Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread

1502503505507508827

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,608 ✭✭✭Spud83


    Thats the thing for me. As a club we don't need to get rid of all the debt all though that would be nice obviously. We just need to get rid of a large chunk of it.

    Having debt is not the worry, its the level of the current debt that is the worry and the fact its just getting bigger.

    If we could find owners who could

    A) get rid of the Glaziers

    B) after that leave the club with what 50% of the current level of debt being financed successfully.

    we would be on much more solid ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    Headshot wrote: »
    They are utd fans first, business men 2nd, why i say this because a person driven by just business would never touch utd the way is atm, thats what i think

    I know what you are saying but what happens when their back is to the wall? will they still be utd fans first?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    id agree with the sentiments above

    getting rid of all the debt is obviously the end goal, but for now the goal should be getting the debt to a manageable level for the medium term, so that it does not affect how we do business

    for the Glazers to walk away i feel they will have to be offered around the 400 million just for their stake(more if they want to drive a hard bargain) then work on the debt so if someone was to raise a billion then the debt could possibly be wiped out altogether

    the way the game is these days, to actually have continued success after SAF retires we will need to be able to spend money, in the current structure that would be a bad idea even if were allowed by the owners


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Headshot wrote: »
    They are utd fans first, business men 2nd, why i say this because a person driven by just business would never touch utd the way is atm, thats what i think

    cant say i agree with that tbh

    from a business point of view, buying United and making the debts manageable is not a bad investment idea, the brand is huge globally and makes a significant profit each year

    maybe im cynical, i just cant see 40-50 multi millionaires willing to risk alot out of their personal fortunes because of a love for the club


    EDIT: just to point out, as there seems to be some confusion

    I was answering only the part where Headshot said it didnt make business sense to buy United in the first two paragraphs, the last bit is just my personal slant on the idea that 40-50 lads will put up so much money for love of a football team rather then business reasons


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,574 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    kryogen wrote: »
    cant say i agree with that tbh

    from a business point of view, buying United and making the debts manageable is not a bad investment idea, the brand is huge globally and makes a significant profit each year

    maybe im cynical, i just cant see 40-50 multi millionaires willing to risk alot out of their personal fortunes because of a love for the club

    From my back of an envolope calculations, there is little money to be made personally, unless they take more out of the club than they 'should' in comparison to how is used to be.

    50 guys would need to come up with an average of 20million each to raise the 1billion. Our dividend was about 20million per season (may even have been less) before the glazers, which means an average return of (maybe) 400k per year for the investors. meaning 50 years to even get back the cash they put in, if that is their goal.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    From my back of an envolope calculations, there is little money to be made personally, unless they take more out of the club than they 'should' in comparison to how is used to be.

    50 guys would need to come up with an average of 20million each to raise the 1billion. Our dividend was about 20million per season (may even have been less) before the glazers, which means an average return of (maybe) 400k per year for the investors. meaning 50 years to even get back the cash they put in, if that is their goal.



    that kind of explains one of my reasons for why i cant see this happening


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,574 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    kryogen wrote: »
    that kind of explains one of my reasons for why i cant see this happening

    it does make it look unlikely, but I am willing to give it time, and see what is said if/when things become more formal. I'd like to see what their plans actually are, rather than idle speculation, before making any real judgement on the validity of any bid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    kryogen wrote: »
    that kind of explains one of my reasons for why i cant see this happening

    Will be interesting to see what they have to say, only thing is these are certainly business savvy people so they should have a decent and workable plan. My guess would be they have someone (financial house) short term to come on board with a view to getting the glazers out (with a promise of some short term profit for them) and then take it from there.

    They need to be backed, they are not going to be willing to put up that much money themselves. The key difference wil be it will fans making the decisions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    it does make it look unlikely, but I am willing to give it time, and see what is said if/when things become more formal. I'd like to see what their plans actually are, rather than idle speculation, before making any real judgement on the validity of any bid.

    thats fair enough but i doubt the details of their plan, if they come up with one, will be made public, so an element of speculation will always be involved when discussing it

    EDIT: actually it might cause of the involvement of MUST i guess, depends on what kind of a role they play


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,756 ✭✭✭CR 7


    Anyone looking for a jersey, fairly cheap here: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055841388

    Maybe not a good time to post this, given the current topic of discussion.:pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,589 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    kryogen wrote: »
    ill say it again, i can only see this being plenty of hype and then fizzling out

    the sheer amount of investors said to be involved makes this very very complicated and how do we know, even if in the unlikely event it did happen that we would be any better off?

