Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

"No to war" & "breakdown of international law" - Spanish PM Sánchez

«134

Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 13,592 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    Good on him. 👍️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,141 ✭✭✭✭10-10-20


    He was brave enough given the frequent use of Rota and Moron by the US, but I admire his principals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    We should at least do a few random checks on any U.S. military or government flights landing in Shannon. As we already have this right there's no need for any official announcement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,796 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I'd like this to be a thread for Ideas/discussions about peace please.
    Most of us Im sure are aware on the economic implications of saying 'no to war'.
    Could we use thread to post ideas, links, peaceful protests, petitions etc?

    https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/government-in-ireland/how-government-works/standards-and-accountability/public-petitions/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Not clear what you want for this thread, asking for suggestions for peace and then highlighting 'economic' downside of opposing war.

    Do you support anti-war initiatives or not?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,796 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Im sorry its not clear. Its most definitely - 'No to war'

    I was stating its not necessary to use this thread to discuss the 'cons' e.g. "economic implications"

    Thanks for Qs and I hope thats clarified the purpose of my post☮️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,750 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    In reality there is no such thing as International Law, thinking there is is very naive.

    Big countries with big military can do as much as they like until someone with a bigger military stands up to them, that's all it comes down to , who has the bigger guns. If international law did exist the war in Ukraine and these middle east wars would never have started. The UN is a completely useless organization from a peace point of view, UNESCO is a nice thing but outside of that it's useless.

    Stopping wars has now become more difficult due to globalization, back in the old days if you wanted to start a war you had to make the effort yourself to build up your level of arms and manufacture everything yourself. Now you can just get it supplied to you from companies all around the world. It would be nice of there was a complete ban on international arms sales and provision of anything to any military from outside the country but I doubt that could be enforced.

    Post edited by Jack Daw on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,070 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    So he’s on the side that massacred 30k of their own people and funded terror groups in all the surrounding area for decades. ‘Death to America and death to the West’ includes Spain and all of Europe. With Russia knocking on Europes door we would be wise to play along.

    Spain also regularised 500k irregular migrants, coming to a welfare office and housing list near you:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62n6gw1dp9o

    Post edited by Potatoeman on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,854 ✭✭✭weisses


    It takes 2 to tango… If you need fisherman to ward of Russian ships you are doing something wrong.

    What we need in Europe is to be self sufficient in everything, it prevents us from looking the other way when atrocities are being committed because it would hurt our economies. Be strong economically and have formidable military defence capabilities is the best guarantee of a peaceful life on our continent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    If we are saying no to war, are we also saying no to Iran killing 33,000 of its own people this year? Are we saying no to Iran's laws on hijab wearing which mean a woman could be executed for showing her hair in public?

    If we are saying no to those things, how do we stop them?

    Waving flags, hand-wringing and crying are not going to save the people of Iran from their oppressive rulers. Should Ireland beef up its military force and take on despotic rulers, seeing as the UN has done nothing for decades?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    I've seen some UK media outlets citing that figure but what are the sources?

    I remember when Hamas attacked that Kibitz there was meant to be a room where they slaughter hundreds of babies, it circulated as fact for a few days until it was totally debunked as a zionist source.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,239 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    I guarantee you the US is not doing this for humanitarian reasons. They would not have fired a single shot if there wasn't black gold or any other resources to be had.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    One thing is certain, many who had being only thinking about installing solar and buying an EV will have more financial motivation to get away from oil.

    Trump will get bored of this war quickly, but as the biggest refined oil exporter in the world I can see him simply pulling the US back from the middle east.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,210 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Well said Mr Sanchez.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,305 ✭✭✭Everlong1


    Spot on. Every time I hear someone wailing about "international law" I want to cringe. The law of the jungle is the only one that exists. Which is why the Irish electorate need to wise up fast and drop this infantile posturing about our so called "neutrality". The likes of Putin doesn't give a sh*t about our so called neutrality. The only way to establish anything like an international law/rules based system would be if people stopped voting for war mongering cretins like Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    I think it was a human rights group was the source for the 33,000, some others had it at 36,000, the Iranians admitted to 3,000. Which number is the threshold of a dictator killing his own people for you to want action?

    It still doesn't move us from the Catherine Connolly 1950s United Nations view of the world where we stand idly by wringing our hands and crying about American imperialism while dictators like the Ayatollahs and Putin and Maduro can get away with killing their own people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    What do you think will happen to refugee numbers from the middle east to Europe and the US if Trump and Netanyahu continue to pursue this 'war'?

    Trump is an idiot. Gets voted in on anti-immigration policies then goes down the route of starting a war that will probably result in an explosion of refugees. 500k will be a drop in the ocean compared to what's coming if this continues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,851 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Peaceful negotiation is the only solution backed up with some big threatening weapons. War isn't the solution, particularily in the nucleur age.

    People are wildly naive if they think that violence is the solution to these types of issues. Whats your own threashold of a dictator killing his own people for YOU to act?

    DJT has the blood of several of his own people on his hands. He doesn't even care about his own people in the region - they are all on their own as they try to get out of a warzone.

    The yanks and Isrealis have not given a legal rational for kicking off violence in the whole region, the talks were obviously a complete farce.

    Violence leads to more violence, ultimately without adults in the room, we will end up wiping each other out - I do think that's what we are heading for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,653 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Or you know, US interventions in the Middle East have historically gone wrong. This doesn't mean we're remotely supportive of the Iranian regime, just recognising that these interventions have gone disastrously wrong. It's even more concerning when it's in conjunction with a regime who are pretty okay with committing genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    When peaceful negotiation fails, what is the solution? That is where the hand-wringers of the Irish left have always failed to haven an answer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    Bombing civilians isn't an answer. The Shah terrorised his nation with the backing of foreign governments, that memory is still in living memory there. Every time the US and Israel bombs Iran it justifies Iranian resistance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    It hasn't 'failed' it's been used as a ruse twice in a year by the U.S.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,851 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    More negotiations and non lethal forms of persuasion.

    Tens of thousands will directly die in this war both in Iran and surrounding areas. The global economy is going to be in complete turmoil. Who knows what other states get drawn in to it and what the ultimate outcome will be? A complete **** show. Who knows the long term outcome in the region.

    There was no pressing need to kick this off at all, keep negotiating, keep talking - but deciding to go to the gun at early stages is completely wrong particularily when you look at some of the rationale being used.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    Some may think Trump can't be criticised because only "bad people" are getting hit.

    Would annexing Greenland by force be finally crossing the line for those people?

    Iran's greatest crime in the US's eyes (don't mention the protest crackdowns, the US armed the Shah to do worse) is not simply becoming another puppet state like the rest of the gulf.

    Israel and Iran were even in alignment against Saddam Hussein in the 1980s!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭Enduro


    More negotiations and non lethal forms of persuasion.

    Is there anything to be said for another Mass?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,239 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Hopefully the Kurds won't fall for the "help topple the regime and we'll back you up" US offer. America is notorious for leaving its allies in foreign lands in the lurch when they decide to pack up and go home.

    Funny how the US never intervene in murderous hellholes like Sudan when there aren't any goodies buried underground.

    Plus the US are fine with malleable strongmen who murder their own people, "he may be a bastard but he's our bastard."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    Even the concept of international is pure puff. If you're a palestinian you're into the fifth generation of people forced by gunpoint off their ancestral homeland all because one sect got the USA behind them to do what they like.

    Bush Jr invaded Iraq without a UN mandate for a war waged on an invented pretext. We've been told for three decades that Iran will have the bomb next week etc…

    At the same time as the US backed Saddam Hussein against Iran they also hosted godly warriors of Afghanistan in the Oval Office.

    Before that they carpet bombed Vietnamese rice farmers to "protect the American way of life".

    After they invaded Iraq then they said they didn't do nation building. Iranians know that if let the USA and Israel will do a Gaza on them and then let them rot. Regime change, still waiting for that in Venezuela.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Funny how the US never intervene in murderous hellholes like Sudan when there aren't any goodies buried underground.

    Afghanistan disproves that oft-repeated nonsense trope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,477 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    I just had a look there at his speech and wholeheartedly agree. At last an EU leader with the balls to stick it to Trump and his proxy Israel, or is it the other way around?

    Helen, on the other hand, remains 'extremely concerned'.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭Enduro


    This post is good at illustrating that there has been no breakdown of international law. It never really existed in the first place, so there was nothing to break down. (A bit like MAGA, there was no "great" American past to become "Again").



Advertisement
Advertisement