Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

VanDice is In the Well

124»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 161 ✭✭colquhom


    Van Dice wrote: »
    Ok, this is exactly the sort of problem that you can deal with away from the table rather than trying to decide on the fly while you're playing. There is no definitive answer, but instead I'll try to answer with some of the factors that should influence your decision.

    First, his 3bet of 7% is an average across all positions. So when you raise on the button, and he reraises from the BB, the percentage is bigger than 7%. Just say for this example it's 10%.

    Then your next problem is assigning him a range. Some people 3-bet very polarized ranges, while others 3-bet more balanced ones including hands like 88. Against people with the polarized 3-bet ranges, you can 4-bet bluff a lot. They just won't have enough good hands in their range that they can shove for value.

    ****************************
    Off on a tangent, if you're 4-betting, you can make it 52.

    [I'm NOT saying any of these ranges or assumptions are correct in this example, just giving an example of how you can think about a situation on paper]

    Anyway, you make it 52. So you're risking 45 more to win 30. Assume he either shoves or folds. If he folds to your 4-bet 60% of the time, you break even on the bluff. If his shoving range is JJ+, AK - that's 3% of hands. So if he's 3-betting more than 7.5% [3%/40%], you can 4-bet any two profitably. Those ranges won't hold exactly true for most people, and obviously if you start 4-betting any two, he will notice and adjust.

    Also, try to 4-bet bluff hands with an ace in them, because of card removal.
    ********************************

    Anyway some factors that should influence your decision:

    He's made his 3-bet size quite small. You should call more often.

    How often does he c-bet in RR pots? The higher this is, the more apt you should be to both slowplay monsters preflop, and also shove flops as bluffs. Against players who 3-bet a lot and c-bet too much, rather than 4-bet bluffing you should be much more inclined to call their 3-bet and bluff-shove flops. When choosing hands to do this with, think what his calling range of your flop shove will be, and try to select hands with some equity. Overcards with backdoor flush draws, gutshots, etc.

    Does he check-fold a lot in RR pots?
    Does he fire a c-bet and then give up?
    What does he think of your hand strength in RR pots?

    Those are just some of the things to think about, not everything.

    Well, maybe to be specific on one of the hands, I don't think you should do anything other than call with 99. And a lot of the hands you listed are going to be extremely difficult to play profitably. You should probably be folding most of the time with them.


    The deeper it is, the more frequently I call. The more you call, the weaker your hand is, but this is compensated for by having positional advantage with deep stacks.

    tyvm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭Van Dice


    Thanks for all the questions, hope they were answered at least semi-respectably.

    Over and out...
    Three dots in an ellipsis...right Kayroo? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,039 ✭✭✭Theresalwaysone


    Few more questions for ya Jim considering your enjoying your opportunity to pontificate.

    Favourite football player of all time and why?

    Liverpools most important player this season?

    Dossena? wtf.

    Your World 11?

    Opinion on Roy and Sunderland?

    Best up and coming poker player in this country? Dont sit on the fence.

    tyty


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,039 ✭✭✭Theresalwaysone


    Dammit, ignore so Jim. Didnt realise ya were finished.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,461 ✭✭✭RedJoker


    Van Dice wrote: »
    Then your next problem is assigning him a range. Some people 3-bet very polarized ranges, while others 3-bet more balanced ones including hands like 88. Against people with the polarized 3-bet ranges, you can 4-bet bluff a lot. They just won't have enough good hands in their range that they can shove for value.

    You got this backwards, against people who aren't polarizing their range you should 4bet bluff more, they're turning all their callable hands (like 88, KQ, TT etc.) into bluffs against you. Against people who use a polarized range you should call and shove flops more, particularly if they have too many air hands in their range.

    Nice well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭Van Dice


    okok one last one cos I know you enjoy talking about Liverpool
    Few more questions for ya Jim considering your enjoying your opportunity to pontificate.

    Favourite football player of all time and why?
    I think Maradona was prob the best, ones I like that I've seen - Redondo (awesome), Maldini (legend), Messi (could watch him all day), McGrath (hero). Gerrard at Liverpool (inspirational, and one of the best I've seen)
    Liverpools most important player this season?
    Alonso's been brilliant so far. At the end of the season I'm sure I'll say Gerrard though, he's just the best player we have, and Torres seems in love with him.
    Dossena? wtf.
    God knows. Maybe not even God.
    Your World 11?
    The 07/08 FIFPro team nailed it, except for having Puyol and Terry in there. Two other defenders, probably Evra at left-back. Dunno about the other centre-half.
    Opinion on Roy and anyone?
    Roy was wrong
    Best up and coming poker player in this country? Dont sit on the fence.

    tyty
    haven't a clue!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭Van Dice


    RedJoker wrote: »
    You got this backwards, against people who aren't polarizing their range you should 4bet bluff more, they're turning all their callable hands (like 88, KQ, TT etc.) into bluffs against you.
    They aren't bluffs, they're shoving some of these over 4-bets.
    Against someone who's 3-betting 10% but is 3-betting and sticking it in with 99, I think you should 4-bet bluff much less than against someone who is 3-betting 10% but only having JJ+ and AK in their range as value hands.

    If the guy with only JJ+ and AK doesn't bluffshove, he just doesn't have enough good hands to do anything about your 4-bet bluff.

    The guy with TT/99/AQ/AJ can shove all of those, making your 4-bet bluff less profitable.
    RedJoker wrote: »
    Against people who use a polarized range you should call and shove flops more, particularly if they have too many air hands in their range.
    For sure. I agree with you on that, I mentioned doing that against people who 3-bet and c-bet too much.
    RedJoker wrote: »
    Nice well.
    thanks

    DEFINITELY getting out of here now though!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,201 ✭✭✭Macspower


    Great well VD... spent last hour reading it all... most informative.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭FeetMagic


    Very nice read. Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,461 ✭✭✭RedJoker


    Van Dice wrote: »
    They aren't bluffs, they're shoving some of these over 4-bets.
    Against someone who's 3-betting 10% but is 3-betting and sticking it in with 99, I think you should 4-bet bluff much less than against someone who is 3-betting 10% but only having JJ+ and AK in their range as value hands.

    If the guy with only JJ+ and AK doesn't bluffshove, he just doesn't have enough good hands to do anything about your 4-bet bluff.

    The guy with TT/99/AQ/AJ can shove all of those, making your 4-bet bluff less profitable.

    That's not a balanced range though, that's a range which has way too many value hands and we shouldn't be 4bet bluffing or calling against him, we should just tighten our opening range and 4bet/call for value more.

    If the guy with the polarized range thinks he can get it in with 99 or AJ then he'll be 3betting those too, his range is still polarized though.

    Assuming the value ranges are the same the guy who's not polarizing should be 4bet and the guy who's polarized should be called.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,771 ✭✭✭TommyGunne


    Van Dice wrote: »
    Thanks for all the questions, hope they were answered at least semi-respectably.

    Over and out...
    Three dots in an ellipsis...right Kayroo? :)

    Nope you got it wrong here actually! As I said in the economics and tv thread, it should be

    Over and out....
    Three dots in an ellipsis...right Kayroo? :)

    Kayroo actually misused the ellipsis when he quoted your post that time I think. There should be a full stop after the first ellipsis. The second is just an ellipsis cos its mid sentence.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,868 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    Good read VD, just gathered the energy to read it there. I must add this to the list of wells in the sticky.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭Moneymaker


    Van Dice wrote: »
    The girl who hosts the WPT is very hot though. Layla something? idk.

    agree!


Advertisement