Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2025/2026 - See Post #1 for Mod Note

1478479481483484487

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,697 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Thats already my opinion, its why for example I don't want United to spend 100m+ on Anderson. From a football perspective the galactico fees are rarely ever justified.

    Even the ones that do ok, they rarely have done so much better than a cheaper option would have done anyway, and not by enough to justify the risk.

    Imagine paying more than the value of Celtic FC for a player and then he plays crap because he was tired after the world cup, or because he didn't fit well with the lads already there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    From memory Neymar went for 222mn and was arguably a flop. Barca spent god knows how much, but all huge transfers, replacing Neymar with Griezmann, dembele and coutinho and were all flops. United added pogba and Antony to the huge transfers list and both were flops.


    Ronaldo to Juve wasn’t a flop. Can’t remember the other flops (caiciedo and Enzo are good signings I suppose) but Barca and United done a fair bit of heavy lifting on the huge transfers usually equaling flops. kvartshkeila a definite hit and he went for 90 million I think but not sure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,782 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    Whats the cut off figure for a high value flop? Would Nicolas Pepé be considered an expensive flop?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,521 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    yes, i dont even know what they got for him when they sold him, 12 million? Appartently hes found his level at Villarreal and is one of their best players now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭ronjo


    Definitely although was wrong place at wrong time for him. Arsenal were dreadful then and his stats weren't "that" bad



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Well actually when comparing fees it does make sense to use a standard currency.

    Convert it to pounds if ya want. I won't be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,106 ✭✭✭✭L'prof


    Pepe never worked out. I’d consider him a flop. At the same time since his signing there’s been players signed for more money who’ve scored less and people are bending over themselves backwards trying to justify their returns



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,386 ✭✭✭IrishOwl...


    The Isak situation is fairly black and white if you ask me.

    The guy is obviously unbelievably talented. If you can get him fit and keep him fit, he'll easily score 20+ league goals.

    However, that's the problem. Can he stay injury-free for the majority of the season?

    Bear in mind that Liverpool now have Iraola managing them. A man known for demanding an incredible amount from his forwards, to the point where they're often expected to come off after 60 minutes because they've run themselves into the ground.

    It'll be very interesting to see how Isak adapts to that system and whether his body can cope with those demands over the course of a full season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,409 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    I don't think Isak will have any issues with the coming off on 60mins part



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,171 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    I think you're taking a very black and white view of things and making that "if" do a LOT of work for your argument.

    And this isn't about "things not being set up for him". This is about him coming into a team that was massively under-performing with no creative spark or initiative to attack, with wingers that just collapsed in form and a midfield incapable of forward passes. On top of that he only joined the team 4 games into the season with no proper pre-season training. He then made a sub appearance and started the next 3 games which was the start of the teams complete collapse. In the next 9 matches, he was injured for 3, made 3 starts, and was a sub for the other 3. Not the pattern of a player who was fit. He scored 2 goals. Then he was injured for the next 14 games. In the last 7 games he was injured/benched for 3, started 2 and was a sub in 2. Again, not a pattern of a player who is match fit. His playing time and recovery from breaking his leg was being managed.

    So before (though that ship sailed) you write him off, maybe step back and consider the context in which he played. I make no judgement on him for last season either way. He's massively talented, he knows how to find the net. What he needs is a proper run in the first team with a team behind him that can create chances.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    It's impossible to judge Isak so far. He didn't even have a pre season and then missed most of the season with a broken leg ,and when played was playing in a **** system.

    I don't care if he cost £1 or £100M tbh. All I care is, can he score a good chunk of goals next season and contribute to a successful season. That's all that matters. To me anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,139 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Kieran Trippier signs for Wolves to replace Matt Doherty who has been released.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Here are the top 20 transfers of all time (NOT adjusted for inflation)
    Fees from transfer market

    Going through them and signing a 100m+ player often doesn't lead to the desired effect on the team.

    Neymar — Paris Saint-Germain — €222.00m — 17/18
    Didn't achieve what he was brought in to do, they improved and achieved their goal of winning the CL in the years after he left. Has to be a Flop at this fee. Missed every march it seemed when his sister's birthday came up.

