Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

easiest linux distro?

  • 06-11-2005 06:01AM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 703 ✭✭✭


    Since I'm building myself a new computer, I have decided to give away whats left of my old computer by building a semi-brand new one for a family member; only problem is that I only have licenses for windows 98, windows ME and windows XP. now, considering that XP is already being used, according to the microsoft eula I cant install it on another 'puter.

    I know I could do so without a second thought, and many would but considering the person using the computer would only be using it for internet, email and maybe some word processing, theres really no need to delve into legal ambiguity.

    personally, I usually opt for Redhat, but I dont know which is the best 'distro for basic needs. It must have a familiar windows-type interface, and the usual stuff (browser, email client, open office); and thats about it.

    any ideas? I was thinking maybe SuSe, Gentoo, or unbuntu


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    Is the family member good with computers?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭Duffman


    Ubuntu has firefox and open office included in a default install. Just rearrange the Gnome panel to make it more windows-like. It seems to support any hardware I throw at it out of the box.

    I'm not familar with Suse but I think it's supposed to be an easy to use distro.

    Gentoo is not what you want here.

    Download Ubuntu and see what you think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 703 ✭✭✭SolarNexus


    dublindude wrote:
    Is the family member good with computers?
    good enough, I wouldnt go so far as to expect them to understand (or want to) linux. She uses a computer at work everyday for typing etc. I expect that if it has a simple or windows-similar interface, she'll have no problem using it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Of the various distros I've tried, I'd say Ubuntu is the most straight forward and also has great support online through the ubuntu forums and unoffical ubunutu starter guide.

    You could also go for Kubuntu, the KDE varient of the same (Ubuntu uses Gnome by default, which I'm not too crazy about.. I think it's the only diference between the two)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,485 ✭✭✭✭Khannie


    more voteage for ubuntu

    fedora core is also fine

    For an end user like that, all you're really looking for is a reasonably intuitive UI (once you've set things up properly). The ubuntu file manager is the closest I've seen yet to windows explorer though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 210 ✭✭HomunQlus


    SolarNexus wrote:
    Since I'm building myself a new computer, I have decided to give away whats left of my old computer by building a semi-brand new one for a family member; only problem is that I only have licenses for windows 98, windows ME and windows XP. now, considering that XP is already being used, according to the microsoft eula I cant install it on another 'puter.

    Do you think that stops anybody? Why do you think Microsoft has an OS share of 94% [with Windows]? Because Microsoft knows that their software is being pirated, and they allow it in silence. Fact.


    For the Linux (the correct name is GNU/Linux by the way):

    Easiest Linux: Novell/SuSE 10.0
    Another easy Distribution: Mandriva Linux
    Good, but not perfect: Ubuntu Linux
    If you're used to Windows: Fedora Core 4

    For the expert: Gentoo Linux
    For the REAL expert: FreeBSD

    And for the Uber-Geek: Solaris 10 (for PC, and yes, it's free)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,485 ✭✭✭✭Khannie


    HomunQlus wrote:
    the correct name is GNU/Linux by the way

    :rolleyes:

    I suppose you refer to it as GNU/Linux all the time in conversation then? :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 210 ✭✭HomunQlus


    Khannie wrote:
    :rolleyes:

    I suppose you refer to it as GNU/Linux all the time in conversation then? :rolleyes:

    I'd say so... :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,744 ✭✭✭deRanged


    I tested a copy of Suse the other day and was amazed at how simple to use it was. I'd recommend that for a new-to-linux user.
    The setup was very straight forward, second only to OS X in my experience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,485 ✭✭✭✭Khannie


    HomunQlus wrote:
    I'd say so... :D

    HAHAHAHAHAHA. LOLing.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 94,998 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    HomunQlus wrote:
    Do you think that stops anybody? Why do you think Microsoft has an OS share of 94% [with Windows]? Because Microsoft knows that their software is being pirated, and they allow it in silence. Fact.
    Just because 1 in 7 random serial numbers worked on all products before windows 98 doesn't make that true. For instance in Italy the country with the most copied SW in the EU they had a campaign in national magazines where they showed what a valid OEM cert looked like complete with a valid serial number so user could make sure that what they installed was genuine. I can't find the denial of the "china quote" where they disowned the "if people are going to pirate software let's make sure it's ours" but I'm sure it must exist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭Fenster


    Gentoo <3

    :D

    I kid, I use it myself, but I warn all but the most dedicated away from it.

