Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Grappling in Karate article

124»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 426 ✭✭kenpo_dave


    The only point I was trying to make was the clip was an unrealistic example of a smaller guy "incapacitating" a larger guy. IMO if the larger guy had been a competent striker and had been striking in that "fight" then he would have KO'd the smaller guy. Im not saying that smaller guys cant incapacitate larger guys, but rather that the size difference in this clip was too great for that to happen in all-round fighting. Who knows, perhaps my opinion on this will change on this as I get more experienced in MMA and have seen more fights. But for now my opinion is staying put :D.

    OSU,

    Dave.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    kenpo_dave wrote:
    IMO if the larger guy had been a competent striker and had been striking in that "fight" then he would have KO'd the smaller guy. Im not saying that smaller guys cant incapacitate larger guys, but rather that the size difference in this clip was too great for that to happen in all-round fighting.
    And yet it does, did, and will happen.:rolleyes: I think you need to do some research here Dave.


    This comes back to..... guess, guess... training methods. If the big guy had trained in the three ranges with good training methods then yes, he would be a difficult oponent to take down. If he trained in striking and didn't have a sprawl or clinch then chances are he's going to get taken down.

    Its difficult to appreciate these days because most MMA "strikers" (Liddel, Wand,Bang) are such good wrestlers and grapplers too that they get to stay on their feet. Their "anti-grappling" techniques are to learn how to grapple.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭Michael O Leary


    Roper wrote:
    Colleague?:eek:

    Seriously Michael, I think you misinterpreted what Matt was saying that day. What I got from it was "striking not the best option", you seem to have got "always go to ground". Now I wouldn't agree with Matt on everything he says or writes, or on everything John K says or writes, but from hard, painful experience in the gym and on the STREET I know that to be true.

    And just because I run an ATG doesn't mean I represent SBG when I speak, or that Matt Thornton represents me when he speaks, except of course on matters of training methods on which I totally agree;)

    Peace Michael, and I don't think anyone is trying to run WT down, it is a bit of a silly fight in the video I'm sure you'll agree. I'd expect a lot better with their credentials.

    Look forward to training with you someday,

    Barry

    Hey Barry :)

    The question of striking versus grappling as self-defence in the street is highly subjective. However you said that not even the best BJJ guys recommend grappling for self-defence in the street. This is untrue. I was at Matt's seminar and I know what I heard. He said that in the majority of cases it is a good idea to go to the ground. John sounded a bit surprised at this and queried it. I guess because in the original thread, "Hand Speed", he agreed that for him, Plan A in a self-defence situation would be to stay standing up with Plan C, fight on the ground. I don't know if he has changed his mind now and if he has then fine. If you don't agree on some points with Matt, then fine but it is untrue to state no one in BJJ argues the case for going to the ground in a self-defence situation. Matt has also argued this point on his website if you want to check it out. That was my only point. It is not criticism but about dispelling myths. How it relates to Wing Tsun I don't know. :(

    Regards,

    Michael O'Leary
    www.wingtsun-escrima.ie


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    The question of striking versus grappling as self-defence in the street is highly subjective. However you said that not even the best BJJ guys recommend grappling for self-defence in the street. This is untrue. I was at Matt's seminar and I know what I heard. He said that in the majority of cases it is a good idea to go to the ground. John sounded a bit surprised at this and queried it.
    Michael,
    I genuinely don't remember this. What I do remember is him saying something along the lines of "a strangle is the safest, most human way to end a fight" I'm not defending what Matt said by the way. Hes more than capable of that himself:rolleyes: If he said it I'm sure he'd stand over it and I would say "okay Michael, you remembered it better then I". I'd even buy you a nice cake for dragging this out.

    Surprise surprise I don't know every BJJ guy in the world, so my throw away remark may have even more going against it if you ask a few more BJJ guys. I DO know a lot of the best Irish BJJ guys, and know that their opinion is to stay standing first, but they'd be guys with skill in the 3 ranges so they have a choice. Maybe if they were lone rangers they'd go to ground.

