Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Scott Steiner Interview With Baltimore Sun

13»

Comments

  • #62
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    Abyss was a monster heel, Awesome Kong is a monster heel, Samoa Joe was too over to be a heel full stop never mind a monster heel and thus TNA turned him face as logic would dictate (blatant stab at WWE and John Cena). Joe never really absolutely dominated people in TNA even Sonjay got in his fair share of offence.


  • #63
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    FX Meister wrote: »
    You're just taking random statements and shouting false like you know what your talking about. TRUE

    And these unnamed statements are? Hell of an arguement you present here and pretty hypocritical too.


  • #64
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Machismo Fan wrote: »
    Abyss was a monster heel, Awesome Kong is a monster heel, Samoa Joe was too over to be a heel full stop never mind a monster heel and thus TNA turned him face as logic would dictate (blatant stab at WWE and John Cena).

    You going back where this whole thing started where I said Awesome Kong is a better monster heel the Steiner, do you agree? All I’m saying is Joe played the role of monster heel well and DID show intensity doing so. At that time the crowd was never going to boo him anyway no matter how hard he tried.
    Machismo Fan wrote: »
    Joe never really absolutely dominated people in TNA even Sonjay got in his fair share of offence.

    Sorry so Abyss is never generous with his offence? Sure

    Are you talking about Joe's debut? That went 5 minutes tops on PPV. That’s pretty much a domination and Joe no sold most of Dutt's offence.


  • #65
    TOPDAWG
    Closed Accounts Posts: 637 ✭✭✭TOPDAWG


    Anyone remember Steiner's purple thong at the royle rumble in 2003 when he was facing HHH??!? EEEEEEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW. I still shiver when i think about it and have banned my girlfriend from wearing purple lingerie. haha


  • #66
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    I've already said I don't think Steiner is a monster heel at all. I only really realised that Abyss gets beat a lot after saying it. The match against Dutt was relatively competitive.


    Slammiversary 2005: Samoa Joe Debuts
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Cq8vajLLSs

    It certainly wasn't an Umaga/Brian Kendrick crush.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Machismo Fan wrote: »
    I've already said I don't think Steiner is a monster heel at all. I only really realised that Abyss gets beat a lot after saying it. The match against Dutt was relatively competitive.


    Slammiversary 2005: Samoa Joe Debuts
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Cq8vajLLSs

    It certainly wasn't an Umaga/Brian Kendrick crush.

    Neither was Umaga/Flair.


  • #68
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    I'm not saying Umaga doesn't have competitive matches, that was just a reference.


  • #69
    the flananator
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,434 ✭✭✭the flananator


    rovert wrote: »
    Excuse me if I disagree. You do know what exceptional means right? Awesome Kong is a far better at being a monster heel as well.


    I found the match to be very enjoyable, definitely match of the night. It told a great story. Kaz was the pluckly underdog, who, despite being a little out of his depth (storyline wise, in reality he's a great worker) gave it his all. Joe was the newly crowned champ, with a chip on his shoulder with something to prove....and eh, a bit of a badass:p. Steiner was the old-timer seeking once last shot at glory.

    In the bout, Steiner dominated with his throws and 'plexes. Joe was proving to be a worthy adversary, until an Elbow Suicida went awry when Scott clobbered him in the noggin with his trade-mark pipe.

    With Joe knocked out outside, it looked like it was a matter of time till the dominant Steiner took the win and the title. But the never-say-die Kaz fought hard and managed to get Steiner in the position for a Spanish Fly from the top rope; unfortunetly for Kaz he was sent flying to the outside only for Joe to re-enter the ring and hit the Muscle Buster on the still-tope-rope straddled Genetic Freak for the 3 count.

    Sure, Joe was always going over, but wrestling's all about suspending one's belief.

    As for Awesome Kong being a better monster heel; whats you point? Vader has a better monster heel aswell. Bam Bam Bigelow too. Mike Awesome aswell. Add Kane on the right day. Abyss has his moments to be sure. But how does this affect the validity of my comment that Steiner palyed his "monster" heel role well in this match? It was a totally random comment to make. Then again, I suppose it was better that you just saying FALSE and leaving it at that.

