Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1198219831985198719882002

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,255 ✭✭✭TokTik


    So if Russia had just cut off all imports, made a naval and land blockade around all of Ukraine, bombed and shot and starved Ukrainians regularly, whilst slowly settling their land, controlled their water and electricity supply etc, you’d have no issue with Russia??

    Good to know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Most people just act on our feelings or gut which is influenced overtime by things happening in our life, our experiences, and for things we haven't experienced - things we hear or read (which of course is often manipulative bullshit), and it can become ingrained.

    People can then accept that feeling as the truth, and work backwards from that, consuming and accepting things that reinforce it no matter how implausible, and disregarding other things, no matter how logical or evidential.

    We are all guilty of this, but it can be dangerous and insidious because it can grant some the ability to disregard some appalling violence, even against children, if their gut tell them it's justified.

    Some people on this thread have clearly just given into this in the worst way and are supporting Israel's brutality and nonsense without any scrutiny because they feel it in their gut that Muslims are bad and deserve it, despite likely never having been in a Muslim country. I would say zero people on this thread have ever had negative interactions with Gazans so much that theyd want them being killed like this (I may be wrong)...

    I also don't believe defending Jews is the reason for many people supporting this butchery - the most antisemetic comment you can make is to say opposition to a genocide is antisemetic and going against Jews, which does nothing but f*ck them all under the bus as complicit when they aren't. Loads are guilty of this.

    I don't know what the motivations for this posters pov is tbh, and I'll never know unless they say it, but happy they engaged.

    I find it mad the logic they apply can't be explained, or put on any other similar situations in the world outside of this one, and it doesn't give them pause for thought.

    But as I said, most people just feel things in their gut, despite the apparent nonsense of it, and will keep going on the same track without scrutiny, and that's the way it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,876 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    what are you on about? This is not Russia thread. And Russia are in the wrong in that conflict..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,809 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,730 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The main difference there is that Ukraine didn't carry out an attack on Russian soil before the invasion

    Also there's no proof that Zelensky and Putin are in kahoots whereas the same can't be said for Hamas and Netanyahu.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭wildgreen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭BettyS


    thank you for answering in good faith and trying to explain your stance. It is good to see that we can have civil discussions.


    Harm is something that is material according to law. These activists were coming to deliver food. It was a peaceful expedition. They were simply delivering food to famished people. According to your posts, Israel was correct to prevent the expedition of the flotilla to Gaza, due to the possibility of harm to Israel. Would you explain the material harm that you mean in this context?

    Additionally, you state that Israel has the right to prevent the passage to and from another sovereign nation. What gives them this right? And what current safeguards are in place to ensure that this is not abused?

    Finally, I attended a talk with a surgeon and he stated that his medical colleagues were denied the transport of food through the drip for patients who cannot eat by mouth to Gaza. What is the purpose of preventing food for hospital patients who cannot eat? Who is responsible when these patients starve to death? And why should patients starve? What purpose does it serve?

    Thank you for engaging



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,342 ✭✭✭Field east


    I thought that a cease fire ment that both sides would stop shooting/bombing eachother. According to some media outlets /US admin and Israel the cease fire is still holding . But how does one explain the continued bombing , etc of Lebanon and the West Bank?



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,546 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Even Christian Broadcasting Network, which has millions of international viewers and is particularly watched in the US and Africa, is now reporting on attacks and harrassment of Christians, including desecration of cemetries, in Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,809 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    The US media won't often show the reality of what's going on. The Americans aren't great with nuance. Besides, Israel can operate outside the rules, international norms and laws don't apply to Israel. Special status due to their predominant religion or something.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,883 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    For the US and Israel a ceasefire just means a little time to replenish their stocks of weapons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    ... And if they did would everyone be defending Russia mass killing and starving Ukranian citizens I wonder? Or would they be defending Ukraine if they somehow managed to blockade, starve and commit a genocide on Russian civilians?

    This is the rhetorical q obviously not aimed at you.

    I think the answer to both of the above would be firmly no.

    But in Gaza, for some reason, they do



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,364 ✭✭✭Enduro


    This is the Israel/Palestine thread. The ceasefire in Gaza has no relevance to Lebanon. It also has no relevance to the West Bank. Many things are happening in the West Bank, but I'm not aware of Israel conducting any bombings in the West Bank.

