Ping times for gamers

Bios · 08-07-2009 12:15AM

Perlico
1.5mb
12.10am

64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=90.1 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=89.0 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=90.3 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=88.0 ms

64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=87.1 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=88.9 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=85.8 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=90.2 ms

64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=122 time=70.9 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=122 time=71.8 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=122 time=71.7 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=4 ttl=122 time=73.9 ms

alanucc · 08-07-2009 12:21AM

Eircom 3mb 12.21 am

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 44ms

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 59ms

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=121

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 43ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 43ms

docmol · 08-07-2009 12:28AM

NTL 10mb Cabra, Dublin 7 00:30 am

C:\Users\dave>ping 85.8.132.222
Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 90ms, Maximum = 99ms, Average = 92ms
C:\Users\dave>ping 85.114.152.67
Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=55
Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 40ms
C:\Users\dave>ping 85.236.96.22
Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=118
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=118
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=118
Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 37ms, Average = 34ms
C:\Users\dave>

Playing CSS on English servers with ping around 25ms, downloads like the clappers:)

Kinetic^ · 08-07-2009 12:34AM

Smart 4mb

85.8.132.222

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=52

85.114.152.67

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=58

85.236.96.22

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=124

d22ontour · 08-07-2009 01:12AM

Smart 6mb

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 29ms

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 47ms

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 29ms

Jonathan · 08-07-2009 01:15AM

BT 3mb (fastpath line)

> ping 85.8.132.222
PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222): 32 data bytes
32 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=35.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=30.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=30.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=30.0 ms

--- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 30.0/31.2/35.0 ms





> ping 85.114.152.67
PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67): 32 data bytes
32 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=40.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=40.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=40.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=40.0 ms

--- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 40.0/40.0/40.0 ms





> ping 85.236.96.22
PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22): 32 data bytes
32 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=122 time=25.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=122 time=25.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=122 time=25.0 ms
32 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=4 ttl=122 time=25.0 ms

--- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 25.0/25.0/25.0 ms

Gonzo · 08-07-2009 01:22AM

Eircom 7.6meg, 1.22am

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 19ms

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 30ms

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=120

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 16ms

wcarey1975 · 08-07-2009 09:19AM

BT 3Mb package

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=50
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=50
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=50
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 50ms

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 60ms

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=120

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 43ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 46ms

vibe666 · 08-07-2009 10:24PM

PogMoThoin wrote: »

Note: So far its been all Windows pings, if anyone uses linux for pingtimes won't be comparable as it uses 64 byte pings instead of 32

except for mine. i did mine straight from my router and the default on that is 56 bytes for some random reason.

Skittle · 08-07-2009 11:11PM

UPC 20Mb Time 23:10

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=51

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=55

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=120

Baneblade · 09-07-2009 06:32PM

BT 24mb

time 18:30pm

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 38ms

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 48ms

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 32ms

Simi · 09-07-2009 07:04PM

Ok i'll indulge in your study.

UPC 10mb - Galway City
~19:00 (aka peak time)

First a control.

C:\>ping boards.ie

Pinging boards.ie [89.234.66.107] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=59
Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=59
Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 89.234.66.107:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 13ms

Now 1st IP.

C:\>ping 85.8.132.222

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=50
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=50
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=50
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 92ms, Maximum = 104ms, Average = 97ms

2nd IP

C:\>ping 85.114.152.67

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 43ms

And 3rd

C:\>ping 85.236.96.22

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 42ms

BrokenArrows · 09-07-2009 07:17PM

19:15
UPC 20MB
Galway city

ping 85.8.132.222

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=301ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 113ms, Maximum = 301ms, Average = 165ms

ping 85.114.152.67

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 79ms, Maximum = 176ms, Average = 143ms

ping 85.236.96.22

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=120
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=120

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 65ms, Maximum = 264ms, Average = 132ms

Tar.Aldarion · 09-07-2009 07:21PM

Fastcom, 2mb Sligo 19:20

C:\Users\Paul>ping 85.8.132.222

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=53
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 27ms

C:\Users\Paul>ping 85.114.152.67

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=46
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=46
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 39ms

