Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

National Football Leagues 2026

1171819202123»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭Westernview


    You reckon? I think you are naive to believe that. Its an open secret that refs give easier frees to a team who had a man sent off and are down to 14 players. And with that being the case its not a stretch to say they also do it after making a major mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,509 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    This is a different point to the one which says that another referee will give Murphy the red card he should have got on Sunday.

    "It will be interesting to see if avoiding the sending off could go against Murphy down the line. If he had got the red card its unlikely he would be issued a second one. But after all the coverage over this he may end up getting one as it will be in the minds of referees that he should have gone yesterday. It shouldn't work that way but referees often seek to rebalance a situation."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭Westernview


    Referees are human and often succumb to media pressure. Either knowingly or subconsciously they could easily send Murphy off for a lesser offence during the championship as a consequence of the furore this week. As others have mentioned the Kerry media machine is very influential when it ramps up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    A ref wont try and balance the books on that game, but he likely wont get the benefit of the doubt in a close call red if the situation occurs, and I imagine he might want to be very careful with that trademark punch in the ribs tackle for a while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,509 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Donegal should get their appeal ready in advance. To get Murphy's close call red rescinded.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭FullBack Jam


    There would be no appeal. Striking or attempting to strike is a red card. And behaving in a way which is dangerous to the opponent is a red card. If he continues to tackle with the closed fist punch, he will get a red card in the coming months.

    You made the comment that "There are no cases where a referee balanced out a mistake made by another referee in a different game. Not even any case where a referee balanced out his own mistake later in a game". I don't think that's the case. I've often seen matches where a ref makes what seems to be the incorrect decision. It could be borderline, but the crowd get on his back, and a raft of booing starts. A couple of minutes later, you'd find that the team that has been "wronged" gets a very soft free. They are only human, and can get caught up in the hype and excitement of a big game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,509 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    How often were you a supporter of one of the teams involved? Are you thinking of any examples where you saw it on TV, giving you the advantage of slow motion replays not available to referees?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭FullBack Jam


    I don't know what the point of the questions are, but to answer them:-

    Been following GAA for about 40 years. Been to hundreds of games. I'm thinking of moments both when I am at matches and when I watch on TV where the ref can get caught up in the hype and the crowd on his back, and where he makes a decision that he quickly realises might have been wrong, that he gives a soft free afterwards to the team that was initially wronged.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,509 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The point is that supporters of a team cannot be trusted to be impartial. You will know that from listening to them at games. You will have heard them telling the ref he is wrong even though they are 50 yards away from the action, and he is right beside it.

    Of course being right beside the action, does not give a referee sight of things which are obscured from his view. This is where the TV replays turns critics of referees into experts.

    Donegal would appeal any red card for Murphy, judging by what happened in the past. The red card coming up for him according to posters here will be of the "close call" variety.

    https://www.donegaldaily.com/2011/06/17/murphy-wins-his-appeal-to-line-out-against-tyrone/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭overshoot


    I dont think any retrospective action can be taken as the referee took action in the game. If he missed it it would be possible but maybe im wrong.

    The GAA has shown themselves completely rudderless when it comes to discipline over the years. There has been lots of closed fist tackles in games, lots of poor high tackles that dont get the appropriate card with yellow or worse imo a black given out where its not a black offence at all.

    Even melees, they had the chance a few years ago with Donegal Armagh in the league. Donegal didnt appeal, Armagh did and all got off. It was the perfect chance to back up a referee when just one side appealed and they balked at it. Fortunately donegal still won the championship game minus the players.

    If they want to deal with discipline a memo at the start of the year, appeals against whats found to be a valid red card will see the ban doubled (and back it up), honestly believe that would bring a big change on the field



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,302 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    There is a common scenario where refs make a particular effort on one or other rule at the start of the championship, a push which seems to be have ended by the quarter finals or so. Not only Murphy would need to be careful with closed fist action after the recent publicity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,509 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    One they can spot a lot easier is overcarrying. And they have dozens of chances to penalise it in every game, but only a few cases are picked up.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/football/2024/0301/1435444-overcarrying-a-step-too-far-for-the-gaa/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,509 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    RTE Sport have made up their minds that Murphy will not face any further sanction. But in the absence of any source, they couch it in journalese.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/football/2026/0402/1566467-murphy-to-face-no-further-punishment-over-casey-incident/

    "Donegal's Michael Murphy will not face any sanction for his strike on Kerry’s Dylan Casey during the Tir Chonaill County’s Division 1 triumph on Sunday, RTÉ Sport understands."

    "The GAA’s central competitions control committee (CCCC) have the power to examine incidents like this and dish out further punishment, but that is not expected to happen in this case."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,001 ✭✭✭downthemiddle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭robbiezero




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,768 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    This will drag on.....

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,509 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Another "RTE Sport understands" story, but this one is not finished.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/football/2026/0403/1566646-brennans-12-week-ban-is-upheld-by-the-chc/



Advertisement
Advertisement