    There's your explanations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 467 ✭✭random.stranger


    Do you think the world should have come to a unanimous consensus that Nazi Germany were committing genocide against the Jews, Romani and other people, before trying to stop them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    So this isn't worthy of comment?

    "Several refugee camps are nearly empty after Israeli forces launched
    Operation Iron Wall on 21 January, making it the longest operation in
    the West Bank since the second intifada, according to the agency.

    The operation started in Jenin camp and then expanded to Tulkarm, Nur
    Shams, and El Far’a camps, displacing 40,000 Palestine refugees. "

    https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/02/1159971



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,876 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Germany started a world war by invading Poland…..the "trying to stop" them started very shorty after this…there was no waiting….and I could be wrong, but I think the term genocide was first used in around 1945 or so, maybe couple years before, so your question really is a bit pointless here.

    As it stands, there are still some rather influential countries who have not said yes, that Isarel is committing Genocide….The UK and the U.S. being two very influential countries. And also, the Genocide decision has not been declared yet. Would it be a huge shock to me if it's a yes? No, it wouldn't. Israel sure have done plenty of damage, but it's not fully clear yet that they have committed a genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 467 ✭✭random.stranger


    The persecution of the Jewish people began in 1933, the world war didn't begin until 1939. So if "reputable countries" like the US & UK were aware of the decline in treatment of Jewish people in 1933, should they have waited until they had a unanimous consensus on the subject before acting?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,876 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I didn't live in the 1930s. It's almost 100 years ago. People have been hurting and killing each other since we first walked earth.

    What ya want me to say? That the world in 1933 should have jumped on Germany because in 1933 the Germans began persecuting jewish people? Yes, maybe they should have….I really don't know



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 467 ✭✭random.stranger


    But shouldn't they have waited for a unanimous consensus first???

    Edit:

    That seems to be the standard you're holding before acknowledging a genocide in Palestine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,876 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Maybe….I don't know…like I said, the world 100 years ago a lot different than it is today. The UN and NATO didn't even exist. Cannot say with any degree of certainty what people 100 years ago should have done. They did what they did, and that is history.

    Regarding this genocide call. Israel may be close to what one could call genocide, but they have argued that their war is NOT against the people of Gaza, but against the terrorist scum in Gaza called Hamas (and those aiding and abetting Hamas), who are a huge threat to the people of Israel; Israel have also argued that their military operations are never to attack and kill civilians in Gaza, but are against terrorists in Gaza. Isarel also argue that many many times before attacks they issue evacuation orders; if they really were committing a genocide they wouldn't be doing this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,809 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    They killed 21,000 children in Gaza and are currently starving the rest. Why don't Israel let aid into the starving children? Why don't they let the international press in? "But but but who asked for a flotilla of food?"

    Don't expect an answer.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 467 ✭✭random.stranger


    "They did what they did, and that is history."

    Isn't the point to stop genocide before it becomes history?

    If we wait for a unanimous consensus, it is already too late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,876 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Israel I will admit, and have no issue admitting have committed war crimes. But genocide has a far higher bar

    Below points are very important:

    "Israel’s objective has never been to wipe out the Palestinian people. Its stated and demonstrated aim has been to dismantle Hamas’s military and governing capacity, prevent further terrorist atrocities, and return the hostages. Israeli leaders have said again and again that the war is with Hamas and not the Palestinian people, yet critics dismiss these statements as if they have no meaning

    Unable to prove genocidal intent, accusers instead point to the tragic effects of war: civilian deaths, destroyed buildings, food insecurity. They then argue that these outcomes prove genocide. But that is not how international law works. If devastation or high casualties alone proved genocidal intent, nearly every war in history could be branded genocide. Such reasoning strips the word of meaning.

    Civilian suffering in Gaza is real, but responsibility lies primarily with Hamas, which has embedded its military machine inside homes, schools, hospitals, and mosques, deliberately using civilians as shields. This reality cannot be separated from the conduct of the war.

