Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What would you do to improve the LOI?

13567

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    dreamers75 wrote: »
    No they are not in Dublin anyway may explain a few things. A lot people up in the big smoke wont let their kids play GAA (myself included) some will thats their choice but for arguments sake my kids u10s and other kids u7s none of the kids play GAA. Get the odd weirdo who does tho.

    I don't want to make this into a GAA thing as that'll only take the thread down an unfortunate road, but hurling in particular is massive at underage level up here in Dublin, the work that has been done the past few years has been phenomenal, to the stage where Dublin U-14, U-16 and minors regularly get the better of their counterparts in Kilkenny, where the game is almost religion. Your own experience with your kids and their mates is a pretty small survey group upon which to base your generalisation. But then agaon, judging by the "weirdo" comment you'd already made up your mind on the matter, no matter what anyone says.

    But as I said WAY off topic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,872 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    dreamers75 wrote: »
    No they are not in Dublin anyway may explain a few things. A lot people up in the big smoke wont let their kids play GAA (myself included) some will thats their choice but for arguments sake my kids u10s and other kids u7s none of the kids play GAA. Get the odd weirdo who does tho.
    What? You are depriving your kids of the opportunity to play GAA?

    I think all kids should have the opportunity to try out all sports.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    It all boils down to money. With more money you can get better facilities, better players. The best way to generate income is by getting people through the door.

    So, the clubs need to actively go after punters, and for me the best way to do this is to grab the interest of the children.

    Go into the schools, talk to the children, inspire them to be interested. Give them an incentive to go to the ground - meet the players, have a kickabout with them - raffle a fecking bike. Whatever it takes.

    The clubs need to ingrain themselves into the psyche of their community, and the best and easiest route is through the impressionable children. When they start going to games the facilities will naturally improve over time.

    Make it cool to go to a game. A big advantage the LOI has over the English clubs is the summer season when kids are at a loose end. Use that advantage and get them in the habit of going to the game. Clubs need to be responsible for their own survival by being active, not passively hoping for a good gate. Even half-price or gratis seats will provide some peripheral income.


    Every club does everything you posted and more.


    http://stpatsfc.com/community_news.php

    Thats goes back to 2004 and only cos its a website issue, we have all been doing it for years.

    Kids free etc with a paying adult is the norm, it doesnt work. We have max 4000 fans one day i will see them all again at a home game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,355 ✭✭✭dyl10


    Improve the facilities and build from the ground up.
    No more "sugar daddy" clubs.

    Most of our young talent isn't making it to England anymore and the players are filtering through into the LOI.

    Teams like Bray and UCD who have tried to play good football and bring young lads through, are crowded out by teams existing beyond their means.
    European games have been great over the last few years but it hasn't brought attendences up and many of these high spending clubs have ended up bust (Drogheda, Cork, Bohs (soon)).

    Enforce the salary cap!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    eagle eye wrote: »
    What? You are depriving your kids of the opportunity to play GAA?

    I think all kids should have the opportunity to try out all sports.

    WAY OT /please dont ban me

    Kids can play it in school if they want(i did won 2 medals in croker woot me). They aint playing for Round Towers Clondalkin, only thing i am depriving them off is seeing bigotry and a class based system of picking players hardly things you want to teach your kids tbh.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    Quite a civil and interesting thread actually. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    stovelid wrote: »
    Quite a civil and interesting thread actually. :pac:

    Pointess is the word i would use sadly i go back to my previous incarnation for this quote.
    kdjacl wrote:
    There is no point trying to get people who dont go to their own teams games to go to your teams. People who like football watch it on tv, football fans go to games.

    Assume anyone over the age of knowing their team isnt going to go to your teams game and become one of you. But know that any kid on the street with a ball if brought enough times will.

    /my kids like 9 of them were not allowed pick a foreign team until they hit 100 pats games (the ****ers all picked United and thankfully Sevilla :D ). My fault they picked United, theres a picture of me pissed drunk with my bro and mate trying to lift the PL trophy at OT from a game we went to years ago up on the wall.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    dreamers75 wrote: »

    /my kids like 9 of them were not allowed pick a foreign team until they hit 100 pats games (the ****ers all picked United and thankfully Sevilla :D ).

    9 kids?! Season ticket pain.... :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    stovelid wrote: »
    9 kids?! Season ticket pain.... :D

    only 4 but i use 9 as an exaggeration as it fukin feels like it some times :(


    use condoms people srsly use condoms, 2 is never enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,980 ✭✭✭✭Gavin "shels"


    Only way forward is the 16 team division, attendences in the long run will increase as you have the likes of Shams, Bohs, Dundalk, etc... bringing bring away support. Bigger attendences equals more money for the clubs to work with on and off the field.

    As said before, salary caps need to be enforced properly. League T&C's need to be enforced by the FAI properly, none of this Morton Stadium is grand because they have plans to bulid a stadium in X many years, likeso has happened with United Park, etc... Morton isn't up to League standards, like Tolka was pre-season but our club had to spend thousands to get a license while also closing off the Ballybough End stand which has to be a safer and better stand than the terrace in Morton.