    Don't United have 50 more investors now because of that bond issue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Boggles wrote: »
    Don't United have 50 more investors now because of that bond issue.

    there are more then 50 who took up the bonds im sure, but do you not see the difference?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,589 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    kryogen wrote: »
    there are more then 50 who took up the bonds im sure, but do you not see the difference?

    I do, my point was that The Glaziers had no problems getting 50 people to pump 10 million each into the club, it was actually over subscribed.


    The red knights will have very little difficulty getting 50 investors IMO.

    It's a myth that these people will do it for the love.

    But from my reading of it in the papers, sterling is very cheap to buy at the moment, the investors take their 20 million sterling and park it a club like United who chances are won't devalue, the sterling bounces back against the dollar and by that very action the 20 million is worth alot more.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,352 ✭✭✭daveyboy_1ie


    Manchester United has reported a reduction in the club's huge debt burden. The football club said its gross debt was £507.5m by the end of last year, compared with £716.5m in June.
    Pre-tax profits for the last three months of 2009 were £6.9m compared with a loss of £2.7m in the same period in 2008.
    The news comes as the "Red Knights" consortium of financiers has been meeting to discuss a possible bid.
    Deloitte's sports unit said on Tuesday that the Premier League champions were behind Real Madrid and Barcelona in terms of football income.
    US sports tycoon Malcolm Glazer took over the club for £800m in 2005.
    But his reign has been controversial, with many fans opposed to the huge levels of debt that Red Football, the club's holding firm, took on to finance the takeover.
    By June last year, the club's debt passed £700m for the first time.
    Green and gold
    Many fans wore green and gold - the colours of Newton Heath before it was renamed Manchester United in 1902 - at Sunday's Carling Cup final, which the defending champions won.
    In January, Manchester United successfully raised £504m through a bond issue, meaning the Premier League club will be able to pay off nearly all their outstanding debts.
    The club faces an annual interest bill of £45m a year on the bonds.
    Revenue in the last three months of 2009 rose to £87m, from £74.4m in 2008.
    Manchester United's cash balance stands at £122.1m, up from £8.6m.
    There was increased income generated from matchday revenues and its TV rights, particularly from the elite Champions League competition.
    Media revenues rose 33% to £53.4m.

    David Gill did allude to our cash balance being healthy but how we get rid of so much debt? And £45M a year on interest is only manageable if we are succesful, god forbid we win nothing next year.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8545662.stm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,435 ✭✭✭✭redout


    So they wiped over £200m off the debt in 6 months ?

    Doesnt make sense.

    Not buying that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,352 ✭✭✭daveyboy_1ie


    redout wrote: »
    So they wiped over £200m off the debt in 6 months ?

    Doesnt make sense.

    Not buying that.

    Exactly, in June the accounts say United (or their holding company) make £40M or so profit (even with Ron's money) and 6 months later £200M is gone from the debt, even though there was only £8M profit made in the final 3 months of the year. Never the brightest at maths but something does not add up there.

    Where did they get the magic beans from is what I want to know.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,406 Mod ✭✭✭✭lordgoat


    Just a small thing, i hope all fans here have joined MUST. If not it's an easy first step.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,574 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    200million would be roughly what the PIKs are worth, and they are not United debt, they are debt personal to the Glazers. It has been accounted for as part of the club debt because they are considered to be part of the debt owed by the company that owns United, and money is/will be taken out of United to pay these debts, regardless of them being personal to the Glazers.

    Thats my understanding


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,018 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    lordgoat wrote: »
    Just a small thing, i hope all fans here have joined MUST. If not it's an easy first step.

