Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1897898900902903913

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Don't forget it'll take Iran more then 5 years to get anywhere near where they once were.

    Built different

    I'm on the verge of a site ban. Please don't rage bait me, I'm easily triggered especially late at night!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭bored65


    This should put an end to arguments few pages back about Russian “gains”

    https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-june-6-2026/


    “ ISW assessed that Russian forces seized or infiltrated about 40 square kilometers in May 2026, but ISW’s calculations, excluding Russia’s infiltration areas, found that Russian forces lost control of about 280 square kilometers.[3] ISW assessed that Russian forces seized or infiltrated about 28 square kilometers in April 2026 but lost control of about 116 square kilometers.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,998 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    As I have mentioned previously, to some derision, the bridge is the key to routing the Orcs from the south, not just Crimea, now that the single other land supply route is under fire control.

    Sure Ukraine may look like it's trying to isolate Crimea, but that isn't the core aim of what they are trying to achieve, it's a side effect, the main aim being to cut off Orc forces to the immediate north of Crimea, from resupply.

    'An army marches on it's stomach' was an ode to the vital nature of logistics. Knock out the bridge and you curtail logistics for Orc forces in the south, routing them then takes far less effort and becomes very possible.

    Mention of the Neptune is interesting. From what I can gather, its more accurate than the flamingo, but with a 250kg vs 1000kg warhead. If Ukraine cold improve the flamingo accuracy, it would be a far greater threat to the bridge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,998 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Oh dear. I hope they don't run out of food and ammunition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,617 ✭✭✭wassie


    image.png

    AI meme (I assume). Sign translates (apparently) to "Vladimir's plan is coming together: We are seriously preparing for the full restoration of the Crimean Bridge!"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,722 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Definitely AI. What good is toilet paper when you don't have a toilet?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Tiger and Sherman were not comparable tanks, you’re comparing a Ford Transit with a Honda Civic. Just because both have four wheels and drive on roads doesn’t make them the same. Different designs for different jobs, Sherman was better at its job than Tiger would have been at it.

    It is unlikeLy that the Ukrainian system can do everything Patriot can do for much less price or availability. What is important to Ukraine is that it can do what Ukraine needs doing for less price and greater availability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,935 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Several analysts saying this is the best strategic position for Ukraine since 2022. The logistics situation for Russia is dire. Reports the strikes impacted bringing weapons to the front.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,022 ✭✭✭✭irishgeo


    Why is someone waving a flag on top of the building?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭mossie


    I'm a bit worried that Russia may use a tactical nuke if things keep getting worse for them. I've been to Ukraine (Kharkiv), albeit many years ago I still have contacts, and I know that people there are somewhat nervous of this happening.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I dont think it's likely as Putin wants to colonise Ukraine as hes doing in the occupied territories.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,805 ✭✭✭✭Jelle1880


    Russia has been doing this for years, it's all for propaganda. They send in a few guys to waive a flag, claim a town or whatever is captured and then whatever happens afterwards they don't care about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,935 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,084 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It's an interesting question and one I've certainly wondered about, myself.

    Ultimately, I think the answer is 'no', but that's provided the situation is responsibly managed. Probably the most likely scenario of something crazy happening like the deployment of any kind of nuke is if Putin feels the war is totally unwinnable and that this failure will lead to his political and personal demise. At this point, like that cornered rat story he's told before, he could decide to make the world burn. So, as much as it pains me to say it, he'd need to be given some kind of off-ramp to ensure this doesn't happen. At least in the short to medium term, he'd need to feel like his position as leader of Russia was still secure. He may get Prigozhin'd later, but until then, Putin continuing to lead a sorely weakened Russia would be better than the most serious nuclear escalation the world has seen since WW2.

