Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

[Irish Times - 29 Dec. 2009] Dart line to be split

Options
  • 29-12-2009 2:21pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 6,026 ✭✭✭


    I don't understand the need to split the line myself, it'll upset the dynamic of the coast and city, jobs and general social related journeys. It feels very 'LUAS'..

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/1229/1224261353133.html?via=mr

    The Irish Times - Tuesday, December 29, 2009

    Dart line to be split to make way for underground

    OLIVIA KELLY

    DUBLIN’S DART line, which has carried passengers from Howth to Bray for 25 years, is to be severed following construction of the Dart Underground, Iarnród Éireann has confirmed.

    The company will next March seek a railway order to construct the new Dart line, which will run underground from the Docklands to Heuston Station and Inchicore via St Stephen’s Green.

    The underground line, due to open in 2015, will result in the current north-south Dart line being split in two.

    Currently Dart trains run from Howth on the north coast of Dublin to Greystones, south of Bray, Co Wicklow, with city centre stops at Connolly, Tara Street and Pearse stations.

    Once the underground line is built, passengers travelling from the north side will no longer have direct access to Connolly or Tara Street stations. Their Dart will run as normal to Clontarf Road, but will then enter a tunnel at East Wall and continue to underground stations at Docklands, Pearse, St Stephen’s Green, Christchurch, Heuston, and emerging at a surface station at Inchicore.

    Passengers heading south will have to change at Pearse to return to the current Dart route.

    Southside passengers travelling into the city will still have access to Pearse, Tara Street and Connolly stations. However, after passing through Connolly, their train will turn west, through Drumcondra and out to Maynooth in Co Kildare. To head north on the current Dart line, they also will have to change at Pearse Station.

    Presenting the proposed lines to a recent meeting of Dublin city councillors, Dart underground project manager Peter Muldoon said the severing of the current Dart line would not affect journey times.

    “If you are going from one side of the city to the other, you will have to change trains; just like every other major city. We hope to have one train every five or six minutes, so the time from leaving your house to arriving at work will not be adversely affected,” he added.

    Capacity constraints at Connolly Station meant it was not feasible to construct the underground line from Connolly to Heuston stations and preserve the existing north-south Dart line.

    “We have a major capacity problem with the tracks coming into Dublin,” Mr Muldoon said. “There are a huge number of tracks coming into Connolly and only one track coming out.”

    The current line capacity at Connolly meant that extra trains could not be added to improve the frequency of the service, he said. The changes would allow a far greater number of trains to move through the city and would ensure passengers had a fully integrated public transport system, which brought them quickly to their destinations.

    “This proposal takes people where they want to go – the Docklands and the south inner city. Merely transferring people between Heuston and Connolly doesn’t take people where they want to go,” Mr Muldoon said.

    Iarnród Éireann will begin a new round of public consultation on the line and the proposed stations in the new year before it seeks a railway order, for permission to undertake the project, next March.


«13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭paulm17781


    Mother of God... Slow news day obviously.

    The split will allow the DART to function as two separate lines with increased frequency on both. Once the split happens, we will have a DART network which will be vastly superior to the DART line.

    This plan has been around since 2003. Good to see The IT picking up on it so quickly. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,026 ✭✭✭Amalgam


    Why split what is already joined? I'm not trying to be argumentative (honest), just looking for a rationale.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭paulm17781


    Amalgam wrote: »
    Why split what is already joined? I'm not trying to be argumentative (honest), just looking for a rationale.

    The loop line bridge (Tara st.) is the most congested part of the network. The plan mentioned above will have half the DART lines completely bypassing this line so Howth / Malahide to Kildare will not affect the DART service.

    With all these trains removed you no longer have Maynooth trains competing with Northern trains for space. This allows a much greater frequency of trains from Maynooth to Bray.

    It is not possible to increase the frequency (any where near the level this allows) with out by passing the loop line and Connolly station. I believe Connolly can not handle any additional services.

    Also you, shouldn't look at it as splitting the DART line. It is joining up the commuter lines. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭trad


    Does IR have the funds to pay for this or is it dependant on future Government funding?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭paulm17781


    trad wrote: »
    Does IR have the funds to pay for this or is it dependant on future Government funding?

