Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General British politics discussion thread

1630631632634636

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Its NATO territory on Cyprus, ffs lads if that's the only criticism you have then I think he would get over it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,278 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    It is a British Overseas Terrority base, named Royal Air Force Akrotiri in Cyprus. That is like saying the Falklands is NATO territory which you would never ever hear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,476 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Its British territory, you'd think hed mention that first.

    He's out of his depth in that job



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,323 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Was listening to a couple of recent podcasts where Labour Ministers were separately in the studio and were discussing the work they were doing within their department. Both of them at some point referred to the changes as "Reforms" and then went to to justify them and used the term: "reform is needed to bring about the improvement the public want/deserve etc" or similar.

    Makes sense when you read it, but on air it could sound like a positive reference to the Reform party and them being needed for the public. I'd be surprised if by the time the election comes around this phrasing has been coached out of them. If it hasn't, it's not a good sign of their communications strategy.

    A casual listener who just heard a few select minutes could draw the conclusion it was someone promoting ornadvocating Regorm rather than an actual minister of the labour government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,323 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I'm surprised this wasn't discussed in here.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/nigel-farage-mar-a-lago-keir-starmer-donald-trump-us-uk-relations/

    The leader of the right-wing Reform UK opposition party has promised to raise his opposition to the prime minister’s controversial Chagos Islands sovereignty deal — a major point of contention with the president — with whoever he sees in Florida on Friday night.

    Farage has been one of several high-profile figures on the right of British politics who has been aggressively lobbying against the proposal to end the long-running colonial dispute.

    Could this be seen as borderline treasonous? For the leader of an opposition party to go to the President of another country and present a position directly in opposition with that of the Prime Minister.

    And if not that, to have the current leading candidate to be the PM after the next UK election to be canoodling with a President who spoke dismissively of the current PM at a time when WW3 is the closest it has ever been to breaking out is a massive red flag no?

    Imagine if Harris had won, Farage was PM and it was Jeremy Corbyn going to speak to Harris, how would the media in the UK be handling this story?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭midlander12


    Both Farage and Badenoch and their parties have been openly currying favour with Trump and parroting his lies about the UK since he took office. In another more innocent time this would indeed have been seen as disloyal if not treasonous, but these days it's just standard 'populist' politics. The Mail and the rest of the right-wing press have of course gone along for the ride.

    What's interesting is that it appears to have convinced at most 30% (or less) of the UK public i.e. those that support 'Reform' and probably a minority of Tories. The far right obviously think this will be enough to get them into No 10 thanks to their bonkers electoral system. However, as two recent byelections have shown, voters seem to be copping on and voting for the party most likely to stop Farage in individual areas. The May local elections will show whether this has become a more general phenomenon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,323 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The more I think about it, the more inappropriate it comes across as.

    We know exactly how manipulative Trump is and while he may be off the scene by the time there is a new election in the UK. He could make a lot of statements in support of Farage/Reform and against Starmer positions between now and then. Or Trump's favouritism towards Farage may encourage the US right wing media and particularly Musk to be positive towards Reform when talking about UK issues.

    If Vance is the next President (I don't think he will be) and MAGA™ still exists, that would work best for Farage.

    If I were Labour, I would continually point to the polls against the war (US and UK) and that Farage is going against the prevailing thought of the people in both countries just to align himself with who is a disruptive President. Starmer can't say stuff like that, but the labour mouthpieces or communications people should be able to spread that message.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    If I were Labour

    If you were Labour in Britain, you would be supporting genocide in Palestine, and you would be aiding nd abetting Trump & Yahoo's war against Iran.

    Forage is as different to Starmer as Biden is to Trump i.e. different style, the same shíte. Many people seem to have already forgotten the smirking faces of Miller and Blinken as they dismissed Israel's campaign of blodody slaughter as unproven while telling us that the IDF is investigating the matter.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Forage is as different to Starmer as Biden is to Trump i.e. different style, the same shíte

    This is incredibly stupid on a great number of levels. There are, quite obviously, chasmic fundamental differences between Farage and Starmer and between Biden and Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭midlander12


    They should be repeating that message day and night. Both the Tories and 'Reform' are clearly very much a minority persuasion, but they are being portrayed by much of the media as being the vox populi.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    As China’s ambition increases, stories like this will become a constant feature of politics in every Western country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,612 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I can't help thinking that Reform and the Tories blind support for Trump is a disastrous blunder. The guy is clearly unhinged and is becoming extremely unpopular in the US outside his hardcore MAGA base. It surely must be an electoral liability for the two parties to try and hinge the UK's fortunes to this out of control warmonger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    A trip down Memory Lane…when Randy Andy saved Mandy:

    This was noticeable at a Co-operation Ireland charity event held at the Albert Hall in London in April 2000 which was compered by Patrick Kielty, who now presents RTÉ's The Late Late Show.

    Lord Mandelson, as he has been known since 2008, was "in a strange, almost detached, mood" that evening, according to the state papers.

    He embarrassed David Trimble on two occasions by confusing Harland & Wolff with Shorts and asking "loudly" if Kielty's father, Jack, who was shot dead by the UFF in 1988, "had been a member of the IRA".