    Barry


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭Michael O Leary


    Roper wrote:
    I'd even buy you a nice cake for dragging this out.

    Blueberry swirl cheescake please, Starbucks special. :D I'll shut up now.

    Regards,

    Michael O'Leary
    www.wingtsun-escrima.ie


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭john kavanagh


    kenpo_dave wrote:
    IMO if the larger guy had been a competent striker and had been striking in that "fight" then he would have KO'd the smaller guy.

    hmmmm so an example of a small grappler incapacitating a much larger guy who has good striking....off to you tube....

    "Outweighed by over 100lbs, you'd think that Genki would be in trouble but he submits Butterbean in no time at all without taking a single punch"

    in this clip it takes him less than 15secs to apply a technique to a professional K1 fighter that would've broke his leg.

    lol its too easy:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 314 ✭✭Mola.mola


    Michael,

    Just a small point, a strangle and a joint lock can be applied from a standing position.

    Kevin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 437 ✭✭silat liam


    I came apon this article and thought it had just interesting points

    "I'll fight you on broken glass!"
    by Don Rearic

    You know, I've been seeing all of this nonsense for nearly five years on the Internet. Sometimes, "serious" martial arts and self defense forums resemble an MTV Show asking kids what their opinions are on martial arts and fighting. Grown men become children and squeal like little girls when you dare to challenge their worldview or sacred, martial cow (TM).

    I'm not a badass, but I'm as bad as I ever had to be. I have kicked ass and had my ass kicked as well. I used to laugh at people I would meet who claimed to be in a lot of fights and never had their ass handed to them by someone that was stronger, faster, meaner or just plain “better” than they were. It sure is possible that people like that exist, but in most cases, it is usually a case of someone who has an undercurrent of “bully” in their persona and they pick their fights very carefully.

    I once engaged an NHB Fighter in a "debate" in a forum and I tried to get the environment that I am used to, across to him as a reality. His response was, "I don't care, I'll fight you on concrete, blacktop or broken glass!"

    I was like, OK, are we talking about going home with minimum damage to us and maximum damage to the attacker, or are we talking about sporting nonsense and ego inflation? What he could not comprehend was the fact that I don’t want to have to fight on broken glass. He just could not understand that survival is not a “game” to me. It’s not a sporting competition to me. It’s not something to hyper-inflate my own ego. I’m not so fragile in that department that I have to prove my manhood by saying such silly things, let alone doing them.

    Call me a “sissy” or a “pussy” if you must, I’m not stupid. I have nothing to “prove” in the “balls” department. I want to survive, that is all. Almost everything you see on this website is geared to that end and that end only. Very little sporting element or “Art for the sake of Art.”

    Really, you want to fight on glass? You think you're that bad? If you are, you're not bad, you're stupid. Watch Royce Gracie in one of the early UFCs where he goes upside down against the chain link fence with his face grinding into the mat. You think you're going to pull that off in the street where the chain link exists but the mat does not? You think grinding your face into blacktop or concrete with all sorts of sharp and jagged debris is "the way to go" when it comes to fighting?

    If you do, you need your head examined; you're a fool, an idiot. Strong words, harsh words...true words.

    Now, if you find yourself on the ground, being taken there against your will, you have to fight there. But the focus should be on getting back on your feet where you are not so vulnerable. Understand that the street (and the battlefield) is not a mat, nor is it a competition. It's real life where people live and die and of those that live, some are maimed, crippled and parts of them are destroyed forever.

    Real life. No bull****, no marketing hype, no theorizing or painfully convoluted reasoning...just reality. Reality is a bitch. Reality does not care how big your balls are or how bad you think you are. Reality just exists.

    Reality

    • While you may be able to control the person you are fighting, you cannot control the possibility that he will have a weapon you did not know he had until it is too late.

    • While you may be able to control the person you are fighting, you cannot control the possibility or presence of multiple attackers, people other than him that might help him.

    • While you may be able to control the person you are fighting, you may not be able to control the environment and who lands on what.