    As for Steiner not actually being the monster heel; in this match he certainly was. He thrashed Joe and Kaz with his hard-hitting offence through-out the match.


  • #70
    FX Meister
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,215 ✭✭✭FX Meister


    rovert wrote: »
    And these unnamed statements are? Hell of an arguement you present here and pretty hypocritical too.
    FALSE


  • #71
    Fozzy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭Fozzy


    FX Meister wrote: »
    FALSE

    Leave it out please


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    You originally wrote
    the flananator wrote: »
    His main event match versus Kaz and Samoa Joe at Sacrifice was exceptional.

    the flananator wrote: »
    I found the match to be very enjoyable, definitely match of the night. It told a great story. Kaz was the pluckly underdog, who, despite being a little out of his depth (storyline wise, in reality he's a great worker) gave it his all. Joe was the newly crowned champ, with a chip on his shoulder with something to prove....and eh, a bit of a badass:p. Steiner was the old-timer seeking once last shot at glory.

    In the bout, Steiner dominated with his throws and 'plexes. Joe was proving to be a worthy adversary, until an Elbow Suicida went awry when Scott clobbered him in the noggin with his trade-mark pipe.

    With Joe knocked out outside, it looked like it was a matter of time till the dominant Steiner took the win and the title. But the never-say-die Kaz fought hard and managed to get Steiner in the position for a Spanish Fly from the top rope; unfortunetly for Kaz he was sent flying to the outside only for Joe to re-enter the ring and hit the Muscle Buster on the still-tope-rope straddled Genetic Freak for the 3 count.

    Sure, Joe was always going over, but wrestling's all about suspending one's belief.

    How does any of this make the match exceptional?

    You originally wrote
    the flananator wrote: »
    He played the monster heel to perfection.

    the flananator wrote: »
    As for Awesome Kong being a better monster heel; whats you point? Vader has a better monster heel aswell. Bam Bam Bigelow too. Mike Awesome aswell. Add Kane on the right day. Abyss has his moments to be sure. But how does this affect the validity of my comment that Steiner palyed his "monster" heel role well in this match? It was a totally random comment to make.

    As for Steiner not actually being the monster heel; in this match he certainly was. He thrashed Joe and Kaz with his hard-hitting offence through-out the match.

    So it other words Steiner didn’t play the monster heel to perfection? I not rehashing what already wrote but Steiner isn’t a monster heel.
    the flananator wrote: »

    Then again, I suppose it was better that you just saying FALSE and leaving it at that. .

    If you read any of the threads I post in I don’t just leave at that unlike others (yourself included.)You of all people taking in the above statements into account shouldn’t be lecturing people on making random statements or not backing up what they say.

    FX Meister wrote: »
    FALSE

    I’ve written significantly more than you in this topic. Not to mention at least I can fully back up what I say which you have failed to do again.


  • #73
    FX Meister
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,215 ✭✭✭FX Meister


    rovert wrote: »
    You originally wrote





    How does any of this make the match exceptional?

    You originally wrote





    So it other words Steiner didn’t play the monster heel to perfection? I not rehashing what already wrote but Steiner isn’t a monster heel.



    If you read any of the threads I post in I don’t just leave at that unlike others (yourself included.)You of all people taking in the above statements into account shouldn’t be lecturing people on making random statements or not backing up what they say.




    I’ve written significantly more than you in this topic. Not to mention at least I can fully back up what I say which you have failed to do again.
    come on man, leave it out yeah.


  • #74
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    FX Meister wrote: »
    come on man, leave it out yeah.

    Stop trolling either join in here or GTFO, you are becoming thing which you are complaining about.


  • #75
    FX Meister
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,215 ✭✭✭FX Meister


    Can a mod lock this, rovert is geting out of hand at this stage. I've asked him to stop but he hasn't


  • #76
    Rjd2
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,291 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    FX Meister wrote: »
    Can a mod lock this, rovert is geting out of hand at this stage. I've asked him to stop but he hasn't

    Erm you do know Rovert apart from one or two comments which may have being a little to short for some has contributed some interesting LONG posts:pac:


  • #77
    the flananator
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,434 ✭✭✭the flananator


    How does any of this make the match exceptional?