    The "awkward silence" which ensued from that comment was resolved by a diplomatic intervention from Prince Andrew who "smoothed over the moment by remarking that there could hardly be a family in Northern Ireland that was untouched by the conflict".

    The Duke of York also had a better grasp of the Harland & Wolff/Shorts situation than Lord Mandelson and "appeared more knowledgeable than the secretary of state about industrial policy on Northern Ireland", the papers said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭midlander12


    More evidence that Farage and Badenoch are in a hiding to nothing as regards Trump in general and Iran in particular:-

    67% of Brits see themselves as anti-Trump, and only 13% as pro, while 70% see Reform as being pro-Trump. Huge majorities of all party voters other than Reform see themselves as anti, including 61% of Tories. Reform voters however see themselves as pro-Trump by 46% to 24%.

    Which parties do Britons see as pro- or anti-Trump?

    Only 25% of Brits support the war either strongly or somewhat, and 59% oppose. The figure for Tories is 43% either way, with only 14% strongly supporting. For Reform voters, it's 57% for, 27% against. For Lab, LD and Green voters, support is practically in single figures.

    Do you support or oppose the military action that the United States has taken against Iran? | Daily Question

    These two polls confirm the impression that on these issues Farage, Badenoch, the Daily Mail etc are appealing to a very specific minority of the UK electorate, namely those who support Reform and the more extreme Tory voters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,451 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    Farage and Badenoch have both u-turned on support for the war today, although its not really a u-turn when they just flat out lie saying they never supported it in the first pace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,612 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Given that Trump is the messiah or figurehead for 'right wing populist' movements in Europe, this is pretty disastrous for them. He being identified as a barking mad nutjob and warmonger may mean he is rapidly becoming an electoral liability for any party that wants to identify with him. If Trump is still president in three years' time', this will not be good news for Reform or the Conservatives (he is already a busted flush).

    Not sure either how these Reform and GB News types are able to square the circle of being right wing nationalists and isolationists and yet pro-Trump and Israel and pro-overseas wars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,323 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    A week is a long time in politics. A month is a lifetime.

    On the 11th of February, Starmer was reeling after McSweeney had resigned and had yet to face increased accusations of bad judgement after Mandelson was going to be arrested 2 weeks later. When that happened, and was followed up by losing a safe seat in the by-election, everyone thought his days were numbered.

    Either through finally developing a back bone for long enough to develop his own view on US/Israel and act against their demands, and given how the last week has played out, the pendulum has swung at leas away from the very negative view towards him if not quite going in to the positive range just yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭midlander12




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭midlander12


    There's also this word salad from Meloni today:-

    “It is within this context of crisis in the international system — where threats are becoming increasingly alarming and unilateral interventions carried out outside the framework of international law are multiplying — that we must also place the American and Israeli intervention against the Iranian regime,”

    Middle East crisis live: Claims new Iranian supreme leader ‘safe’ despite war injuries; ships hit in strait of Hormuz

    I haven't seen Farage's or Badenoch's statements yet but I see Starmer accused her of 'the mother of all U-turns' at PMQ's and she rather pathetically tried to throw it back at him over not increasing fuel duties. He must feeling he's finally dodged one bullet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,278 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Not a good day for Starmer

    Lost the appeal against Kneecap

    Was warned about Mandelson before appointing him to the highest diplomatic post

    Calliing the US attacks on Iran defensive is gaslighting of the highest order



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,546 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Unite the union has voted to cut Labour affiliation by 40% - £580,000 - on the anniversary of the Birmingham bin strike.

    Ahead of the rules conference next year union chiefs will now formally consult with members to see whether they want to remain in the Labour party.

    https://bsky.app/profile/pippacrerar.bsky.social/post/3mgs4qpb5ll2a

    Labour are going to be down a significant amount of money every year, best case for them is 580,000, but if Unite end affiliation completely it will obviously cost them more than double that but also open the floor gates for other unions to ponder disaffiliation.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Labour are abolishing the last 92 hereditary peers in the House of Lords. A deal has been reached to appoint some of them as life peers so they can keep their seats.

    In 1998, there were about 2000 hereditary peers and Labour removed all but 92 of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,915 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Welcome to Cork PM Starmer☺️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    Away from the immediate it's interesting to see that after a public consultation the most popular theme for new banknotes was national wildlife.

    Sounds like the public has a bit of fatigue from UK historical figures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,323 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Winston Churchill's granddaughter has basically told the anti-woke brigade to cop on and that her grandfather was never going to be there forever and it's fine that if he is removed from the note.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    A lot of sashes and union jacks being brought down from attics!😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,915 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    He could swing by and visit Macrrom, Morgan McSweeney's home town 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭midlander12


    I watched the interview on Newsnight. The woman was a model of common-sense, a far cry from most political 'debate' these days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭Dub Counsel


    I have been an election observer in many countries. Observers are there to observe and report to their observer body what occured whether it is good or not. Other than say an old person who needs assistance there should never be two people in a voting booth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,278 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




Advertisement
Advertisement