    This will be incredibly unpopular with some people; I know that before I say it, yet I feel it has to be said. I know some people consider loyalty to system, style or teacher is paramount. I’m not trying to change you or even reach you. If you think what you are doing is the thing to do, by all means, do it. This is my opinion based on what I have observed. It is a warning to people getting involved in some systems and styles, people who are looking for a method of Self-protection.


    Two more things to consider


    1. Most people who are killed in streetfights by being punched in the face or head are not killed by the strike; their head impacting the ground kills them. I have observed this for a very long time in newspaper and other, local, news stories. I wish I had some online source to direct you to in order to “prove” it, but it is a reality that I have watched play out in the news time and time again.

    2. In cases where multiple attackers are concerned and someone is beaten to the point they are in critical condition, or beaten to death, invariably, it ends up on the ground with the attackers kicking the person to death, etc. That being the case, the reality of the situation, why would you want to do half of the attacker’s job for them and favor the ground to begin with?

    Going to ground is not an “advantage” on the street or Battlefield, this is where the clear difference is seen between Sporting and Combative.

    This is where we see the Point of Demarcation between “Survival Arts” and “Sporting Arts.” The words, “Martial Arts” have been whored out to the point you don’t know what you are getting into anymore. It might be Sport, Spiritual, Cultural or Survival Oriented. Very few have several of the components at once, but they do exist.

    So, to those that train to go to the ground to get some sort of “advantage” over an attacker because you think it is cool and you believe the hype, hey! You might just win! But what if you are fighting someone who does not play around? What happens when that folding knife, pocket screwdriver or boxcutter comes out that you never knew existed? It’s not going to be like sparring or a demo where everyone gathers around and they all know for the most part this is now shifting to the “Knife Defense” portion of class.

    No, you’re going to feel it in most cases before you ever see it because smart, violent people don’t let you see anything, you’re already bleeding and maybe dying in some cases, before you even realize what happened. Understand that it is a myth that everyone will threaten you with a weapon before they use it on you. Especially if they are losing because you are more skilled than they are and you are actively beating them or humiliating them. Understand what I am saying, a common boxcutter that can be found everywhere, a little bit larger than a stick of chewing gum, can kill you. Understand, precisely, what I am saying…if you can feel your pulse, a boxcutter with intense pressure from the attacker, can sever that vessel. In general, if the pulse can be felt, you can cut the vessel with a very small but sharp knife.

    Same thing holds true for the attacker having a concealed handgun that you did not know about. It is hard to get the “advantage” when you’re shot three times crossways through the thoracic cavity before you even knew what happened.

    On the ground, you are vulnerable to weapons you did not know the attacker had to begin with. You are vulnerable to multiple attackers, the guy you are fighting, and he might have friends, relatives or associates that you don’t know about. Perhaps someone will just come up and kick you in that thick head of yours because they want to get a hit in and you’re there and you’re not supposed to be in that neighborhood. You know what I mean? There won’t be any opportunity for cool sporting movements when your head is punted like a juiced up NFL Player would boot the pigskin during the Super Bowl.

    And, like it or not, even if you are crazy enough to say, “I’ll fight on broken glass!” Or perhaps you are nutty enough to claim; “I don’t care if you gouge one of my eyes out!” You’re not tracking properly on the concept of survival; you’re stuck in the game! Life is not a game, the street is not a game and the battlefield is not a game.


    Don Rearic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 437 ✭✭silat liam


    I fight you on Broken Glass (part 2)
    by Don Rearic

    The Unforgiving Environment


    I have been in areas where the ground was littered with used syringes, broken bottles of Night Train and Mad Dog 20/20, busted chunks of brick and cinderblock. Shattered and discarded heavy lumber with and without nails sticking out of it, used car parts like intake manifolds, water pumps and transmissions. All sorts of sharp, jagged and dangerous objects.

    Fire Hydrants, curbs, cars, trashcans, all of these things can damage you and the only thing the grappling gods have to offer in response is, “Well, I want to let him land on that stuff…then I’ll land on top of him!”

