Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Rape Seed/Trinity College/Begger - C&C

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,067 ✭✭✭AnimalRights


    #2 and especially #3 are nice.
    #1 while gorgeous it also looks like you've over used the photoshop, not saying you even did use it but that what it looks like, the 2 trees either look like they were slapped in there or the others removed.
    #4 looks like you've lit the begger up too much or darkened the rest of the photo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,270 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    #1 - Stunning. Love the colour, light, angle, DOF ... brilliant photo.

    #2, #3 really nice images. Not a big fan of B&W but these look great.

    #4 - Does nothing for me at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭PaulieC


    #1 I like as it's almost like 3 pics in one - the sunny foreground, the overcast midground with the stripes and the background with the trees. I would like to see it with the clouds bumped up a bit - I think there's scope in there to bring them out a bit to give then a bit more oomph.

    #2,#3 - I like #3 the best of these, again because it's like 2 pics in one - the top half looks kind o mediterranean and the bottom looks more like what it is - serious academia...

    Nice set


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,155 ✭✭✭PopeBuckfastXVI


    First three are pretty nice.

    Beggertography has been done to death imo.

    There's always a contrast to be had between a begger/people at pass machine or a begger/people shopping. It's because beggers hang around where people with money will be!

    And on the other side of things beggers and the homeless weren't put on this earth for our amusement and so we can get their picture outside a big corporate building and think how clever we are for building such an interesting dichotomy.

    No offence OP, this isn't really directed at you in particular, but at beggertography in general.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,486 ✭✭✭run_Forrest_run


    I love #1, tis the season for rapeseed pics, I was going to stop the car on the way from Kilkenny to Dublin last Sunday to take a pic but realised I had no camera:(


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭slumped


    #1 while gorgeous it also looks like you've over used the photoshop, not saying you even did use it but that what it looks like, the 2 trees either look like they were slapped in there or the others removed.

    The photo has been processed very little. The trees are natural and nothing has been added.

    I increase saturation on yellows and adjusted contrast in sky.

    S


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 311 ✭✭decsramble


    Love #1 The dof with the division of the shot into 3 bands of color and then the lines draw me in. Great composition. BTW there seems to be a black line in the bottom left?

    Personally I prefer #2 to #3 it's nicely framed, the b&w suits it and it's more original than #3.

    #4 I agree with AnimalRights, beggar looks too bright?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,689 ✭✭✭shepthedog


    Very strong set of images there and a nice variation in subjects.. Number one and two really stand out for me.. Rapeseed is the subject of the month on boards anyway.. Cool shots overall/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 ✭✭pippatee


    Very strong panel of images ... they show a good understanding of different aspects of photography ...

    Number 1 is my favourite, but only because I would prefer landscape photography,

    I would brighten the top of the image if it were mine ... but ... well ... it isn't ...

    lovely set,

    Philip


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭slumped


    First three are pretty nice.

    Beggertography has been done to death imo.

    No offence OP, this isn't really directed at you in particular, but at beggertography in general.

    This is actually the only beggartographic shot I've ever taken but know what you mean.

    S


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,459 ✭✭✭Dodgykeeper



    Beggertography has been done to death imo.


    .

    Agreed!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Valentia


    First three are pretty nice.

    Beggertography has been done to death imo.

    There's always a contrast to be had between a begger/people at pass machine or a begger/people shopping. It's because beggers hang around where people with money will be!

    And on the other side of things beggers and the homeless weren't put on this earth for our amusement and so we can get their picture outside a big corporate building and think how clever we are for building such an interesting dichotomy.

    No offence OP, this isn't really directed at you in particular, but at beggertography in general.

    My nomination for post of the month. It's like rapeseed fields or the bell tower in Trinity haven't been done to death.......LOL!! Talk about showing bias.......

    I like all the shots. The rapeseed shot really works well because of the difference in the foreground and the mid ground contrast and saturation.

    The B&Ws are well converted and composed. OK Frank Lampart might appear to be a little lit up but I wouldn't use the shot to have a go at someone else's style. Especially when that style requires a little bit more risk than shooting a blue sky.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭slumped


    Valentia wrote: »
    The B&Ws are well converted and composed. OK Frank Lampart might appear to be a little lit up but I wouldn't use the shot to have a go at someone else's style. Especially when that style requires a little bit more risk than shooting a blue sky.

    Thanks Valentia.

    Didn't spot the Frank Lampard lookalike until you said it!

    There was a little risk in this but to be honest I was standing at bank of Ireland on Westmoreland street and the begger was across the road at AIB.

    It's not the best shot I've ever taken but was a new departure for me. Also really getting the hang of Photoshop which helps a lot!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,155 ✭✭✭PopeBuckfastXVI


    Valentia wrote: »
    My nomination for post of the month. It's like rapeseed fields or the bell tower in Trinity haven't been done to death.......LOL!! Talk about showing bias.......

    Well rapeseed fields and the trinners bell tower aren't people who have been f*cked over by life. Beggers are not inanimate objects/subjects, they are people, who are not there to provide some sort of quote-unquote gritty urban subject matter.

    I can see a thousand rape seed pictures and, tbh, the one in this post is one of the best I've seen, and tire of them, but every so often see an uplifting one.

    I can see a thousand pictures of the homeless or beggers and just get f*cking depressed, it's not some amazing exposé, oh my god there's homeless people, who would have thunk it!? Is it art? Is it right to treat poor people as art?

    I don't have the answers, I just think it's a cheap way of building what people seem to think is a clever dichotomy, but it's not clever, it's cheap and easy.

    Anyway I don't want to hijack the OP's thread. The 4th picture is well taken, and nicely composed, I just don't think it should have been taken at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Valentia


    Well rapeseed fields and the trinners bell tower aren't people who have been f*cked over by life. Beggers are not inanimate objects/subjects, they are people, who are not there to provide some sort of quote-unquote gritty urban subject matter.

