Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Grade Inflation - what do you think?

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭Effluo


    CnaG wrote: »
    It didn't factor into my choice

    The amount of 1st's attained may well have been a factor if there were a lot less awarded in a certain college than in other college.

    It would imply what the quality of education was, Now that I think about it....

    Anyone I know in UCD or Trinner's(roice) seem to be given a shed load more work than people in Maynooth. Has anyone else noticed this?

    What are the stats in terms of % of Firsts awarded in each college?

    I did a bit of a google search but could find nothing only stuff relating to Arts students


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 42,985 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lord TSC


    That's ridiculous! So they were basically saying that it's impossible to get over 70%? If they were going to change the marks, that's fine, but have each of the exams independently reviewed by a different examiner and marked as they see fit!

    Yeah, that was my thought as well.
    Thinking more, it was actually 20%, since I actually still walked out with the A (77%).

    I could see their point, since the screenplays were marked at a different standard than every other essay people did for the other seminars. But I agree we should have had another examiner come in and regrade them. I know for a fact there were people who got cut from 70+ down into the 50s who did deserve a higher mark than they walked out with. :/


Advertisement