Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Henry Nowak - I can’t breathe

13567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    You should be more worried about why this incident has struck a nerve in the UK. It is a huge boost for Reform because it backs up everything that they have been saying.

    This decade will be looked back on as the decade where the middle failed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,182 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The media are only interested because it suits Reform and the far right, causes they've worked hard to promote. The facts of the case are being openly dismissed. Here's the judge's statement:

    “The police were given a convincing but wholly false narrative of the incident. It was dark and Henry was wearing a dark top. The entry damage caused by the knife through it, would not have been obvious. Whilst there was visible blood on Henry, it would not have clearly been seen coming from that wound and the clearly visible facial wound was not life threatening. Henry was complaining that he had been stabbed and was struggling to breathe but that would not have necessarily told the officers how serious the situation had become. It is the experience of the criminal courts that sometimes, someone arrested and handcuffed will feign injury in the hope they may be released. These police officers were faced with having to make quick decisions in pressurised circumstances about the best way to act. The genuine shock to the particular police officer, when he realised that he had been giving CPR to Henry when he had a serious chest wound, tends to show that he was doing his best in a very difficult situation.”

    https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Digwa-Final-Sentencing-Remarks.pdf

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    "I don't think you have mate" was said by one of the cops when he told them directly he'd been stabbed, sorry but that's shocking way to respond to someone who is lying in a heap on the ground. To just outright dismiss him like that was incredibly poor.

    The media are interested in it because it was an horrific case that showed how incredibly negligent the police were. You are only dismissing the genuine interest because it conflicts with your world view and you can't stand it that all the people pointing out the DEI/Anti-Racism nonsense pushed by the police in the UK was a bad idea that would lead to negative consequences have sadly been proven to be correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,182 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I never dismissed anything. I suspected bad faith when I clicked on this thread and you've rushed to provide yet another example.

    The Nowak family asked for this not to be politicised and we've posters here talking about awarding Farage a medal and exalting him as a hero. We have others spewing bilious drivel about immigration. This isn't genuine interest, it's the highjacking of a tragedy for political purposes against the express wishes of the victim's family.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,095 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    I linked earlier to a Polish doctor working in an English hospital who wrote a lengthy analysis of the incident based on the publicly available "Sentencing Remarks" where the Judge discusses excerpts from the section report, the one you just quoted from, I believe.

    He says that the claim that he could not have been saved at any point after the attack, or even after the police arrived, does not seem to be right.

    A number of other doctors have since posted on the thread I linked to, and not one of them has disagreed so far. For instance one who says that if it's true that he died at 67 min post injury and 60 min after police arrived, then that is clearly enough time to get him to theatre and for the surgeons stop the bleeding. That doesn't mean he would have survived (it's a different point to the more detailed analysis) - what they're saying is that it's "ludicrous to say it was non-survivable. We don't know precisely what happened, and we don't know if he could have survived. We do know that calling the injury non-survivable lacks any credibility."

    So why on earth might the judge want to smooth things over by claiming that it wouldn't have made any difference anyway?

    Oh wait.😒

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,040 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    The Sikh community are not to blame for this incident and I’d feel confident in saying that Sikh’s would be way down the list of coming to the attention of the police in the Southampton area.

    It’s pretty obvious from the video that the police saw a Sikh family and a White Boy and profiled the white lad as some far right racist yoof straight off the bat. Profiling so far removed from reality. It had to stop.

    Don’t blame people for being angry and frustrated over blatantly obvious two tier policing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,182 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There's no such thing as two tier policing. It's a white supremacist conspiracy theory.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,040 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    Which part of the first post in this thread is bad faith? I started this thread so your opinion of it is directed at me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,040 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    There will be a full inquest and I’m sure it will examine if his life could have been saved if the scum family had rang an ambulance instead of the police. Because the 999 call wasn’t flagged as a high priority call. Think it was over an hour before police arrived and they didn’t know of any danger to life right up till then.

    That was all on the Digwa family.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    A bit like the way the George Floyd tragedy was exploited I guess?

    Fact is this has already been gaining traction as a big story before Farage commented on it.

    I think most people showing a interest want consequences for the police officers involved and probably resignations from leadership within Hampshire Police.

    Fact is Nowaks family are clearly more aligned with Farage than some people want to admit, based on what his sister has liked on instagram and what his godmother said the other day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Really bad faith posting their tbh.Just throw out the whole white supremacist nonsense to throw the thread off track.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    The problem with your statement is events. They suggest otherwise, you may indeed be correct, but events happen and gain importance beyond their immediate effect.

    The middle ground will have huge problems trying to stop people believing Farage on this, because events.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,095 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    I'm fairly sure that when they said they didn't want it to be politicised they ALSO meant people saying that the media are "only interested because it suits Reform and the far right, causes they've worked hard to promote". It doesn't get much more "political" than that awful comment!

    Moreover, his sister Olivia is reposting Robert Jenrik on TikTok, asking Shabana Mahmood if "white lives matter just as much as everyone else’s?" So is she "far right"? And his father said that the police treatment of his dying son was "inhumane and degrading".

    And I’m pretty sure that when Henry Nowak’s father said he did not want his son’s death to create more division, he did not mean: "I want left-wing politicians and commentators to weaponise my grief to shut down debate."

    So I suspect it's more likely comments like yours they're objecting to rather than wanting all discussion shut down.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Sentencing remarks and victim impact statements are almost always carefully curated to try and get things to blow over in difficult cases, I'd be shocked in Nowaks father wasn't somewhat nudged in the direction of saying what he said at the end of his statement.

    Look at the furore that occured here when Ryan Casey actually decided to dispense with political correctness in his victim impact statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,095 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    You know that line about justice "not only being done but being seen to be done"? That's the problem with reaching straight for the "White supremacist" nonsense. Especially as you outlined your own conspiracy theory about the media just now, so you're hardly exempt from "conspiracy" thinking yourself.

    Thing is, it doesn't really matter that there is no official "two tier" system - it matters that it looks like there might be. And TBF, the police "Anti racism commitment" document which explicitly said racial equality "does not mean treating everyone 'the same' or being 'colour blind'" is actually getting uncomfortably close to said 2-tier system - as was the recent attempt to bring in different sentencing guidelines for ethnic minorities.

    All of that really was handing those who believe there is 2 tier justice a massive reason to believe it. It just seems to confirm everything they suspect.

    And calling people far right for caring that an 18 year old lad was left to die like an abandoned dog on cold gravel more than an hour after he was stabbed is not going to make people think "Oh yeah well I wouldn't want to be far right. Best just say it's not that awful really, could happen to anyone." It's going to make people think "Well if it's far right to be upset by that, then maybe the far right aren't all that bad."

    If Farage or some other far right clown gets into power, it will be the fault of leftwing extremists who think it's perfectly fine to politicise the death of a violent thug like George Floyd, but that the death of an 18 year old lad who seems like the nicest person could only be being exploited for political reasons.

    It actually tells me that politicians like Kaur who were so exercised about Floyd's death didn't ever care about it - she, and they, were only exploiting it for their own reasons. And that's why they assume that everyone else is doing the same.

    Post edited by volchitsa on

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    The middle ground in both the UK and Ireland need to seize the narrative, but also need to address the concerns that people have. Homophobic attacks getting underreported because of the religion of the attackers is one example that needs to change.

    The left is lost on these issues, too far gone to be able to come back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    There definitely is two tier policing in the UK. We know there is as the policy documents specifically lays out that there should be two tier policing.

    This is a statement from the NPCC anti-racism commitment. https://www.npcc.police.uk/our-work/police-race-action-plan/police-anti-racism-commitment/

    Our commitment to racial equity means

    Producing equality of policing outcomes for people from different ethnic groups by responding to individuals and communities according to their specific needs, circumstances and experiences, with understanding that these will be racialised and with the aim of reducing harm.
    It does not mean treating everyone ‘the same’ or being ‘colour blind’ (racial equality).

    That is a hugely problematic statement. How in earth can equality of policing outcomes be achieved, and what on earth actually is equality of policing outcomes?

    Does it mean per capita arrests must be equal for all racial and ethnic groups regardless of crime rates within ethnic groups? How does that work when culture/ethnicity can influence certain crimes. Jihadists for instance are obviously much more likely to come from a Muslim background than a Christian background. Surely proper policing should involve investigating crimes fairly without undue bias, but also not ignoring reality and suspicious behaviour because of the racial or ethnic background of the person in question. So don't presume a muslim is a radical because of his religion but if there is reason to suspect radicalism it shouldn't be ignored for fear of being accused of racial bias.

    We have seen that excessive pandering to DEI tokenism has resulted in dangerous individuals not being properly held to account before they harmed others.

    This is from a Guardian article regarding Valdo Caccone, a paranoid schizophrenic who killed three people in Nottingham. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/feb/23/nottingham-killer-valdo-calocane-race-mental-health-inquiry

    Mental health professionals decided not to detain the Nottingham triple killer Valdo Calocane despite a violent incident in 2020, after they considered research that addressed the over-representation of young black men in custody, a public inquiry has been told.

    One of the teachers who was trying to raise concerns about Axel Rudubanka, who attacked, maimed and killed little girls at a Taylor swift themed dance class said this at the inquiry. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c20pznkxpvnt

    "I was told my attitude towards risk was because I perceived him to be a black boy with a knife, they thought I was racially profiling him."

    The inquiry about the Manchester arena bombing, which killed 22 people and injured over a thousand more. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-54695580

    A security guard had a "bad feeling" about suicide bomber Salman Abedi but did not approach him for fear of being branded a racist, an inquiry has heard.

    Just to be clear these tokenistic measures which tiptoe around issues for fear of racial bias don't just harm white people, they harm all people, regardless of colour, creed and ethnicity, who may suffer the consequences of dangerous behaviour being minimised or ignored.

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,579 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    What happened here is that the police arrested somebody that had been stabbed because the other person pretended they were racist. They believed the false racism allegation over the words of somebody that was literally dying from stab wounds. Not sure how anybody can argue that this isn't seriously f..ked up with a straight face.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭MeisterG


    the idea that this story is of interest to the media as it promotes Reform is utter nonsense - it’s of interest because it touches on a very raw nerve that everyone has in the UK at the moment. That the government of the day is against them and that this is becoming institutionalized. Britain is very very divided and some cases are lightning rods..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,071 ✭✭✭aero2k


    I probably should have emphasised in my earlier post that I was in no way trying to excuse the police behaviour which imho was absolutely scandalous - not merely negligent, but actually reckless. I'm no expert in first aid, but I am aware of the advice never to move anyone until you have established the extent of their injuries. Nowak was handled like a rag doll. I just happened to remember the pathologist's comments as reported in the judgement and thought they were important to mention even if only so they could be questioned as you have done.

    Even if we dismiss the compelling argument you have presented, and completely accept the one outlined by the judge, the defence of "well it doesn't matter what the cops did, Henry would have died anyway" doesn't stand up. The precautionary principle, applicable in so many other areas, fits well here too. If an individual is on the ground and a cop doesn't know how they got there, then the only rational course of action is to assume they are ill or injured in some way, or perhaps under the influence of drugs, until you can definitively rule those things out. Provided the cops can protect themselves from injury, there is no downside to believing whatever claims the suspect is making, even if they later turn out to be false.

    Thanks for the prompt to clarify 😀.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,095 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Absolutely. I find the arguments that "It's very rare" (so one death/a few deaths? is a price worth paying) and "It wouldn't have made any difference, he'd have died anyway" (so it doesn't matter that he died miserably on ground having his rights read to him like a criminal, or that the police officer who coldly said "I think he's going to be sick" was actually listening to him suffocating in his own blood) to be unspeakably cruel and offensive.

    And saying that the media "only care because it promotes the far right" is only slightly less offensive. That video was so awful, and when you compare it to the video his sister posted where he was dancing with her, the notion that only the fdar right could possibly be revolted by his death is bizarre. I find it so upsetting. Just like the Stephen Lawrence killing was upsetting - but nobody expected his family not to be "divisive". That contradiction in itself is an issue: it was quite ok for Stephen Lawrence's mother to campaign about the racist aspect of his death, but the Nowaks were obviously handed a statement by lawyers to make, and that's now being used to shut down equivalent comments about the racist aspects of his death.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,095 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Apparently Digwa's grandmother, who also lives in Southampton, is now blaming his violence on the fact that he grew up in the UK. Imagine blaming a whole group of people collectively for something - that would be terrible wouldn't it? But maybe it's ok when a brown person does it?

    She also says his mother just did what any mother would do to protect her child when she hid the weapon. Really?

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,071 ✭✭✭aero2k


    Oh dear, just counting down to the dismissing of your Daily Mail link. It's unfortunate, but they are happy to cover things the Guardian won't touch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    His family have proven themselves to be a complete bunch of scumbags, so his own scumbaggery has been revealed to be somewhat unsurprising



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,176 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    What the government is against them? The one they just voted in 2 years ago or the government that they voted out after being in power for 14 years that they dumped out for not being for their interests?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,182 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I live here. This government is not against us. It's not exactly bold or radical but that hasn't prevented corporate interests and their puppet Farage mobilising against them with this two tier drivel.

    The media are overwhelmingly pro-Farage and pro-Reform. Farage is the most popular Question Time guest despite at the time have one MP. He was an irrelevance being amplified by the BBC. He has only a few MPs ten years later and they're still doing it.

    Incidentally, Hampshire police are 5.1 times more likely to stop a black person than a white person. Across the rest of the country, it's 3.8 times. The police objectively treat non-white people worse than white people.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭MeisterG


    differ subsets think different administrations are unfair on them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Your conclusion is only valid if you assume that the crime rates are exactly the same.

    Imagine if the police were looking for a rapist and were required to gender-balance their enquiries?

    Edit: I looked it up.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2023/statistics-on-women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2023-html

    Here are the statistics, men are 49% of the population in the UK, but constitute 84% of the arrests, and 96% of those incarcerated. This is far more unbalanced than the race statistics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,095 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Digwa isn't black. From the link in that article, the rate of arrests of Asians in Southhampton is exactly the same as for whites.

    Plus I wonder how many failures to arrest the guilty-but-nonwhite perp plus needless death of the white victim it takes to even up the score? I think a death would count for an awful lot of arrests, don't you?

    (Separately, I was a little disappointed to see in that article that Stephen Lawrence's friend who was with him when he was killed is so lacking in empathy for Nowak and his family.)

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    You forget to mention that black people committ crimes at a much higher rate than white people which obviously will mean they will get arrested and stopped at higher rates also.

    So in reality they aren't treated worse than white people

    Most people of course already have worked this out so the type of bullshit you're peddling doesn't fly anymore.



Advertisement
Advertisement