    Kylian Mbappé — Paris Saint-Germain — €180.00m — 18/19
    Played better for PSG overall than Neymar but still did not lead them to the CL and they improved as a team after he left. Similar issues now at Real Madrid where they were winning CLs before but now have to accommodate him. Can't call someone who scores as much as him a flop but it's also hard to not argue that they are a better team in the post Messi,Mbappe & Neymar era.

    Ousmane Dembélé — FC Barcelona — €148.00m — 17/18
    Flop but now leading PSG to CL wins. Didn't work at Barca though.
    Right player under the wrong circumstances, PSG able to accommodate him much better - i.e doesn't need to play every week to win the league. Massive talent but workload needs to be managed, most big clubs can't carry that.

    Alexander Isak — Liverpool FC — €145.00m — 25/26
    Very poor first season and needs a big start to the next. Poor injury record overall.
    Questions if he will fit longer term are fair at this stage. Talent is there but not clear if it will work out at Liverpool.

    Philippe Coutinho — FC Barcelona — €135.00m — 17/18
    Flop, never looked anything like the player at Liverpool. A panic buy for Barca after losing Neymar to PSG.
    Ended up out on loan and knocking them out of the CL for Bayern. Disaster.

    João Félix — Atlético de Madrid — €127.20m — 19/20
    Flop - never reached the heights he should have, now in Saudi at the age of just 26
    Talent was there when the deal was made but he was never the right fit for Atleti. Panic move after losing Griezmann to Barca.

    Jude Bellingham — Real Madrid — €127.00m — 23/24
    Success, lead them to the CL in his first season. Was a massive part of it, looked like he thrived being at this leve.

    Suffering now as the team is trying to fit in more "name" players.

    Florian Wirtz — Liverpool FC — €125.00m — 25/26
    Not hit the heights yet but the talent is there, If they play to his strengths he'll be OK I think.
    But not the first season fans would have hoped for with a 125m signing.
    Would expect a better 2nd season.

    Enzo Fernández — Chelsea FC — €121.00m — 22/23
    Not a flop but light succes - they overpaid but he is one of their better players.
    Again not the heights you would expect for the fee. Not lead them to much of note yet and with 2 100m+ midfielders they should be much better.

    Eden Hazard — Real Madrid — €120.80m — 19/20
    Big Flop - terrible signing for Real. Looked past his best almost instantly

    Antoine Griezmann — FC Barcelona — €120.00m — 19/20
    Flop - never fit in at Barca. Has gone back to Atleti since and rediscovered his form but his time at Barca was poor.

    Jack Grealish — Manchester City — €117.50m — 21/22
    Won plenty at City but was never really the main man. Flop is harsh I suppose because of the trophies but calling it a success doesn't feel right either. His goal and assist record is pretty poor.
    Light success.

    Cristiano Ronaldo — Juventus FC — €117.00m — 18/19
    Juve would have brought him in to win the CL and that didn't happen. They were closer in the pre-Ronaldo days. Ronaldo still delivered goals (and in the CL) but they offset some of his cost by selling players instead of making the big push to win the CL. Overall hard to call it a success.

    Declan Rice — Arsenal FC — €116.60m — 23/24
    Success - has become one of their best players and is now a league winner with them.
    Regarded as one of the best in europe now

    Moisés Caicedo — Chelsea FC — €116.00m — 23/24
    Light success - has become one of their best players and one of the best in the league.
    But like Enzo, the pair of them haven't lead Chelsea to much.
    If he moved to a better run club I would expect he would be important to success.

    Romelu Lukaku — Chelsea FC — €113.00m — 21/22
    Flop - Never found the form needed.

    Paul Pogba — Manchester United — €105.00m — 16/17
    Didn't push Utd onto any success. Form inconsistent.
    You'd want a lot more from 100m+. The talent is obvious but it didn't lift the club in the way fans hoped.
    Club was badly run during his time. Has to be called a Flop overall.

    Gareth Bale — Real Madrid — €101.00m — 13/14
    Success - won everything and scored in multiple finals, formed a deadly trio.