    Anyway, I've heard people say that this war is really about the resource-rich land in the Donbas. Well, as far as I can see, does Russia not effectively control the great majority of that territory. If they could sign a ceasefire which allows Russia to de facto hold that land in a frozen conflict type scenario, could Putin not take that back to his people as job done?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,048 ✭✭✭✭josip


    No chance of that happening. Winnie wouldn't let him. China will instead up their supplies and tech a bit more to maintain battlefield equilibrium. In exchange for more 'contracts' in Russia's east.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,084 ✭✭✭✭briany


    In exchange for the continued hope of securing the land on its western flank, Russia cedes a great chunk of its east…

    Those earths better be mighty rare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 985 ✭✭✭midlander12


    Another snippet of good news. Looks like Russia's puppets in Armenia have flopped:-

    Pro-EU ruling party leads Armenia parliamentary election, exit polls show – POLITICO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,084 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Have to feel a bit for Armenia - they have no proper allies anywhere, it seems like. Their ostensible allies in Russia and Iran have done f all for them in recent years as they saw their de facto exclave of Artsakh fall to Azerbaijan. Not that I think the EU will do a whole lot more in this situation, given Armenia's geographic detachment from Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,236 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Putin Using a tactical nuke would actually be a sign of weakness, to the west ,the chinese and mainly the russian public ..

    And it would be heading in a direction that he doesn't really know the outcome, what will other countries do in response , not to russia homeland - but to any russian assets beyond their recognised international borders ..

    How would the chinese take it ?

    Other than nuking a city or major civilian centre , what would Russia gain , the ground nuked would be unusable , and nuking a major population centre would likely be a step too far ..

    It'd likely start a wave of nuclear proliferation, the polish, the swedes ,the finns maybe even the turks and Greeks, south koreans , Vietnamese and definitely the Ukrainians...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,048 ✭✭✭✭josip


    A tactical nuke would be an airburst so little radioactive impact on the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,563 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    How soon before we see Terminator Drones, who's sole purpose is to eliminate a person, and doesn't stop until it does



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,388 ✭✭✭green daries


    I would probably say not very long ...probably being worked on at this stage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,022 ✭✭✭✭irishgeo


    I'd say the Chinese have warned him against it.

    The USA have allegedly told you use one and it's goodbye to you and mother Russia.

    How well maintained is the Russian nuclear weapons program and would MAD even kick in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭Jon Doe


    No. Putin needs to burn. Russia needs to experience defeat if it is to change. It has been so for hundreds of years, And if a tactical nuke goes off, well don't let a good crisis go to waste: it will be an excellent opportunity to evaluate who's a leader and who's a autocrat simp.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭Jon Doe


    This. No doubt the Russians have "a" nuke. No doubt the Russians can re-manufacture "a" nuke in a matter or weeks. But thousands on stand by? No. Most people fail realize what a nuke is: an extremely complex machine that is incredibly costly to keep fully functional. The current crop of Rus leaders can't be bothered to buy and maintain proper military tires but they're spending billions on nuke maintenance? No. No way. Not when beautiful french & Italian yachts are on sale!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,998 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I'm both impressed at Ukraine's ability to do this so consistently and Russia's ability to just sleep walk into this disaster.

    1000055083.jpg

    It's another huge depot up there so there will be plenty of targets for follow up strikes.

    I'm on the verge of a site ban. Please don't rage bait me, I'm easily triggered especially late at night!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    It's gas (pun not intended) how Ukraine has gone from strength to strength, on the ground and diplomatically, since TACO took office and did his best to pull the rug from under them. The result has been the opposite. Hugely impressive and VZ deserves massive credit - his energy levels are astonishing, into the 5th year of Putin's war. He's galvanised a nation, put in place the right people (and made the right changes it seems) to oversee the military side of things (as opposed to Putin who appears to have taken a leaf/ chapter out of Adolf's play book) and pulled most of the civilised world behind his country.

    If it wasn't for China and to a lesser (but no less forgivable) extent India, Russia would be back behind its own borders by now and we would probably be rid of Putin the war monger. His time will come.

    Post edited by Paddigol on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,935 ✭✭✭zv2


    They already have heat-seeking and facial recognition drones.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



Advertisement
Advertisement