Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Electric, Hydrogen & Hybrid Electric Buses in Ireland

15354555658

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 102 ✭✭hfjm20


    I noticed the 37 leaving Blanchardstown at 17:45 was allocated EW254 per bustimes. Is this an error on the site?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 321 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    Don't think so. Harristown has some duties on the 37 at peak hours



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭Jakey Rolling


    On the Grid capability - supplying enough power to simultaneously charge even 20 vehicles at say 200kW needs a substation of at least 5MW capacity. That's enough to supply a typical town of 1000 people. It really is not trivial for EirGrid to accommodate these at every location without network upgrades. Charging will need to be managed to reduce peak loads, you can't just plug 70 buses in at once all drawing full power.

    100412.2526@compuserve.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    All should have been taken into account before these buses were purchased. Complete PR move that wasn't thought out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,273 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    But you won't be charging all your buses at once except at night, when demand elsewhere is minimal

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,273 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    How do you know it wasn't? You don't just rock up to a "bus dealer" and say you'll take the 100 buses he has out the back. Any contract for the delivery of buses would have a significant lead time, were they assured at the time that the grid infrastructure would be in place by the time the buses were delivered?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Well what I do know is they ordered what 600 electric buses. 200 or so have been delivered so far and most of them are sitting in storage. Someone on a very high salary hasn't done their job very well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,628 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I think that you can take it as read that at government level they did not realise that the grid would require significant work before the buses were ordered. If they did, they would have ordered hybrids.

    We are months, if not years behind in terms of rolling out the buses at this point due to the power infrastructure not being able to cope with this.

    Some buses have been in storage since late 2024.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    If you read the planning application for the Galway Depot and what the hold up is, it is pretty infuriating and shows some of the nonsense that has to be dealt with.

    So the planning application is pretty straight forward, mostly just charging infrastructure in the existing depot, nothing unusual. It turns out that the Galway planners were unhappy with how the bright lights of the depot would impact wildlife! So the design team had to go away and do an even more detailed and comprehensive Natura Impact study taking this into account and then because of this, the Galway planners made them re-advertise to the public about the updated study and thus they have to wait another 5 weeks for public feedback!

    Keep in mind, this is all in the footprint of an existing depot, in the middle of a business park in the middle of a port!

    As far as I can see there hasn’t been a single application to the plan by a member of the public, it all just seems like silly rubbish from the Galway planning department!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,273 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Right so is this person in NTA/TFI, ESB Networks, Eirgrid or perhaps in ACP?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,628 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    As I understand it the decision to order the all electric fleet was taken at government level (i.e. the previous Minister) and actioned by the NTA, but neither they nor the Department of Transport in doing so gave sufficient or indeed any consideration to what the grid requirements might be to power the chargers and the timeframes to deliver them.

    Separately, there have been issues with the planning applications by the operating companies.

    The bottom line is that a fleet of buses was ordered without any proper consideration of how they would be charged, and 200 of those buses have been lying idle as a result.

    That is a fundamental failure on the part of the Department and the NTA.

    As a result we are likely to have 20 year old buses in frontline service well into 2027.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The root cause is the same issue with all infrastructure in Ireland, lack of investment. In this case lack of investment by the government in the grid.

    It really shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that there are going to be increasing demands on the distribution network given government policy towards massive increase in electrification, whether EV charging or heat pumps. Non of this should have been a surprise to ESB Networks.

    Imagine if a new Pharmaceutical factory was to be opened and they couldn't because they couldn't get a grid connection, ESB Networks would be rightfully crucified, this really isn't any different.

    ESB Networks need to sort this ASAP, this might not just impact buses, but could also impact Metrolink, DART+, CACR, Intercity electrification and new Luas lines, all of which will also need significant increases in Distribution grid resources.

    Either way ESB Networks need to sort their issues!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭john boye


    Sure, the Grid is the problem now but it really feels like we could be a lot further along the process if whoever decided we were going 100% electric and ordered the buses had put an ounce of consideration into whether we'd be able to charge them. Saying the grid is the root problem rather ignores that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 102 ✭✭hfjm20


    Were better hybrids than the PA's available? Their electric performance is quite poor it has to be said



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    So should we cancel Metrolink, DART+ and new Luas lines so?

    Frankly it is ESB Networks job to ensure they can deliver on customers demands. Frankly charging infrastructure for buses isn’t rocket science nor should it have been a big deal. Keep in mind other countries have been rolling out EV buses for years before us (single deckers) across Europe without issues. Over 9,000 EV buses were sold in Europe last year.

    If ESB Networks can’t sort some chargers for a depot, often in industrial estates or ports, god help us when we need to build sub stations across Dublin for DART+ and Metrolink!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭john boye


    Again, ignoring the recklessness of ordering 100s of electric buses without checking if we could charge them. And somehow conflating my comment into suggesting I was saying We should cancel all future public transport projects. Don't hurt your back moving those goalposts!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Maybe just maybe if operators themselves were allowed to decide what buses they wanted to buy then we'd be in a better position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,479 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I get the impression they are never plugged in, and regen only does so much



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Frankly I'm glad this happened now and with buses and that the NTA and DoT realised these issues that the distribution grid now. At least with buses, we can continue to just operate with the older buses for a while longer until is gets sorted.

    Imagine instead we spent billions on Metrolink and DART+ only to discover that they couldn't open and operate because lack of distribution grid resources! The DART+ charging infrastructure at Drogheda station requires a large and very expensive battery energy management system (BESS) in the station to act as a buffer for the grid, because of lack of distribution grid capacity in Dorgheda!

    I suspect there are some pretty high level and intense meetings going on between the DoT/NTA and DoCEE and ESB Networks and that ESB is getting a kick up the ass. This issue risks all major public transport plans in Dublin, not just buses!

    To be clear I'm not moving the goal posts, I'm pointing out the bigger picture and the much more serious issues that exist.

    You mean the operators who decided to get rid of dual door buses and go to single door buses or the operator who decided to get rid of double decker buses and replace them with single decker buses!

    Anyway, it isn't like it would make much difference, there are only a very small number of manufacturers and DB and BE have a long history of buying Wright buses anyway. Since Wrights came out of bankruptcy, the new company is mostly only interested in BEV and hydrogen buses, which reflects the market as a whole, pretty much all the manufacturers are dropping Diesel/hybrids in favour of BEV.

    Yes, not really any good options, Wrights use to have a hybrid bus, but I don't think they make it any more, at least they have dropped it from their website. They do still make a pure Diesel bus! But in pretty small numbers, more for very small operators, their emphasis really is on the BEV's now.

    Realistically the alternative would have been to continue to buy the ADL PA's which they didn't seem to be happy with either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭john boye


    It's actually a good thing that someone ordered hundreds of buses we can't do anything with. We should thank them, really.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    To be clear, over 200 BEV buses are out on the road across the country, being used every day per Bus Times!

    Sure, there should be more out, but lets not make this out to be a bigger deal then it is. As frustrating as the planning nonsense like Galway is, they will get there eventually and we will have a massive fleet of BEV's on the road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 102 ✭✭hfjm20


    If I'm being honest, I'd rather have a good few buses in storage waiting to go out than have a new set of PA's or other crappy hybrids out on the road for a number of years. At least when the grid issues are fixed it won't be too long before these are out on the roads (hopefully!)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    Honest question, looking around at what is available, did we really have much of an option other than BEVs? As someone mentioned it doesn't look many manufacturers are making diesels in any decent numbers, or at least not Wright or ADL. Then for hybrids neither the ADL or Wright model seem to be advertised anymore and also as mentioned by some people they don't have a good record.

    Like I see a lot of people say "we should have bought diesels as a stopgap instead of rushing electrification" but could we have even got them in large enough numbers to make a difference?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    No they could be built to an NTA requirements with dual doors just like TFL. In London operators still decide what buses they buy just they have to meet TFL spec. The NTA could turn around and say to operators right we will give you funding to buy new buses provided they meet these specifications.

    I wouldn't say DB/BE have a long history of buying Wright bodied buses. Pre NTA the only Wright bodied buses DB ordered were the VG, AW bendies and WV class single deckers but the overwhelming majority of the fleet were the AV/Xs, RV, RA and RHs.

    Then with BE they did a good few Wrights single deckers for city/town services but none of the coaches were Wright bodied and the double deckers they used on the 103 were East Lancs bodied DD class.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    So let’s get this straight, you would prefer for DB/BE to take on the cost of spending 10’s of millions on new buses per year, rather then have the NTA buy them for them and take on the responsibility of that cost and all the risk that goes with it!!

    I can tell you with certainty that DB/BE management are delighted that the NTA have taken on those risks and costs.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yep there are almost no options! Really the only option would have been to continue to buy the ADL PA’s as we had a framework agreement for that.

    Wrights and Volvo have both dropped their hybrids. And those were really the only other options.

    There really aren't that many manufacturers left in the double decker UK/Ireland market and the old days of different bodies on a Volvo chassis are gone, everyone is doing integrals now and the market has mostly completely moved over to BEV’s



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    MCV are still building a fair few Evoras on Volvo B8Rs at the moment, but almost all of the orders are for two or three vehicles here and there, mostly for smaller independent rural operators in the UK where the cost of building the infrastructure for electrics doesn't make any sense.

    They're also still building tri-axle EvoSetis on the Volvo B8L, but these are pretty much aimed at the private hire market and school services due to their length and high specifications rather than normal service work.

    See the news stories here for some examples



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    They could well be but at least it would within the interests of DB/BE management to run a reliable fleet that don't spend more time over a pit than they do on the road and it's safe to say most of the NTA purchased fleet fall well short of that basic expectation.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    But the NTA would of required they be BEV buses anyway as it is national policy, just like how TFL now requires all new buses bought in London to all be BEV’s, so you would up in exactly the same situation.

    It was government policy to electrify, so whether the NTA bought them or DB/BE, you’d end up with pretty much the same buses!

    And the buses we buy are basically just a tweak on the TFL spec bus. The UK/Ireland double decker bus market is relatively speaking tiny and it is mostly dominated by whatever TFL spec as the biggest customer.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Also in the UK the operators can buy what they want as they are private, state owned companies and semi-state companies are required to tender to comply with public procurement requirements.



Advertisement
Advertisement