Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Taking up boxing

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,483 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I was thinking Pro Rules MMA as a pretty tough sport. 5-10 minute rounds are no joke!

    This pro MMA, is this a recognised sport. Is it affiliated to a world governing body!!. I'm not dismissing it, but when one tries to discuss the worlds toughest sports, we need a set of standards and rules which we can apply to the debate. Boxing for example is one of the oldest sports in the world and it has competitive action from junior to senior to pro level all over the world. It's been an Olympic sport from day 1. Soccer the same, one governing body, Rugby also, Golf also etc etc. This MMA you talk about is not recognised really as a sport. Who regulates this on a world level??. It sound like Fight Club to me Mark. Either way, from watching UFC to Muay Thai to pro boxing, I'll take Pro boxing as my choice of the worlds toughest sport, followed closely by Muay Thai


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,248 ✭✭✭Millionaire


    just because something is not affilated to a sole governing world or national body does not mean it is not tough. ok the titles may not be offical recognised but it is can be just as tough.

    Like in earlier post, I said to let the athlete competing boxers train in peace. have places for people who want hard training or who even want to do a few bouts, (e.g. white collar boxing). you said if it is not affilated to the national body then it is not boxing. IMHO a hard punch in jaw that knock you out, is a tough thing to be on the receiving end of, no matter if you an affilated boxing club, a non affilated club, a kickboxing club, or MMA etc.

    I don't think the measure of what is tough or not, the debate has nothing to do with what assoc, body or sports politics you follow. do y'all c my point!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭mark.leonard


    walshb wrote:
    This pro MMA, is this a recognised sport. Is it affiliated to a world governing body!!.

    from the UFC website -
    "The new UFC has completely restructured the formerly undisciplined spectacle of Mixed Martial Arts into a highly organized and controlled combat sport. Under the leadership of owners Lorenzo and Frank Fertitta, the new UFC is now regulated and recognized by the world’s most prestigious sports regulatory bodies including the Nevada and New Jersey State Athletic Commissions."

    I have to agree with Millionaire's points.
    Trying to disallow MMA from this discussion becasue it is not in a unified world organisation seems a little pedantic!
    Have you ever watched a high quality MMA event? If you have then you will see it bears little resemblance to a Fight Club.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,483 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    from the UFC website -
    "The new UFC has completely restructured the formerly I have to agree with Millionaire's points.
    Trying to disallow MMA from this discussion becasue it is not in a unified world organisation seems a little pedantic!
    Have you ever watched a high quality MMA event? If you have then you will see it bears little resemblance to a Fight Club.

    Mark, who said anything about not allowing it into the discussion. I'm open to all ideas. Yes I have seen UFC in action and you can dress it up anyway you like. To me it's two guys going hell for leather in a street fight. I see it every week in Temple bar. It's barbaric and tends not to last very long because anything goes. Street fights are no different. And to me anyway it is not as strenuous as boxing or as tough as regards endurance, no where near Mark. A lot of the guys who I've sen participating are nowhere near as conditioned as a pro boxer. Some of them are even unfit looking and flabby. I agree that it takes guts, courage and a certain level of stupidity, but as regards the fitness end of thing, it's not remotely close to 12rds of Pro boxing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    walshb wrote:
    To me it's two guys going hell for leather in a street fight. I see it every week in Temple bar. It's barbaric and tends not to last very long because anything goes.
    Way off. See me for DVD's ;)