    Israel, by contrast, has implemented measures unmatched by any modern military to mitigate civilian harm: advance warnings, leaflets, phone alerts, humanitarian corridors, pauses for evacuation, and canceling legitimate strikes when civilian risk was too high.

    At the same time, Israel has facilitated unprecedented humanitarian assistance. More than two million tons of aid have entered Gaza since October 7, including food, medicine, fuel, and water. Israel has overseen the vaccination of Gaza’s entire child population, repaired water infrastructure, delivered medical supplies, and enabled fuel shipments to keep hospitals and essential services running."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,876 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I'd happily engage you civilly if you weren't so patronising and condescending in your tone towards me. yesterday you asked me a question and couldn't resist the digs. It's a strange way to expect people to respond to you. I mean, all you have to do is engage politely without the need to resort to the add on digs….it's your call here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,809 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    You never answer questions. I like exposing that. Blinkered view. Attention seeking.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 467 ✭✭random.stranger


    This is all very nicely worded statements on all of the precautions taken by Israel, I'm sure Nazi Germany would have put out propaganda in their time. The thing is the reality has been documented, live streamed by Israeli soldiers, people can't unsee it.

    There is public uproar in Israel when their soldiers are brought to account for the atrocities they have committed. The most moral army in the world line doesn't work anymore.

    The International Association of Genocide Scholars published a finding in 2025 that Israel's actions in Gaza meets the definition of genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,876 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yes, and there will be plenty people both sides arguing yes and no. They are just people; so let's wait for the ICJ ruling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭BettyS


    walshb? I would genuinely be interested to hear your opinion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,876 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    We've been over the flotilla debate ad nauseum. I think Israel were absolutely right to intercept the flotillas. Not much more to it.

    I also said that in my view these flotillas were never about getting any aid to people anywhere. They were only interested in trying to paint Israel in a bad light, and always knew they'd get intercepted.

    Isarel were never letting them in, knowing full well that they were openly hostile to Israel. Israel control who gets in and out to Gaza. You may not like this or agree with it, but Israel decide!

    BTW, are we actually saying that NO aid whatsoever is being allowed enter Gaza? That right now (during a ceasefire) that Israel are allowing no aid-food to enter Gaza that people there may need to survive? Because IF this is true, then that could well be viewed as an act of genocide. Or is it that the flow of aid is being monitored and restricted?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,314 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I won't go into detail on each of your points - they have all been thoroughly debated here, with corroborating evidence, many times over from day one to 2.5 years later.

    1. Israel's objectives are absolutely to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Palestine and Israel. They have stated it categorically many times. Their actions support those statements.
    2. IDF stated that Hamas was defeated in 2024. Then continued razing Gaza to rubble
    3. Israel abandoned the hostages and their families from day 1
    4. I agree that without intent, this is just "another" war. However, there is a lot of commentary with corroborating evidence that intent exists. Senior Govt. officials and IDF commanders are on the record as stating intent. That is why there are ICC arrest warrants for Gallant and Netanyahu for war crimes. And why many organisations and govts. have clearly stated that Israel is committing Genocide.
    5. Legal responsibility for Palestinian civilians in Gaza also lies with Israel. This is why the ICJ issues preliminary measure for Israel to take, twice. Israel has ignored those measures. Twice. And banned UNWRA and 30 odd other aid organisations.
    6. Israel has implemented nothing to ease the plight of Gazans
    7. If Israel was so good at providing humanitarian aid, why was famine confirmed? As for repairing water infrastructure, that may be the case. But who bombed the living daylights out of it?

    All the above are arguments we've seen here for years. And they are all false and hold no water at all. Why? Because all those talking points come from who? Israel. Its pure Hasbara. Like "the only democracy in the ME" and "the most moral army in the world".

    Israel is highly adept at fooling some people, probably even most. They swallow the Hasbara every day. But fortunately, there are many who know how Israel operates and don't believe a word of it. Correctly.

    Notwithstanding any of the above, why does Israel not allow independent investigators into Gaza or the West Bank? Why does Israel not allow the press into Gaza?

    Because if they did, a much brighter light would be shone on their atrocities and we'd be even more sickened by what they've done than we currently are.



Advertisement
Advertisement