    It was included in Transport 21. It is the single most important project in Transport 21.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭peter1892


    By splitting the existing DART line they'll be able to connect rail & light rail together - DART, Luas, Metro.

    For example - if you lived in Malahide & worked in Sandyford you'd be able to take the Dart to Stephen's Green, change onto the Luas Green line & head on to work. Currently you'd need to get off the Dart at Pearse & walk up to the Green.

    For someone living in Castleknock & working in the city centre it would be possible to take a Dart to Drumcondra & change onto the Metro towards the city, for someone in Tallaght wishing to take public transport to the airport this would involve taking the Red Luas line to Abbey st then walking across to the O'Connell st Metro stop.

    Splitting the Dart line like this opens up rail transport in Dublin in way that can't be done right now. Think of the proposed Dart line as being like an X with Pearse in the middle of it.

    Of course, my examples above depend on the various bits of the plan actually being built!


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 7,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭**Timbuk2**


    If this ever happens, Northern commuter trains (e.g. Dundalk/Drogheda -> Connolly) still run as far as Connolly/Pearse?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭paulm17781


    If this ever happens, Northern commuter trains (e.g. Dundalk/Drogheda -> Connolly) still run as far as Connolly/Pearse?

    No. They'll go Clontarf, Dockland / Spencer dock, Pearse st (underground), Stephen's green, Christchurch, Heuston, Inchacore and onto Kildare. Far most useful than a train to connolly.

    Isn't it great how the IT spun this as a negative when in fact it will benefit the city hugely. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭peter1892


    paulm17781 wrote: »
    No. They'll go Clontarf, Dockland / Spencer dock, Pearse st (underground), Stephen's green, Christchurch, Heuston, Inchacore and onto Kildare. Far most useful than a train to connolly.

    Isn't it great how the IT spun this as a negative when in fact it will benefit the city hugely. :rolleyes:

    Won't the diesel trains still have to go to Connolly though? IIRC the interconnector will only be suitable for Dart/electric trains. Or will they divert northern commuter (diesel) services into Docklands instead?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭paulm17781


    peter1892 wrote: »
    Won't the diesel trains still have to go to Connolly though? IIRC the interconnector will only be suitable for Dart/electric trains. Or will they divert northern commuter (diesel) services into Docklands instead?

    The tunnel is only for electric trains but Maynooth is going to be electrified as is Kildare. There'll be far fewer deisel trains about (in Connolly)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    But he was asking about Northern Commuter services, of which a fair few will still be diesel (Dundalk) even if the DART-to-Dwada happens...


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭KC61


    At the moment every train that operates to Maynooth uses a slot that could be used for a Northern line train from the loop line bridge. Every train from Maynooth blocks both Northern line directions.

    By splitting it into two separate DART lines it means that the service from Maynooth and that from Howth/Malahide (or further if DART is extended north) will be able to operate on a self-contained basis and not conflict with one another.

    This means that it will be possible to increase frequency on both routes.

    As for Drogheda/Dundalk services, if they are still diesel operated, then they will go probably to Connolly or perhaps Grand Canal Dock still using the loop line. If they are DART then they will go via Docklands to Hazelhatch.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 301 ✭✭crocro


    Here's a video that explains the dart underground project http://www.irishrail.ie/projects/dart_underground.asp

    If the metro is anything to go by, it will probably take until 2012 to get planning approval and a further 2 years to be financially approved plus a further 6 years to build so there's no panic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 992 ✭✭✭fh041205


    MYOB wrote: »
    even if the DART-to-Dwada happens...

    :eek:

    I would wager quite a lot of money that we won't see that for a very very long time, if ever.


  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭noelfirl


    Once the underground line is built, passengers travelling from the north side will no longer have direct access to Connolly or Tara Street stations. Their Dart will run as normal to Clontarf Road, but will then enter a tunnel at East Wall and continue to underground stations at Docklands, Pearse, St Stephen’s Green, Christchurch, Heuston, and emerging at a surface station at Inchicore.

    Passengers heading south will have to change at Pearse to return to the current Dart route.

    Southside passengers travelling into the city will still have access to Pearse, Tara Street and Connolly stations. However, after passing through Connolly, their train will turn west, through Drumcondra and out to Maynooth in Co Kildare. To head north on the current Dart line, they also will have to change at Pearse Station

    Good grief, subversive and anti-public transport journalism at it's best. Heaven forbid that people would have to change lines to get to their final destination, oh no, we wouldn't want that now would we.


