Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

The Skeptical Environmentalist in Dublin Wednesday 15th June

  • 12-06-2005 08:00PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 183 ✭✭


    Meeting Global Development Challenges:
    Ireland's White Paper on Development Cooperation

    To be held in Trinity College, Dublin

    Wednesday 15 June 2005

    Bjorn Lomborg, The Skeptical Environmentalist will be speaking at this conference. I asked if could attend just the Lomborg talk, and I got the ok.


    More information here


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 424 ✭✭Obni


    I would have liked to attend the meeting as I am currently dragging myself through the book, however the demands of work mean I only check the board every few days and I missed your post. Any chance of a quick summary?

    I know from questions you've asked at meetings that you're involved in environmental science, so what did you make of the book as an informed reader?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭DadaKopf


    I went along to his thing in Trinity on Wednesday. It was about development aid, not the environment. He was utterly wrong on the most basic premises about how to analyse and eradicate poverty. A perfect example of how statisticians and economists do not live in the real world. They are *not* natural sciences.

    There's an entry on him on Wikipedia.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 459 ✭✭Neuro


    DadaKopf wrote:
    He was utterly wrong on the most basic premises about how to analyse and eradicate poverty. A perfect example of how statisticians and economists do not live in the real world. They are *not* natural sciences.

    What were his premises and in what ways were they wrong?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 183 ✭✭BrendanBurgess


    Hi Obni

    You missed a great presentation on the rough topic of Global Problems and Global Solutions, which is the title of his new book.

    In a project known as The Copenhagen Consensus, he gathered together teams of economists, all experts in their own area of development. They were given the challenge of how to spend an extra $50b dollars on solving global problems. They had to prioritize. And then they argued and came up with a fair consensus on the following orders of priority:
    1) Disease - control of HIV/Aids
    2) Malnutrition - Micronutrients
    3) Trade Liberalization
    4) Disease - control of malaria

    All the projects relating to Climate Change were declared to be "Bad Projects". It's not that Climate Change isn't recognized as a problem, it's simply that we can do so little about it. It's good economics and rational thinking - what is the best way to allocate limited resources.

    Lomborg is a great speaker. Very clear thinking and very happy to challenge the world to think seriously and clearly about the problems we are facing.

    Brendan


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,471 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Not sure if anybody was listening to Radio4 this morning at five to nine, but the useful and energetic Dick Taverne turned up to debate the merits of organic food with somebody from the food-scare industry. The link is available here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 424 ✭✭Obni


    Thanks Brendan.

    I'm still struggling to finish the Skeptical Envir., so I guess I'd better get a move on before the next book appears.


Advertisement