Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Fidel Castro admits Cuban communism doesn't work anymore

  • 09-09-2010 05:27PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭


    article

    An almost off the cuff remark by the one time scourge of the USA but not one I was expecting. I guess when you are near the end and no longer in power one has the latitude to speak freely.

    No doubt under Raul there will be a push to open Cuba up and get in the investment the country desperately needs which in turn should force Washington DC to get real. Cuba is no more a threat than I am.


«134

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Communism in one country never does.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    It must be a cold day in hell :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,362 ✭✭✭Sergeant


    MUSSOLINI wrote: »
    Communism in one country never does.

    Has there been any examples where it worked with more than one country?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Sergeant wrote: »
    Has there been any examples where it worked with more than one country?
    I meant never will.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    MUSSOLINI wrote: »
    I meant never will.

    It's actually never been tried.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    karma_ wrote: »
    It's actually never been tried.
    Pure communism? Never got past the socialist stage has it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38,989 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    This post has been deleted.

    If only the US hadn't sanctioned them they need not have had to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,889 ✭✭✭evercloserunion


    This post has been deleted.
    You really think that had it not been for Castro the people of Cuba would have lived long affluent lives? Just like the rest of South America yeah?

    If the right gave two sh*ts about the Cuban people they would've opposed the US embargo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38,989 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    This post has been deleted.

    Why then were they not given a chance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    mike65 wrote: »
    article

    An almost off the cuff remark by the one time scourge of the USA but not one I was expecting. I guess when you are near the end and no longer in power one has the latitude to speak freely.

    No doubt under Raul there will be a push to open Cuba up and get in the investment the country desperately needs which in turn should force Washington DC to get real. Cuba is no more a threat than I am.

    Castro also came to the defence of Israel which was a bit unexpected http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/08/fidel-castro-criticises-mahmoud-ahmedinejad


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,362 ✭✭✭Sergeant


    karma_ wrote: »
    Why then were they not given a chance?

    They were. For the past 48 years they have been the subject of an embargo from the United States. They are free to trade with almost every other country on earth. Since the massive flow of subsidies from the USSR dried up, the country has stagnated.

    The country is ruled by a totalitarian elite. Human rights abuses are numerous. It is naive to blame all of the ills of the Cuban people on the USA. Blame the leadership who crush the rights of the Cuban people, blame a failed political system and ideology.

    It ain't a small country putting it up to Uncle Sam, it is a dictatorship.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    Castro also came to the defence of Israel which was a bit unexpected http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/08/fidel-castro-criticises-mahmoud-ahmedinejad

    I don't see this is unexpected? Like I said in another post, Jewish people have long been entwined in Left-wing politics. Left-wing politics is at its roots is about equality and fairness for all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,849 ✭✭✭Valmont


    I wouldn't have said that Cuban communism has failed, it gives the impression that communism worked somewhere else. Oh wait, all of those other communist countries weren't 'proper' communist regimes because communism is awesome and...


    Just thought I'd get that argument out of the way early.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    Sergeant wrote: »
    They were. For the past 48 years they have been the subject of an embargo from the United States. They are free to trade with almost every other country on earth. Since the massive flow of subsidies from the USSR dried up, the country has stagnated.

    The country is ruled by a totalitarian elite. Human rights abuses are numerous. It is naive to blame all of the ills of the Cuban people on the USA. Blame the leadership who crush the rights of the Cuban people, blame a failed political system and ideology.

    It ain't a small country putting it up to Uncle Sam, it is a dictatorship.

    What you actually mean is that it's a dictatorship that the US didn't approve of because of its paranoia of left-wing politics. The US only support right-wing dictators and have never shirked from overthrowing democratically elected governments and installing dictators instead when it suited them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,849 ✭✭✭Valmont


    karma_ wrote: »
    Left-wing politics is at its roots is about equality and fairness for all.
    Yum, that sounds all fluffy and equitable. Tell me, when fairness and equality have been achieved in this social democratic society, how do you decide who collects the bins?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭fontanalis


    karma_ wrote: »
    If only the US hadn't sanctioned them they need not have had to.

    If communism worked they wouldn't need the US, but I agree that the embargo is ridiculous as China is basically an ATM for the US and with their ties to Saudi Arabia they can stoop no lower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    karma_ wrote: »
    What you actually mean is that it's a dictatorship that the US didn't approve of because of its paranoia of left-wing politics. The US only support right-wing dictators and have never shirked from overthrowing democratically elected governments and installing dictators instead when it suited them.

    But it's still a dictatorship. And not because of the US. As you admit. So what exactly is your point?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    Valmont wrote: »
    Yum, that sounds all fluffy and equitable. Tell me, when fairness and equality have been achieved in this social democratic society, how do you decide who collects the bins?

    Is that the best argument against left-wing policies there is?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭fontanalis


    karma_ wrote: »
    Is that the best argument against left-wing policies there is?

    I think Cuba is a good arguement against it though.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    Einhard wrote: »
    But it's still a dictatorship. And not because of the US. As you admit. So what exactly is your point?

    I would favour letting Cuba be the architect of it's own destiny. Should the Cuban people want change it is up to them to force that change, free from outside interference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    karma_ wrote: »
    Is that the best argument against left-wing policies there is?

    It's not exactly a good argument, but then neither is blaming Cuban totalitarianism and economic malaise on the US. But better that then blaming the people who actually ran the place with an iron fist over the past few decades eh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    karma_ wrote: »
    I would favour letting Cuba be the architect of it's own destiny. Should the Cuban people want change it is up to them to force that change, free from outside interference.

    Kind of hard to be the architect for anything really when you're arrested, imprisoned and maltreated for even picking up the tools of change.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭fontanalis


    karma_ wrote: »
    I would favour letting Cuba be the architect of it's own destiny. Should the Cuban people want change it is up to them to force that change, free from outside interference.

    But Castro and his brother are the architect!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    Einhard wrote: »
    It's not exactly a good argument, but then neither is blaming Cuban totalitarianism and economic malaise on the US. But better that then blaming the people who actually ran the place with an iron fist over the past few decades eh?

    Of course you can't place the blame entirely on the US sanctions, but being denied access to a powerful and rich trading partner that close cannot have helped. If teh US actually thought it would not work, why fear it? Why not let not just let it fail?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    karma_ wrote: »
    Of course you can't place the blame entirely on the US sanctions, but being denied access to a powerful and rich trading partner that close cannot have helped. If teh US actually thought it would not work, why fear it? Why not let not just let it fail?

    Well the US is free to impose anctions on whomever it wishes. You might legitimately disagree with the sanctions, but they really shouldn't be used to excuse dictatorship and tyranny, which seems to be a reflexive reaction of many left wingers. And I don't use that phrase in a pejorative manner.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    Einhard wrote: »
    Well the US is free to impose anctions on whomever it wishes. You might legitimately disagree with the sanctions, but they really shouldn't be used to excuse dictatorship and tyranny, which seems to be a reflexive reaction of many left wingers. And I don't use that phrase in a pejorative manner.

    Of course you are correct in that there is no excuse for tyranny, my real issue is with the US, not that they oppose tyranny, but they only oppose one kind of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭fontanalis


    karma_ wrote: »
    Of course you are correct in that there is no excuse for tyranny, my real issue is with the US, not that they oppose tyranny, but they only oppose one kind of it.

    Why don't you oppose both kinds. People who oppose regimes like Pinochet nearly always have some soft defense for Cuba.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    karma_ wrote: »
    Of course you are correct in that there is no excuse for tyranny, my real issue is with the US, not that they oppose tyranny, but they only oppose one kind of it.

    So in the face of actual tyranny in Cuba, with people detained, tortured and disappeared for speaking out against dictatorial rule, your real issue is with US hypocrisy. No offence, but this kinda sums up why I have little time for the Irish Left in general.


Advertisement
Advertisement