    Whatever happens it has to start from the top imo, from the FAI and filter down.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭mink_man


    I think if there were some top players who wanted to start out coaching should start in the LOI, that could persuade some promising youngsters to stay in Ireland?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,497 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    major bill wrote: »
    The crowds believe it or not were better before the FAI took over and the league was a much better spectacle to watch.

    Maybe that was beacuse people had a bit more money then plus teams were building badwagons, spending money like crazy to try and get into Europe.
    curry-muff wrote: »
    I know this might sound like an outlandish statement, but what about ditching the club idea and adapting to a gaa like county based system, Ive always wondered what it would be like, would certainly make me care a bit more about Irish football.

    The GAA county system has been around for a century and is very established. To simply transfer that to soccer would take years to become popular.

    You cannot compare the two sports or how they are run, a guy playing for his local GAA team and the fans of that local GAA team have a direct link to the county team that may be playing in front of packed grounds for the summer.

    A guy playing for his local soccer team and the fans of that local soccer team have more often that not lo link to a LOI team.

    I do not belive ethat theeir is a big enough population in this country to make a 16 team LOI sustainable.

    Merge the LOI, SPL and LOW, make franchises and introduce salary cap and revenue sharing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli




    I do not belive ethat theeir is a big enough population in this country to make a 16 team LOI sustainable.

    Merge the LOI, SPL and LOW, make franchises and introduce salary cap and revenue sharing.

    Given we have 27 teams spread out across the premier,first and A championship a 16 team premier division could be viable it might be worth a try.

    I don't see a merger with the SPL happening though. UEFA mighnt look kindly on it and the SPL probably would'nt want it either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    Merge the LOI, SPL and LOW, make franchises and introduce salary cap and revenue sharing.

    For a start, there would be murder about European qualification places.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,969 ✭✭✭antomorro-sei


    stovelid wrote: »
    For a start, there would be murder about European qualification places.

    The SPL could just kick Celtc and Rangers out to Engerland. Happy days, some away trips to Edinburgh :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,497 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Given we have 27 teams spread out across the premier,first and A championship a 16 team premier division could be viable it might be worth a try.

    I don't see a merger with the SPL happening though. UEFA mighnt look kindly on it and the SPL probably would'nt want it either.

    Well if you really want a sustainable league with decent crowds then you cannot afford have the too big a spread of teams.
    Is not a huge market out there and people do not have a huge amount of cash to spend on sports, so 16 teams would spared a small market too thin if you ask me.
    stovelid wrote: »
    For a start, there would be murder about European qualification places.

    Of course it cannot happen in isolation. It would be part of a bigger re-organisation of European leagues and would have to be discussed and agreed with all the stakeholders involved.

    I know comparing sports is not an exact science but you have to look at what rugby did in this part of the world once the professional ear came about.

    Rather than keeping current structures and seeing good players move to leagues with the bigger financial power they decided to re-invent themselves with franchises and created a a competitive league that has a decent following both at games and on TV

    Soccer can learn a lot from that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    Well if you really want a sustainable league with decent crowds then you cannot afford have the too big a spread of teams.
    Is not a huge market out there and people do not have a huge amount of cash to spend on sports, so 16 teams would spared a small market too thin if you ask me.



    But as it stands we have teams plying each other 4 times a season minimum. This repetition does'nt help with the crowds either.

    A 16 team league could have teams only playing each other twice a season at the most.

    I don't understand why you think doing this would spread the market too thin. There are 27 teams in the LOI altogether so it would'nt spread the market any thinner than what it is.

    In fact the teams brought up from the first division could receive a boost in crowds and sponsorship revenue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,497 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    But as it stands we have teams plying each other 4 times a season minimum. This repetition does'nt help with the crowds either.

    A 16 team league could have teams only playing each other twice a season at the most.

    I don't understand why you think doing this would spread the market too thin. There are 27 teams in the LOI altogether so it would'nt spread the market any thinner than what it is.

    In fact the teams brought up from the first division could receive a boost in crowds and sponsorship revenue.

    The theme of this thread is that there is something wrong with the LOI.
    One main point is that the league is poorly attended.

    My point is that Ireland is a small market and there are just not enough people to support a sustainable 16 team league.

    The solution is to be part of a larger league involving Scotland, Ni and Wales with possibly 5 to 8 teams in Ireland

    Yes there may be as 27 team league at the moment but how well attended are games outside the top teams in the top division ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    The theme of this thread is that there is something wrong with the LOI.
    One main point is that the league is poorly attended.

    My point is that Ireland is a small market and there are just not enough people to support a sustainable 16 team league.

    The solution is to be part of a larger league involving Scotland, Ni and Wales with possibly 5 to 8 teams in Ireland

    Yes there may be as 27 team league at the moment but how well attended are games outside the top teams in the top division ?

    And moving some of those into the premier division could boost attendances. I don't see any reason why a 16 team premier division would negatively impact on current attendances.

