Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1186318641866186818692051

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,823 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    In unrelated news, Barron Trump has recently been spotted limping and occasionally stopping to rub his ankles.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,843 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭Firstsub


    The press pool need to act in tandem to expose Leavitt. If a reporter asks her a tough question, she lies, then attacks the reporter and refuses a follow up question. The next reporter needs to pull her up on her lies and tell her she is insulting the press and the general public with her falsehoods. The next reporter needs to do the same



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,995 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Zero chance of that happening. The White House press corps was gutted very early on. Supression of the press is always one of the first steps of a fascist power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,562 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    There was an item on F/B that those who are in the reservist category and not presently active, but with previous field service, are to be moved up the "call-up" chain from a lower status.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,823 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    It also wouldn't make a blind bit of difference. The press trying to hold the WH team accountable for their answers, non-responses, deflections etc, will only make the WH team remove or at the very least ignore those members of the press.

    You cannot shame the shameless, and as has been seen from every WH Spokesperson since Sean Spicer claimed Trump had the biggest Inauguration ever even though that was demonstrably not true, they will lie and they will not care because that is the exact job they have been hired for. Karoline Leavitt knows she'll probably follow Kayleigh McEnany and get her own show on Fox News or something.

    The best the press corps can do is at least ask the questions which may result in a lie, and then their news org challenges it back in the studio. Six members of the press corps all asking Karoline Leavitt the same question is only going to result in six members of the press corps being lied to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,053 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The press pool has been overrun with hand picked sycophantic social media loons.

    There isn't an independent organ left in US democracy that isn't already riddled with cancer

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,562 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    That was one thing about Trumps garbage statements about NATO that no one seemed to call him out on: the fact that the U.S wasn't under attack while he was asking his NATO allies to actively respond against whomever it was carrying out the supposed attack.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,951 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Hopefully the Vatican will respond by sending the following gift to the White House...

    1000038541.jpg

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,562 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Given that it was the Pentagon, and not the State Dept, which called in the Papal State ambassador to display Trump Administration displeasure over Leo's statement, "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,410 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,683 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    meanwhile.

    IMG_2130.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,339 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    Pam Bondi gets a shot across the bow on CNN

    "We still have the votes to get her to be able to testify. And we'll have another vote," Khanna said. "Look, I know Jim Comer. I like him on a personal basis, but he was Captain Ahab in chasing Hillary Clinton to testify. And Hillary Clinton has been out of office for 20 years. So certainly he can have Pam Bondi come and testify and answer why they haven't released the Epstein files."

    "I'm confident Pam Bondi will eventually show up. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and I drafted the subpoena, and it was for Pam Bondi as an individual, not Pam Bondi as Attorney General," Khanna said."

    Todd Blanche has already stated Pammy does not have to go as the subpoena is on DoJ not her personally, an early tester, not that Pammy will answer any questions directly, be another shouting match.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,663 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    I know . And if believe the rumour or his trip to Moscow and , I know this is probably a BS rumour from the time but a " golden shower " .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,142 ✭✭✭Paulzx


    The bonespurs are obviously hereditary



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,843 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Sortof. It's more that the IRR has become more relevant with the shift in military needs.

    All US Army contracts are for an eight year minimum obligation, be they active or reserve. The difference is how long one is expected to show up for regular duty and training. If you sign up for a 'three-year-stint', you are, in fact, signing up for three years of duty, and five years of mobilization eligibility. As members of the Individual Ready Reserve (emphasis on 'individual'), they are used to augment units to fill various gaps. However, as needs over the past years have been very generic (eg stand around with a rifle), there has been little requirement to call up IRR personnel. We had one with us in Afghanistan, but that was an exception.

    However, as the requirements have shifted back to conventional warfighting from general counterinsurgency ops, various gaps or potential gaps in skill-sets can be identified, and the policy isn't so much to 'move them up the call-up chain' as much as 'keep better track of what skills are where so we can pull them in as needed'

    https://taskandpurpose.com/news/individual-ready-reserve-policy-2026/

    image.png

    image.png

    By way of a practical Irish example, consider the time a little over a year ago that the Naval Service put its ship to sea without a working gun because almost all the people trained to maintain the thing had left the military. If the Irish military had felt it was important enough to have a working gun, they could have called back a single technician from the First Line Reserve to fill the capability gap.

    Although this IRR thing has been the case for some time, another reason it's come into the news of late is that Congress has recently mandated doing an assessment of the actual capabilities of the US mass mobilisation process, the first time since the '70s.

    https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2025/12/30/what-is-nifty-nugget-ndaa-revives-47-year-old-military-exercise/

    This is basically just automating what is already law, courtesy of President Carter in July 1980: All men must register by age 25, but it requires going and filling out forms to do it. Some folks don't, for various reasons. I only barely made the cut by being registered without my knowing it when I joined the Army two months before my 26th birthday. I got lucky.

