SIGPO - Notify

Raphael · 2005-05-05 17:09:20

(from post 4384) SigPo and fans, thank you for your valued, dedicated, and diligent help in promoting signature awareness throughout all these fantastic years we have been together. I must now close this long held tradition in favour of a sleeker, quieter, and dirty laundryless SigPo 2.0. This M3GA-Thread has now been…

Comments

#3302 15-12-2008 11:40AM

biko

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 75468

Pimmed above

fixed by user, thanks

0
#3303 15-12-2008 05:23PM

6th

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,247 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2005

Posts: 15919

Limerick-man: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=105204

Notified via Visitors Message.

*Edit: Fixed by user.

0
#3304 15-12-2008 05:24PM

6th

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,247 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2005

Posts: 15919

How about leaving a visitors message on peoples profiles instead of a PM?

0
#3305 15-12-2008 10:50PM

brianthebard

Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2004

Posts: 15335

Thought we were entitled to notification? My sig got stolen!

0
#3306 16-12-2008 09:31AM

6th

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,247 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2005

Posts: 15919

brianthebard wrote: »

Thought we were entitled to notification? My sig got stolen!

Awww, poor didums.

0
Advertisement
#3307 16-12-2008 10:20AM

biko

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 75468

Sabotage wrote: »

How about leaving a visitors message on peoples profiles instead of a PM?

If you like. The reason I'd rather PM is that it's less "in your face".

brianthebard wrote: »

Thought we were entitled to notification?

No. It's a courtesy on our part, mainly for the newbies that don't know their way around.

0
#3308 16-12-2008 01:45PM

brianthebard

Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2004

Posts: 15335

I made sure it was the right height and you said on the previous page that 500 wide was ok.

0
#3309 16-12-2008 07:39PM

biko

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 75468

biko wrote: »

Flickr images has been deemed ok by the admins.

biko wrote: »

Certain sigs are allowed to be wider than other so anything under 500 wide is ok in my book.

I know this can seem confusing, and it is because some sigs are allowed to be 500 wide and the rest not. Therefore I just leave the width at 500. But that's just me.

It doesn't mean that someone else can't notice and report it. Note that any Smod/admin can happen upon it while browsing and remove it (they actually do all the removing, not me nor any other sigpo). Admins/ smods are the thin blue line on boards and if they remove it they mean business.

0
#3310 16-12-2008 07:42PM

brianthebard

Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2004

Posts: 15335

My image was only 351 wide. I've resized it yet again to 300 wide, that is the limit isn't it? does there not need to be some consideration about whether to allow 500 or not? If some are getting away with it and some aren't then confusion will obviously arise. I don't mind leaving mine at the current size, provided I'm not arbitrarily being chosen to be edited while others are not.

0
#3311 16-12-2008 08:48PM

Gordon

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2001

Posts: 34513

Your sig was 40k or so. I remember looking at it some time ago and seeing that Sigpo had seemed to ok it so I ignored it, then I checked again and it seemed to rise in kilobytes. I notice kb more nowadays as I'm not on broadband.

0
Advertisement
#3312 16-12-2008 09:23PM

brianthebard

Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2004

Posts: 15335

I find that hard to believe? I resized it slightly and its now 5kb? How could it be over 40 after such a small adjustment?

0
#3313 16-12-2008 09:24PM

Gordon

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2001

Posts: 34513

No idea, but that's why I deleted it.

0
#3314 16-12-2008 09:27PM

brianthebard

Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2004

Posts: 15335

How arbitrary of you.

0
#3315 16-12-2008 09:53PM

Gordon

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2001

Posts: 34513

Not arbitrary, I saw your sig image downloading, when I see something downloading then I know that it's not a small filesize, therefore if it is a sig image it is probably too big. As long as your sig is within the rules then I won't delete it, it's quite simple really.

0
#3316 19-12-2008 02:23PM

javaboy

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2007

Posts: 14818

Sig2big not notified: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=60623 :cool:

0
#3317 21-12-2008 04:53PM

KTRIC

Closed Accounts Posts: 9,346 ✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2005

Posts: 8753

Vulgar sig http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=71015

0
#3318 22-12-2008 08:20PM

Villain

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: November 2002

Posts: 15112

Is mine ok?

0
#3319 23-12-2008 01:37AM

biko

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 75468

A bit wide at 550px. Can you make it less wide?

Offensive Brian Capture above pimmed

0
#3320 24-12-2008 02:54AM

Overheal

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2006

Posts: 79793

Too Tall; Too Wide; >20kb. Notified

0
#3321 24-12-2008 11:53AM

Anti

Closed Accounts Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: April 2004

Posts: 11948

Overheal wrote: »

Too Tall; Too Wide; >20kb. Notified

Oh really ?

0
Advertisement
#3322 24-12-2008 07:17PM

Overheal

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2006

Posts: 79793

yeah, you really didnt have to be so vulgar in that PM. But thank you for correcting your image size from its previous 60-odd kilobytes and oversized dimensions. Think of the electrons you're saving. Eco Warriors Unite!

0
#3323 24-12-2008 07:20PM

Anti

Closed Accounts Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: April 2004

Posts: 11948

fag...

0
#3324 24-12-2008 10:53PM

Overheal

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2006

Posts: 79793

Be nice, its the holidays

0
#3325 26-12-2008 12:18PM

Gordon

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2001

Posts: 34513

Anti banned from feedback.

0
#3326 30-12-2008 05:22PM

Columba Rad

Closed Accounts Posts: 825 ✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 747

My sig ok ??

0
#3327 01-01-2009 10:48AM

6th

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,247 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2005

Posts: 15919

Biggins: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=136539

Notified via Profile.

*Edit: Ok so Biggins deleted the visitors message (an Smod can still see it) and ignored it. notified again by PM.

0
#3328 01-01-2009 01:18PM

6th

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,247 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2005

Posts: 15919

DenMan notified: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=161519

0
#3329 02-01-2009 07:20PM

biko

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 75468

Columba Rad wrote: »

My sig ok ??

is actually too high and too heavy but it's no biggie in my own opinion.
Someone might object though and then we'll talk again.

0
#3330 03-01-2009 02:30PM

Hagar

Closed Accounts Posts: 16,786 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: April 2002

Posts: 15099

This poster Pen1987 has an animated RSS Feed ad in his sig.

Poster not informed, I thought someone here would have a more informed opinion on the matter. Personally I hope we don't get more of them.

0
Advertisement
#3331 03-01-2009 03:25PM

biko

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 75468

Pen1987 informed

edit: fixed by user

0

This discussion has been closed.