THEIR FEELINGS KNOWN.
    SORT IT OUT OR LOSE A VOTE.
    Politicians ultimately care about votes, enough people ask for change, change WILL happen.

    Keyboard warriors like us, change very little sadly, best interests at heart or not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    kippy wrote: »
    So you think the financial regulator is the only "auditor" who has been looking at the banks the past ten years?
    He is the regulator (Yes, that office has been at major fault) but ALL of the banks and most of the public sector organisations have been audited by private sector auditors for years.........the banks have been audited by "third parties" for years.

    I love your simplified thinking.

    They were audited by entities who are easy to pay off (under the table) to give an all clear.
    In case of rating agencies it was in the interest of these agencies to give junk good rating to earn more money.

    All of these scenarios could be easily prevented.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    They were audited by entities who are easy to pay off (under the table) to give an all clear.
    In case of rating agencies it was in the interest of these agencies to give junk good rating to earn more money.

    All of these scenarios could be easily prevented.

    Are you suggesting there was:
    A - Gross negligence
    B - Fraud
    in the audit process of these entities?

    Well fcuk me pink - call the freaking cops!
    Why werent they prevented by the way?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    i am not sure why you attacking me for asking for more accountability and data :confused:

    god forbid someone suggests that more transparency and change is required :( in the current system

    all of the issues you raised stem back to lack of transparency and corruption yet you think there is no point in reform.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    i am not sure why you attacking me for asking for more accountability and data :confused:

    god forbid someone suggests that more transparency and change is required :( in the current system

    I amn't attacking anyone.
    I am asking for a bit of logic, a bit of common sense and a bit of straight forward reasoning instead of acting like the politicans of this world and trying to be popular.

    We have an electorate that very plainly dont care enough.

    You've said yourself that there were "dodgy" dealings in the banks for years. No one cared, nothing to do with transparency. We as an electorate kept electing people that stood for these "ideals" and we continued to do so. We will probably elect another 30-40 of them next time round as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    kippy wrote: »
    I amn't attacking anyone.
    I am asking for a bit of logic, a bit of common sense and a bit of straight forward reasoning instead of acting like the politicans of this world and trying to be popular.

    We have an electorate that very plainly dont care enough.

    How do you know how the electorate are feeling? the one way to find out is elections, but we are being denied that....

    They might not care now but wait till hospitals start to close and schools fall apart (I am from Galway too ;) so you know exactly what I am talking about) and then point out to these people {politely} that they are where they are because of who they voted for and not holding the politicians in check.

    Maybe they would start to care then, in meantime its 20:13 and i still have work to do (hmm in order for more of my hard earned €s to be taxed and wasted :D)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,766 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    How do you know how the electorate are feeling? the one way to find out is elections, but we are being denied that....

    They might not care now but wait till hospitals start to close and schools fall apart (I am from Galway too ;) so you know exactly what I am talking about) and then point out to these people {politely} that they are where they are because of who they voted for and not holding the politicians in check.

    Maybe they would start to care then, in meantime its 20:13 and i still have work to do (hmm in order for more of my hard earned €s to be taxed and wasted :D)
    The electorate can very easily go to their local politicans (be they councilors or TD's) and make it very clear how they feel and what they want to see changed.
    Elections are only one voice the people have, they have other means of communicating with the THE PEOPLE WHO REPRESENT THEM.
    I do agree, they will care eventually. Some point will come where they will care but it is TOO LATE then. It really is.
    The time to care was in the past 10 years when we, as an electorate and population could have guided our politicians into making decisions that would stand to use as a country in the long term.
    Too late now to be honest - we've all got to pay for the waste. So long as we ALL pay, I have no issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    The total and up to date wage bill for all public, civil and state employees employed by the state and/or paid from the public purse.
    Alongside with detailed department/section breakdown + number employed where and doing what.
    Going back 10 years at least on a monthly basis.
    Sprinkle on top data for people employed indirectly via Quangos and various schemes which would be affected if funds were to be cut.


    And before you mention it, CSO are not up to date and exclude large sections such as the health services.

    Will this answer your question?

    http://www.kildarestreet.com/wrans/?id=2010-06-09.291.0&s=number+public+servants+breakdown#g292.0.q

    On a related note the amount of resources which are spent on FOI's, PQ's, Oireachtas Queries etc while necessary, is excessive. Time spent answering these queries is time spent away from engaging in real reform! We just can't please everyone


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    kippy wrote: »
    Are you suggesting there was:
    A - Gross negligence
    B - Fraud
    in the audit process of these entities?

    Well fcuk me pink - call the freaking cops!
    Why werent they prevented by the way?

    Surely there must be some mistake...


Advertisement
Advertisement