Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Argentina legalised SSM today.

13567

Comments

  • #62
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    Dr. Baltar wrote: »
    We should also outlaw black people & ginger people from having kids because the children might be made fun of in school. :rolleyes:


    and people wearing glasses - how could you have skipped over this?


  • #63
    caseyann
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,938 ✭✭✭caseyann


    Blay wrote: »
    They wouldn't be procreating, they would be rasing the child and given the "adults" some hetrosexuals raise their children into, I'd bet homosexual couples would do a better job.

    Right ok world and parents have done a good enough job so far,going to try take that away from them now to.lmao


  • #64
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    caseyann wrote: »
    Right ok world and parents have done a good enough job so far,going to try take that away from them now to.lmao

    WTF? Any chance of a translation into English?


  • #65
    Witcher
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,521 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    caseyann wrote: »
    Right ok world and parents have done a good enough job so far,going to try take that away from them now to.lmao

    Take what away?

    The children would be given up for adoption, it's not like gays are stealing children from parents at gunpoint.:rolleyes:


  • #66
    Dr. Baltar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭Dr. Baltar


    sligopark wrote: »
    Paedophuilia is linked with homosexuality - just look at NAMBLA - although this is not to say all homosexuals are paedophiles nor near it - sure this would be like claiming all roman catholic priests are paedophiles.

    Why would gays want to try and claim marriage whe it is a union between men and women for the institution of having children.

    Whilst I am all for equal rights - when I see a bloke give birth then perhaps it might be a logical claim until then why?
    Gregory King of the Human Rights Campaign said that "NAMBLA is not a gay organization ... They are not part of our community and we thoroughly reject their efforts to insinuate that pedophilia is an issue related to gay and lesbian civil rights.

    http://www.jstor.org/pss/190542


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    Blay wrote: »
    They wouldn't be procreating, they would be rasing the child and given the "adults" some hetrosexuals raise their children into, I'd bet homosexual couples would do a better job.

    not sure about that really - have you any evidence of this?


  • #68
    Joey Wide Narcotic
    Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Joey Wide Narcotic


    sligopark wrote:
    Why would gays want to try and claim marriage whe it is a union between men and women for the institution of having children.
    I love this line, it's as if infertile couples aren't allowed to marry and all women past the age of ~45 have their marriages dissolved.


  • #69
    caseyann
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,938 ✭✭✭caseyann


    Blay wrote: »
    Take what away?

    The children would be given up for adoption, it's not like gays are stealing chil;dren from parents at gunpoint.:rolleyes:

    You just said they would do better than an heterosexual couple ;)


  • #70
    plein de force
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,148 ✭✭✭plein de force


    sligopark wrote: »
    eh gay parents giving birth LOL

    genetically gay LOL

    LOL:rolleyes:

    i meant the parents you have as in the ones that bring you up not biological parents


  • #71
    Witcher
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,521 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    sligopark wrote: »
    not sure about that really - have you any evidence of this?

    Don't need evidence I didn't say it was fact I said "I'd bet".


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    caseyann
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,938 ✭✭✭caseyann


    MikeC101 wrote: »
    WTF? Any chance of a translation into English?


    Ah read between the lines :D


  • #73
    Witcher
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,521 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    caseyann wrote: »
    You just said they would do better than an heterosexual couple ;)

    Honestly..what are you talking about..you aren't even making an argumant your just posting disjointed sentences with winks.


  • #74
    Dr. Baltar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭Dr. Baltar


    caseyann wrote: »
    You just said they would do better than an heterosexual couple ;)

    A number of surveys have been carried out in numerous countries investigating the effects that same sex parents have on a child and (I recall a Canadian study) most seem to find that the children get on equally as well as children of heterosexual parents.
    Can't seem to find that beautiful Canadian study so here's an info page instead: http://www.colage.org/resources/facts.htm


  • #75
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    caseyann wrote: »
    Ah read between the lines :D

    Aha! It's cryptography of some kind.

    Cleverly disguised as something I'd expect to return to the person who wrote it with "At least try to keep your writing between the lines" in red ink.

    Good job.


  • #76
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    bluewolf wrote: »
    I love this line, it's as if infertile couples aren't allowed to marry and all women past the age of ~45 have their marriages dissolved.

    bet you all those infertile couples married hoping for kids and the majority of those after meopause had kids...


  • #77
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    Originally Posted by sligopark viewpost.gif
    Paedophuilia is linked with homosexuality - just look at NAMBLA - although this is not to say all homosexuals are paedophiles nor near it - sure this would be like claiming all roman catholic priests are paedophiles.

    Why would gays want to try and claim marriage whe it is a union between men and women for the institution of having children.

    Whilst I am all for equal rights - when I see a bloke give birth then perhaps it might be a logical claim until then why?