    Barabaric? That's a bit subjective. Some might say that about rugby, your beloved boxing, or even soccer at its worst.
    I think calling it barbaric shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the sport. Sure, it's not as pretty as boxing, but once you understand the skills required to operate in the "unnattractive" ranges, you can appreciate it as a sport far better.
    I agree that it takes guts, courage and a certain level of stupidity, but as regards the fitness end of thing, it's not remotely close to 12rds of Pro boxing
    All sports take a certain level of each of these. Boxing, of which you are so fond, is based on a desire for competitiveness that bypasses your better senses. Who would want to get in a ring for 12 rounds and be hit? Far easier to sit back and watch someone else.
    The fitness levels required are far different. For the amount of grappling and wrestling that takes place in an MMA ring, you require a different type of fitnes, more akin to a wrestlers workout. This may also account for the appearance of some (very few) of the fighters involved.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭pma-ire


    walshb wrote:
    Mark, who said anything about not allowing it into the discussion. I'm open to all ideas. Yes I have seen UFC in action and you can dress it up anyway you like. To me it's two guys going hell for leather in a street fight. I see it every week in Temple bar. It's barbaric and tends not to last very long because anything goes. Street fights are no different. And to me anyway it is not as strenuous as boxing or as tough as regards endurance, no where near Mark. A lot of the guys who I've sen participating are nowhere near as conditioned as a pro boxer. Some of them are even unfit looking and flabby. I agree that it takes guts, courage and a certain level of stupidity, but as regards the fitness end of thing, it's not remotely close to 12rds of Pro boxing

    Jees! I'm standing up for MMA :rolleyes: :p

    But you seem to be talking about the first few UFC's. Which were brutal!!

    Since then it has become much sharper and the fights and fighters have more structure so that they don't all finish in seconds, and do go to different ranges.

    The indurance of these guys has to be high! I would bet that most in the New UFC fighters would be in better shape than many pro boxers in the world!!

    The only that is carrying a bit of flab is Tank Abbot (I think??) and he gets beat by the leand mean fighting machines that step up to him at times. Who could also give a boxer a good run for there money I'd bet!!

    Your blinkered view of the subject is a sorrowful let down to your obvious intelligence. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,483 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Guy's as far as I'm concerned...MMA has not come near far enough in this world to be really recognised as a sport or anything like it. I'm agreeing with you that it's tough, corageous, fit, strenuous etc etc. It's just not as tough, strenuous, enduring, skillful, competitive, rewarding or idolised as the sport of Pro Boxing. Most I'm sure will agree with me. If these guys were so damn good and tough and fit, they'b be in the ring making a hell of a lot more money than they are making from UFC and MMA. Plain and simple, there is no tougher arena in sport than the boxing ring, 12 rds of 3 minutes of two ultra conditioned athletes going toe to toe non stop action. Nothing in my view comes close except maybe Muay Thai....Bring in any other so called sport that you like, it doesn't match pro boxing at its best.....


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    MMA has not come near far enough in this world to be really recognised as a sport or anything like it.
    MMA in some shape or form has been around since Pankration in ancient Greece (the most highly regarded Olympic sport) to having elements in pre-Queensbury rules boxing. Its not some new-fandangled flash in the pan and just because boxing is more "established" means nothing.
    It's just not as tough, strenuous, enduring, skillful, competitive, rewarding or idolised as the sport of Pro Boxing.
    Well since Pro-boxing has become somewhat of a farce and MMA organisers are starting to get their asses in gear things are gonna change. To say that one sport is tougher than another demeans all sportmen. They are different sports and are tough in different ways. There is a greater skill set required for a pro-MMA fighter than a pro boxer. The range of techniques is greater and the variables to train for are many more.
    If these guys were so damn good and tough and fit, they'b be in the ring making a hell of a lot more money than they are making from UFC and MMA.
    That is one of the most naive arguments Ive ever heard. The money made from any sports promotion depends on mainly the tickets sold and the tv profits. The amount of money the fighters make depends on the revenue of the show. If the sport is young it is gonna draw in a smaller crowd. The doesnt mean that its sportsmen are better or worse than any others.

