Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

"Green" policies are destroying this country

111261127112811291131

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,594 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I have no problems with us achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. All in favor of it actually.

    Problem is that I have actually done some research, and to keep throwing good money after bad as we presently are at wind and solar will not do anything much other than make beggars of us.

    You on the other hand do not appear to have given that much thought and are going with nothing more than blind faith it will all work out.

    Best of luck with that, but I have always been a believer in that old say that when money talks bullshlt walks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I’ve made only a handful of posts here and your “research” still manages to attribute positions to me that I never stated. You’ve repeated it several times now without producing a single quote.

    If this is the standard of research being applied, I’d be slightly concerned about the conclusions you’re drawing elsewhere.

    On the economics point, fossil fuels are hardly the model of financial stability either. Ireland imports nearly all of its oil and gas and is completely exposed to international price shocks. Generating more of our own electricity from wind and solar reduces that exposure and keeps more of the money in the domestic economy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Why do you think the money is staying in the local economy?

    Most of the companies involved in renewables seem to be foreign owned energy corporations like Statkraft, Orsted, and Galileo.

    And they are not using jimmy and johnny down the road to build or maintain them either.

    Post edited by bloopy on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Of course. I’m forgetting all those Irish producing oil fields dotted all over the country employing Johnny and Jimmy up the road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Right, so like the oil fields, the money will be leaving the local economy.

    Main difference is that our land will be tied up while doing that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I can 100% guarantee you there are more Irish companies involved in building, installing, maintaining and servicing wind and solar projects in Ireland than there are Irish companies working in oil fields in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Wait.

    So your answer is just a confidant opinion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,594 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Was this post intended for someone else and you sent it to me by mistake ?

    Other than that I have no idea why you would send it to me as I have not at any stage mentioned anything about the economics of fossil fuels. I have said I am all in favour of a net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and that means no fossil fuel use in generation. I have also said that like major green advocacy groups I look on the idea of substituting wood burning for fossil fuels is a con in that it might as well be coal where emission levels are concerned.

    If someone has concerns on the data provided by another poster and are questioning it, then they need to show where they believe the data is incorrect. Posting vague insults and nothing else just makes them look a bit of a dick.

    On economic points, economically the path we are on if continued will be a financial disaster for both citizens and the state and there really is no difference to our domestic economy whether we are paying outside providers for renewables or fossil fuels for our electricity.

    We are now also importing electricity where the volume has been rising year on year. For 2025 our net imports were 14.6% of our total demand. That is not doing anything for our domestic economy or our energy security.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    You’re still at it.

    I never claimed wind and solar should supply 100% of the grid.
    I never said economics didn’t matter.

    Wait.

    There are plenty of Irish players involved in renewables here. Companies like Mainstream Renewable Power, DP Energy, Power Capital Renewable Energy, BNRG, NTR, Greencoat Renewables, Harmony Solar, Solar 21, Energia and Enerpower are all Irish firms active in developing, financing or operating wind and solar projects in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,972 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    This thread has gone full strawman.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,331 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Plenty of Irish companies involved in building, maintaining and servicing fossil fuel projects too.

    I wonder is there stats showing the number employed in these areas for a comparison



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    There probably are stats somewhere, but they won’t be very impressive in the Irish context. Ireland has almost no domestic oil production and very little upstream fossil fuel activity. Even optimistic projections for a future Irish oil or gas field talk about roughly 800 long term jobs once production starts.

    By contrast, the wider green and sustainability sector already employs about 42,000 people in Ireland, including around 12,500 directly in renewable energy such as wind and solar.

    So if someone wants to compare employment impact in Ireland specifically, the numbers are already heavily tilted toward renewables.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Agreed, people arguing against claims nobody actually made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Mainstream is owned by Aker Horizons (Norwegian), and apparently are shortly moving their headquarters to Oslo.

    Energia is owned by Ardian (French private equity firm)

    Enerpower is owned by KKR (American private equity fund, also involved in that giant Gas pipeline running through native american land a few years ago)

    Solar 21 and Harmony are one of the many little developer companies pushing their weight around rural communities up and down the county at the moment. Secures planning and sells off to bigger players such as Statkraft and Energia. Ironically fairly instrumental in turning many communities against the idea of climate change, let alone renewables.

    Solar 21 funding comes from retail and other unregulated products. Several projects currently in liquidation or insolvency process.

    Harmony funding unknown as not publically disclosed.

    Power Capital primary funding from Eiffel Investment Group (French) and Ethias Insurance Group (Belgium).

    Sounds like a very solid structure we are building all this upon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭dmakc


    Thanks for debunking that drivel in quote and saving me the bother. Some people truly are way behind on the economics of this mess we find ourselves in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭bloopy


    I have only become interested in all this fairly recently, due talking with friends and family members in various areas of the country, who have lately had the pleasure of having one of these shitebag 'green' developers inflicted on their communities.

    It is like a wild west out there at the moment, and rural communities are paying the price.

    Finding the current frenzy to be very similar to the housing developers in around 2006/7.

    The idea that some people think that sticking 'Green' in front our you name makes you as pure as the driven snow, is quite irritating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    You’re still proving the point that there’s a whole ecosystem around the sector.

