Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

IVF case

  • 12-07-2006 03:51PM
    #1
    Just The One
    Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭


    I seem to have missed the outcome of the recent IVF case in the high court. Can anyone tell me what the results were.


Comments

  • #2
    Ruu_Old
    Closed Accounts Posts: 36,634 ✭✭✭✭Ruu_Old


    Is this the one you are talking about? Its the only article I could find about it anyway.


  • #3
    Just The One
    Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Just The One


    Ruu wrote:
    Is this the one you are talking about? Its the only article I could find about it anyway.



    cheers - i just heard that the ruling is not until next Tuesday.


  • #4
    FillSpectre
    Closed Accounts Posts: 834 ✭✭✭FillSpectre


    I can't get over the fact she has said even though he doesn't want another child with her she expects him to support the new child if she does. it is nearly as bad as the lesbians who "took" a guys sperm got pregnant and then sued him for support.
    If there were ever sexist laws before there are new ones now.


  • #5
    nesf
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,635 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    FillSpectre wrote:
    I can't get over the fact she has said even though he doesn't want another child with her she expects him to support the new child if she does. it is nearly as bad as the lesbians who "took" a guys sperm got pregnant and then sued him for support.
    If there were ever sexist laws before there are new ones now.

    It's pretty much the law of the land. He would be the genetic father, so she would be within her rights to demand maintanence etc. Which is a bit ****ed up tbh.


Advertisement
Advertisement