    I have no doubt that pro-boxers in general are tough, well trained athletes but to get into a pissing match about who is tougher and to be so insulting towards fellow combat athletes reeks of boxing snobbery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,483 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Colm, don't be so sensitive mate. I'm a huge fan of sports in general, from snooker to athletics to tennis and to Boxing. I just have a greater interest in boxing and I feel it's OK to say one sport is tougher than another without fearing that I may be insulting somebody. My god, most sports persons themselves will agree on this and they all will agree that it really takes that extra bit to be a dominant pro boxer. Athletes themselves recognise this, so why would you feel that I'm being demeaning to the other sports. Far from it mate, soccer players, rugby palyers, runners. They are all fantastic, but pro boxing does take that little extra from a human than these sports. Let's not be afraid to express our views and stop worrying who we may or may not be offending. I never slagged off those other tough sports, I merely pointed out my reasons for choosing Pro boxing as being tougher im most aspects. Yet you bring the whole Snobbery thing into it...I think you're well off the mark there Colm. All the sports I admire and have great respect for all the great athletes through history. I'll name a few........Daley Thompson, Rod Laver, Bjorn Borg, Carl Lewis, Keith Wood, Sonia, Michelle Smith, Mark Spitz, Jesse Owens, Matt Biondi, Ray Robinson, Ray Leonard, Pete Sampras, Sean Kelly, Roche, Lance Armstrong, Pele, Babe Ruth, Jordan, Wilt Chamberlain. The list goes on and on and a lot of sports are considered. So for you to say Im showing snobbery is not true. I respect them all, I just happen to think that the sport of boxing is the pinnacle. And I almost forgot the greatest athlete of them all.....Muhammad Ali


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well it seems to be that you have a pretty poor view of MMA and grappling from comments such as.
    I used to think Judo and Wrestking, but from watching it lately, they do more messing and posing than actual hard work
    This MMA you talk about is not recognised really as a sport.
    It sound like Fight Club to me
    To me it's two guys going hell for leather in a street fight.
    It's barbaric and tends not to last very long because anything goes.
    And to me anyway it is not as strenuous as boxing or as tough as regards endurance, no where near Mark.
    I agree that it takes guts, courage and a certain level of stupidity,
    If these guys were so damn good and tough and fit, they'b be in the ring making a hell of a lot more money than they are making from UFC and MMA.
    Bring in any other so called sport that you like

    Or have I taken you wrong?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,248 ✭✭✭Millionaire


    HI WalshB :-)

    What about the like o Pro Kickboxing which in the original form PKA Professional Karate Assoc which was massive in the USA and Canada in I980s, massive TV coverage , sponsorship, Pro fighters. or Full contact Karate as it wa called then.

    Bill superoot Wallace, Benny Urquidez, Jow Lewis, Brad Hefton. Don Wilson. Jean Yves Theriault from Ottawa Canada who was a teacher of mine in 1994 for 1 year and the world middle professional champion for years. he fought Rick Roufus (who when K1) when Jean Yves was in his 40s, I was ring side that night in Montreal.

    These guys fought Pro for a living to packed arenas on TV etc.

    Now not only did these guys box 12 rounds or sometime more, they were also kicking too. In kickboxing you have to do a min of 8 kicks or more depending on assoc , per round. WHy is that. Because it is less tireing to box than to kick. otherwise youd just end up boxing al night. so conclusion boxing and kicking together is much more exhausting than boxing alone, and most kickboxers onhere will back me up. remember thai guys might be prone to kicking more and boxing a little less re how fights are scored.

    So I think pro kickboxing is tougher than boxing, especially i you add in leg kicks. Thai guys would take boxers down in 1 round with full on leg kicks.

    Of course boxing is tough. I know some guys (brothers the 3 o them) now in their 40s who boxed for ireland, boxed professional (one knocked Bruno out) , and now are 2 are senior council barristers and 1 a top specialist doc in the USA. and I disucssed this subject before with one, and more open guys you could not meet.

