IMPACT's '10 myths about the public sector' are based on figures from 2005

SLUSK · 25-10-2009 01:04PM

RCIRL wrote: »

All houses were "ridiculously overpriced" during the boom, so you are saying everyone who bought a house during the boom is thick. These thick people you are referring to would include, single people, newly married couples, family's with children all all ages. Some of these people are all suffering now and could possibly be suffering for the rest of their lives.

They had no choice, unlike you lucky enough to be either spoon fed by your parents, housed by the Co Council or lucky enough not to be in a situation where you require one of life's most important necessity's.

The only person who is thick my friend is you.

You do not have to live in a council house or with your parents if you do not own a house. Ever heard of renting, it is very common in alot of countries. Ireland is one of the few countries were you "have" to own the place you live since "rent is dead money".

I would say negative equity is dead money

dresden8 · 25-10-2009 02:20PM

wicklowmale wrote: »

2) Why should the private sector take the brunt of the redundancies in the country? approx. 200,000 so far in the private sector but none in the Public sector

This is an untruth.

People who propagate it are untruth tellers.

IMPACT's '10 myths about the public sector' are based on figures from 2005

Comments