Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is Irelands neutrality stance in WW2 unfairly criticized? (see Mod note 217)

17576788081109

Answers

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    If you were from neutral Ireland and were one of 50 Irishmen held by the Nazis in slave labour Concentration camps for a few years, and 22 of the 50 died, and the Irish government were afraid to pressure the Nazis for your release, and Dev had more respect for Hitler than for your Irish friends killed in the camps, would'nt you feel abandoned too?

    You should read the books.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Books?

    Two seconds on google and I was able to find out more than you were willing to post because you are that bitter and frankly twisted in your hate.
    Think hard on what you are doing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Technically they were British seamen with Irish nationality.

    Just as I was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Two seconds on google is no good. I gave you links from numerous sources. You could not be bothered reading them as that would have taken much much more than 2 seconds. As I say, you should read the books. You would learn a lot as I had to fill you in on so many things.

    https://www.independent.ie/entertainment/the-lost-story-of-our-nazi-slaves/a/146740305.html

    https://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/irish-slaves-of-the-nazis-remembered/a/146781998.htmlhttps://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/uk-gave-payouts-to-irish-sailors-put-in-death-camp-for-refusing-to-help-nazis/a/116946190.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Did you read either of the books mentioned?

    Note: I do not know any of those involved and have no commercial involvement or involvement of any kind with them, apart from having read them many moons ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Peter Mulvany of the Irish Seaman's Relatives Association Disputes Harry Callan's retelling here, and also rubbishes 'The Irish Government Abandoned' sensationalism. :


    German Documents in our archive show, that by the end of August 1944, Irish Chargé d'affaires Con Cremin had successfully acquired the cooperation of the Nazis to extract the Irishmen from Bremen-Farge Arbeitslager: (see letter dated 30th August 1944: Con Cremin to the Irishmen in Farge bei Bremen.)

    However the German authority required proof that each of the Seamen to be issued an Irish Passport, qualified for Irish Citizenship before being released from Bremen-Farge Camp.

    Following extensive background checks on each of the Seamen to ascertain their Irish Nationality via the German Minister in Dublin Dr Eduard Hempel, in cooperation with Assistant Secretary of the Department of External Affairs Frederick Boland, by October/November 1944 all except 3 of the Irish Born British Merchant Seamen had been confirmed as having Irish Nationality.

    Following rechecks within Ireland, by the 22nd January 1945 the final batch of 3 Passports were issued from the Irish Legation in Berlin for Henry Callan, Edward Condon and William Knox including exit visas.

    Prisoners declaring they were British, albeit born on the island of Ireland, was of concern to the German authority.

    As Harry Callan declared he was of Northern Ireland Nationality/British in early 1943 and refused to sign for an Irish Passport as he deemed himself to be British, until invited to do so again in 1944, and interestingly now signed for an Irish Passport, perhaps he and those Irish Born British Merchant Seamen/Prisoners, who declared themselves to be of British/Northern Ireland/English Nationality, should take responsibility for the delay in obtaining an Irish Passport, which would have led them to being released at the very latest by the end of 1943 from the Bremen-Farge Arbeitslager.

    Unfortunately, the efforts of Chargé d'affaires William Warnock to gain the release of all surviving Irish Born British Merchant Navy Seamen held in Bremen-Farge Arbeitslager had been frustrated due to these varying claims of Nationality by Harry Callan and others.

    Conceivably, there are some Irishmen who would have been alive had Mr Harry Callan and some of his shipmates cooperated with the Irish Legation in 1943?

    Ironically, by January 1945 following the efforts of Irish Chargé d'affaires Con Cremin, Mr Callan and all qualified Irish Born British Merchant Navy Survivors held in the Bremen-Farge Arbeitslager were awarded an Irish Passport.

     However, by January 1945, it was too late for some of the Irishmen. Perhaps Mr Callan and others, who since 1945 have directed their approbrium and apportioned blame towards the Irish Legation in Berlin for their continual incarceration in the Arbeitslager Bremen-Farge, should in fact be grateful for the efforts of the Irish Diplomatic Corps, who despite all the difficulties for Neutral Ireland during World War Two, made representations and intervened on behalf of Northern Ireland Born British Merchant Navy Seaman Mr Callan and his Shipmates in the Bremen-Farge Work Concentration Camp, which arguably hastened their return to the SAFETY of their former Camp, Marlag und Milag Nord Westertimke, in April 1945: (Film extract showing the Liberation of Marlag und Milag Nord 28 April 1945 - Imperial War Museum): (Google Map location Prison Camps Germany where Irish Born British Merchant Navy Seamen were held 1941-1945):

    Interestingly, Mr Callan confronted former Irish Chargé d'affaires Con Cremin in Dublin many years after the war and accused Con Cremin of doing nothing for the Merchant Seamen held in Bremen-Farge, Cremin never answered Callan's charge.