  • Registered Users Posts: 997 ✭✭✭Colm R


    Thats an awful article. Whatever about the implementation, I don't think I have heard any dissent on the purpose or need for the interconnector.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭Metrobest


    paulm17781 wrote: »
    The loop line bridge (Tara st.) is the most congested part of the network. The plan mentioned above will have half the DART lines completely bypassing this line so Howth / Malahide to Kildare will not affect the DART service.

    With all these trains removed you no longer have Maynooth trains competing with Northern trains for space. This allows a much greater frequency of trains from Maynooth to Bray.

    It is not possible to increase the frequency (any where near the level this allows) with out by passing the loop line and Connolly station. I believe Connolly can not handle any additional services.:)

    I am supportive of any new underground rail project that has a sustainable economic or social benefit for the city of Dublin. Dart Underground needs further assessment and a proper cost-benefit analysis before it should be advanced.

    A few observations:
    - Dart underground will service Nama land housing estates that were, and are, not conducive to mass transit. Will there be a comprehensive planning strategy to densify the areas within walking distance of its stations?
    - Outside of peak hours, where will the demand for Dart Underground come from? What attractions will it have over the private car?
    - The loop line bridge is one of Dublin's biggest eyesores. Dart Underground should encompass its removal.

    The biggest worries for me are lack of any clear overarching planning strategy to justify Dart Underground; the unknown factors of cost and actual passenger demand, Irish Rail's proven inability to manage large scale projects (it couldn't even extend the platforms of the Dart stations on time).

    Worst of all though, is the shortsighted approach to the hideous loop line bridge, which is like an ugly wart on the face of Dublin. This elevated railway line should be dismantled entirely. Neither Tara nor Connolly are suited to their current roles ; the only way to expand their capacity is underground.

    The focus on Docklands is interesting, but for this project I can't help wondering if it would not be better to run the Kildare-bound tunnel underneath Pearse and to connect with Metro North at an underground O'Connell Bridge/Tara interchange. Tara street overground station could be done away with completely.

    Before I am dismissed as crazy, for an example of such an interchange please see Madrid's new station at Plaza del Sol. It combines Renfe commuter trains with Madrid's metro in a massive underground cavern right in the heart of the city. It is an engineering wonder.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,473 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Metrobest wrote: »
    - The loop line bridge is one of Dublin's biggest eyesores. Dart Underground should encompass its removal.

    It one of the most recognisable features, and rather a nice looking bridge compared to some of the others along the river.

    Granted the place may well look better but that said it is necessary with/without the inter connector. I imagine the diesel will not be allowed use this


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    This thread is like a mash together of posts from existing threads.

    I had to check the date a couple of times.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭Metrobest


    It one of the most recognisable features, and rather a nice looking bridge compared to some of the others along the river.

    Granted the place may well look better but that said it is necessary with/without the inter connector. I imagine the diesel will not be allowed use this

    It obscures views of the Customs House and cuts off the Docklands from the rest of the city.

    How it would work is this:
    The loop line bridge is dismantled.

    Southside diesel trains terminate at Pearse, Northside at Connolly.

    Dart Underground connects the network via a tunnel between East Wall and Heuston, via Connolly/Tara/Pearse (four tracks between East Wall and Pearse).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,312 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    One thing that could be contemplated to placate the whingers would be to run Howth services to Bray while Malahide etc. ran to Hazelhatch. This could be predicated on only Maynooth electric service going into Connolly and Navan/Pace staying diesel and going into a now-permanent Docklands surface station.

    After all, I don't think anything is actually going to be physically "split" in terms of connections from Northern Line to Connolly, otherwise Enterprise wouldn't work!


  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭noelfirl


    Southside diesel trains terminate at Pearse,
    Only two platforms, only two tracks, no room for expansion.
    Northside at Connolly.
    Congestion abounds.
    Dart Underground connects the network via a tunnel between East Wall and Heuston, via Connolly/Tara/Pearse (four tracks between East Wall and Pearse).
    Where do DARTs from Bray go (not just "inventing a tunnel", they have to go from elevated to subterranean via what sort of alignment, and thus how to get onto the Western line to Maynooth)?