    Also the merger between leagues won't happen and would'nt solve anything. It's not a realisitc solution to the problem. However a 16 team premier division is a viable prospect that could have positive results. It would at least be worth trying it for a couple of seasons.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭SantryRed


    I'm fcuking sick of the sight of some teams in this league the amount of times we play them. It's a joke. 16 team league rectifies this.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭digme


    We need to get the games onto sky or something similar, maybe even our OWN Irish sports channel?We need to launch a god dam satellite and do our own thing for a change.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    digme wrote: »
    We need to get the games onto sky or something similar, maybe even our OWN Irish sports channel?We need to launch a god dam satellite and do our own thing for a change.

    Actually the IFA did this with their league games when negotiating the deal to show the NI matches with Sky. Sky showed a couple of games from the NI league last season.

    The FAI should try and do the same thing when they are selling the rights for the internationals to Sky.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,497 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Actually the IFA did this with their league games when negotiating the deal to show the NI matches with Sky. Sky showed a couple of games from the NI league last season.

    The FAI should try and do the same thing when they are selling the rights for the internationals to Sky.

    How would that help ?
    Surely putting games on a pay station will not attract new people to the league

    Yes you may get people who sub to sky already for EPL watching LOI games but it will hardly put more bums on seats


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 598 ✭✭✭Whippersnapper


    I used to go to LOI games all the time from the early 90s right up until roughly 2002. The reason I stopped going was because the game was taking second place to a circus of events on matchday that I can only assume were there to appeal to punters.It started off with a ridiculous mascot and went on to include cheerleaders on the pitch before the game and at half-time. The final straw was when, while trying to watch the first-half of a game, a guy in a Dominoes pizza uniform kept walking up and down in front of us with a pizza box, shouting out that he was taking orders for half-time. Call me pernickety but I just want to watch the game, I’m not lacking in concentration so much that I need entertaining at half-time, that’s what the match programme is for and I’m not planning on sitting there for hours on end so that I may need to order a pizza for later.

    As for facilities, I’m not fussed about them. I remember going to Longford and the toilet was in what seemed like a hastily constructed shed. It was part of the experience of going to the games, we knew the clubs were poor but the players were passionate.

    Maybe I’m just an old romantic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    How would that help ?
    Surely putting games on a pay station will not attract new people to the league

    Yes you may get people who sub to sky already for EPL watching LOI games but it will hardly put more bums on seats

    Because it's better than the 0 LOI games Sky shows at the moment. The FAI could make it a clause of getting the rights to screen their internationals.

    A lot of people watch Sky even though it is a subscription channel. A bit of extra coverage from Sky would be no harm at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,497 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Because it's better than the 0 LOI games Sky shows at the moment. The FAI could make it a clause of getting the rights to screen their internationals.

    A lot of people watch Sky even though it is a subscription channel. A bit of extra coverage from Sky would be no harm at all.

    But there are games on RTE, and a highlights show on RTE, everyone who has a TV in Ireland has RTE.

    Do you expect some sort 'Oh LOI games are now on Sky, so they must be good, I'd better take a bit more interest now' reaction from Sky viewers ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    But there are games on RTE, and a highlights show on RTE, everyone who has a TV in Ireland has RTE.

    Do you expect some sort 'Oh LOI games are now on Sky, so they must be good, I'd better take a bit more interest now' reaction from Sky viewers ?

    Having matches shown on two channels is better than matches on only one. RTE only seem to show matches around the start of the season and the end of the season so theres room to pick up mid-season matches.

    They also show sky sports in a lot of pubs so when the LOI matches are on they might be shown in pubs and any extra coverage the league can get has to be welcomed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭Bob the Seducer


    Having matches shown on two channels is better than matches on only one. RTE only seem to show matches around the start of the season and the end of the season so theres room to pick up mid-season matches.

    They also show sky sports in a lot of pubs so when the LOI matches are on they might be shown in pubs and any extra coverage the league can get has to be welcomed.

    LoI games are shown on RTE, TG4 and Setanta under the current deal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,100 ✭✭✭eightyfish


    Having matches shown on two channels is better than matches on only one.

    I'm sorry but the Sky thing makes no sense. I've seen matches on RTE, TG4, Setanta Ireland and occasionally TV3 if I remember correctly. What sense would there be in bringing a pay-channel into the mix? The reason more games are not on TV is because there isn't the demand for it, and if there's not the demand on free TV people definitely arn't going to pay for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    eightyfish wrote: »
    I'm sorry but the Sky thing makes no sense. I've seen matches on RTE, TG4, Setanta Ireland and occasionally TV3 if I remember correctly. What sense would there be in bringing a pay-channel into the mix? The reason more games are not on TV is because there isn't the demand for it, and if there's not the demand on free TV people definitely arn't going to pay for it.

    There was no demand for the Irish league matches either but the IFA got a deal for Sky to cover some of those matches because at the end of the day it's free publicity and coverage for their league.

    Showing matches on Sky as well as RTE, TG4 and Setanta just adds more coverage and publicity. Given a lot of people in this country have Sky sports anyway i don't see any reason why not.

    If the FAI made the coverage of 3 or 4 games a season by sky on sky sports 1 as a clause for the right to screen the internationals deal than thats basically extra publicity and coverage for the league at no cost to the clubs or the league itself.

    How is there no sense in that?


Advertisement