    Mr Callan has also asserted on previous occasions that he was never photographed in the Bremen-Farge Arbeitslager, and had never signed for an Irish Passport. That is UNTRUE: An Irish Passport Application was signed on the 07 April 1944 by Mr Callan which also includes a photograph taken while he was a prisoner in the Bremen-Farge Arbeitslager. It is inexplicable that Mr Callan records in his book that he did sign for an Irish Passport in 1943, yet the German record for the 5 July 1943 shows 5 men refused to complete the Irish Passport Application form sent by then Irish Chargé d'affaires William Warnock, and Prisoner Nr 90882 Harold Callan is recorded in German Archives as one of 5 Irishmen who refused to sign for an Irish Passport stating he was of Northern Irish/British Nationality, which raises concerns as to the reliability of Mr Callan's memory.

    Thankfully German records in our archive (Extracts in English follow) have helped to work through the obvious inconsistencies in accounts given by Irish born British Merchant Navy Seamen held as Internees in the Bremen-Farge Arbeitslager 1943-45:

    There is more here on a horrible website.

    Irish Seamen's Relatives Association (1939-46)



    *Posted as proof that there are conflicting narratives about all of this.

    I'm not claiming any of it is true but he does seem to have the verification for his claims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Scan_20260606.jpg

    Recommended reading

    Scan_20260606 (2).jpg

    Back cover shows painting of Irish Pine being torpedoed by U608 16th November 1942 with no survivors. The disappearance of the Irish Pine remained a mystery till the war diaries of U608 were found by the author in British military archives. No mention was recorded of sighting of neutral markings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    We were neutral because we wanted to be and were able to. Others either were invaded, had war declared on them or jumped in to gain some advantage over regional rivals, as did a lot of S. Americans.

    At least we stuck to our principals beyond the point where doing so was advantageous.

    We can be proud of that at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Ireland's neutrality in ALL OF the second World War was morally unjustifiable and a political lost opportunity. Being neutral and from Ireland did not do any of the 50 Irish merchant sailors captured by the Germans any good when the Germans sent them to slave labour Nazi Concentration camps. Being neutral did not save people in the neutral countries invaded by Germany during the war from also being sent to slave labour / concentration camps. We were just lucky that we were shielded by Britain and that the Allies did win the battle of the Atlantic.

    "Principles" did not do much when the Axis powers invaded, either here in Europe or in the Far East etc.

    Post edited by Francis McM on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    America wanted to be neutral till the decision was taken out of their hands.

    They thought the Atlantic and the British Empire would shield them, then Hitler decided to declare war as he’d soon defeat Russia in the Spring of ‘42 as he saw it. He gambled and lost.

    You play the hand you’ve got. Churchill did and so did Dev.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Wrong. The U.S. began actively gearing up for war starting in 1939. Roosevelt recognized the looming global threat and took several major steps to boost military production, supply Allied forces, and expand the U.S. armed forces well before the attack on Pearl Harbour.

    Of course, the Americans like all the Allied countries did not want to have to war, as they knew only too well the human and financial cost. But they knew someone must stand up to the Axis powers and it was the moral thing to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    Wrong,we were a poor country being dragged into a power struggle that had nothing do do with us. We were just out of a trade war with Britain and most of the country didn't have running water or electricity. What exactly did we have to gain by joining the war in 39? I asked you before, what could we provide to the war effort that would make a difference? The Treaty ports were obsolete, hence the British handing them back with no plan for the coming war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The US were happy to let small nation’s freedom be trampled on.

    They only went to war because war came to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    No moral lectures from America on Irish neutrality please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Most of the USA did not have running water in 1940 either, and only a third of homes in USA had a flush toilet. But they still sent their young men off to fight the Nazis for us here in Europe.

    Because the Nazis proved, despite Dev's friendship, that they would and did put neutral Irish in slave labour Concentration camps at their own will.

    Did you read any of the books recommended for you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Imperialists and colonists never had an issue sending the young to their deaths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    We were still relying on parish pumps for water not flush toilets. Are you advocating to send our men off to war to fight for foreign powers, why didn't America send theirs in 1939? Most Americans signed up after Pearl Harbour when they were defending their own country. Yes, you had the likes of Eagle Squadrons who volunteered in lesser numbers than the Irish. I'll ask again what justification did we have to join in 1939?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    When or where did I advocate sending men off to fight the Nazi in 1939? Given our history that would not have been realistic. Least we could have done though is given them back, until the end of the war, the Treaty ports, to save young mens lives in the Atlantic.

    The American geared up for war in 1940 etc, well before Pearl Harbour. But I would not take any moral lessons from America anyway. They were late for both world wars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Wrong again. The US saw what was happening in Europe and the U.S. Army rapidly grew from only 180,000 Soldiers in 1938 to more than 1.5 million in just two years.

    In 1939, the United States Army ranked only thirty-ninth in the world.

    It designed and started producing modern aircraft, ships etc etc which it knew it would need in the war against the Axis powers in Europe. It introduced the draft - the first ever in peacetime - before Pearl harbour. Did you know that America launched more vessels in 1941 alone than Japan did in the entire war? I do not think you knew last week when Pearl Harbour was, it was not until Dec 7th 1941.

    You really should get a few good books on WW2 sometime, you would really learn a lot. It is really astonishing you know so little, given you have been on this thread so much and obviously have an interest in history and politics. I'd nearly buy them and send them to you myself.

    Did you order the ones on Hitler's Irish Slaves yet?

    Post edited by Francis McM on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    When or where did I advocate sending men off to fight the Nazi in 1939?

    But they still sent their young men off to fight the Nazis for us here in Europe.

    What else did you mean?

    US conscription began in September 1940 for men between 21-45 and they called up 900,000.

    After Pearl Harbour they widened it to 18-64 and called up another 9,000,000. Many more volunteered after Pearl Harbour and some didn't even wait to be drafted and signed straight up the day they turned 18 like Grandpa Don who I mentioned here before.

    On the Treaty ports, you were shown before how they were obsolete and that even the British Navy said they didn't need them. All Convoys went up the Irish sea and across the North.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    FDR was promising voters that none of their children would be sent to foreign wars. I.E. Poland and other small nation’s freedom could swing on Nazi gallows.

    Only when they were attacked did we hear of their concern for freedoms.
    You are spinning as usual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,244 ✭✭✭growleaves


    If they joined the British Merchant Navy which was supplying the Allied armed forces they were considered a legitimate target of war under international law. You know this since you (claim to) have read two books on the subject.

    A prisoner of war swap between Britain and the Axis powers could have gotten them home.

    Why they would feel abandoned by DeValera, of all people, makes no sense to me. The Irish Government didn't encourage enlistment in foreign armed forces but covertly turning a blind eye to people traveling to Britain to volunteer.

    It's another demonstration of how weak your case is imo. According to you DeValera now bears responsibility for random Irish people who voluntarily joined up to be part of the inter-linked British civilian and military war effort despite discouraging them from doing so ahead of time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Not to mention they were not ‘abandoned’ by the government

    @Francis McM got caught spinning that story too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Under the rules of the era, merchant vessels were required to be warned and allowed to surrender or evacuate before being sunk, and their crews were to be spared. Of course we know the Axis powers did not always pay much heed to the rules of war or even observe common morality.

    Prisoner swap during ww2? Little do you know. Returning trained soldiers to the battlefield would only give the enemy an immediate tactical advantage, and the vast numbers of captured humans made standard swaps logistically impossible.

    If you were from neutral Ireland and were one of 50 Irishmen held by the Nazis in slave labour Concentration camps for a few years, and 22 of the 50 died, and the Irish government were afraid to pressure the Nazis for your release, and Dev had more respect for Hitler than for your Irish friends killed in the camps, would'nt you feel abandoned too? Dev has no problem soaking up to Hempel the Nazi party member who was distraught over the death of Hitler, wringing his hands, but how did Dev treat the Irish prisoners who survived Hitlers slave labour Concentration camps when they returned home?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,244 ✭✭✭growleaves


    By the way, it's not all clear that Irish veterans of the British army were anti-neutrality.

    Four of my father's uncles fought in the Royal Navy during the second world war and at least one of them was an IRA supporter.

    In History Ireland magazine, Brian Girvin and Geoffrey Roberts say: "Nor were these [Irish veterans of the British armed forces] hostile to neutrality: for the most part those interviewed believed that neutrality was Ireland’s best policy."

    Their source is Tina Neylon, historical researcher who headed up the Volunteers Project at NUI Cork (interviewing veterans).

    Article here:

    https://historyireland.com/the-forgotten-volunteers-of-world-war-ii/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,122 ✭✭✭adaminho


    I wonder do they think Dev abandoned James Brady who served 12 years after Joining the Waffen SS to avoid being imprisoned like the other Irish serving for the British?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    This nonsense has been catergorically debunked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    When did Roosevelt say that Poland and other small nations freedom could swing on Nazi gallows? Seems like something you made up again? Like you made up your lie about how the Americans did not use the word Nazi, like how you made up the lie the Holocaust film was shown here in May 1945 etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I didn’t quote anyone. He wasn’t sending Americans to fight in a foreign war. I…E the war in Europe.

    They were staying neutral.
    If you want tge exact quote he used in his campaign speeches, look it up in one of your books, it is rather famous after all, if you have even a passing interest inWW2



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,540 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Probably gave him a clap on the back after he arrived home in 1950.



Advertisement
Advertisement