    Quote:
    Gregory King of the Human Rights Campaign said that "NAMBLA is not a gay organization ... They are not part of our community and we thoroughly reject their efforts to insinuate that pedophilia is an issue related to gay and lesbian civil rights.
    Dr. Baltar wrote: »
    http://www.jstor.org/pss/190542

    classic Dr. Baltar


    NAMBLA - National American Men and BOY Lovers Association

    men boy = paedophilia


    :clap:


  • #78
    caseyann
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,938 ✭✭✭caseyann


    Dr. Baltar wrote: »
    A number of surveys have been carried out in numerous countries investigating the effects that same sex parents have on a child and (I recall a Canadian study) most seem to find that the children get on equally as well as children of heterosexual parents.
    Can't seem to find that beautiful Canadian study so here's an info page instead: http://www.colage.org/resources/facts.htm

    Thanks but you are pointing your monitor in wrong direction,i could care less if they have kids or not or get married or not,not my problem or business. thanks anyway.:)


  • #79
    Joey Wide Narcotic
    Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Joey Wide Narcotic


    sligopark wrote: »
    bet you all those infertile couples married hoping for kids
    Not everybody marrying wants kids, surprise surprise...


  • #80
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    bluewolf wrote: »
    Not everybody marrying wants kids, surprise surprise...

    a handful here and there round the planet are hardly a sizeable minority bluewof...


  • #81
    Joey Wide Narcotic
    Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Joey Wide Narcotic


    sligopark wrote: »
    a handful here and there round the planet are hardly a sizeable minority bluewof...

    It still means the "institution of marriage" isn't exclusively for children, especially since post-menopause women getting married actually get married!


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    Dr. Baltar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭Dr. Baltar


    sligopark wrote: »
    Originally Posted by sligopark viewpost.gif
    Paedophuilia is linked with homosexuality - just look at NAMBLA - although this is not to say all homosexuals are paedophiles nor near it - sure this would be like claiming all roman catholic priests are paedophiles.

    Why would gays want to try and claim marriage whe it is a union between men and women for the institution of having children.

    Whilst I am all for equal rights - when I see a bloke give birth then perhaps it might be a logical claim until then why?

    Quote:
    Gregory King of the Human Rights Campaign said that "NAMBLA is not a gay organization ... They are not part of our community and we thoroughly reject their efforts to insinuate that pedophilia is an issue related to gay and lesbian civil rights.



    classic Dr. Baltar


    NAMBLA - National American Men and BOY Lovers Association

    men boy = paedophilia


    :clap:

    This is the ultimate fail post ever. I was making the point that at the beginnings of NAMBLA they tried to become a part of the LGBT community. The community then rejected them. :rolleyes:


  • #83
    rainbow kirby
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,928 ✭✭✭✭rainbow kirby


    There needs to be a special version of Godwin's Law for every time someone mentions NAMBLA in threads about equal rights for the LGBT community. :pac:


  • #84
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    Dr. Baltar wrote: »
    This is the ultimate fail post ever. I was making the point that at the beginnings of NAMBLA they tried to become a part of the LGBT community. The community then rejected them. :rolleyes:
    rainbow kirby wrote: »
    There needs to be a special version of Godwin's Law for every time someone mentions NAMBLA in threads about equal rights for the LGBT community. :pac:


    Agreed they are a paedophilic group who believe because of their homosexuality (ie male on male tendencies) they are part of the LGBT community who in fact fear them and what they confirm


  • #85
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    I assume we'll be seeing the fabric of society ripped to shreds, straight marriages devalued to the point where straight people will no longer get married, people being allowed marry animals, adopted children growing up gay, and an angry god sending plagues and locusts to destroy Argentina within the next week or so?


  • #86
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    MikeC101 wrote: »
    I assume we'll be seeing the fabric of society ripped to shreds, straight marriages devalued to the point where straight people will no longer get married, people being allowed marry animals,

    would my dog then be able to claim social welfare and adopt my cat?


  • #87
    Dr. Baltar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭Dr. Baltar


    sligopark wrote: »
    Agreed they are a paedophilic group who believe because of their homosexuality (ie male on male tendencies) they are part of the LGBT community who in fact fear them and what they confirm

    They are delusional peadophiles who try to justify their actions by claiming they are gay.

    The Catholic Church has blamed homosexuality for the child molestation caused by PAEDOPHILE priests which is also delusional - child molesters molest children - gay people do not.

    Homosexuality and Paedophilia are two completely different things, one of which is absolutely disgusting and wrong because it is non-consensual and frankly, I find your comparison of these two groups highly ignorant and highly offensive.


  • #88
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    sligopark wrote: »
    would my dog then be able to claim social welfare and adopt my cat?

    Almost definitely, but only if both you and your dog are gay.


  • #89
    scientific1982
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭scientific1982


    sligopark wrote: »
    Agreed they are a paedophilic group who believe because of their homosexuality (ie male on male tendencies) they are part of the LGBT community who in fact fear them and what they confirm
    "What they confirm". What do you mean by that ?


  • #90
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    MikeC101 wrote: »
    Almost definitely, but only if both you and your dog are gay.


    I might well be and given my dog humps all dogs irrespective of sex I fear he might well be bisexual :D


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    sligopark
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    Dr. Baltar wrote: »
    They are delusional peadophiles who try to justify their actions by claiming they are gay.

    forget catholic bashing for a minute - when is male on male not homosexual?


Advertisement
Advertisement