    Calling the match "exceptional" was pretty hyperbolical I agree, but I personally enjoyed it immensely. It was definitely MOTN; that you would hold the clusterfcuk that was the Terrordome ahead of it doesn't leave me with a very high impression of your opinion. Maybe Steiner and the guys didn't do enough MOVEZ~~!! for your liking but for me they did more than enough in that they told a good story.
    So it other words Steiner didn’t play the monster heel to perfection? I not rehashing what already wrote but Steiner isn’t a monster heel.

    I was speaking in general terms. In this match, Steiner played his role as well as any of the names listed above could have, in my very humble opinion.


  • #78
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    the flananator wrote: »
    Calling the match "exceptional" was pretty hyperbolical I agree, but I personally enjoyed it immensely. It was definitely MOTN; that you would hold the clusterfcuk that was the Terrordome ahead of it doesn't leave me with a very high impression of your opinion. Maybe Steiner and the guys didn't do enough MOVEZ~~!! for your liking but for me they did more than enough in that they told a good story.

    I said:
    rovert wrote: »
    Some people would say the Terrordome match was better.

    Im not one of them. The 3 way was a decent match on a bad card nothing more nothing less.


  • #79
    ShawnRaven
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,602 ✭✭✭✭ShawnRaven


    Jesus, i leave the PW forum for one day and all hell breaks loose!
    Can't we all just get along? ;)

    PS: Try not to step on rovert's toes in the next few days folks, he just suffered a proverbial bitchslap from Mr Alvarez recently and is feeling, somewhat sensitive about it. ;)

    VR!


  • #80
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    validreasoning! wrote: »
    PS: Try not to step on rovert's toes in the next few days folks, he just suffered a proverbial bitchslap from Mr Alvarez recently and is feeling, somewhat sensitive about it. ;)
    VR!

    What?


  • #81
    D-FENS
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭D-FENS


    rovert wrote: »
    What?

    We playing the Stone Cold game now?

    My turn - what? :D


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    the flananator
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,434 ✭✭✭the flananator


    rovert wrote: »
    I said:



    Im not one of them. The 3 way was a decent match on a bad card nothing more nothing less.

    Some would say you're a douche-bag, obviously I wouldn't, I think you're great, but some would.


  • #83
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    the flananator wrote: »
    Some would say you're a douche-bag, obviously I wouldn't, I think you're great, but some would.

    Did I hurt your feelings, the flananator?


  • #84
    the flananator
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,434 ✭✭✭the flananator


    rovert wrote: »
    Did I hurt your feelings, the flananator?

    I'm weeping into my key-board now. Why don't you love the Big Bad Booty Daddy? WHY? Fcuking telling me why!!!! :mad:

    :D:D:D I apologise, the rovernator, some would say I'm OTT.


  • #85
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Looks like I did then.


  • #86
    the flananator
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,434 ✭✭✭the flananator


    rovert wrote: »
    Looks like I did then.

    You've ruined my life with your harsh words. You are the Dark Baron of Boards.ie, rovert.


  • #87
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    the flananator wrote: »
    You're ruined my life with your harsh words. You are the Dark Baron of Boards.ie, rovert.

    Yet you keep replying.

    Back on topic plse


  • #88
    MikeHoncho
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭MikeHoncho


    rovert = Boards.ie monster heel:D


  • #89
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    Looks like there has been some unreasonable ganging up on rovert here, besides the original False statement his contribution to this thread has been good.

    On Steiner,its unfair to dicredit his points on his reputation and not based on what he is saying.


  • #90
    FX Meister
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,215 ✭✭✭FX Meister


    Steiner is a ****ing douche nozel. FACT


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    ShawnRaven
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,602 ✭✭✭✭ShawnRaven


    FX Meister wrote: »
    Steiner is a ****ing douche nozel. FACT

    True!
    VR!


Advertisement