What’s your most controversial opinion? **Read OP** **Mod Warning in Post #8023**

You're supposed to post controversial opinions.

Meanwhile Catholicism has engaged in a large scale cover up across the globe in relation to paedophilia. On top of that they've made far more of an effort to limit the rights of women legislatively in Ireland. So want Catholicism to be banned too, right?

People are incapable of naming one country that has benefitted from the spread of Islam (because there isn't one) yet oddly they are quite happy to have it spread in Europe and be pandered to. They point out the harm other religions have done around the world and then oddly use this as justification for why Islam should be tolerated, when surely the more sensible idea would be if one religion has caused harm it's probably not a good idea to allow another one any foothold in a country.

Or maybe start with the most recently imported and the most problematic of them all, and finish with the one who gave us modern Europe - that Europe that allows us to have this conversation in the first place.

That would be an attack on peoples basic human rights. There should always be a distinction made between Muslims who don't force their opinion on others and the lunatics that go to great lengths to force Islam on others.

That's possible of course , i would never underestimate the greed and low cunning of a solicitor , but there is year in year out changes to the laws of the game to reduce and prevent injuries , i think they have mouth guards that measure impacts now and if its too high the player gets called aside , NFL just wanted the slobber knocker moments for tv and never did any of that ,

Over all people like sports that push you the extremes of your ability's , and that's dangerous but so is crossing the road

Definitely a case to be made for not allowing any new religious buildings to be constructed and existing ones not allowed to be converted from one religion to another.

Proselytism (for non Muslim religions) is banned in pretty much every single Muslim country so no reason why it shouldn't be banned in Europe aswell and just ban it for all religions including Christianity.You want god you'll find it in your own way you don't need to be converted to it by someone else.

First paragraph is accurate.You just want to pretend it isn't.For example 81% of Somali immigrants in Minnesota get some form of welfare, this compares to 21% of Native born Minnesotans, how the hell is that a benefit to Minnesota as a state or America as a country?

How is it a loss loss. It means immigrants who are productive and know they will have jobs all the time arrive whereas those who aren't won't bother trying to come. Productive immigrants in work all the time who pay taxes and don't take from the welfare system are a bonus for a country, with a system which restricts immigrants entitlement to social welfare it means only a high calibre of immigrant who knows they will be in work all the time will arrive.

People have no entitlement to live in whatever country they choose if they want to emigrate that's fine but they should have no entitlement to take from the welfare state of their new country and certainly none for a very long time in the new country.Not a single social house should be provided for any immigrant in any country.

This is a description of the MAGA cult, right?

You skipped The Enlightenment period. It's probably responsible for most of the things we enjoy today and it was based on skepticism, not Christianity.

Apologies , I thought that it would be self evident the link between the learning and education centers in monasteries and church's that funded facilitated and spurred the development of medical engineering and cultural progress. Mostly but not only via Church founded and financed collages and schools, the language of learning up until 100 years ago was Latin

Of course enlightenment in the Americas would have nothing to do with Christianity . in god they trust and all that