Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1200201203205206424

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 254 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I am pointing out the poster's clear bias when it comes to the Middle East based on things he has literally said. But yeah accuse me of being an anti-Semite or whatever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    The amount of dancing expat Iranians is so pitifully small compared to population at home plus the fact that they ran away, it make no sense even to mention it. Have you seen crowds in Iran screaming death to USA and death to Israel?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    There's no defending enriching to that level while also declaring the destruction of another state. You definitely won that argument but tbf it's not a hard one to win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 597 ✭✭✭Piskin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    This adventure will result in one thing. Energy companies and pretty much everyone else is popping up champagne bottles as this is beautiful excuse to jack up prices of everything even higher. And we know from experience than even when this adventure ends and prices of oil and gas come back to january levels consumer prices will not fall down one red cent.

    Happened many times.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    They are like some of the Iranians I know but are they a representative sample of the entire population at home? Exiles are a notoriously unreliable source of information on the mother country - look at Irish America or the Miami Cubans. Generally speaking, the sort of people who support the regime aren’t taking white collar jobs in the West. The pro-mullah faction may only be 10-20% of the total but that might be enough to keep the regime in place unless there’s a split in the government itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭nachouser


    It'll all go away when a few Saudi's get together and chuck 10bn at Trump through some crypto wheeze.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I wouldn't be so sure. The spice must flow, and folks are going to do what it takes to make it do so, even if it means swallowing their morals and talking with the US.

    As to the organisation, whatever about the political-level machinations, the lower level systems such as military-to-military have generally remained good globally. If the Omani Navy Ops Chief wants to talk with the US Fifth Fleet Ops Chief, I strongly suspect he knows him by name, has his 'phone number, and speaks the same military operational language.

    That's assuming that nations don't just do it on their own. There aren't many threats left Iran has which non-US forces can't handle.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    While I imagine this is broadly correct, it is a fairly stupid game for Iran to be playing.

    I also think people misinterpret statements like "Iran is x months away from a bomb" - not helped by anyone who is making the statements mind you. The timeline US intelligence reports is a breakout time for a bomb if and when Iran decides to restart their nuclear weapons program. However, they are not consistently enriching uranium to 60% and building underground labs and amassing high tech centrifuges for fun. Their goal seems fairly clearly to get as far along as possible while technically not developing a bomb so that the breakout time (and thus the amount of time to stop them) is as short as possible.

    Withdrawing from JCPOA was unbelievably stupid - mind you, it did nothing to stop Iran's non-nuclear malevolence - but what's done is done in that respect. Biden made very little headway with Iran as the "trust" was broken. The Omanis claim a deal was close, but Iran refused to halt enriching uranium, so I'm not sure it was as close as they thought.

    Nor is it "fair" that Israel (allegedly) has nukes but other States are stopped from developing them. But geopolitics aren't fair, and the entire world is a safer place if Iran doesn't have them - if you can avoid religious fundamentalists having a nuclear device that is a good thing.

    There are no "good guys" in this entire endeavour. There frequently aren't in reality. But the speed with which Iran has scattershot missiles at all their neighbours (who had nothing to do with this for the most part) and how quickly all the nearby Arab countries have turned on them does rather say something about how Iran is viewed.

    At this stage all there is left to do is hope that some good comes of all of this for the Iranian people and all those who suffered under Iranian terrorist proxies. Though I don't rate the chances of that super highly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,613 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Indeed : exiles are likely to be young, well educated, liberal, perhaps not even practising Muslims etc…..couldn't really be said that they represent 'Iranian public opinion' to a huge degree.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,438 ✭✭✭brickster69


    4-5 weeks now according to Trump or as long as it takes. Qatar has 4 days left of interceptor missiles and other Gulf states are asking for more already which they wont get because they don't have them to give.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 975 ✭✭✭BettyS


    The strategy used to be coherent. However, now it is liable to change, depending on what way the leader-in-chief is feeling at that particular moment. The strategy of suppressing any uprisings depends on relative stability and collaboration with other foreign powers. Trump uses international relations as a bargaining chip. Eventually, people get fed up of the threats and end up walking out. It was the collaborative approach that empowered America, not the current isolationist approach. And two nations are not enough to suppress a nation as large as Iran



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭Exiled Rebel


    Every Iranian I knew in London, and there was quite a few, hated the regime. None dared return even for a holiday. Many travelled to Turkey to meet family who travelled in the other direction from Iran.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Deals don't work with tyrants. Countless examples throughout modern history.

    Neville Chamberlain made a deal in Munich, 1938 leading to "peace in our time" that … didn't work out very well.
    Ukraine made a deal with Russia in 1994, Ukraine gave up its nukes in exchange for security guarantees. That didn't work out very well.
    The US made multiple deals with North Korea in the 90s and early 2000s for them not to develop nuclear weapons.
    But hey, a "deal" with Iran would surely have worked out totally … this time 🙄

    Though I think we would all wish it were different, some problems can't be solved by making deals, sooner or later they have to be solved with force, because some people only respect force.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Well, please explain why you think knowing Jewish people introduces some kind of biased thinking in someone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,890 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    That sounds a lot like the Venezuelan and Cuban exiles. Both regimes they escaped from still exist.