    1+

    iv been a free member for awhile now, just about to become a full member as we speak


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭Smegball


    That article sounds like complete horse shít.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,153 ✭✭✭everdead.ie


    Thats the reduction of bank debt only I think it's 716.5m overall tho including PIK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,435 ✭✭✭✭redout


    200million would be roughly what the PIKs are worth, and they are not United debt, they are debt personal to the Glazers. It has been accounted for as part of the club debt because they are considered to be part of the debt owed by the company that owns United, and money is/will be taken out of United to pay these debts, regardless of them being personal to the Glazers.

    Thats my understanding

    So in other words there really isnt a £200m reduction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,574 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Again, thats my initial understanding . From what I can tell the debt on the club has reduced, from circa 540 to around 510 (could be wrong) but that the 200 or so is still owing on the PIKs. I'll be reading up more on this when I get home later, on the phone at the moment.
    redout wrote: »
    So in other words there really isnt a £200m reduction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,903 ✭✭✭Eire-Dearg


    Some of you's might be interested in this

    http://backpagefootball.com/info/general/united-they-stand/
    It sounds like a missing scene from the Da Vinci Code. On Monday night, reports leaked to the press that a group known as “The Red Knights” had come together and attended a secret meeting, presumably held in an underground lair by candlelight, to discuss their plans to wrestle control of Manchester United from the evil forces known as “The Glazers”. The group is a veritable who’s who of global legal and financial powerhouses, with representatives of some of the world’s most influential organizations holding exclusive membership. Despite the early stages at which their epic quest lies, their intentions must be looked upon as being very, very serious.

    debt_516x350_86661a.jpg

    There has been a strong air of revolt circulating around Old Trafford in recent months. A campaign begun by the Manchester United Supporters Trust (MUST) protesting over the current financial state of the club due to the structuring of the Glazers business model since their takeover in 2005 has swiftly gathered momentum. Each week more and more fans don the Green and Gold colours of Newton Heath, the club from which Manchester United grew, to demonstrate their disgust with the club’s rulers.

    On a day where it was made known that United took in profits of £276.5m last year, the fact that a debt of over £700m still looms over the club is seen as unacceptable and a notable source of concern for the future. Last year alone, payments of over £68m were handed over just to service the interest on this figure. As a result of this, there is a strong sense among supporters that this debt is stopping the club from aiming to sign the world’s best players and has caused them to become small fry compared to counterparts such as Real Madrid and Barcelona whose funding seems endless.

    Last summers record sale of Cristiano Ronaldo for £80m has resulted in little reinvestment in playing staff and the signings that followed his departure, however effective they have turned out to be, did not send alarm bells ringing around the offices of United’s rivals as Alex Ferguson, despite his claims otherwise, seemed resigned to shopping away from the higher priced markets which he once frequented. United fans watched in disgust as big names like Ronaldo, Kaka and Karim Benzema, who Ferguson had long admired, packed their bags and headed toward the Estadio Santiago Bernabéu while they sniffed around signing Michael Owen on a free transfer.

    Critics of the recent fans campaign say that United supporters are being irrational, after all the club has featured in the last two Champions League finals, won three league titles in a row and back to back Carling Cups, during which time the Glazers demanded minimal influence into how the club was run. While United remain successful on the pitch, money will continue to flow through their turnstiles, tills and boardroom, however should a downturn in form occur, fans worry that the club is ill-prepared to deal with the lower revenues that will be generated as a result. It’s a sad fact for any United fan to admit but with Sir Alex nearing the age of seventy, his days in the charge at the club which he made the most successful in world football are on the way to nearing their end. When the day does come that he is replaced, there is no guarantee that success will automatically continue. His are very large shoes to fill and a period of unparalleled change at the club may easily result in a downward trend in their triumphs, which is why fans are eager to ensure that Manchester United as a football club will long be able to stand proud as a trophy contender rather than slip into mediocrity as the Glazers continue to milk their accounts.