    Its best respect all styles. No need to be so elite re what we practice. no one learns that way/

    Personally for toughest I still back up the MMA SBG guys. they brawling in all ranges. I am only back from training in thai in bangkok with a good cage guy Riccico from south of france. Kickboxing rules I would last there no probs, but get into clinch and MMA, no way man, unless I could use an Uzi! ha ha
    still he near wet his pants when I took him down to Patpong! LOL HAHA :-)
    Peacr dudes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Clive


    walshb wrote:
    This pro MMA, is this a recognised sport. Is it affiliated to a world governing body!!. I'm not dismissing it, but when one tries to discuss the worlds toughest sports, we need a set of standards and rules which we can apply to the debate... This MMA you talk about is not recognised really as a sport.

    Who regulates professional boxing on a world level?

    There is no International Federation for it, and there are four major world governing bodies, and numerous others.

    Who regulates kickboxing on a world level?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,483 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Colm, get over it will you. They are merely opinions that I believe in. Yes I do see UFC and MMA as a type of Fight Club. So what, that's my view. I didn't say it wasn't tough, because it damn well is...really tough. Yes I do see them as not really recognised Sports as such, and a lot of people would feel the same. They aren't as established on the global scale as other sports like Boxing, soccer, basketball etc etc. I for one wouldn't know where to go if I wanted to do this type of activity. I have give the utmost respect to Muay Thai and I also think that the wrsetling in the Olympics is top notch. I take back what I said about the wrestling, the Judo I found to be lacking in the Athens Games. Now we can go on all day about one sport or another, how many damn sports can you say are martial arts. I say a few yet others will come up with anything they see fit. Muay Thai, Boxing, kickboxing are at the top in terms of physical ability, toughness, endurance, skill, strength, speed, stamina. all the others like Taae kwon do, jujitsu, grappling, ninjitsu etc etc just don't cut it in my view. The UFC and MMA re on a slightly different level again, tough as hell, but not as regulated or competitive as Pro boxing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,248 ✭✭✭Millionaire


    ISKA WAKO and WKA

    some kickboxing orgs. but i think it like pro boxing there are several or more internationally.

    Ok I'm retiring from this thread.

    Yo later dudes!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,483 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    ISKA WAKO and WKA


    Ok I'm retiring from this thread.


    Me too....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,081 ✭✭✭Musashi


    I'd say for toughness and mental grit either cyclists or cross country skiers are the hardest guys around, but that's just another opinion :)


    I do remember a competition on TV years ago testing various athletes including a boxer,Terry Marsh,and a cross country skier won it outright,and was top in nearly all events as well regardless of what the particular stresses were.The guy was just an animal!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    Was it "It's a Knockout"? :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,081 ✭✭✭Musashi


    No, your prolly thinking of "Superstars" with Brian Jacks (Judo Hero) and his dodgy sliding squat thrust technique!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 thebuyer


    this has been a very interesting discussion.
    Whilst I agree with a lot of what Walshb says and I acknowledge his in-dept knowledge of boxing in Ireland I also think that our boxing clubs are perhaps losing something if his argument is correct.
    Recreational boxing training has proved a valuable source of revenue for many boxing clubs in the states ( i know this first-hand from living in N.Y) and probably other countries too. Instead of relying solely on grant aid many boxing clubs could tap into another source of revenue which could improve their competitive members lot.
    Whilst real fighters might lampoon so called "white collar boxing" ,gyms such as Gleasons in N.Y now secure a sizeable source of their income from people pursuing such training and who are willing pay for it.
    Most boxing clubs only train on specific nights so it would'nt be necessary to have non-competitive people using the facilities at the same times.
    Having more people involved in other areas of boxing might also generate increased interest in the sport which if tapped into could result in larger attendances at amatuer boxing contests and thus raise the profile ( and income) of the sport, another benefit for the comeptitive member. I looked at the recent 4 nations boxing on RTE and was somewhat surprised to see the number of empty seats at this prestigious event.
    Wrestling used to be a huge sport in ireland years ago but is now virtually extinct beacuse they did'nt move with the times and realise the changing nature of sport particiaption in ireland.


Advertisement