Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Hard Drives - Worlds Quickest?

  • 29-08-2005 02:14PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,783 ✭✭✭✭


    What is the worlds fastest HD in the following catagories.

    IDE
    SATA
    SCSI

    I am presuming that the WD Raptor is the quickest in the SATA catagory, or can some of the 7200RPM 16MB NCQ HD's give it a run for it's money?

    Am in the market for a new HD or 2, and want the fastest available, obviously within reason......which probably rules out the SCSI route, unless I just buy a small one and a controller to use as the boot drive.

    Thoughts and advice pls.

    Inqui


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭WizZard


    SCSI is fastest overall.

    WD Raptor 74GB is the current fastest in the SATA category. Or try a RAID 0 array with two of those for a faster access still! ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,830 ✭✭✭unklerosco


    I think custom pc reviewed one of the newer samsung 7200rpm drives n it came out faster than the raptor... cant remember the model, will have a looksy ltr.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,783 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Which issue? I have them here, and I thought I remembered reading that one of the New 16MB Buffer NCQ Drives came out as quick if not quicker than the raptor.......and alot more GB's for a similar price.

    Inqui


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,830 ✭✭✭unklerosco


    If u have the latest one read the review on the Scan comeleon pc... They question the use of 5 raptors when the samsungs r bigger, faster n quiter...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭Dooom


    I've a new WD 250GB SATA 2 16mb cache drive in my system, beside my 74GB Raptor and tbh the WD seems to load things a good bit quicker. Although some things load quicker with the Raptor. Dunno. Weird I say...Weird!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,817 ✭✭✭✭po0k


    Samsung Spinpoint SP2504Cs I think, 120 or 125Gig platters, SATA300, NCQ, I have 2 in raid0.
    Silent, fast, ninja drives.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 710 ✭✭✭Dundhoone


    Are these the samsung drives you have Syxpak?

    http://www.komplett.ie/k/ki.asp?sku=307913&cks=PRL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭Gone West


    I once used a system with a pair of 15kRpm 36 gig Seagate Cheetah SCSI drives in Raid0
    I must say. Very very impressive, although the price is astronomical. $600 for 60 gigs of fast hdd space.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,830 ✭✭✭unklerosco


    Dundhoone wrote:
    Are these the samsung drives you have Syxpak?

    http://www.komplett.ie/k/ki.asp?sku=307913&cks=PRL

    They're the ones custom pc say are faster than the raptops... 10secs quicker loading levels in farcry..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,894 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    FuzzyLogic wrote:
    I once used a system with a pair of 15kRpm 36 gig Seagate Cheetah SCSI drives in Raid0
    I must say. Very very impressive, although the price is astronomical. $600 for 60 gigs of fast hdd space.

    Or even $600 for 36 gigs as they were in RAID0 ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,783 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Raid 0 is striped, so you get the full capacity of both drives, so 68GB. The problem is if one fails you lose ALL the data.

    Inqui


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,946 ✭✭✭SouperComputer


    always worth a browse:

    www.storagereview.com


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭4Xcut


    fastest would be the new pci card coming out. you can put ram into it and it has a battery for when the pc is off. it can hold 4 ram sticks so thats 8gigs. not bad if its at ram speeds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭Gone West


    unkel wrote:
    Or even $600 for 36 gigs as they were in RAID0 ;)
    Youre mixing up raid 0 and raid 1 my good man!
    I wouldn't touch raid 0 ever again.
    Not after that 300 gig of data loss last time.
    *shudder*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 928 ✭✭✭-oRnein9-


    I highly recommend the WD Raptor , excellent main boot drive and superb load times in games and applications, hasn't failed me yet in nearly a year and a half jinx touch wood.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16 ebooborg


    where would i be without my western digital raptor?!

    still booting up..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,894 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    FuzzyLogic wrote:
    Youre mixing up raid 0 and raid 1 my good man!

    Indeed I was :o

    And that's after having had RAID0 for well over a year myself. Went back to non raid a few months ago. Didn't notice any performance decrease btw (2*Samsung SATA 160GB 8MB Cache)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭Gone West


    yep, I'd have to agree with you there.
    Unless you are tansferring huge amounts of data (read: linux ISOS) over a 1000mbit lan connection and both computers are using radio0, theres feck all noticable difference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭WizZard


    FuzzyLogic wrote:
    and both computers are using radio0

    What music do they play regularly? Any good?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭Gone West


    ¬_¬

    *raid 0


  • Advertisement
Advertisement