    Suse 10 gets my vote for newbies.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 210 ✭✭HomunQlus


    Just because 1 in 7 random serial numbers worked on all products before windows 98 doesn't make that true. For instance in Italy the country with the most copied SW in the EU they had a campaign in national magazines where they showed what a valid OEM cert looked like complete with a valid serial number so user could make sure that what they installed was genuine. I can't find the denial of the "china quote" where they disowned the "if people are going to pirate software let's make sure it's ours" but I'm sure it must exist.

    Windows was and still is overpriced. Only companies can afford that in large amounts. I do not know a single person that bought Windows, yet they have it. The CD-Key mechanism will always have weaknesses, exploits will make it possible to still install Windows. Even though the serial has been used X times. I think that there are more pirated Windows copies out there as genuine ones. Still, Microsoft knows this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,842 ✭✭✭steveland?


    SolarNexus wrote:
    good enough, I wouldnt go so far as to expect them to understand (or want to) linux. She uses a computer at work everyday for typing etc. I expect that if it has a simple or windows-similar interface, she'll have no problem using it.
    Get a few Live CDs and let her try them before you go installing

    Off Topic: Has anyone actually been prosecuted for having pirate Windows installed, apart from companies... just individuals


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 703 ✭✭✭SolarNexus


    steveland? wrote:
    Off Topic: Has anyone actually been prosecuted for having pirate Windows installed, apart from companies... just individuals
    I've not heard of it, loads of companies but not individuals. I used to be able to say that about torrent downloads :/

    Considering she actually works for the government, I dont think it would be prudent to have her owning a illegitimate copy of windows. Hell, I've installed windows on my computers at home so many times now, I couldnt tell you which one is 'paired' in compliance with the EULA; then again I doubt even microsoft can figure out their EULA's.

    Just FYI: I installed Kubuntu and although I like it, and is perfect for a new user (what a perdy' interface by default), I expected to have more options for installing packages - more like redhat. Kind of a disapointment that I wasnt able to rip out some of the more technical apps, but it works great nevertheless. Now all I need is to get a cheapie chassis, and keyboard/mouse/speaker combo from dabs (£30 total, amazingly cheap).

    oh and as for saying GNU/Linux: I saw a documentary about the creation of linux and how the whole 'thing' started - your man from the Free Software Foundation was not far from having a heart attack insiting that Linux should be said "GNU/Linux" and that *ALL* distros should be called "GNU/whatever" -I think he was a leeeetle bit uptight about the issue. if you know what I mean, then the job is done, no bother about checking whether I stuck gnu to the front

    (wow.. that was a long rambling post)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭Voodoo2


    Did you try Lindows now known as Linspire?

    http://www.linspire.com/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 703 ✭✭✭SolarNexus


    Voodoo2 wrote:
    Did you try Lindows now known as Linspire?

    http://www.linspire.com/
    I wouldnt dare... I like to try to keep away from controversial projects like Lindows/Linspire

    *edit
    moreover If I want a free distro, Linspire @ $59.99 is not free, I might as well consider xp-home for that price.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 210 ✭✭HomunQlus


    Linspire originally wanted to be a GNU/Linux in which Windows applications run natively. Very soon, they had to abandon that idea. Yet, they still do their thing.

    The installation you get with Linspire (doesn't matter which one) comes pretty much empty. Like almost no applications, I believe even something like KOffice was missing.

    They have something called "Click 'n Run Warehouse" in which you can download software for Linspire, like applications. They charge you for download open source software. There's also the Gimp in the list.

    This is against the General Public License - and a legitimate reason to file a lawsuit against Linspire Inc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    HomunQlus wrote:
    This is against the General Public License
    No, its not as long as the source is also available.

    http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
    Does the GPL allow me to sell copies of the program for money?
    Yes, the GPL allows everyone to do this. The right to sell copies is part of the definition of free software. Except in one special situation, there is no limit on what price you can charge. (The one exception is the required written offer to provide source code that must accompany binary-only release.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 210 ✭✭HomunQlus


    Alright.... didn't know that.

    I can't remember if they gave me the source also or not. :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,594 ✭✭✭forbairt


    Just installed Ubuntu this weekend and it gets my thumbs up ... the support forum seemed great ... :) Its got Openoffice by default installed .. along with a load of games I'm having a few issues with my wireless card but it detects the network easily enough ... installing new packages within it is simple enough as well

    Its running ok on a 500mhz pIII with 128mbs of ram .. not lightening fast mind but good enough :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,484 ✭✭✭✭Stephen


    I've been dual-booting SuSE with Windows XP since 9.2, and have tried earlier versions from time to time as well. Now using SuSE 10, and I must recommend it - its very easy to use. I'm using the "evaluation" version that includes some closed source products like flash player, acrobat reader and the very very good YaST tools for package management/system configuration etc. OSS-nazis have the option of OpenSuSE available to them :)


Advertisement