    Well, if your mindset is “grappling,” that’s what you are going to do, except you might not be in control like you think you will be. You might be the guy landing on that **** and be the one that gets damaged by it.

    Certain people in the Military are giving BJJ and Variants of it a whole new audience and a whole new life now that interest in the UFC has waned. Now, some sectors of the Military are embracing grappling as a viable method of Combatives. This is not Combatives; it’s a sporting method.

    The typical Battlefield environment is even worse than the street. With blasted out tree trunks/stumps and all manner of wrecked equipment, some people in the Military actually think going to the ground is not only viable, but also a great idea. Again, people are not tracking.

    What really becomes a perversity is the concept of MOUT, Military Operations in Urban Terrain. With all of the aforementioned debris lying on the ground and the added element of blasted out chunks of concrete with rebar protruding from it, glass everywhere, steel “I” beams and twisted wreckage…you name it and it will exist in an urban environment that has been bombed or shelled. Yet, these sport adherents insist grappling is not only viable, but also preferred. It’s a particular bit of insanity that strikes the “True Believer.” I’m a True Believer in survival and not much of anything else.

    Even if you know how to fall and even if you manage to land on your enemy, you may still be severely injured in a streetfight by the environment… But on a Battlefield with all of this garbage on the ground? Good grief, these people are shameless in their promotion of a “solution” to the “problem” of Combatives Training being “unpopular” with the Soldiers!

    These Combatives Programs defy logic. Even the Gracies are fond of saying, “More than one? Get a gun!” This seems to be lost on the Military proponents of grappling in that environment.


    What you need to know


    So, does grappling have a place in Self-defense and Modern, Military Combatives? Yes it does! It always has and it always will. The difference being, you do not plan to go to ground nor do you train to go to ground. You train and make contingency plans for those times when, for whatever reason, you will be taken to ground by force. It’s really that simple. Any Self-defense or Military Combatives Program should be geared toward competency not in “grappling” but in knowing enough to get back on your feet where the “advantage” really is. There is no “advantage” to being on the ground because incredibly skilled athletes can demonstrate the “advantage” in a sporting environment that has rules, a forgiving surface, no multiple attackers and no possibility of hidden weapons...

    By all means, learn how to counter, escape and counterattack from those positions! Do not, however, embrace the grappling mindset, it’s a killer in the real world and the fact that some people have used it and succeeded won’t make much difference when you encounter something they never did, like two more guys exiting a car, and you get killed.

    I think everyone knows the often cited, “Most fights end up on the ground” is a statement not of fact, but taken out of context from a Los Angeles Police Department Study they conducted about how fights progressed with their Officers apprehending Suspects. Most aggressive people have to be taken to the prone position to be handcuffed; this is where that interesting statistic came from. Not from fights in general.

    You are not apprehending anyone as a Private Citizen, you must survive and you must survive with as little damage as possible and grappling is not the recipe for that to become a reality.


    The Prophecy: Hate Mail


    I know this will happen, it is inevitable. But, you can save your time and the possibility of developing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome by typing me out a lengthy correspondence informing me of how “stupid” I am, as one Aikido Practitioner did after I wrote another article on this site. Don’t waste your time, if you think I am so far off base and this article is entirely foolish, don’t waste your time. I know what I know and you’re not going to sway me or convince me differently. This is a common sense issue and not a matter of style or passion for an Art or Sporting endeavor.

    You keep doing what you do and I will keep doing what I do. At the end of the day, I won’t be teaching my Wife to gain an “advantage” by willingly going to the ground for a violent rapist, thereby accomplishing half of the goal of his attack to begin with. It’s just stupid to me.


    Don Rearic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭Michael O Leary


    Mola.mola wrote:
    Michael,

    Just a small point, a strangle and a joint lock can be applied from a standing position.