    Although in theory failing to register is a felony offence, nobody has been criminally indicted for it since 1986. However, the question "Have you registered for selective service" is very common on government forms for anything from job applications to financial aid. A 'no' removes the eligibility, thus providing a very strong incentive to do so.

    https://www.sss.gov/faq/

    image.png

    Automating the process thus benefits everyone: The military gets a full accounting of eligible personnel for the federal militia, whilst persons who would not otherwise be eligible for various government benefits or opportunities will automatically become eligible for such (Or at least, will no longer have that block to eligibility).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Thank goodness Americans chose Trump instead of Harris…

    Not only did the president pledge not to enter into any further costly and drawn out overseas wars during his run for the White House, he also used the prospect of the draft’s return as a stick with which to beat Democratic rival Kamala Harris.

    “She’s already talking about bringing back the draft,” he told his supporters at a September 2024 rally in Las Vegas. 

    “She wants to bring back the draft, and draft your child, and put them in a war that should never have happened.”

    A week before Election Day, he told another crowd in Atlanta: “All of your sons and daughters will end up getting a draft notice.

    “Congratulations, you’ve been drafted in the military. You’re going to fight a war against a country that nobody’s ever heard of.’ Isn’t it true? Isn’t it ridiculous?”


    At the very least, any draft-related change at the moment, no matter how bureaucratically obscure and meaningless in practical terms, is terrible optics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,951 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Laser focused as always on what matters…

    1000038542.jpg

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,320 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Crazy that they can manage an automatic registration system for US citizens to be registered for military service, but that's too complicated for voter registration 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,676 ✭✭✭Glaceon




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,604 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Edit: Yes they are planning a UFC fight on the White House Lawn.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,843 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    It's a national system, once-off. Eligibility to vote will change depending on where you happen to live at the time. The Selective Service system can be triggered pretty much with a birth certificate some two decades ahead of time (Technically, the system uses the federal SSN which is normally applied for at the same time as the birth cert), one doesn't 'move away' from registration validity. A small move of a couple of miles in the first 18 years of life and suddenly one is in a different voting district and needs to register with the new district anyway, which is a state-level event, not federal. Or in some places, even a new state. I don't see how automatic registration for voting will work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,976 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Every time I see rimmer of the year Mark Rutte I want to vomit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,358 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    Time for some "Yes, sir, Officer Obie, I cannot tell a lie, I put that envelope under that garbage." tactics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,562 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Useful road sign from the Canadian Border Services Agency for those weary of the fight against Trump.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,320 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    So when someone is registered via their birth in the selective service draft.
    They are born and registered at an address, how does the draft follow their moves through life?
    Dad gets a job in a new state, family moves.
    Does that kid then drop off the draft?

    No. He doesn't.
    Because the federal government tracks those subject to the draft.

    That you struggle to transpose that into how could it work for the vote?
    Well, whilst states do have responsibility for vote roles and manners of elections.
    Trump & Co are seeking every lever they can to federalise control of those elections, including seeking ID mandates and placing federal law enforcement and potentially even troops at polling places.

    Yet, rather than just utilise the system in place for tracking citizens, even ones who've moved states to ensure that eligibility to vote is both correctly counted and tracked.
    They are implementing a system that requires voters to prove their eligibility amid a charged and uncomfortable atmosphere.

    Where the entitlement exists, it shouldn't be for a citizen to prove they are eligible, particularly not when citizenship and location are being tracked to the extent that the selective service draft allows, as the federal government, already holds the data via birth certs, passport records, SSNs and other data that can all be easily reconciled back to confirmation of citizenship.

    As an example, in Ireland, although we don't have states, we do have elections and the control of the register and rolls delegated to the county councils.
    Yet, the voter registration cards drop in the letterbox before elections, the rolls are updated regularly and voting is incredibly straightforward, and yes, ID can be requested when one presents themselves to vote.

    If I show up and ID is requested and I don't have it on me?
    My provisional ballot is cast, pending my presenting the confirmation.
    I can do that without fear of being labelled and illegal or picked up in a sweep.

    In any event, even the Heritage Foundations own numbers confirm that 1560 votes cast in elections between 1982 & 2025 were fraudulent, a rate of 0.000116% of total votes cast.
    So a non issue, but one that in federal terms (where the complaining arises) there exists the dataset to preclude it as an issue.

    Weird that rather than finding a way to utilise that?
    That finding a means to intimidate and control election places seems more important.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,562 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It does have a vested interest in seeing the "political" status-quo there stay inset.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,921 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,882 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe




Advertisement
Advertisement