    Red Knights, a title which remains unofficial, are comprised of some extremely powerful big city players. Amongst others present at yesterdays meeting were Jim O’Neill (Head of Global Economic Research at Goldman Sachs), a life long fan of United and close friend of Alex Ferguson, Keith Harris (Chief-excutive at Seymour Pierce and well know football deal maker), Mark Rawlinson (Senior Partner at Freshfields, a law firm which worked with the Glazers during their initial takeover and most recently oversaw the buyout of Cadburys), Richard Hytner (deputy chairman worldwide of Saatchi & Saatchi and co-founder of United Shareholders group that fiercely opposed the Glazers in 2005) and Paul Marshall (co-founder and chairman of Marshall Wace, one of the London’s largest hedge funds).

    None of the men listed above, or the others in attendance yesterday are short of a penny or two. However, when it comes to taking over the now third biggest club in the world (as of today’s reports) their pockets just don’t run deep enough and that’s why their contact books may be the most powerful tool at their disposal. Manchester United is valued at roughly £1bn and it is the provisional aim of the Red Knights to delve into the world of the global financial superpowers to see can they find the investment they require. Crucially, some of the money would also be sourced from supporter’s trusts so as to ensure everyday fans of the club can have their say in the future direction of Manchester United. The big point at which the group can use to self itself is that it has been officially backed by the MUST, who themselves have grown into a massively influential presence outside the offices of Old Trafford.

    Sources have been quick to point out that yesterday’s meeting is merely the first step along a path that may ultimately lead to little to no change in the control of the club but the fact that such a powerful group has been formed at all is significant. As of yet, the group also say that they have opened up no channels of communication with the club. Furthermore, the glazers insist the club is not for sale, but as pressure mounts amongst fan groups, hopes will be for this message to change.

    One thing is for sure, as United seek to add Premier League and European Cup successes to their already impressive trophy haul in the coming months, these are crucial times both on and off the pitch.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    quiet in here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,435 ✭✭✭✭redout


    Gill backs spending rules
    Manchester United chief executive David Gill is of the opinion Premier League clubs have no excuses if they fail to comply with Uefa's proposed rules on spending.

    European football's ruling body is determined to safeguard the sport's financial future by ensuring clubs only spend what they earn.

    The 'financial fair play' rules will start in 2012, but with a transitional period for three years after which all clubs will have to show they have broken even.

    Currently, Chelsea and Manchester City both return a loss but the holding company of Manchester United has also recorded losses in two out of the last three years once interest payments on their debts have been taken into account.

    Liverpool's holding company has also been in the red after interest payments.

    Gill said: "I think there is enough money in the Premier League that it should not be an issue.

    "If they are not complying now the transition mechanism means they can get their house in order.

    "The Premier League is one of the wealthiest leagues in the world and there is no reason why they should not be able to comply with the rules."

    Gill insisted however United would not fall foul of the spending rules despite the Glazer family's debts.

    He added: "We have seen what the proposals are and we would meet the financial break-even rules.

    "We as Manchester United have always been run professionally and will continue to be run professionally."

    Gill was speaking following a meeting of the European Club Association (ECA) in Manchester where member clubs announced they had persuaded Uefa to delay full implementation of the new rules from 2012 to 2015.

    Clubs' finances will be assessed over a rolling three-year period to ensure they comply with the Uefa rules before they are allowed to take part in the Champions League of Europa League.

    A Uefa proposal that only clubs with a turnover of 50million euros is being opposed by the Premier League and the ECA who say all clubs should be subjected to the same test.

    There you go Kryogen


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    kryogen wrote: »
    why did you dyslexinise my post?

    so down there means you aint in waterford?

    i am from that sprawling metropolis fyi

    Gowan the Deise. Waterford born and raised, moved away ten years ago.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭Le King


    flahavaj wrote: »
    Gowan the Deise. Waterford born and raised, moved away ten years ago.

    Sure we all have our problems... :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,658 ✭✭✭✭Peyton Manning


    Wow, MUST membership has risen by more than 30,000 in the last 24 hours. Pretty impressive.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭Le King


    Archimedez wrote: »
    Wow, MUST membership has risen by more than 30,000 in the last 24 hours. Pretty impressive.

    How do you become a full member?

    D oul brain seems to not have awoken yet this morning.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement