Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

2012 Poll

1246

Comments

  • #92
    rugalo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 103 ✭✭rugalo


    Torakx wrote: »
    there are theories that our dna is static in its essence and that light can change it also.
    micheal tsarion has an interesting theory that it will be an age of enlightenment.where we will reach a higher level of intelligence.

    its possible but im not sure how much credit i give to that.

    is that the thing about "the children of the light" i think its called. i read something about it, tbh id say its possible as part of evolution over a couple of thousand years if thats even too quick but in what three years we'll all be super inteligent and start using the other 90% of our brains, dont think so.on the 2012 thing i dont actually believe anything will happen but already i can hear "joe bloggs" talking about it so it funny in that respect but i hope people learned their lesson with the whole y2k s***t


  • #93
    Shepherd3
    Closed Accounts Posts: 28 ✭Shepherd3


    rugalo wrote: »
    is that the thing about "the children of the light" i think its called. i read something about it, tbh id say its possible as part of evolution over a couple of thousand years if thats even too quick but in what three years we'll all be super inteligent and start using the other 90% of our brains, dont think so.on the 2012 thing i dont actually believe anything will happen but already i can hear "joe bloggs" talking about it so it funny in that respect but i hope people learned their lesson with the whole y2k s***t

    Ultra violet light can cause mutations in genes which is one of the drivers of evolution. I'm afraid the 2012 thing is more new agey nonsense than a proper ct. As for the brains thing
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10%25_of_brain_myth


  • #94
    rugalo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 103 ✭✭rugalo


    Shepherd3 wrote: »
    Ultra violet light can cause mutations in genes which is one of the drivers of evolution. I'm afraid the 2012 thing is more new agey nonsense than a proper ct. As for the brains thing
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10%25_of_brain_myth

    sorry i got the children of the light thing wrong, if you google indigo, crystal children thats what i was talkin about. its very interesting reading.
    i stand corrected on the 10% brain thing. like i said i dont actually believe anything will happen on 2012.


  • #95
    espinolman
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,205 ✭✭✭espinolman


    thecommander wrote: »
    Do you believe that something big will happen on 21st December 2012?

    Big = End of world, fall of all major governments, catastrophic weather worldwide, aliens, etc


    Big ≠Moriarty tribunal ending, change in government of a single country, hailstones in Cape Town, localised minor events

    Apparently cracks in earths magnetosphere could fail during the sun's polar shift in 2012 :

    http://www.realufos.net/2009/04/nasa-themis-breach-deterioration-of.html


  • #96
    IrelandSpirit
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭IrelandSpirit


    'Something Big' is happening every moment. Close your eyes, breathe deep, and say to yourself - I Am Alive.

    Whatever's in store for us in 2012, trust me, it won't get any bigger than that.


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    espinolman wrote: »
    Apparently cracks in earths magnetosphere could fail during the sun's polar shift in 2012 :

    http://www.realufos.net/2009/04/nasa-themis-breach-deterioration-of.html

    How do you get cracks in a magnetic field?

    And there isn't going to be a pole shift in 2012.


  • #98
    mysterious
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    No
    Dont annonce it as a statement of fact without any evidence. There is vast amounts of evidene at the moment of our planet changing. We are due a Poleshift. i'm not saying it will happen in 2012. But we do have a galactic alignment and mid point tribualtion period. The Hopi, Egyptians and Mayas all made this time aware to us.

    Who knows what will happen in 2012 but all we have is now and do what we can to ensure the people of this world that we are rresponsible and able to move to 2012 and beyond it. Our society is crumnling that fupping god. So this transition will alllow us to become fully conscious beings again.


  • #99
    Undergod
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭Undergod


    There might be evidence of the planet changing, but the claim was that the sun's poles would shift.


  • #100
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mysterious wrote: »
    But we do have a galactic alignment and mid point tribualtion period.

    Yes that's true.
    Like we have every year around the winter solstice.


  • #101
    mysterious
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    No
    Undergod wrote: »
    There might be evidence of the planet changing, but the claim was that the sun's poles would shift.


    Well earthquakes and volcanic activity has also increased drastically since records began. The Pacific plate is changing from underneath and is meant to do with the changing magnetic sphere and inner earth.


  • Advertisement
  • #102
    mysterious
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    No
    King Mob wrote: »
    Yes that's true.
    Like we have every year around the winter solstice.


    But as our Solar system is not originally from this galaxy but from a much smaller one called Saggitarius, it latched onto our solar system during the time of the dinosuars and we have been slowly joining onto its full galactic rim ever since. The 2012 alignment is much more significant than the average winter solictice.:)


  • #103
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,613 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    mysterious wrote: »
    But as our Solar system is not originally from this galaxy but from a much smaller one called Saggitarius,

    Huh?
    mysterious wrote: »
    The 2012 alignment is much more significant than the average winter solictice.:)

    What alignment????


  • #104
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mysterious wrote: »
    But as our Solar system is not originally from this galaxy but from a much smaller one called Saggitarius, it latched onto our solar system during the time of the dinosuars and we have been slowly joining onto its full galactic rim ever since. The 2012 alignment is much more significant than the average winter solictice.:)

    And how do you know this exactly?


  • #105
    Firewalkwithme
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭Firewalkwithme


    mysterious wrote: »
    But as our Solar system is not originally from this galaxy but from a much smaller one called Saggitarius, it latched onto our solar system during the time of the dinosuars and we have been slowly joining onto its full galactic rim ever since. The 2012 alignment is much more significant than the average winter solictice.:)

    Do you have evidence for any of the above? Anything at all?


  • #106
    mysterious
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    No
    King Mob wrote: »
    And how do you know this exactly?

    Its shocking that you don't hear it from mainstream sience and fos news.

    It's called truth seeking. If you want truth you will find it. But you wont find it via the usual news networks, big coporations and NASA etc. This is what we are always aware of on this forum. It's important that we find the truth ourselves whereever we can.


  • #107
    indough
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭indough


    i agree that if you want to reach a certain conclusion then youll find things to sipport it

    it wont necessarily have anything to do with truth though


  • #108
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mysterious wrote: »
    Its shocking that you don't hear it from mainstream sience and fos news.

    It's called truth seeking. If you want truth you will find it. But you wont find it via the usual news networks, big coporations and NASA etc. This is what we are always aware of on this forum. It's important that we find the truth ourselves whereever we can.

    Ok this is getting stupidly tedious now.

    How do you know this is true?
    Where exactly did you get this information from?

    Or are you just making it up?


  • #109
    Firewalkwithme
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭Firewalkwithme


    mysterious wrote: »
    Its shocking that you don't hear it from mainstream sience and fos news.

    It's called truth seeking. If you want truth you will find it. But you wont find it via the usual news networks, big coporations and NASA etc. This is what we are always aware of on this forum. It's important that we find the truth ourselves whereever we can.

    You keep telling us this over and over and it's just getting boring now.

    You say you have evidence to back up what you said. You are not part of 'mainstream' media, NASA and so on so why don't YOU provide us with the evidence if it does in fact exist?


  • #110
    Undergod
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭Undergod


    mysterious wrote: »
    Well earthquakes and volcanic activity has also increased drastically since records began. The Pacific plate is changing from underneath and is meant to do with the changing magnetic sphere and inner earth.

    That's very good, but the point KM was addressing was about the sun's poles, is all I'm pointing out.


  • #111
    mysterious
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    No
    Cartoon_Head wrote: »
    You keep telling us this over and over and it's just getting boring now.

    You say you have evidence to back up what you said. You are not part of 'mainstream' media, NASA and so on so why don't YOU provide us with the evidence if it does in fact exist?

    I'm glad it is, because your coming onto a Conspiracy theory forum for me to persoanlly tell you what is. Why don't you find out. Thats what we do on this forum we all indiviicually do our own research. Conpsiracy theoriest share what they know to people who are like minded, curious, truth seeking and respectful.

    Again this will be my last point on this one Cartoon head. We are not here to teach you. If you want someone to tell you what you won't find out find someone who will.

    2012 topic is not something your going to hear truth about on T.V. We don't come here to this forum to expect others to teach us.

    Uprising, Mahatma, Black Utah, Sofa king, Espinolman, Irelandspirit,nyarlothothep, PaddyIrishman,Kernel and many more and to many to list. They ccome here to share and learn about the world. We are not here to conform and tell others what is.


  • Advertisement
  • #112
    Firewalkwithme
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭Firewalkwithme


    mysterious wrote: »
    Conpsiracy theoriest share what they know to people who are like minded, curious, truth seeking and respectful.

    But mysterious, I am curious. I am curious to know if there is any truth in what you said about the formation of the solar system for example.

    What would be the harm in sharing your evidence? Don't you consider it wrong to hide knowledge from others?


  • #113
    mysterious
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    No
    Cartoon_Head wrote: »
    But mysterious, I am curious. I am curious to know if there is any truth in what you said about the formation of the solar system for example.

    What would be the harm in sharing your evidence? Don't you consider it wrong to hide knowledge from others?

    Your curious and that is great, Google 2012 galactic aligment and there you can discern yourself what you hold to make sense to you.

    All the best in your findings:) I share with info and diusss things with people make an effort to do the same.


  • #114
    Firewalkwithme
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭Firewalkwithme


    mysterious wrote: »
    Google 2012 galactic aligment and there you can discern yourself what you hold to make sense to you.

    I did that and to be honest I don't see anything particularly convincing in the results but if that changes I will be sure to let you know.

    Could you provide a particular link which you think would be of relevance to the claims you made about the origins of our solar system?


  • #115
    sold
    Closed Accounts Posts: 285 ✭✭sold


    now who has been watching to much TV!!??>>..... What has the end of a Calendar got to do with a disaster??


  • #116
    mysterious
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    No
    Cartoon_Head wrote: »
    I did that and to be honest I don't see anything particularly convincing in the results but if that changes I will be sure to let you know.

    Could you provide a particular link which you think would be of relevance to the claims you made about the origins of our solar system?

    Well that proves the whole point. You don't find anythnig worth reading but you expect others to do it for you. Not a chance mate.

    I'm not responsible for you.


  • #117
    Erper
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Erper


    i dont think so...
    they said that Maya civilization made calendar but peaces after 21 12 2012 is missing.. so...


  • #118
    Dr. Shredder
    Closed Accounts Posts: 136 ✭✭Dr. Shredder


    possibly but not because the mayans predicted it, because of a coincidence


  • #119
    Firewalkwithme
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭Firewalkwithme


    mysterious wrote: »
    Well that proves the whole point. You don't find anythnig worth reading but you expect others to do it for you. Not a chance mate.

    I'm not responsible for you.

    I didn't say that it wasn't worth reading. I just asked you to provide a link to where I can find information to back up you claim about the origin of the solar system. I would be more than happy to read whatever you wish to put forward but so far you have failed to present anything related to your claim.


  • #120
    thecommander
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,532 ✭✭✭thecommander


    espinolman wrote: »
    I agree , the sun is not going to have a magnetic pole shift in 2012 , but they will say there will be , they don't even know what magnetism is , well they do but it is forbidden science .

    Reads as: Yeah, but no, they do, they don't, they do, they can't


  • Advertisement
  • #121
    mysterious
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    No
    Cartoon_Head wrote: »
    I didn't say that it wasn't worth reading. I just asked you to provide a link to where I can find information to back up you claim about the origin of the solar system. I would be more than happy to read whatever you wish to put forward but so far you have failed to present anything related to your claim.

    You know what you must do.


Advertisement