    Kevin

    Yep, but Matt specifically talked about the ground. Sorry I am not saying anymore on this as I promised Roper I would shut up in return for a slice of Blueberry Swirl Cheesecake. :D

    Regards,

    Michael O'Leary
    www.wingtsun-escrima.ie


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 314 ✭✭Mola.mola


    hehe fair enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭Michael O Leary


    Mola.mola wrote:
    hehe fair enough.

    I said in another post last night that I would probley apologise to you today, so,,, get ready for it. Sorry for referring to what you do as a fad. I was drunk and feeling a little self-righteous because of the crap you were writing. I actually like what you do. (Just don't tell Roper!) :D

    Regards,

    Michael O'Leary
    www.wingtsun-escrima.ie


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 314 ✭✭Mola.mola


    I was writing crap ? :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: me? TAKE THAT BACK. Let me investigate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭Michael O Leary


    Mola.mola wrote:
    I was writing crap ? :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: me? TAKE THAT BACK. Let me investigate.

    :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 426 ✭✭kenpo_dave


    hmmmm so an example of a small grappler incapacitating a much larger guy who has good striking....off to you tube....

    "Outweighed by over 100lbs, you'd think that Genki would be in trouble but he submits Butterbean in no time at all without taking a single punch"

    in this clip it takes him less than 15secs to apply a technique to a professional K1 fighter that would've broke his leg.

    lol its too easy:D

    Thats fair enough John. You've provided better evidence of a small guy beating a much bigger guy, and I accept that Ive been proven wrong.

    OSU,

    Dave.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    I am not buying a cake from Starbucks. I'd be contributing to global caffeine domination...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 298 ✭✭ShaneT


    hmmmm so an example of a small grappler incapacitating a much larger guy who has good striking....off to you tube....

    "Outweighed by over 100lbs, you'd think that Genki would be in trouble but he submits Butterbean in no time at all without taking a single punch"

    in this clip it takes him less than 15secs to apply a technique to a professional K1 fighter that would've broke his leg.

    lol its too easy:D

    Oh dear. As it happens John, I agree (for the most part) that grappling can be very effective against strikers. HOWEVER. To suggest that "Butterbean" is a "good striker" simply because he "fought" in K-1 is ludicrous. Butterbean was just another of the circus acts that the K-1 organisation likes to throw into the mix as a result of the Japanese obsession with size (a la Godzilla and Bob Sapp).

    Show me a clip of Crocop being "schooled" by a small grappler then we'll talk. But, Butterbean? Please. :o

    Although, there's no doubt that even Crocop had trouble with grapplers in the early days (until he added a bit of ground game to his arsenal).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    I think its an extreme example too, but it fulfils what Dave asked for, someone who could strike and knows how to strike. He has an impressive record over 4 rounds and if he hit Genki once he's dropping.

    Crocop is a very good grappler btw.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 298 ✭✭ShaneT


    Roper wrote:
    I think its an extreme example too, but it fulfils what Dave asked for, someone who could strike and knows how to strike.

    Crocop is a very good grappler btw.


    Dave asked for a "good striker" (ok, I'm certain that's what he meant to ask for).

    And, you're right. Crocop is now a good grappler. :D


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You want a good striker? How about any of the one trick striking ponies in early UFC?

    Gordeau for example...

    Or Stefan Leko in Pride FC


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    This is old, old, old ground.

    As I've said above, it seems silly to be saying things like this when all the examples in the top fighting promotions are such well-rounded fighters. (Hey I used a Roganism!) Crocop is a bad example because hes a good grappler, Wand is a BJJ black belt, same with Blefort, Liddell has great grappling skills.

    The reason we're having this debate is because little grappler doesn't beat big striker so often in the pro shows because big striker knows how to grapple too. Bring a pure striker into an MMA gym and watch the results.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 298 ✭✭ShaneT


    columok wrote:
    You want a good striker? How about any of the one trick striking ponies in early UFC?

    Gordeau for example...

    Or Stefan Leko in Pride FC

    I've trained with Gordeau. And his brother (who's a well funny guy btw). He's a superb striker - agreed! :-) You'll find a picture of Nico (the bigger brother) dropping his foot onto my face somewhere on the Gordeau Bro's site (www.kamakura.nl).