C:\Users\Paul>ping 85.236.96.22

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=121

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 28ms

smiddyboy · 09-07-2009 07:48PM

On Eircom 7.6Mb @ 19:45

ping 85.8.132.222

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 46ms

ping 85.114.152.67

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 67ms

ping 85.236.96.22

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=121

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 45ms

Redisle · 09-07-2009 08:27PM

IBB Breeze 4mb.
20.25

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 29ms

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=49
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 46ms

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=122
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=122
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=122
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 33ms

TheMeatMan · 09-07-2009 09:03PM

Time: 21:01
Eircom
3mb

Pinging 85.8.132.222
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
round-trip min/avg/max = 20/25/30 msec

Pinging 85.114.152.67
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
round-trip min/avg/max = 30/32/40 msec

Pinging 85.236.96.22
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Received reply
Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 msec

z0oT · 09-07-2009 10:54PM

Eircom 7mb
22:54

mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping [B]85.8.132.222[/B] -c 4
PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=53.1 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=52.5 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=53.2 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=53.6 ms

--- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 52.587/53.157/53.623/0.406 ms

mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping [B]85.114.152.67[/B] -c 4
PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=71.3 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=69.3 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=72.6 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=68.5 ms

--- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 68.560/70.463/72.623/1.602 ms

mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping [B]85.236.96.22[/B] -c 4
PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=121 time=49.8 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=121 time=50.3 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=121 time=50.1 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=4 ttl=121 time=50.1 ms

--- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 2999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 49.821/50.105/50.365/0.249 ms

Some_Person · 10-07-2009 07:05AM

Disregard my comment about Alphawave fixing the speed/latency, it's gone down the toilet again.

Magnet: Rory · 10-07-2009 03:31PM

Thank you all for participating in our survey!

The winner (out of a hat) of the €20 voucher is Fluffy.Death !!!

Fluffy.Death - I’ll PM you now and get details of an address to post out the voucher.

I would say keep the survey going, gamers should know what companies or ISP's have good pings as low ping times are a must have for most if not all online games.

We'll post the results soon.

Dardania · 14-07-2009 11:43AM

Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
zeus.dl.playstation.net

although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

Magnet: Rory · 14-07-2009 11:45AM

Dardania wrote: »

Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
zeus.dl.playstation.net

although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

By all means, we would love to see it continue.

Spear · 14-07-2009 11:46AM

Dardania wrote: »

Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
zeus.dl.playstation.net

although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

DNS names like those are potentially a bad idea, since they're often geo-balanced.

Dardania · 14-07-2009 11:48AM

Spear wrote: »

DNS names like those are potentially a bad idea, since they're often geo-balanced.

you're probably rihgt - the zeus one is returning an akami address...

I mustfigure out some way of sniffing the ip address my ps3 connects to through the router - any ideas of software to do that? I have an old hub (not switch)

chris254 · 11-05-2010 08:23PM

Magnet (Rory) wrote: »

By all means, we would love to see it continue.

fastcom sligo
8.23pm

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=51
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 91ms, Maximum = 152ms, Average = 110ms

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=44
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=44
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=44
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=44

Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 78ms, Maximum = 134ms, Average = 100ms

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=114
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=114
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=114
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=114

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 73ms, Maximum = 207ms, Average = 140ms

Xennon · 11-05-2010 08:50PM

Eircon;
8:50pm
Caherconlish Limerick

ping -c 10 85.8.132.222
PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=57.934 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=59.608 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=58.965 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=67.209 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.681 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=76.707 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=91.441 ms
64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=62.914 ms

--- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 20% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 47.681/65.307/91.441/12.550 ms

ping -c 10 85.114.152.67
PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=59.219 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=64.293 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=69.041 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=72.203 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=68.042 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=71.666 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=68.469 ms
64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=58.347 ms

--- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 20% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 58.347/66.410/72.203/4.952 ms

ping -c 10 85.236.96.22
PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=0 ttl=121 time=51.902 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=121 time=51.163 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=121 time=53.348 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=121 time=53.155 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=5 ttl=121 time=40.982 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=6 ttl=121 time=53.646 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=7 ttl=121 time=59.488 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=8 ttl=121 time=58.118 ms
64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=9 ttl=121 time=62.805 ms

--- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 10% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 40.982/53.845/62.805/5.846 ms

:mad:

Next door to the exchange too!!

Thanks Rory.

Calebmcd · 11-05-2010 11:30PM

UTV 8Mb
23:30

Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52
Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52

Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=55

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=121
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=121

Ping times for gamers

Comments