    Yes, large infrastructure projects attract international capital. That’s true for wind farms, gas plants, data centres, pharma plants, motorways and just about every other big project in Ireland. But the projects themselves still rely on Irish planning consultants, civil contractors, electrical contractors, crane companies, haulage firms, environmental consultants, surveyors, maintenance crews and grid engineers. Statkraft or Ørsted might own a wind farm, but they’re not arriving with 500 Norwegians to build and maintain it. The work is being done by companies and workers based here.

    So while some of the capital is international, the employment, supply chain and day to day economic activity are very much local.

    And if the benchmark we’re comparing against is Irish oil and gas fields employing “Johnny and Jimmy up the road”, we’re back to the same problem… there basically aren’t any.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭bloopy


    You think that building our enwrgy production system around institutional investors and foreign power companies is a good idea?

    Our primary source of energy in the hands of companies who are beholden to their shareholders and investors, not the irish people?

    Investors and shareholders who will want a return on their investment, year on year growth were possible.

    Tell me, when do you think this results in cheaper electricity prices.

    When do we end up with an Enron of our own.

    The irish government wont be able to go against these companies, they will literally hold the power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    This is Ireland. We already depends on private companies, foreign capital, imported fuels and interconnection across multiple parts of the energy system. Oil, gas and electricity markets are hardly some pure patriotic public service run only for the Irish people.

    You’re arguing against privatisation and foreign ownership, not against wind and solar.
    That criticism applies just as easily to fossil fuels, gas suppliers and electricity companies.

    I'm sure you'll agree the solution is proper regulation and energy diversity, not deeper dependence on imported fuels from abroad. If anything, producing more energy here gives Ireland more control, not less.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭bloopy


    This is not energy diversity.

    We will be reliant on the whims of large companies tp provide the enrgy at the price they wish.

    It will be no different than relying entirely on gas, or on oil, or on coal.

    The average 50mw farm, after all the social, environmental, and ecological damage it creates, generates around 1-2 million euro in profit each year. You think that those investors are going to be satisfied with that return.

    It would be no different to handing over our primary energy generation to Shell or Exxon - we would still be at the mercy of their whims.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    "It will be no different than relying entirely on gas, or on oil, or on coal."??

    There's a huge difference! Those fuels are some of the most environmentally destructive energy sources we have, which is precisely why countries are trying to replace them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,972 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    If you're arguing for state owned resources. It's a nice idea but that ship sailed long ago.

    "…Ireland's energy import dependency was approximately 79.6% in 2024, marking an increase from 78.3% in 2023. The country relies heavily on imports for fossil fuels, importing 100% of its oil and coal, along with about 79.5% of its natural gas. While renewable energy use is increasing, Ireland remains well above the EU average for energy import dependency..."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭bloopy


    I am not talking about the environment.

    I am talking about money.

    These companoes are not some sort of beneficent entities here tp spread peace, love, and understanding.

    They are energy giants with payrolls, operating costs and earnings calls, just like any other large company.

    The idea that any of them give two craps about the environment is laughable at best. They are there to make money, nothing more, nothing less. If oil and gas and coal became the cause du jour tomorrow, they'd all switch over at the click of a finger. Or at least use it as part of their marketing and pr.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I am talking about the environment! Wind and solar are the future, they're better for the environment!

    Of course they are businesses. Nobody thinks large energy companies are charities. Oil, gas and coal companies also have payrolls, operating costs and earnings calls. They also exist to make money, do you think they just spread peace, love, and understanding?

    The difference is simply what technology they are investing in. Markets follow regulation, policy and demand, not cause du jour! It's not fashion or trends. If governments set the direction toward low carbon energy, companies invest there. The energy sector has always worked like that. The only thing that changes is the fuel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,331 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Yer not including the thousands working in petrol stations and shops though. Or the port workers bringing the product off the ships, or the hauliers carting it around the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,594 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Indeed you have not.

    But then you have been very quick off the mark attempting to rubbish any economic data posted by anyone else in relation to our current 2050 plan, and have refused any time you have been asked to provide any detail as to what level of wind, solar or any other renewables and at what cost you believe will provide us with an economically viable net-zero greenhouse gas emissions grid by 2050.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    You're still at it.

    I haven't rubbished any economic data posted by anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,594 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    When it comes to electricity generation we have gone from being net exporters in 2020 too net importers. In 2025 net imports were 14.6% of our demand needs. A percentage that has been rising year on year giving us less control not more.

    In 2021 both Eirgrid and the CRU warned Eamon Ryan, the then Minister with responsibility, that energy security was becoming a problem but he just ignored them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,507 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Indeed. It’s time for Ireland to buck up and start producing its own solar and wind, instead of importing fossil fuels from halfway around the world and pretending that’s somehow more sensible.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,972 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    It's a little disappointing you can't accurately calculate the break even point to three decimal places of an unproven, experimental energy plan and world energy supply and global events over a quarter of a century. Get it together man.

    If you do work it out let us know. Might be worth buying a few shares in it, if you can predict the future.

    Oh and there's should be all least one version of your calculations that factors in solar production in a nuclear winter.



Advertisement
Advertisement