    I thought we were talking "little grappler" v "big striker with a ground game". Not that I give a monkey's. These sorts of threads drive me a little nutty. :D

    I still feel that a "pure" grappler is going to fair badly against someone with fierce strikes and fierce grappling skills (Matt Hughes, GSP).

    But, Gracie (in the early UFCs) proved the point BEYOND DOUBT that if you can strike but can't grapple - you're going to get choked out.


    Hence, I agree for the most part with what John is saying. ;-)

    As I've said in previous threads (in agreement with Bluming), "put most strikers on their backs and they're babies."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 298 ✭✭ShaneT


    Roper wrote:
    This is old, old, old ground.

    Barry, the sad fact is, "old, old, old" ground for forum long timers is often "new ground" for people like Dave. No harm done answering old questions, who knows, maybe there are a few new answers (I certainly doubt it! :D But there it is).

    As we said on Thursday night, "We don't have to spend all our time searching for things that we don't already know. We can simply review things we know from another perspective."


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I totally agree a well rounded 3 dimensional MMA fighter whether of the Chuck Liddell/Wanderlei/Crocop school of sprawl and brawl, of the Randy Couture/Matt Lindland/Matt Hughes school of ground n pound or the BJ Penn/Sakuraba/Mino school of subs will always kill a 1d fighter (be it striker grappler or "Exotics")

    Now in early MMA it was proven that no matter how good the striker was (See Orlando Weit UFC 2- particularily his mauling of a fat american kickboxer before he fought Remco) they would be beaten 9/10 times by a grappler purely because of the tendency of people to hit the ground or clinch. A big guy who can strike Vs. a little guy who can grapple can be tough but I'd still have more faith in the grappler.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 298 ✭✭ShaneT


    columok wrote:
    I totally agree a well rounded 3 dimensional MMA fighter whether of the Chuck Liddell/Wanderlei/Crocop school of sprawl and brawl, of the Randy Couture/Matt Lindland/Matt Hughes school of ground n pound or the BJ Penn/Sakuraba/Mino school of subs will always kill a 1d fighter (be it striker grappler or "Exotics")

    Couldn't agree more! And, I've now added the term "exotics" to my big book of usefull MMA vocab! :D

    On another note; I really enjoyed working with you Colum. We'll have to do it again when the wrist is sorted. What say you?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah we'll have to arrange it. I'm back to Scotland in September so we can arrange a meet up before then. Maybe get a few heads of the boards there for some more rolling?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 298 ✭✭ShaneT


    columok wrote:
    Yeah we'll have to arrange it. I'm back to Scotland in September so we can arrange a meet up before then. Maybe get a few heads of the boards there for some more rolling?

    Definitely a plan! Maybe toward the end of August? I'd say it's unlikely the wrist will be recovered within 4 weeks, but sure feck it!

    Our place is WELL small (as you know) but it would be good to do an "informal";

    "MMA League Rules Sparring Night"

    No instructors; just people from the boards there to spar (two fights at any one time are manageable on the itty bitty 6m mats.

    Sound like a plan?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 298 ✭✭ShaneT


    So, an Open Invitation to a sparring session (mma leauge rules) now up on boards. See what happens when you put ideas in my head Colum..?

    Visit the Thread Here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭john kavanagh


    ShaneT wrote:
    I thought we were talking "little grappler" v "big striker with a ground game

    thats not what i was saying

    the point was a good small grappler could take out a big strong striker quickly if he doesn't know how to grapple.

    i've been around high level MMA for a while now so i OBVIOUSLY know that pure grappling will not beat a well rounded fighter who can strike and grapple.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,248 ✭✭✭Millionaire


    the point was a good small grappler could take out a big strong striker quickly if he doesn't know how to grapple.

    .

    yeah I know that for a fact...because if someone took me to the ground, I would be next to useless!

    Power rights and hard hooks would be help me much there!

    Thats why I gotta learn some of this ground work pretty soon!


Advertisement