Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Books to avoid like a bookworm on a diet

191012141526

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 mkaobrih


    I really didn’t like American psycho – boring violence and/or shopping - pages and pages on buying a Whitney Huston CD or Bono looking at him in a weird way. Minute detail of getting washed in the morning before work .I did enjoy the movie though – it removed all the boring stuff (and some of the very disgusting stuff).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 30 NickyNin


    I once read a book written by a father and Son author team about Father and Son Spy team who were up against a Father and Son Baddie team - wonder where they get their ideas??? I can't remember the name but it was awful.

    Patricia Cornwell hornet's nest - worst book ever - Her CAT was getting subliminal messages from the building and talking to its owner to pass on the important information. Yes CAT - in fact I believe he solved the case.

    The most overrated book I've read is the The Life of Pi - it might have been okay but I don't know what the bit about the flesh eating island was!? :rolleyes:

    Anything by Stephen King.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 184 ✭✭chezzer


    Cathedral of the sea .... Absolute bull spit ..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    Read the Great Gatsby a while ago, and, tbh, not that great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭galactus


    Aard wrote: »
    Read the Great Gatsby a while ago, and, tbh, not that great.

    Frankly I agree, it features unbelievable characters:

    "The eyes of Doctor T. J.Eckleburg are blue and gigantic—their retinas are one yard high. They look out of no face but, instead, from a pair of
    enormous yellow spectacles which pass over a nonexistent nose."


    and in the end:
    Somebody or someone....goes in a boat somewhere...
    What's all that about! :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    I didnt get it/understand it/appreciate it at the time - I think I need to read it again. Many consider it the "perfect" novel.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 91 ✭✭-Els-


    ^^completely agree! Gatsby has to be one of the most (and I hate to use this phrase!) overrated books out there.

    The writing wasn't bad in it, but as far as plot or characterisation goes... not great. And for a book thats supposed to emulate class struggle in America it leaves you very underwhelmed and really didnt make that much of an impact on me!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭fisgon


    Aard wrote: »
    Read the Great Gatsby a while ago, and, tbh, not that great.

    Gatsby is worth reading, if only for the line near the end, 'we beat on, like boats against the current......' ... though i agree that it is a bit overrated. prefer Hemmingway's Fiesta...

    as for books to avoid...absolutely anything by Paulo Coelho, awful, risible, psuedo-spiritual rubbish.....Doris Lessing's Ben in the World, actually contains the line 'and they lived happily ever after', with no irony.

    There are others......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭TedB


    Hey, Gatsby is a fine book and I take it as a personal affront if no-one else likes it!

    I think why people dislike the Great Gatsby is, as someone has already mentioned, it is damn near to being 'the perfect novel'. Every character is crafted for a particular plot role, while the plot is slowly unravelled, a little like a master puppeteer, twiddling at all the strings together to slowly untangle it apart in a moving finalé.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭femur61


    Shaybo wrote: »
    Labyrinth by Kate Mosse - an absolute disgrace that this ever saw the light of day and a real indictment of the media mafia in the UK that Mosse's (who's a literary biwig at the Sunday Times and in the UK in general) book has been so lavishly praised. Bady written, badly plotted and badly edited.

    .

    Good, because I thought it was just me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭femur61


    The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova - Couldn't get into this book at all and couldn't wait for it to be out listening to reviews on it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 493 ✭✭trustno1


    Q&A by Vikas Swarup (slumdog millionaire) awful book and Rachels Holiday by Marian Keyes, couldn't get past the first chapter (got it as a gift) and I think Ulysses by Joyce is hugely overrated!!!..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 149 ✭✭DJsail


    No-one has ever read Ulysses!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 493 ✭✭trustno1


    DJsail wrote: »
    No-one has ever read Ulysses!!!!

    Huh? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 VanishingLayla


    All James Patterson books are complete tripe.

    Twilight, obviously, but I suppose that goes without saying.

    Deception Point by Dan Brown was very poor.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 127 ✭✭minusorange


    Allen Ginsberg's Buddhist Poetics by Tony Triglio

    Impenetrable crap. Has all the pretensions of the big man but none of his lucidity, passion and verve


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 127 ✭✭minusorange


    400+ pages of self-aggrandising, score-settling, moronic certitudes and masturbation anecdotes from the German Ringo
    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,149 ✭✭✭ZorbaTehZ


    994 wrote: »
    Robinson Crusoe was important in its day, but it's incredibly dull.

    But, but, but... that's my favourite book ! :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 911 ✭✭✭994


    galactus wrote: »
    Frankly I agree, it features unbelievable characters:

    "The eyes of Doctor T. J.Eckleburg are blue and gigantic—their retinas are one yard high. They look out of no face but, instead, from a pair of
    enormous yellow spectacles which pass over a nonexistent nose."
    That was a description of a billboard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 972 ✭✭✭MultiUmm


    For some reason I could never get into To Kill a Mockingbird. People say it's one of the best books of all time, but honest to God I couldn't take anymore by page 90. :( I felt like the plot was going nowhere and it was just an assortment of events really.

    I might attempt reading it agian, just to see if I'll view it in a different light, but I doubt I'll suddenly fall in love with it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 435 ✭✭pinkheels88


    Belfast wrote: »
    Tess of the d'Urbervilles: A Pure Woman Faithfully Presented is a novel by Thomas Hardy,
    I dreary and depressing book.

    LOVE this book! It's a classic :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭Thomas828


    St Ronan's Well by Sir Walter Scott, reading it is like wading through treacle. Tess of the d'Urbervilles by Thomas Hardy is monumentally depressing. Shan by Eric Lusterbader, I lost interest in it after fifty pages or so


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭Thomas828


    And as for the books I couldn't be bothered to finish, there's the first Harry Potter novel and Valley of the Horses by Jean M. Auel among others.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,944 ✭✭✭Jay P


    NickyNin wrote: »
    The most overrated book I've read is the The Life of Pi - it might have been okay but I don't know what the bit about the flesh eating island was!? :rolleyes:

    Eh....NO WAY! I had never even heard of this book when I read it and thought it was absolutely class. Thoroughly deserves whatever praise it gets. Fantastic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 bmtannam


    At Swim, Two Birds by Flann O Brien....codswallop.
    Could'nt trudge through it so threw it aside.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,652 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    DJsail wrote: »
    No-one has ever read Ulysses!!!!


    I have, and it was terrible.

    And don't start going on about looking between the lines or whatever, it was nothing short of the drunken ramblings of some eejit, who for some reason didn't bother his arse to use proper punctuation or syntax.

    Absolutely no point to the story, just 2 men walking around, thinking about people who died and prostitutes.

    He covered up the fact that it was badly structured by trying to convince everyone that it was a "puzzle" of some sort.

    "One of the greatest novels of the 20th century".

    Yeah :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,768 ✭✭✭decies


    Midnight Children .Salmon Rushdie
    Threw it into recycle bin this morning.
    Couldn,t get into it at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 teamB_macro


    i really tried but i can't prod myself to finish catcher in the rye and the twilight books. oh well just gonna catch them on film. but i don't think there's an adaptation of salinger yet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭chenguin


    I have to say I really don't see the appeal of catcher in the rye. I found it really boring.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    chenguin wrote: »
    I have to say I really don't see the appeal of catcher in the rye. I found it really boring.

    :eek:

    I can't even write a riposte.
    Just :eek:


Advertisement