    Kai Havertz — Chelsea FC — €100.00m — 20/21
    An OK player but never in a million years worth the fee.
    Scored in a CL final for them to be fair and sold at a good price to Arsenal.

    Hugo Ekitiké — Liverpool FC — €95.00m — 25/26
    Promising early signs, nasty injury but if he comes back OK he will do well.
    Looked the better buy between him and Isak.

    So over 20 players there's only a handful of real success stories, a few more who did OK and a lot who didn't achieve what they should have.

    Signing a player for 100m+ is tricky business



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,782 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    Jesus I forgot about Hazard!

    Coutinho knocking Barca out was hilarious tbf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Just on the topic of transfer fees, and the above comment on inflation, it reminded me of the recent post by Kieran Maguire on the top transfer fees in the history of football (since 1992) but this time adjusted for inflation.

    And while I know they are not entirely accurate, it does give somewhat of a fairer reflection because we can't compare apples with oranges when talking about transfer fees from 10 years ago to today.

    image.png



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭kyleman


    In fairness to Isak who I would consider a very skilled operator rather than an aggressive striker had poor service when he did play last season.

    He had 3 of the most aggressive midfields in Joelinton , Guimares and Tonali behind him providing service and the comparison physically to Wirtz , Jones and MacAllister was a massive downgrade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,782 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,051 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    Several new additions will be added to that list this summer as clubs' revenue increase.

    Not sure about the figures, just checked the cheapest one, looks like Ekitike was 69m pounds (80m euros), there are add ons of 10m though hard to add that to the figures without knowing what they are.

    For example the add ons for Wirtz are 16m pounds but in order to be triggered Liverpool have to win the PL and/or CL 4 times in his contract, i.e. never going to happen so he will cost 100 pounds but if he is struggling rival fans will say he cost 125m



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,528 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    Why do you think it gives a fairer reflection? I think its just a discussion point that's brought up when there's no real news or games to be discussed. You can say Alan Shearer cost £223m adjusted for inflation but in reality he cost £15m.

    How about someone tally up all prize money earned and ticket sales since the PL started with inflation adjusted, would that give a fairer reflection on the transfer fees clubs spent on players?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    How do you adjust for inflation in football I wonder?
    It doesn't exactly follow standard inflation



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭ronjo


    He factored in spending of the total clubs in the division on a year by year basis I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Transfer Market is fairly good. I'd have very little reason to doubt their fees.
    If you can prove otherwise fair enough



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭BenK


    This is straying dangerously close to 'alternative league table' territory…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭ronjo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,821 ✭✭✭jacool


    Because they are "The Leeds" - biggest city with one club, and therefore deserve (apologies, Matt Johnson) the "The"!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,051 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cy0wrwrpgrdo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    He literally said exactly how he did it. Each transfer is a % of total revenue and then extrapolated it out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Ok lets assume the year is 1995, and the average transfer fee is 1m.

    If a club has 10m revenue and they spend 6m of that revenue on a player, they have spent 60% of their revenue on that one player, and not only is it very reckless spending, it's also completely out of the ordinary - it's 6 times the average fee.

    Now compare it to 2025, and the average spend on a player is now 30m.

    If a club is generating 700m in revenue, and they spend 100m on a player. They have spent about 14% of their revenue on that one player, within their means, and it's around 3 times the average fee.

    the 7m transfer had a much bigger impact on the buying club, and also driving other fees up, than the 100m transfer did. Even though 100m sounds bigger, it actually wasn't a 'bigger' amount to that club.

    So people comparing transfers from the current day to 10 years ago, or 20 years ago, is extremely futile if you're not going to adjust for inflation because believe it or not inflation actually does happen and transfer fees increase as a result. fees don't stick to the same level as they did in 1995.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,821 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Transfer fees are gone mad and they can't be sustainable and I'd imagine most fans would agree with that.

    Ben Jacobs reporting today that Bournemouth value Scott at £80m and United and Liverpool are interested in signing him. He's a good player but not that good, a few years ago his profile/talent etc would see clubs paying around £25-30m for him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    The old adage of a club buying 1 player for 100m means they spent more than the club buying 10 players at 50m!



Advertisement
Advertisement