    There's no overwhelming need to remove the Loopline, since the removal of ads and the nice repaint, it's actually robustly pretty.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭paulm17781


    Metrobest wrote: »
    <snip>

    Been over this with you a million times. Not going through it again.

    The IC is the most important project in T21. All the others become less relevant without it.

    What you're proposing above is a completely separate project to this one. Start a fantasy thread for that one. I've educated 2 - 3 people (who posted) on this thread. Let us not confuse them again. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    Metrobest wrote: »
    It obscures views of the Customs House and cuts off the Docklands from the rest of the city.

    How it would work is this:
    The loop line bridge is dismantled.

    Southside diesel trains terminate at Pearse, Northside at Connolly.

    Dart Underground connects the network via a tunnel between East Wall and Heuston, via Connolly/Tara/Pearse (four tracks between East Wall and Pearse).

    Where exactly would this leave inter-city service connections between Rosslare line trains and the rest of the network? How would freight workings to the South East operate when they are eventually restored? This nonsense about removing the Loop line bridge was last aired by elitist architects in the Irish Times about 1960 - I have the cutting somewhere - and I thought this nonsense had gone the way of the Dodo. The biggest problem I have with the Interconnector is that it is being proposed by CIE who have no credibility in operating, building or anything else to do with railways. If the interconnector was about closing railways, selling off property etc. and being proposed by CIE I would bow to their expertise in the field but building railways.....ffs. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    So basically if I live in Clontarf and want to go Dun Laoighaire, i will go as far as Eastwall and head to Pearse station? Get off the dart there and hop onto the Original dart line South of Pearse?

    Is that how it is, I'm just not sure of the proposed layout. it does seem a little confusing to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭Cool Mo D


    mysterious wrote: »
    So basically if I live in Clontarf and want to go Dun Laoighaire, i will go as far as Eastwall and head to Pearse station? Get off the dart there and hop onto the Original dart line South of Pearse?

    Is that how it is, I'm just not sure of the proposed layout. it does seem a little confusing to me.

    If you live in Clontarf, get on at Clontarf road, or Killester, whichever was closer. You will be on the DART line from Howth/Malahide to Hazelhatch. At Pearse station, change to the other DART line which goes from Maynooth to Bray/Greystones.

    The original line will be replaced by 2 DART lines which form an X shape centred on Pearse station.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,312 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    mysterious - yes, transfers between Northern and Kildare lines for all stations to Rosslare will happen at Pearse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 998 ✭✭✭Kingdom


    mysterious wrote: »
    So basically if I live in Clontarf and want to go Dun Laoighaire, i will go as far as Eastwall and head to Pearse station? Get off the dart there and hop onto the Original dart line South of Pearse?

    Is that how it is, I'm just not sure of the proposed layout. it does seem a little confusing to me.

    Would you not be better off using your yacht? :cool:
    Only kidding, the one question I'd have, is why only two tunnels? IE in my decade of using them always seem to balls up travel on the Kildare line at some point during the week. With the new interconnector it seems trains would come to a standstill if a train broke down in a tunnel.


  • Registered Users Posts: 912 ✭✭✭Hungerford


    Metrobest wrote: »
    Worst of all though, is the shortsighted approach to the hideous loop line bridge, which is like an ugly wart on the face of Dublin. This elevated railway line should be dismantled entirely. Neither Tara nor Connolly are suited to their current roles; the only way to expand their capacity is underground.

    Based on what has happened previously in Ireland, I would say removing the Loop Line bridge would actually be the shortsighted option.

    Most cities have elevated railway lines and the Loop Line does its job particularly well: its main flaws are down to CIE's failure to resignal it in recent years.

    Tara St's problems are down to capacity issues too and CIE's failure to build an appropriate station to meet its importance on the network.

    The line's speed is actually higher than that through the Dart Underground tunnel will be and it's quite flexible in terms of how it can be operated. It's also become a somewhat iconic structure and seems popular with tourists because of the city view it provides.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 912 ✭✭✭Hungerford


    KC61 wrote: »
    At the moment every train that operates to Maynooth uses a slot that could be used for a Northern line train from the loop line bridge. Every train from Maynooth blocks both Northern line directions.

    You forgot to mention the fact that if Maynooth or Northern line trains have to terminate at Pearse, that also blocks both directions. :D


Advertisement