    The Shah actually added to unpopularity by being liberal so not sure what the general population in Iran actually support now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are urging allies to persuade U.S. President Donald Trump to shorten the war with Iran as their missile defense systems' stocks are running low, Bloomberg reported.

    According to an internal analysis citedby Bloomberg, Qatar's stocks of Patriot interceptor missiles will last for the next four days if Iranian attacks continue at their current rate.

    The United Arab Emirates reportedly requested assistance with medium-range air defense, while Qatar has found drones to be a bigger threat than ballistic missiles. According to sources cited by Bloomberg, both countries are working to build a coalition to persuade Trump to end the war diplomatically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    There’s usually a selection bias inherent in being an exile. You’re likely to be unrepresentative of the people who stayed at home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    We’ve seen zombie regimes survive for years with little popular support eg Syria, Belarus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    That hasn’t been quite my experience.One left-wing colleague disliked the regime and America with equal intensity. Another became conservative. But that’s not really my point. The exiles are by their nature an unrepresentative group. They have fewer of the MAGA-type contingent - conservative, religious, poorly educated, xenophobic - than Iran would have.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 254 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    Because he has literally said this in previous posts, but yeah keep trying to accuse me of being an anti-Semite or whatever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    There is no ‘allegedly’ about Israel’s nuclear weapons. As Netanyahu himself once put it: We have Amona (a former West Bank settlement), and we have Dimona. They have existed since 1970 at the latest. The Israelis promised the Americans they wouldn’t build them and went ahead anyway. They even stole American technology to do it. These are established facts despite both Israeli and American attempts to conceal them. I think fifty years is long past time for us to call out the opacity policy of that state. Unlike American politicians and civil servants we can still speak freely about it here.

    Post edited by Ardillaun on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    You are right to an extent. About 20-30% of Iranian's support an Islamic republic. So that's about 20-30 million people. Which is a sizable county in itself. That leaves about 70 million pensions wanting free of the Islamic shackles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,737 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It is noticeable to me that on the BBC they seem to pretend Iran didn’t exist before the Ayatollah. No mention of how the UK and USA displaced the democratically elected Modsaddagh and put the Sha in charge. Who was then overthrown by the Islamic Republic.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭Enduro


    You're very defensive about being accused of being an anti-semite. I haven't said anything about you. I hve simply asked you to explain what you yourself wrote in this thread.

    I have no problem believing that the other poster knows many people of many backgrounds (So do I. I would guess that these days most people do). That has nothing to do with the question I have asked you. You have not answered the question in any way.

    Please explain why you think knowing Jewish people introduces some kind of biased thinking in someone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,334 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Though I think we would all wish it were different, some problems can't be solved by making deals, sooner or later they have to be solved with force, because some people only respect force.

    Did force solve the problems in Iraq? Did it solve the problems in Afghanistan? In Vietnam? In Korea? In Libya? In Syria?

    Do you think it has solved the problem in Gaza?

    That is a horrendously simplistic take and one that is ignorant of the global conflicts that have occupied the world for the last 70-80 years. And before that, force was indeed solved as a resolution to WW2, but that was a World War for crying out loud, there are many reasons why force was required as it was in that circumstance. And even then, excessive force was used at the every end just because.

    The reality is that force can serve a function, but it should be that of a deterrent. Not this attention diversion tactic by which Trump uses it, or selective regime placement by which America in general has used it for decades, or inflicting a genocide, as Israel has used it also for decades.

    True problems are solved with dialogue and negotiation and a recognition and acceptance that just because you do not win, it does not mean that you will lose. We know that in Ireland better than many communities and it is an insult to the millions of people who have died because of idiots who think this next bit of force will fix everything to advocate for what we are watching happen these last few years. If America wanted peace and security around the world, it would embolden and push the UN as the peacekeeping (ideologically and in real terms) body that it could and should be. But the US doesn't want that. It wanted the UN as a faux cover for its dominance for decades and now one idiot in particular thinks that he can ignore even that and treat the world like his to divvy out as he wishes.

    There's a phrase that could possibly match with what you are saying "Speak softly, but carry a big stick" But we don't see that from the US do we? We see bluster, and bravado and barely hidden corporate agendas and then they close their eyes and start waving that stick around like they're hitting a pinata.

    Israel showed us how they could target the leadership of an entire organization at a simultaneous moment without dispatching a single flying drone or bomb and yet when they then tell us that they needed to flatten Gaza and kill nearly 100K people they are doing so as the most moral army in the world. Any who peddles their narrative can do one as far as I'm concerned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 597 ✭✭✭Piskin


    Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, simple as that!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,334 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth 8-bit


    Iran Regime have said they've sunk a US Aircraft Carrier. :/ :I

    Iran live updates



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 254 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I couldn't be bothered engaging with you because I know how this is going to play out.



Advertisement
Advertisement