Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Intersecting Subspaces in N dimensions

  • 22-08-2004 02:49PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭


    Hey guys,

    I have a little problem here:

    given two subspaces U and W both of dimension two of an N dimensional space show in general that if N = 3 the intersection of U and W forms a curve; if N = 4 a finite number of points; and N > 4 they do not in general intersect at all.

    I can kind of visualize the answer for the first two cases based on analagous cases lines viewed in R2 and R3, but I am not really satisfied with the answers.

    I would like a really rigorous maths proof.

    please help


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭charlieroot


    I may be wrong on this but, suppose the N=3 and U = V. Then the intersection would be 2 dimensional and hence a plane?

    If N = 4, then if you have one point in the intersection surely you have infinitely many points - you couldn't have a finite number of points?

    If N > 4, if U = V then of course they'd intersect?

    We are talking about vector spaces with external multiplication by Q right?
    I'm guessing we're not? Are we talking about finitely generated modules?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭planck2


    Just before I answer, what do you mean by external multiplication Q ? Do you mean external multiplication by the set of rational numbers?

    I don't know what finitely generated modules means since I haven't done maths since the end of my second year in university? Any way I don't think they have any relevance since this question appears in a book on tensor calculus by J.L. Synge and A. Schild published in the 1950's, old, but definitely not out of date.

    Now back to the question. As you know a space of N dimensions requires N co-ordinates to determine the position of a point in that space. A subspace of this N dimensional, lets call it B ( the N dimensional space being called A),i is formed when the N co-ordinates of the space A can be written as a function of parameters, the number of these parameters can be anything from 1,....,N-1. If the number of the parameters is N-1 then a hypersurface is formed in A, i.e. B forms a hypersurface in A.

    Now if I have a space A of N dimensions, and two subspaces B and C both of dimension 2 we know that the co-ordinates of A can be written in the following way:

    Ai = f i(B1,B2) and Ai = gi ( C1, C2).

    Now if B and C intersect then we can only have f i(B1,B2) = gi ( C1, C2), with Bj = Ck.
    Note that j doesn’t not necessarily equal k, and at the same time we cannot have Bk= Cj since if we did B would equal C. If N = 3, i.e. the dimension of A is 3, then the B ∩ C simply gives the parameterized equation of a curve. However for me the problem lies in the extension of the proof to higher dimensions for the same line of reasoning gives the same result in spaces of dimension N ≥ 3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 382 ✭✭mrhappy42


    curve = straight line
    "finite number of points" = single point

    would be interested in your proof.


Advertisement