    I can see a thousand rape seed pictures and, tbh, the one in this post is one of the best I've seen, and tire of them, but every so often see an uplifting one.

    I can see a thousand pictures of the homeless or beggers and just get f*cking depressed, it's not some amazing exposé, oh my god there's homeless people, who would have thunk it!? Is it art? Is it right to treat poor people as art?

    I don't have the answers, I just think it's a cheap way of building what people seem to think is a clever dichotomy, but it's not clever, it's cheap and easy.

    Anyway I don't want to hijack the OP's thread. The 4th picture is well taken, and nicely composed, I just don't think it should have been taken at all.

    No, no. It has everything to do with the original post. So photography should stick with "nice" things so that you don't get depressed and photographers who take "beggers", homeless, and disadvantaged people are taking the easy option a should stick to the death defying tasks of rapeseed fields and well built victorian archicture. And you don't see the dichotomy there?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Valentia


    slumped wrote: »
    There was a little risk in this

    I realise that :) I think that His Holiness was referring to someone else who does take enormous risks to capture the more uncomfortable reality that we try to ignore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,155 ✭✭✭PopeBuckfastXVI


    Valentia wrote: »
    I realise that :) I think that His Holiness was referring to someone else who does take enormous risks to capture the more uncomfortable reality that we try to ignore.

    D'oh... not on two threads at once... but no... all you need for a shot with a homeless person next to a rich person is access to a camera and a city centre anywhere in the world. I'd call that pretty easy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Valentia


    D'oh... not on two threads at once... but no... all you need for a shot with a homeless person next to a rich person is access to a camera and a city centre anywhere in the world. I'd call that pretty easy.

    D'oh is right. What's that got to do with what I said??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,155 ✭✭✭PopeBuckfastXVI


    Valentia wrote: »
    D'oh is right. What's that got to do with what I said??

    "I think that His Holiness was referring to someone else who does take enormous risks to capture the more uncomfortable reality that we try to ignore"

    I wasn't :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 52 ✭✭djmike


    The rapeseed is a lovely shot. I live beside a massive rapeseed field so Im hoping for a lot of similar photos this summer.


    Ethically , Id have a problem with shots like # 4, so I coudnt really comment on it


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭slumped


    djmike wrote: »
    The rapeseed is a lovely shot. I live beside a massive rapeseed field so Im hoping for a lot of similar photos this summer.


    Ethically , Id have a problem with shots like # 4, so I coudnt really comment on it

    see my comments in other thread.

    I really don't know what the fuss is about!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 361 ✭✭DjDangerousDave


    Toady at lunch myself and a friend were talking about rape seed oil as a fuel. I was wondering what a feild of rape seed looks like, Its really quite nice.

    Love the #1, I dont know if I would of saturated the yellows so much. But its still very nice and well composed.

    Dave.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    Beggertography has been done to death imo.

    While i appreciate where you are coming from, should us new photographers not explore these type of themes for our own benefit?

    Slumped, no.1 is a great shot for me. Excellent compostion and personally i love the almost "unreal" nature of the trees.

    The second Bell Tower shot would be my favourite.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,067 ✭✭✭AnimalRights


    Dragan wrote: »
    While i appreciate where you are coming from, should us new photographers not explore these type of themes for our own benefit?
    Hehe good point, I was so excited when I finally got round to my "Swans test"
    Don't know if I'll do my Rapeseed test living in the City Centre though!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    Hehe good point, I was so excited when I finally got round to my "Swans test"
    Don't know if I'll do my Rapeseed test living in the City Centre though!

    Personally i will not be missing an opportuinity to photograph any subject just because some people don't like seeing it and it has been done already. I can only assume to develop as a photographer and find my own style i need to embrace a broad range of subjects?:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,264 ✭✭✭✭Alicat


    Dragan wrote: »
    Personally i will not be missing an opportuinity to photograph any subject just because some people don't like seeing it and it has been done already. I can only assume to develop as a photographer and find my own style i need to embrace a broad range of subjects?:)

    Two thumbs up for this post, I agree thoroughly! I'm still on sunsets/general landscapes and flowers in my garden :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    Alicat wrote: »
    Two thumbs up for this post, I agree thoroughly! I'm still on sunsets/general landscapes and flowers in my garden :D

    Me too.....my last 2 weeks has really be concentrating around sunsets and landscapes......my DA is starting to look like a Tourism Ireland advert!!

    Actually, Slumped, where is that field, out of interest??


  • Posts: 5,589 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    #2 and #3 are amazing - fantastic photos

    I like 4 but think the guy is a bit too dark.. but what do I know?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,666 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Dragan wrote: »
    While i appreciate where you are coming from, should us new photographers not explore these type of themes for our own benefit?
    it's nothing to do with what you think about the merits or lack thereof in photographing beggars.
    it's about what the beggars think.

    you wouldn't (i assume) take a candid photo of an adult crying. similar principle.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,264 ✭✭✭✭Alicat


    it's nothing to do with what you think about the merits or lack thereof in photographing beggars.
    it's about what the beggars think.

    you wouldn't (i assume) take a candid photo of an adult crying. similar principle.

    I don't think that's what they were discussing...I think it was more that beggars have been a common subject for many photographs, as have other subjects, and some people feel they are overused, and perhaps abused, but I don't think that was the last two posters were talking about. Merely their opinion on "overused" subjects, not the ethical side of it.

    MY opinion would be that although it might not be very nice to some sensitive souls to show a darker, more depressing side of society, it still exists in our culture and cannot be ignored. If you don't like those types of photographs, you don't have to take them, but don't criticize others for doing it. Photography and "art" are open to interpretation.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement